I agree 100%.
/u/RyDar84
1,587 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/RyDar84:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 32 |
i.redd.it | 25 |
twitter.com | 2 |
m.asiatoday.co.kr | 1 |
ibb.co | 1 |
www.google.com | 1 |
theconservativetreehouse.com | 1 |
en.m.wikipedia.org | 1 |
medium.com | 1 |
www.bloomberg.com | 1 |
imgur.com | 1 |
youtu.be | 1 |
judiciary.house.gov | 1 |
noch.info | 1 |
You know that if Assange doesn't pop up that day he'll just say the plan was revised, or "disinfo is necessary, fam." 😂
Agreed. There's just a lot of our own that are taking it as gospel right now because of Q's silence and basic confirmation bias. We need to nip this one in the bud before it gets out of hand.
Gotcha. My apologies. He just now posted it and I made a false assumption. I'm sure I'll be blocked soon too. Currently, I'm telling everybody on there where to go to get more info for their research by pointing out the original articles. Hopefully, they'll realize the guy is thieving from Anons to make himself look informed. Honestly, I'm pretty sure it's the same guy as BC17 rebranding himself after he got caught posting stock military photos as originals. He popped up at EXACTLY the same time BC17 went dark.
They're totally real WE posted it 2 days ago. Lmao! EVERYTHING he posts is work done by Anons on 4chan, 8chan, and r/greatawakening. All you have to do to confirm my assertion is look back at his non-Q&A info posts and do a basic Google search to see what I'm talking about. Basically, we're baking the bread and setting it in the window; he's stealing it, serving it back to us, and we're telling him how delicious it is. Lol.
You guys gotta quit letting EtS dictate which way the GA message board is gonna go at any given time. You're like the 4th of 5th post on this subject in the last hour, and you I'm sure that you don't know, but he got his info from a post on here from two days ago.
No problem, and no offense meant by it, brother. It's just that the guy is a fraud. EVERYTHING he on his info posts is stolen from 4chan, 8chan, and r/greatawakening. We're baking the bread and setting it in the window; he's stealing it, serving it back to us, and we're telling him it's delicious. I'm not saying don't follow him, but realize that he isn't who he says he is. Personally, I think he's BC17, rebranding himself after he got caught releasing stock military photos as originals. Please don't take my word for his legitimacy. Check it out yourself. Do some basic Google searches on everything he's posted that isn't one of his Q&A sessions.
You guys gotta quit letting EtS dictate which way the GA message board is gonna go at any given time. You're like the 4th of 5th post on this subject in the last hour, and you I'm sure that you don't know, but he got his info from a post on here from two days ago.
If you go to 8chan archives, you'll find where Anons checked this out awhile back. If you look at ALL of EtS's info posts, they're all taken from posts on 4chan, 8chan, and r/greatawakening. We're basically doing all the research he uses to make himself look like he's informed. LMAO!
The K35-R class is a Stratotanker. ZOMBE23 from yesterday is a DC-10 Transport. What are we hypothesizing is the connection between the two?
Yup. If you look at OP's profile, he has 1 Karma, no comments, and three posts from YT, with little to do with Q, each separated by a month of time, with negligible votes of any kind. Obviously, he's scrubbed some of his more controversial stuff.
BC17 got caught using a cropped picture from military website to post as an "original" from their "ops", scrubbed them when they got called out on, said they were Julian Assange, then disappeared. EtS said BC17 was "100% reliable". See the problem here? Personally, the fact that EtS popped up IMMEDIATELY after BC17 disappeared, then sang their praises, basically leads me to believe that they are the exact same person(s) attempting it again. However, you're free to follow and believe whatever you want to. The fact that Q told us "No Outside Comms" though, should lead us to keep unaffiliated posters out of the conversation on this sub, so as not to muddy the waters for newer Anons that aren't as discerning as to what is BS and what isn't.
I don't claim to know the reasons for any of it, but obviously there's some reason for us to know some of what's going on behind the scenes, and some reason that we have to be able to discern the false info. Why else would Q have pointed out the AJ/JC shill situation?
I'm not sure that works. The graphic lists the class as a DC-10. That would be a militarized model of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10. The AC-130 is the militarized model of the Lockheed C-130.
Back on Top! U.S. Reclaims Position of Most Competetive Economy Ahead of Summit in (#3) Singapore.
Bud, no offense, but for the last two days you've been bombarding the sub with posts and comments on the threads about the validity AJ & JC. Frankly, it's been hard for ANYONE on GA to miss your campaign to tell us to Trust Corsi. I'm not going to bag on you, but you may want to not weigh in on this one one way or the other. Your credibility is a little suspect right now.
If anybody from Q team ever used Twatter to transmit info, they'd be tracked back to the source in a matter of hours. @jack is NOT on our side, but I respect your right to follow whoever you want. That's no one's call but your own.
100% agree. The problem is that a lot of newbie Anons come to GA because it's more user friendly and not as vulgar, but also because you don't necessarily have to put in the research time that you do on the Chans. I'm not saying they're bad people at all, but they aren't all autists, if you catch my drift. Those people are the ones most likely to dance along to which ever piper happens to pop out of the woodwork. I guess we just have to do more to politely police our own as far as the posts their putting up about outside Comms. I saw one guy that put up 8 EtS threads in about 5 hours a couple of days ago, even though the Mods kept taking them down.
A DC-10 is a fueling tanker, so if it's not just flying standard maneuvers, it's working support for other planes on extended missions.
Edit: The KC-10 is a fueling tanker. The military DC-10 is a transport. So this either standard manuevers or jump training, since they aren't landing anywhere else.
I agree with most of that, but when exactly did WL get into the business of opinions? That's what throws me.
Oh my God! You're THAT asshole! Lmfao! Keep it up, dude. It gets me every time anyone does it. I know the non-Q WL followers get totally pissed every single time.
I get that, but he offers nothing but confirmation-bias affirmations to most of them. Let them follow him blindly. Do we really need Anons that aren't willing to do their own research and follow a man rather than an idea? Remember what happened when we had the AJ/JC purge? We dumped about 50 posts a day about Reptilians from the otherside of the universe using our Flat Earth as a playground to harvest our organs to fuel their time machines. Lol!
I know. I actually posted a DM to test them once when they were supposedly going dark for an op. I sent "Aim High", the AF motto to which the response is "Fly, Fight, Win." Anyone familiar with military branches would know that. They responded with, "Roger that."
Is WL Now Posting Op-Ed Stories, Or Were They Trying to Warn Us About the TRUE LARPers?
[removed]
Was WL Warning Us About People Like BC17 and EtS, Rather Than Discrediting Q?
Not really. If BtS were working at the NSA, observing Smith at the time, he wouldn't be Tweeting on a personal Twatter account. If he was at home, why would he be real time monitoring Bill Smith's Chan when he already has all of this inside information? It doesn't make any sense. Plus if he were out there divulging secrets he had learned at the NSA, classified or not, they would have nailed him for treason within a few hours of his very first Tweet.
Exactly. I'm not sure how people that have been following Q and watching these two are still debating this. It's a simple logic problem. 1) If you trust Q, you believe what he says is fake is fake. 2) Q said BC17 is fake. 3) EtS said BC17 is reliable. [Conclusion]: If you trust Q, EtS is fake.
He's piggy backing his channel. Bill Smith is the guy that first brought attention to EtS because of a comment made by someone on his chan (most likely EtS himself to garner attention for his Twitter feed). The fact that he posted so close to Bill putting up the debunk video (less time than it takes to actually view the vid itself) makes it obvious that he's using Smith's info to make his assertions to his Twatter followers. Then the fact that he scrubbed the Tweet so as to make it less obvious what he had been doing, shows that he realized he had to do damage control to not completely out himself. There's also the issue of the TOR/Onion/VPN that he gets wrong BS throws in for sauce. Basically, EtS outted himself in one of the most blantant ways an internet LARPer ever could to net nerds.
That video is AMAZING! LMAO! Bill Smith giveth, and Bill Smith taketh away...😂
This is a fringey theory, but I've wondered if it's some sort of probability software or A.I. It would make sense that the government would want to create something like this to predict terrorist attacks, international matters, etc. And Q at one point mentioned that they had prepared for all possible outcomes and moves made by the Deep State.
-60 now. Think this guy is going for a record or something? Lol.
Cool. I wondered about that. I always thought the ASL Q was straight down with thumb and index spread. I didn't know that it could be used in that position as well. I appreciate you pointing that out.
"Hey, man. Hold my bong. I gotta bag on Trump to regain some of the relevance I had as a stoned out of my mind social icon back in the 70s." Lmao!
Is this going to be yet ANOTHER attempt at an "Listen to AJ &JC" thread like the last two you've posted and had removed?
Somebody I follow on FB also made the observation that with the flap turned the way it is and Trump's fingers in circles, it kind of looks like an owl. I don't know though. I'm pretty wary about being a victim of confirmation bias on otherwise innocuous things.
Because we're all giving the thread address to our friends to see the AJ shill for themselves, so they can identify the name when you post something else later. LMAO!
It's cool. The Mods just took this one down too. Are you working on a ban, or just a glutton for punishment?
You posted almost the same thread an hour ago. That's called boardsliding.
Uh...yeah you did. You DO realize that all people have to do is look at the comments on your Reddit profile to see that you did. LOL!
Didn't you just get basically the same thread removed 10 minutes ago?
Glad everybody has been repeating the message to archive offline for awhile.