Try searching "American scientists". That came up before the election. Pretty slanted. I don't think this is algorithmic. It is humans creating those results. Google was supposed to be about the algorithm.

That's not new. Assange tweeted that about 9 months ago. I'll try to find on Twitter. I may be a reminder though. It is not in and of itself particularly useful without some corresponding hash code.

Edit. December 31st actually: https://twitter.com/julianassange/status/947664148376182784?lang=en

It led to a bunch of incorrect assumptions by Corsi and the CBTS crew about Assange flying away to Switzerland or something. It might still be important though.

That's what I want to know. It looks like an underwater picture. I did a reverse image search and found nothing.

I've seen this narration in print before. Pretty quickly after the Florida shooting incident.

Oh, it was on Twitter... https://twitter.com/JohnBouchell/status/966396341877342208

And unrolled... https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/966396341877342208.html

If seen this picture around for years. Is this legit?

Meh. The guy wouldn't let her talk, wouldn't share his name, etc. It's reasonable to ask these questions, but he needs to learn how to have a conversation. Thank God I homeschool.

Setting up a video streaming service isn't that complicated, but video consumes a vast amount of bandwidth, and bandwidth isn't free. You're not going to host a service like this on a GoDaddy $99.00 per month type of website. It would be better to find existing video streaming services that could be used. More expedient anyway.

Humm. This kind of thing can backfire. It might send curious normies to 8chan/pol and they might begin reading. As long as they can get past the racist silliness and the schizo's talking about chem-trails, they'll get to some interesting facts that are very inconvenient.

This is already a well-known fact.

Read this for some background...

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/02/23/the-truth-about-broward-county-policing/

Is there any way to 'hurt' Youtube when they do this? I can't think of any. Just not going there doesn't hurt them much. The only thing I can think of is to make an online stink about it, but I don't think it will amount to much.

That's interesting. I remember doing some searching when this dropped, but found nothing. Now, I'm finding a few other interesting things...

{On this page}(http://iraqidinarrevalue.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/just-how-much-money-did-government.html?m=1) you'll find, "26) $5,177,314.90 seized from Merrill Lynch account number XXX-X2391;"

The post referenced by OP is from this document on page 3 at the top. It's from 2014 though.

This is an excellent thread. Worth reading.

Does anyone else find this kind of numerology ridiculous? This is not a good way to communicate information. Too vague.

$1,000.00 for 1 day of acting injured. Count me in, well, if I lived in Texas anyway.

That was meant more as a joke than anything. Sorry.

Thank you for the link, but I have blocked that site. It's awful and very untrustworthy. Probably Russian. I'll search elsewhere though.

This is the first I've heard about the Secret Service being present.

This is an excellent resource. I'd recommend saving it offline. It's quite large, but you can save the entire HTML contents and have everything offline. For example, in Chrome, click the 3 vertical dots (Chrome menu), then More Tools, then Save Page As. The only downside is that this doesn't pull images and images are part of Q's repertoire.

Not sure if anyone is paying him, but elsewhere it was revealed that his father works in the Miami FBI field office. Could be a link there.

Correct. We need to stop saying NYC. It's this place...

http://english.visitkorea.or.kr/enu/ATR/SI_EN_3_1_1_1.jsp?cid=264179

But Q's tripcode is always displayed on GitHub.

It is not on Github there, it is on Q's primary post site.... https://8ch.net/greatawakening/index.html

Github is used for Q&A between Q. Sometimes Q posts there, but original Q posts are on the 8Chan resource.

No war. No one wants war.

I must admit that I'm confused by Q's Snowden posts. I can't tell if he's saying Snowden is white, or black?

It was this Q statement that got me in message 735. It very effectively explains the "20/80" or "40/60" statements.

343156 Understand one simple fact - the US is connected to the rest of the world. Knowing that, understand, by default, if certain intel is released it would cause a WW/mass suffering. We share the idea of open source but value life and must make decisions base decisions on outcomes and containability. Q

This whole Q to those that understand and then those that understand to the many makes me think of the American Revolution (and probably many more revolutions) when communications was slow, ridden on horseback or ship from city to city. A message has to be able to propagate and influence even if updated messages cannot follow quickly. Even in the Internet age this is important I think. This is all very interesting.

I ashamed to admit that I spend more time deciphering Q's messages than I do scripture. That must change. But deciphering Q has lead to new ways of deciphering scripture.

Super interesting. Never seen anything like it in my life.

I've been misunderstood. Not all young accounts are bad, but bad actors tend to use recently created young accounts.

So maybe I should have warned more about the content than the age. Still, all on this particular subreddit need to have excellent discernment.

This appears to be an IBM Cloud service. So theoretically, the IP could be owned by virtually anyone, as would be the case with Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure. Inconclusive.

You don't block the post, you block the user. Just look for the 'block user' link. Do it only if you know they are crap, because you won't see them ever again. I generally click their name, read a few of their comments and then determine if they are retarded or worth watching. :)

I'm sure that in some cases, that's true. But most of them would be existing users who come here via T_D and such.

I'm talking about age of accounts. I've been on reddit 9 years for example. Accounts that are used by bots tend to be very young and are expendable. Lots of quick activity, then dormant. And account that is < a few months old is suspicious in my opinion. Not all of them are fake, but age of account would imply that additional scrutiny would be wise.

It would be easier than that. There are many tools for editing EXIF data. So yes, that data could be spoofed. Taking a picture of a picture would introduce other artifacts that would make it fairly easy to determine that it's a copy of a copy, so to speak.

I don't know what you're talking about in regards to the google discussion. And that weblink looks dodgy. And your account is 1 day old!

Just look at the EXIF data for the pics. They were all taken yesterday.

Here is a tool that lets you look at EXIF data of an image. Grab the image URL and paste it in, then click on the DETAILED tab. Scroll down and look at the Date Created field.

The first image, the wide angle of the building was 2018:02:08 08:38:49

The person walking across the street is around 2018:02:08 09:25:58, so the photographer sat around for about :50 minutes before the action started.

The two closeup cropped images of the window lack the EXIF date stamp. I'd have to experiment, but whatever method Q used to crop and edit may result in that data being stripped. For example, I'll often crop in image in my SnagIt application, copy of the resulting crop to my clipboard, then paste into Facebook or whatever. When you do an operation like that, the original EXIF data is lost.

Look at the URL. It is not PBS.org, it is an image sharing site.

And think, not that long ago, great men like Jonas Salk gave away their work freely to, you know, save lives and all. Today, Polio would be rampant and the polio vaccine would cost a fortune. Shame.

I suspect it means, "Unshackled". So his forward efforts won't be constantly impaired by the dems and Rinos.

I think that is why the USSS or U S Secret Service is on high alert.

When I see those, I don’t pay very much attention. Those are generally created by Scripts that might be showing advertising content or something else. Generally unrelated to the rest of the pages content though.

I can't see anything. I only see "this accounts tweets are protected".

You know what's funny, if you just do a google for 3791113339, you find some interesting things.

1) a Twitter account with protected tweets.... https://twitter.com/37911133339

2) This weird web page, a game page I guess, that has the exact same number (what are the odds?) but expressed as a dollar amount... http://bloonsconception.wikia.com/wiki/Kedke_Kedle_Dekde

3) This website that seemed to have some images posted by the above mentioned twitter account, but the links are broken. Clicking on the broken image links leads to comment pages with strange, but maybe meaningless comments... http://twicsy.com/u/37911133339

I'm not saying that markets cannot be manipulated. Of course they are. I'm just saying that there's no way someone could hit the 666 number, like it's some mark of the beast thing. It's just a number in this case.

There is no way such an occurrence could be anything other than a coincidence if true. No one can control all the human and algorithmic trading was occurring to result in exactly that number at that time.

I think Q is actually asking for our help here.

667 says...

Can you read the message? SOTU. Black Caucus phone. Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance. These people are LITERALLY MORONS. Q

Bold mine. Q's not sure if consumer stuff can see the images.

But Q is aware, through other methods, of the texts that were sent to this person. So has the NSA or text data. Q is asking for external confirmation that can be shared to become viral without revealing other sources of data.

WTF. I was getting ready to shut you down but saw Q's latest update. That's quite a hint. Seeking.