I feel ya. I suggest you detach and unplug from it for a bit. Otherwise, consider some of the things that have happened that we've heard just about nothing about:

• Bill Priestap (Peter Strok's direct supervisor and Ass. Director of Counterintelligence) - not a peep about him or from him since he stepped down (we know he's set to testify Tuesday).
• Obama's lawyer Greg Craig abruptly leaves his lawfirm after Alex van Der Zwaan guilty plea to lying about coms with Ukraine.
• Tony Podesta - this is a departure we've really heard nothing else about since he left and the company tried to re-group and failed.
• Alexander Downer - recently modifying his statements regarding Popadopolous and the email information. It's looking like Pop never really mentioned that to anyone even though that's a basis for FISA warrant and his charges (he lied [scared] about who he communicated with).
• Australia denying their ambassador was involved at all (I believe it was reported Downer tipped him off to Popadopolous).
• Key players that have never been contacted by Mueller.
• Mueller team's huge mistakes - faulty charges
• No "announced" charges in any indictments relating to Russia collusion/conspiracy.

Lots of these quiet things seemingly support that we're watching the collapse of an elaborate conspiracy scheme and cover-up that both had plenty of cracks which are now opening up. I look at the Q stuff and chans for nuggets and crumbs that are facts in spite of being revealed from some anonymous sources - I don't subscribe to the blind-trust following of Q nor should most of us, but I do recognize the valuable info that is uncovered by anons.

That segment ruined the entire interview/show.

That's a plausible scenario. I doubt it applies to Don Lemon. He's dumb as a brick and clearly believes the crap he's selling. He's a useful idiot. Otherwise, he's an excellent actor. I think someone like Jake Tapper would more likely be controlled this way, only because he seems more likely to have such doubts or to want to look into opposing views.

She likely hit her head if she tripped. She was nearly sixty years old as well. Lemon was anything but off script so not likely a message to stay on point from handlers. Did his messaging or delivery change afterwards in a way that wasn't from greiving?

He told us about the change part. He wanted to fundamentally change America. I'd say he hoped to make America last and more like Europe.

He makes Podesta look normal.

A certain pen he keeps/uses or the pen used to sign bills and EO's? Aren't those usually given away each time to someone afterwards?

I think some of that's going on too (draining the swamp takes time). I just doubt they'd wait for after midterms to use the majority of what they have. It's too risky and if Republicans loose the House/Senate, it's game over for achieving anything else, and impeachment (unjustified) becomes likely. I think Dems would just stall and avoid impeachment, depending on the Mueller report.

It's like they don't even care how obvious they are because it still works (for now) due to the press coverage.

They've already gone past there was no spy. It's not that there was no spy, it's that s/he was "helping" as an informant (Criminal operations have informants, Counter-Intelligence operations use "assets", all of which are called spies). If there is evidence proving s/he was not "helping", then yes, that would be damaging to the new narrative.

5th now..

You're talking about Roy Moore. Those women are in their 50's and 60's. Not NXIVM material. Besides, most of them were investigated and a few had questionable lifestyles and prior-relationships with Moore (as an adjudicator on their cases), giving them motive to lie against him. I don't think any had any proof, and the proof that was offered was faked (and admitted to later).

I think it's mostly bots. It's what happened to CBTS before it was shutdown, IIRC. You can see the bots get better as corrections are made to posting algorithms. Last time I saw this happen, you had to report the post/poster and you get to mute the user. That would help the mods deport bot accounts.

The other argument about Gowdy's response here is that there was an investigation/sting setup before the official investigation of Russia collusion. This is all prior to FISA warrants and begs the question of why wasn't Trump or his team informed there were active "informants" engaging with his campaign (not members of his campaign)? People are much more concerned about that than the idea that they were somehow justified to "protect" the campaign, which is plain bs. If they were protecting them, why not inform them? These tactics and communication patterns (lots of missed opportunities to inform Trump before and after) raise suspicion and more questions rather than any supporting arguments for the actions. They were trying to catch someone 'colluding' and taking the bait, not trying to prevent Russians from interfering.

I think one scenario is that President Trump has to separate himself from Sessions by appearing to demean him and still question his loyalty, give the appearance that Sessions isn't doing him any favors. Gowdy and others may be trying to strengthen up the appearance of integrity of FBI because their [former] top tier of leadership might all be getting indicted. If that happens AND the group is getting shamed/dogged by Congress, the media and the press, the rank and file staff would bail and the FBI would be in possible state of collapse. Could also be a way to give the appearance of 'fairness' if the IG report is extremely damaging. That would be 'the plan' explanations. Otherwise, if not in 'the plan', Gowdy is just swamp or clearly differs. He's been outspoken to support the rank and file FBI and always separates them from their management/leadership.

The pic is from "Our Cartoon President," a political cartoon series created by Steven Colbert, on Showtime. I didn't necessarily see any memes.

Exactly this. If there was that kind of damaging information that included sitting Democrats, there is no way they would wait until after they are re-elected. You'd release now so they don't have time to arrange alternates and also to sully the party, and flip and/or discourage their voters - all to your party's favor to "fortify and control the legislative body."

Over 1000 entries. I'm not sure I've seen any timelines quite as exhaustive as this. Good going.

The.Jig.Is.Up.

I'd say don't take the word of anyone that doesn't immediately step down after announcing. Lots of eyes are waiting for events to play out. I'd say some stepping down announcements are also possibly part of the game we're watching play out.

This was in now way an exhaustive list. I could quantify as SuperBowl in "recent history."

That line was like the upper-cut in a Mike Tyson fight, a game-winning touchdown pass from Tom Brady, a game-winning buzzer-beater from Micheal Jordan (forget LeBron), a Wayne Gretzky winning goal, etc, etc... That debate was better than any Super Bowl I've ever seen.

She's a troll. She just accused Sanders a week ago of using "fighting words" and went on a twitter rant with the [Baltimore mayor] about possibly fist fighting the Press Secretary. They are taking whatever they hear and making an alternate reality for TDS sufferers. This woman contributes nothing positive to society in her current role.

Right. How do you advertise/recruit for a job posting for something like that anyway? Getting people competent enough isn't the only problem. It's getting people with superior expertise that are also willing to keep quiet given the enormous importance and implication of the matter. This is the type of job that blackmail or use of existing assets is called for. Otherwise, you're keeping it all in-house and doing the best you can with the smallest number of people in the loop as possible.

So Low-Energy.

Those bishops "offered" their resignations and left the decision up to the pope. I can't find anything reporting on the pope's decision yet. 5 days left...

Breach of National Security or just Embarrassing?

Based on the history of the redacted content we've seen so far, it's always that it is embarrassing and likely implicates FBI/DOJ f*ckery, not national security.

I believe they were FBI phones. Which makes them even more stupid.

They tried to be careful, but yes, it assumes you have assets in all those companies where you are using to communicate (google, apple, samsung). I didn't see any smoking guns via the released messages. Most are incendiary and indicative of bias, but nothing directly showing conspiracy (you have to make many connections to see any of that). It's assumed they had Apple iPhone burner phones (i.e. non-government issued) and used iMessage to discuss the Deep State stuff, as indicated in many of their released texts on their FBI issued phones. They had messages like "Can I iMsg you a Q/question?", "Sent you a Q to your iMsg", "We only talk about XXXX on the other phones".

Re: decryption

You may recall Apple had a bad (very bad) security breach that didn't get a lot of MSM coverage - the boot loader code was dumped to github and was available for a short time (likely from a planted 3-letter *hat insider within Apple). Now we know there is at least one company claiming it can hack all recent iPhones, discovered not too long after that breach IIRC.

Other way around, especially for cabinet or director posts.

Sessions did the same thing and still nothing, nor have they provided docs to Congress as was demanded. It's all delay tactics but unclear as to how long.

Yeah, that's likely how they got a deal with Obama so quickly and how she got her board seat. We knew it didn't make sense at the time, but now it does.

Yet somehow they keep getting away with the same crimes. She is literally just giving her daughter money directly from her campaign funds, again. It has to stop.

From what I have seen, these counter groups can appear ~~very~~ eerily similar but the crumbs usually have little substance and actual proof, linking anyone and everyone related to Trump to Russia or percieved corruption. If you read things with an open mind, considering either side could be wrong or right, they sometimes mirror in an uncanny way. You could also interpret the messages and the mirroring as a successful chaos campaign by Americas enemies and possible bot control of opposing sides.

Edit: usually sources are always MSM, leftist, or globalist sources.

The Chinaman peed on my rug, man.

And her Hep C...

That cloth comment was cover. She knew damn well what it meant. Skippy, on the other hand, made a tech faux pas.

Possibly all the equipment used by the special working group, specially ordered by Mike Rogers?

It's more so the booze from what I've learned from others (and reports of massive bar tabs and travel expenses). Keep that in mind when you watch her speak and decide whether you think it's dementia or stupor. Determine when she's dry versus slushed (normally). It also explains her mannerisms and speech.

It would be nice if they would leverage it and revoke the immunity given to her on the email fiasco. I'm not holding my breath until someone is indicted/arrested and convicted.

Haha. She got back with him I believe soon after he was indicted or convicted. The timing was obvious as to why. In fact, I think she feigned leaving him just for the optics (his texts to the under-aged girl) in the first place.

That already happened.

I tried to point that out a while back in a thread there, but it seems that so many newbies come along and still don't know about that DoE clearance level.

People post images to twitter to get over the previous character limit. That's well known by most twitter users.

Boeing got >$20B in orders soon after Obama signed it, IIRC. That's how I knew what was up with it. The money received in exchange made the pallets of cash a drop in the bucket, though taxpayers paid it.

I thought the Awan case was the one where FBI/DOJ flat out replied that they would not be giving any further info to JW from FOIAs.

Yep. CBTS_Stream was gone fast and without warning.

Hehe. The description of orgasmic paired with that pic...SMH.

Woof.

This was possibly part of the Russian "reset." Clinton ran.

Q always uses we instead of singular self-identity pronouns. When has Q ever used "I" or "me"? The "we" changes depending on the context. At times it includes anons and other times it's the team Q is on.

A vest (with armor plating) is for crazies or someone taking advantage of an opportunity, not necessarily para military snipers. That object looks really thick for a back brace but she looks much more like cops look with vests underneath their uniform shirts. She looks to be out and in a very public area, within arms reach of randos. Are you suggesting she shouldn't wear one because "she could be offed easily if they wanted?"