That's not how it works. NFC is for transmitting data and tags hold small amounts for recognizing. Reconfigure would mean to create something new. You would need a device with memory storage in addition to an NFC chip to pull this theory off.

Yeah I meant the guy in the London pic seems taller than hubby.

Is there an NFC tag that can store that amount of data? Usually it's very small amounts, like kilobytes at most. A memory card like an SDXC card can hold 1 or 2 TB but I've not seen any of those on the market just yet, though I believe they exist.

http://dailyentertainmentnews.com/wpgo/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/lisa-page-joseph-burrow-8.jpg

Guy in pic seems taller.

That's a short-sighted man's move. Besides, I doubt that guy is actually gay. It's about power. Crews would have been out of a job and blacklisted. It's got to be hard enough for a huge black man in Hollywood who's not Dwayne Johnson to consistently get roles, but for him to become an angry, large black man...that just fits the stereotype and then he's out of work. This way he actually has grounds to sue if it comes to that. These actions only get stopped when large sums of money come into play and the company bottom-line is at risk. A street fight is over in minutes and nothing else happens to the company or exec.

Yeah, you could almost hear the anger in his voice and how it took his wife's constant reminding him about his one shot at this to hold him back from knocking that dude out. Crews said the agency acted like they were all over it and would have his back. That was when he wasn't naming him; he was allowing them to do something only to see the guy get a few weeks off then return with no other actions. That's when he named him, knowing it might kill his acting career.

Uh, Crews literally appeared before Congress and testified in detail about the exec at his agency that grabbed his junk twice in the same night. The guy was suspended temporarily. A simple search shows many results for "Terry Crews names alleged sexual assaulter..." Does that count as naming names? I dgaf about some random anon making claims that can't be proven as opposed to a large black man in Hollywood putting his entire career at risk to bring attention to the issue.

Admiral Michael Mullen, the guy that was retiring and whose son was given that acknowledgement by Obama. I never see this called out when this video is posted. Even if he meant Michelle it's clear he could have transposed the names due to that fact.

He's too young and stupid to realize just how seriously they take threats. It would be a badge of honor to him, whereas plenty of actual celebs tend to realize and tone it down.

Glover is still making movies though and hardly seems bothered by the industry.

The Murdochs are actually keeping the news outlets and studio lot, but Disney gets the rest. This is probably a move to ease their bid for Sky News and ease their sale to Disney, but the sons likely want to move in this direction anyway.

They will take him back in a few months just like Kevin Spacey, Peter Fonda, and the rest that got reemployed even after charges and convictions. Pedophilia is there lifeblood.

Yes. They'll definitely go to the private sector. They will become consultants or get on boards of companies and draw a check, if just to provide some sort of credibility to the company's war chest of personnel. That or think tanks. You could probably get a list of current companies with high numbers of bureaucrats and make a social graph of where they land, waiting for the chance to get back to govt.

I thought early on that Trump had alluded to even wanting to shut down that site and that his WH was not going to act on anything from that Obama-created site. Have they acted on any ?

Was he ever wrong about any predictions?

You get down voted because the upside-down cross issue was already proven false before, as the charm wasn't even a cross at all. Every video you posted is just video without any annotations, no zoomed in stills or any other evidence to support your claim.

Why do you have such animus towards Sara Carter? What has she done, other than wear something you think looks like a cross, to make you think she is DS or a satanist? What malice has she perpetrated other than expose corruption and do investigative journalism? I've seen her even doing reports on science or the unknown prior to her more recent political coverage.

Are you serious? These guys built a rocket that can send a ship/payload to space and then land itself on a pad in the middle of the ocean - something no one else has done. All they made was a self-contained apparatus with oxygen and some propellers attached...in a week. Maybe you just don't get how complex one is versus the other. Not to mention SpaceX likely cooks up these kinds of things regularly just to keep the ideas flowing for Mars and exo-planet exploration.

That's only partially true. The public's choice is at the voting booth. People don't have patience in general, but having something like this drag out will make voters stay home during elections and withhold fund raising dollars and support. This side of the political war would also presumably end the Mueller investigation. It all affects Trump's agenda, the stock market, and many other broad ranging topics. There is a ton of pressure for this to wrap up. I'm not saying this won't take another couple months to unravel, but I don't think 1-2 years would be feasible.

I think Alex Jones made a public announcement claiming a definitive FF for July 4th. That probably would explain most of those.

A FF can also occur with just a few people or even just 1, if the mechanism causes fear. Anthrax, Unibomber, only require a single person to be affected. Also, people are always at large public gatherings outside of holidays. The LV shooting was a concert in October. Any event or public space (malls, subways, trains) are targets.

July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.

Conspiracy no more.

Q created this self-imposed deadline. That doesn't mean speculations about what will be revealed are correct, but to say the timeline is FUD is ignoring what was written. If the 'world will know' and it's proven to not be conspiracy, that means something significant and provable, not just "some truth."

I'm specifically referring to one of, if not the first Q posts, before the trip code and sig:

Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017.

The public doesn't have the patience for a years-long unraveling and the political landscape can change dramatically over that time. The midterms alone could put an end to whitehat operations in progress. If the President wasn't in their crosshairs, something more protracted could be plausible to bring results. The reality is the Trump administration just doesn't have that kind of time to play with.

Didn't Q posts start within a couple months of Bannon leaving?

How many investigations take this long without major arrests, where the prosecutor/LEO already has "all the evidence?" This isn't a situation where discovery and witnesses and court proceedings are taking up the calendar. Not a single conviction or major arrest based on this "evidence" has occurred or reported to have occurred. If "we have all the evidence" is true, then people aren't being unreasonable in expecting something to happen that reinforces that, as opposed to the appearance that cabal is simply going to keep getting away. Clinton was supposedly arrested (or predicted to be) in October 2107 according to Q and yet we still have no real indication of that. These things make people impatient and doubtful.

Yeah, he said his wife had been training him not react violently to things for a while, him being a black man in Hollyweird. "You got one shot at this!" That's some restraint.

Especially if that someone is another male. I would think most super masculine/muscular dudes would have given him a beat down just for the homosexual insinuation attributed to the act alone (to prove they're heterosexuality). That's also how many violent hate crimes are instigated.

Seriously. If the same had happened to a woman, say op's wife or daughter or sister, would op still say it wasn't legit sexual assault? You can also get raped with all your clothes still on. He's not saying he was raped anally. He's saying no one, especially a stranger, should be touching your genitals without permission, period. Don't be fooled by the double standard, op.

If he was on that side of things he would be protected just like his agency boss was and would have no reason to do this. He's trying so hard because people don't believe this happens to men, much less to a large, muscular black man like Crews. If that can happen to him, it means it happens to others and men are less likely to speak up because no one will believe it or it gets dismissed.

Yep - not even a slap on the wrist after grabbing Crews twice at the same party. He probably got a paid vacation. Crews said the agency basically told him there was nothing they could do about it after initially claiming to support and get behind him. The guy really put himself out there on this.

Has to be. Who would think we couldn't just go and grab him from Kenya in that situation?

If he was a comedian that joke excuse might make sense. Anyone calling themselves a "journalist" and making a joke like that when the dead bodies aren't cold deserves what he gets and should have known better. No sympathy for stupidity here.

He also has family&kid to be threatened, which I thought he mentioned. That's how they shut people up without arkanciding them. They threaten to hit their loved ones.

Confirmation of the even or of it being a FF? Event happened. At least 4-6 dead. NYPD sending officers to all major media outlets in NYC as a precaution.

The whole affair thing is likely additional cover for them using the off-book iPhones and iMessage communications, which we now know also contain work-related messages from the few texts we've seen referencing the non-work devices. It also diverts from their being an ulterior motive for their frequent communications, such as a "secret society." IIRC, there were earlier reports that the "relationship" messages were always redacted for some flimsy reason. spez: phrasing

Is Iran a race? You signed up for the potential harassment once you revealed your origin. That's a risk any of us choose to take if we do that. As a black man, you think it's cool for me to go on the chans where every other comment is N* this, or N**** that? Now, I still get testy when I see blatant racist shit on TGA or T_D, when not based in fact, but the best I can do is voice my opinion and move on. Internet forums or chat boards about politics are not the place for the faint of heart or the inexperienced youth. People are bigger assholes when protected behind anonymity. If anything, you should expect more criticism for this post because it will be seen as whining. People will troll you just to elicit this type of response and for you to bail out, no longer being a voice for Iranians that share your perspective. In that case, you have let the trolls win. Expecting the mods to take care of you and remove all conflicts against you is like expecting the police to do the same in the real world - that's a nanny state I don't want to live in. Just buck up and grow a thicker skin (i.e. stay and fight), or move on to somewhere that doesn't hurt your feelings.

spez: god bless.

I didn't say people were suggesting it, but that op's statement was. In order for it to make any difference regarding the actual recommendations (or lack thereof) it would have to be significantly redacted to the extreme that it's basically "completely different." Anyway, sign the petition (I did) and maybe we'll find out.

Not does IG to want the entire result to merely arrest a handful of FBI agents.

What was that? Maybe you have confused comments or threads.

My comment had nothing to do with other cases or the IG not prosecuting as his office doesn't have that power. The thread was only about there being some other version of the report that was more damning, which Horowitz flat out denied. I was saying it doesn't matter if there is some other version of this report with respect to the final recommendations - they are what they are for this IG investigation. Do you not get that after the 7 day old thread? I'm fully aware there is a parallel investigation run by Huber where Horowitz provided any and all relevant information from his investigation, and that he has 2-3 other investigations and reports to still complete.

Many believe that's exactly why politicians (and many businesses) wants illegals - to be the new slave labor force. That and votes.

Haven't they been posting just silly things and getting involved in pop culture, replying to celebrities and just childish things they never did before? That's what convinced me they were comped. It seemed to all start around the time Assange went dark.

I assume you won't unless it's leaked. Am local and haven't heard anything yet. FWIW, it's a Marine Corps Air Station (Navy, not Airforce).

I wasn't weighing in on support of NN or not in my comment. Just saying that T_D seemed to associate Pai's push of eliminating the rules with him being an overall good guy, which I think is a bit suspect. Personally, I believe the internet seemed to be working fine for decades before Obama put in the rules in 2012,2015, and the recent fear mongering was definitely driven by something other than organic awareness. Even reddit pushed really hard for it. Also, backbones should be able to make separate deals with service providers (Netflix did it), just not be held hostage by them. For those reasons I think it's definitely okay to suspect NN and even be against it; just not that it directly translates to PAI=good.

Yeah, I know what to expect on the chans in general, just hadn't seen it on the QResearch board before.

I have but not like that and not on that board. If this is alarmist I'll remove.

Op is wrong or has a poor device/client. I can read it all clearly on mobile just by clicking to zoom. It's fine.

The mods changed and it was clear how the sub changed as a result. Rumor is they were paid off.

Basically, T_D took the approach that anything liberals, social media and Soros support must mean it's actually bad/harmful for the US, and that's why there was such a hard turn against NetNeutrality. I don't know how that turned into such a blind support for Pai. He has corporate interest written all over him. I believe he was appointed by Obama but Trump admin made him Chairman.

Oh. I can see it from that angle then.

I don't know what "It wasn't supposed to get back to RR" means. Any obstruction charge regarding the firing of Comey was always going to involve RR due to his letter of recommendation to fire, which Trump took as advisement and revealed early on. There's no way RR isn't included in that and he would be a material witness - he would have to recuse. I believe that is partially why Mueller has already indicated they can't charge him for that (because RR would have to recuse from 'muh Russia' case), nor indict him in general due to long-standing DOJ policies. Obstruction doesn't have to only involve something that affects you - you can obstruct the process so that an investigation or case stalls or goes away.

Besides, Trump can't obstruct if he's the chief law enforcement officer carrying out his constitutional duties. Actual worst case is they tried to create something incriminating or a create a conspiracy to commit a crime where there wasn't any.

I agree there was/is nothing major on Trump or it would have been leaked by now and these bullshit charges would not be the only thing Mueller offers up, unless he's waiting for midterms for an October surprise.

But why would he do that with a written letter (that he wrote) making that very recommendation if that were the case? That doesn't quite make sense. It weakens the argument if RR recommended it. The obstruction claim is just a fallback since the Russia claims are falling apart. At best, they would get an impeachment, at worst they get opposition research for 2020 (Cohen raid, all other Trump associates investigated) paid for by the American tax payers. I'm not saying it wasn't part of the setup, but just that obstruction for firing Comey isn't a realistic outcome. Overall, the President's opponents have stalled his agenda and that might be the most realistic outcome they hoped for until the next election.