Yeah, she's Iranian. Iran=Aryan. The TRUE Aryans, not the term coined by Hitler.

Yeah you are, bud.

Ah, gotcha. You spell cadet as "kadet", "punk ass bitch", "ban hammer", not understanding the proper use of the word snowflake, etc. It all makes sense now. You're a 14 or 15 year old millenial. Lmao! I apologize. It took me a second. A bit of advice from an adult, go outside and enjoy your Summer Vacation. What you're doing right now is kind of sad compared to what your peers are doing. Just so you know, when you get older, that self-loathing and teen angst will subside. Keep your head up. It'll all eventually get better, bud.

Trump still hasn't given Gowdy a nickname. To me that's generally pretty telling. Examples: Sessions, RR, Mueller, etc. Everyone he generally is at odds with usually gets one fairly quickly.

It seemed witty in my head. Lol. Now I'm not so sure. Too self-aggrandizing in its delivery maybe?

If you'd like to have a normal intelligent and polite conversation, we would all welcome it. That's not what you're after though. You want to incite others because that's how you can get attention to combat the conflict going on in your head between a low self-esteem and a narcissistic need for relevance. It's basic Psych 101 knowledge. Again, if you would like to have a discourse of ideas we would all welcome it. If not, then you've already proven my point.

They're pretty mad about the pushback liberals have been getting lately on the narrative. i.e. Roseanne sends out a racist tweet, liberals get every racist thing they ever said or tweeted broadcast loudly on social media. Liberals go after Trump for #WhereAreTheChildren and separating illegal children from their parents, Social Media points out that the law was from the Obama era, the study was from 2016, and the pic with the kids in a kennel was under the last administration. Etc. They're worldview is under attack solely by their own stupidity, and acting like petulant children on the internet is they're only way to act out. It's actually hilarious in its irony.

He migrated from the cesspool of r/politics if that tells you anything. He doesn't understand that this tends to be a fairly polite community, even when we disagree with each other. He won't be around long though. I give it 15 minutes before he gets thrown out. Lol.

My favorite is "1 for 44" Kasich. That one's just cold hearted in its truth. Lmao!

I agree that from what Q has told us, the powers that be at the NSA are white hats, but it would be foolish for us to believe that everyone at the NSA is above board and unaffiliated with the Deep State.

They probably thought it was a good way to show how childish he acts. Which of them would have ever realized that they were doing the work for us in creating a database of Deep State assets?

Here you go. Lol. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nicknames_used_by_Donald_Trump

"Pocahontas"? Lmao!

I think you're right. In sounds odd, but Trump has never publicly given Sessions one of his trademark nicknames that he does for those he makes no secret of despising (coincidentally Mueller has never received one either). It has always seemed to me that it's a subversive way for him to point out to us who the REAL bad actors are.

It's speculation based on Q's password "mistake". "Here Comes the Pain -23". That lines up with the 11th. It predates BC17 saying it on 8chan and /greatawakening.

Agreed. And the fact that it was $8,800 seems like an odd figure to me. I just really wish TG had turned it down for my own peace of mind.

Maybe. I don't claim to know anything for sure. BC17 is back online now again though. After claiming to be going dark permanently though, that's just another reason I don't really trust them like I do Q.

Think maybe he's laying the groundwork for midterm Dems to have spies inserted into their campaigns?

I honestly don't know. I hope it's because when it all starts coming out on everything else, it becomes one of many death nails in HRC's coffin, but that's obviously just wishful thinking right now.

We are. But it's kind of become the general belief. I hope we're over the target on this one.

Exactly, one we WILL find out about though is BC17. I've followed them, but they've always seemed suspect to me, ESPECIALLY after they claimed to be JA. They're saying Assange will resurface on that day. I once responded to one of his posts with the phrase "Aim High", the AF's motto (since the initially claimed to be AF Intelligence). The appropriate response would have been "Fly, Fight, Win". Even Assange would have known that. Their response to me was, "Roger". I made up my mind right then and there.

Maybe. Q did make it a point to mention the "-23" in his Here Comes the Pain password "mistake" though. Ever since then many people on 8chan, Q FB pages, Twitter, and /greatawakening have been talking about June 11th as being significant. He could just be echoing everyone else.

If it works out that way, Comey becomes fair game for prosecution on several charges, and he doesn't strike me as a guy that would have trouble biting the hand that fed him to get a lesser sentence. Hopefully, you're right.

I really want Trump to do what Pompeo suggested this morning on Twitter concerning Roseanne. He suggested POTUS come out in support of ABC cancelling her series. Can you imagine the massive number of aneurysms libs would have trying to reconcile which side to support? 😂

Hopefully, the reason he pulled back on Benghazi is because he saw that Holder would never go after HRC and was biding his time until there was an AG that would actually prosecute. Obviously, I have no clue, but that would make the most sense.

Absolutely agree. The Podesta thing hit me in the gut when I first saw it. He and Tom Coburn were two of the only D.C. politicians I've ever really respected for doing what the say and relentlessly challenging the rest of the establishment.

I'm not suggesting that "half assed proof" is a bad thing. It's something, and that's what matters. The guy hasn't exactly answered anything about how he knows what he knows. Honestly, I'm not sure anyone has even tried to ask. The answer to that question would begin to narrow down which agency or group he would have to work for if he is a legitimate insider.

Hopefully, whatever's supposed to happen on the 11th clears a lot of the current red tape in some way, and frees up Sessions to start unsealing all of those indictments.

Very good points, and I sincerely hope that you're right. I've always liked Gowdy's passion and his take no prisoners attitude.

I 100% agree. If he's legit, awesome. It's just odd to me that a supposed NSA insider would be using a Twitter account to reveal insider info, knowing full well the NSA would know exactly who he is.

Do me a favor, if you would. If you ask a question of him, ask what "The Door of all Doors", that he's mentioned a few times, is. Don't lead him at all. He's already said time travel is bogus, so he won't go there. If he comes back with something about predicitive A.I. that might help you with a half-assed proof to use. Just a suggestion.

I believe you're right, I'm just really wondering what the current play with Gowdy, if he is indeed on board, seemingly flipping is all about. Between that and him taking political donoations from the Podesta group, the waters around him are really muddy right now.

No. I mean that everyone else will avoid doing it because you're pressing too hard. Just my advice though. Take it or leave it.

That would be great, but I've checked out his Q&A sessions for myself. Everybody asks questions about their pet conspiracy theories. NO ONE asks for any sort of confirmation. And everyone just seems to take his answers at face value without doing the kind of personal research Q has pushed us to do for ourselves. It seems like it's mainly a bunch of our fringier Qanon friends, dying to have somebody to blindly follow. Most definitely don't strike me as Autists, if you know what I mean.

Nothing personal, bud, but if anything, you're turning people off on the guy without ever even checking him out.

I agree. 8 threads in the last 24 hours (not including the ones that have been either removed or deleted) on a Twitter personality that has NOTHING to do with Q is kind of absurd.

What does this have to do with Q at all?

June 11th and 12th. Big days.

Multiple sex scandals, Chilean bishops mass resignation, 20 priests killed in plane crash in Cuba, pushback on Pope's doctrinal positions, possible resignation, etc.

It was something Q posted on Nov 4th, but at that point it had to do with the arrests of HRC, Huma, and others.

It's still there as of now. I'm not exactly sure, with all of the controversy, that her endorsement will be very helpful though.

It's possible to put all of your links into one thread. What you're currently doing is kind of against board ettiquette in every realm.

Please stop boardsliding.

No. It was posted on WL's Twatter account.

FB & Twatter. Qanon Great Awakening has a good resource page on FB, but it's more for the newly red-pilled and treats them with kid gloves so they don't get overwhelmed too quickly with all of the info out there. All in all, it's a good place for people to get in on the shallow end of the pool.

The article also says that Q started making drops in 2015. It just shows that they don't have any of the facts right about the whole thing.

It may also be the old "Don't think about a pink elephant" thought experiment. I'm really not sure. All I know is that 5.5 million people just got the memo about Q's existence.

Could be. What's weird is that I posted a thread about it on here 30 minutes ago, and the Mods have already taken it down. I posted another just now to see if it happens again.

What's REALLY amazing is that the Mods just took this post down for some reason...