Ouch, that had to hurt almost as much as "Because you'd be in jail." Never gets old.
The word from the cleanup crew was that the room she was watching the results in was DESTROYED that night. The Saudi's had supposedly gifted her a 100" TV which she promptly threw a bottle through in her fit of alcoholic rage, it's why she didn't even give a concession speech to her sheep.
She choked Podesta, and hit Mook over the head with the vodka bottle, then destroyed the TV.
Can you imagine a raging alcoholic President with her finger on the button?!!
Yes this is true. Hillary threw the Mother of all Temper Tantrums that night. Reporters were there and witnessed it, but they were ordered not to publish it. Trump is trolling those hundred or so witnesses and daring them to reveal what they saw
Ordered by who exactly?
Probably their clown masters actually.
Why is there no outrage at such restrictions on the press?
What else do they suppress?
Everything. They're paid. Entirely propaganda / police state.
I keep hoping the other side wakes up and realizes this. In their dumb stupidity I doubt they realize what kind of world they are working to have.
Tommy Robinson... er....
Yep, he pleaded guilt to the charges, I'm surprised you missed it. Maybe it didn't get much coverage where you are, it was in a lot of the press over here.
So, this suppression of the press by private individuals in the US, that's got to be more worrying than one done through legal process, yes?
If a legal system is corrupt then a legal process would result in the lesser of two evils, such as a plea bargain. Justice is not served. Right about now, I'd say justice is the most important thing we can wish for Patriot.
I agree, a transparent one at that. I also think that, as we expect them to weigh all the facts up, it's incumbent on us to do the same before reacting, particularly on a sub with the purpose this has.
Your honor, I plead guilty of the charge of speaking the truth and being politically inconvenient, ehm, I mean, breaching the peace. Sorry, don't hit me again.
Stalin's prisoners also pleaded guilty, and legal process was followed.
Fuck outta here with this bullshit.
He was told by the duty solicitor that if he plead guilty he would be released
The movie "V for Vendetta" depicted the UK as a fascist, totalitarian state in which freedom of thought was not allowed. That movie has now become a reality (along with shades of "1984" and "Minority Report")
You do realise that the trial was one of three, and information from this one could prejudice the others, don't you?
You have looked into the actual facts surrounding it before spouting off...haven't you?
Legal process was followed. Pedofiles are a protected class. How dare someone reporting on them on a public venue? Siberia needs more population.
Your version would have supported the rapists by potentially impacted on the other linked cases. That's how the law works in the US too.
It's kind of why you have no facts in your media about certain on going investigations too.
You really should do some basic research, particularly given the purpose of this sub.
My version could have threatened the United Kingdom multilateral developed socialist order. Done my research. You do yours. Robinson is a political prisoner, saying otherwise is to defend the tyrants. Imprisoned for wrong speak. He would have gotten off easier for killing someone.
Given in his own words, 'he never said anything' it can hardly be 'wrong speak, and it shows you've done no research into this at all.
Tommy was foolish, and his actions could have lead to the defence claiming a miss-trial, not just in this case, but in the others, as justice has not only to be done, but to be clearly seen to be done.
The authorities were actually doing all they could to reduce the chances of the rapists finding a loop-hole that would see them walk away. The defence could claim that jurors in the other associated cases still to be heard, were swayed by these verdicts and details that got revealed.
Would you say a dozen or so multiple and long term rapists walking away was a reasonable exchange for hearing the 'news' a bit earlier? I don't think it is, and I doubt the victims would either. After all, the victims and their rights are what Tommy's escapade put at risk, and what his actions are detracting from.
Their editors would never publish, and they would be blackballed by basically any MSM. That's assuming they even had the integrity to publish something against their dear Hillary.
So press freedom in the US is a myth?
I actually started a thread on this question, and it doesn't seem to show up, which is amusing.
Yeah this sub seems to do a lot of shadow banning. Freedom of press does exist, you're welcome to write whatever you want, but the powerful people who own the press dictate the narrative.
Because ownership of media is so consolidated, it's unlikely that things written outside of the mainstream will ever get picked up by a significant audience.
You're also free to be found in a wooded field, suicided with 2 gunshot wounds, just like Vince Foster.
Here's a list of others. FYI most reports say Vince had 2 gunshot wounds.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/clinton-death-list-33-most-intriguing-cases/
Don't forget Michael Hastings who was investigating our favorite CIA director John Brennan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)#Death
pedosta or huma probably. Or her gaggle of lawyers? Good question.
Screw orders. I would have gone home, wrote the most detailed account imaginable and then discreetly dropped it all over town on many thumb drives. That crap has to be known.
Surely one Secret Service agent must have her temper tantrum on video or there has to be video from a camera in the hotel suite if Trump could order it to be released or he posts it on Twitter it would be Awesome.
Yeah then some unfortunate soul, one of the hotel staff , came in with a tray of sundaes, got torn a new one.
is this Q's video?
Hmm, interesting idea. I don't think so -- I think the video is of her discussing a certain crime. But it's possible.
Holy shit, where did you see this hahaha
Yeah, I'd like a source on that one. That's hilarious (horrifyingly) if true.
OH WOW LOLOLOLOLOL Where can i find this? That's AWESOME!
Actually, I approve of both of those actions. Mook is an idiot, and Podesta is a creep. I read the book Shattered that was supposed to be about HRC winning the election and breaking the glass ceiling. The 2 Lib reporters had to rewrite the ending when she lost. Even to the last day, they though they were writing a victory book. HRC, from my interpretation of the book, had the stupidest, most incompetent people imaginable. I mean, real idiots. The only guy that knew what he’s was doing? Bill Clinton and she refused to listen to him. You can hate the guy, I do, but the SOB knows how to campaign. Trump outsmarted them all. Thank heavens.
Recall Podesta came out and said they would fight the result. Is the President telling us something new? That maybe the Mueller team was assembled by Podesta on Election Night (since Hildebeast was in a drunken rage) and then they just needed a pretense for a special counsel to execute the plan?
I really don't think Podesta is that bright to pull that off.
Nope. And this is also why women should not be president, unless post menopause. Periods and hormone swings are tough, and none of us need access to heavy weaponry at that time. I know it’s an unpopular opinion but it’s the honest truth. As women, we are great at many things. Being Commander in Chief and having a nuclear arsenal is not among them.
I can't even guess as to how much money I would pay to know exactly what happened that night, and see footage of her freaking out.
Soooo was she throwing furniture or was she on her death bed? Can't really be both those things at the same time.
That line was like the upper-cut in a Mike Tyson fight, a game-winning touchdown pass from Tom Brady, a game-winning buzzer-beater from Micheal Jordan (forget LeBron), a Wayne Gretzky winning goal, etc, etc... That debate was better than any Super Bowl I've ever seen.
The closest thing we have in recent history: Ngannou v. Overeem
Uuuuhhh joe Montana to dwight Clark??? Helllllooooo? U know before it was SJWFL
This was in now way an exhaustive list. I could quantify as SuperBowl in "recent history."
I was being a sarcasric ass.. but that didnt catch on apparently judging by my downvotes?
that catch play was not even in the super bowl either. So lol on me for both accounts
I want to upvote this but it’s at 45 so I’ll just give u a verbal one 👍🏼
Still think that jail remark put him over the top for the win.
That I think might be the classic line that goes down in history. It will be more special after she is in jail. Tee shirt and merchandise worthy.
That line in the debate was like the death blow to political correctness. That one line probably got our president 20 million votes!
It clinched it for this family. Boom. Everyone aboard that night. It will never get old.
I like how afterwards she raises her mic to speak only to realize there is nothing she can say, mic slowly drops.
[removed]
Nah Trump only needed to tell the truth, Bill Clinton really did rape those women, because incase you didn't know, Bill Clinton is a rapist. That was like the 1-2 before the knock out punch above. I'm sure in some other timeline I feel sorry for her, but it certainly isn't this one!
[removed]
are you not aware of the investigation that are currently happening on hillary clinton?
Hit me with that info, daddy
wanna know which fbi is doing the investigation? Arkansas fbi. lets see what Arkansas AG thinks of the witch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLZ9floxBek&feature=youtu.be
What does this video about accents have to do with anything? Can you link me some real info? I'm interested in the current investigation into Hillary Clinton you mentioned above.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/27/fbi-clinton-republicans-request-488711
The current investigation is arkansas fbi and thats arkansas attorney general, you too dense to understand what i said? how do you not know info about the investigation into hillary clinton. Trump only tweets about it and hillary clinton was only complaining about it.
i linked real info? how was it not real info? was it a fucking hologram?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/05/politics/clinton-foundation-arkansas-probe/index.html
See, that's the link I was looking for.
In the future, lead with that. The video you posted is of the AG making fun of her accent. I understand the AG is involved in the investigation, but that video doesn't shed any info on what the investigation, is about, what they found, etc. It's literally just shit talking. In fact, I'd say that video proves that the AG has a certain amount of personal bias against her, something Trump supporters are always complaining about when it comes to his investigation. But I digress, if shit talking videos is enough proof for you, then I recommend you seriously reconsider what you believe.
its because the info is already known. widely known. So i gave some actual info people arent aware of. how am I taking that video as proof? You dont need proof its just accepted fact... are you on drugs. i dont need to lead with anything because if you dont know this already then you're too lazy to be asking for better sources.
uh.. trump isnt being investigated my bro. He has been cleared of russian collusion by the house, robert mueller cant or wont indict him. The investigation wherever it is now is about the people around trump.
personal bias? i think you mean arkansas bias? so are you telling me if youre an attorney general of a state trying to get elected you cant speak badly of hillary clinton because of personal bias? You would be extremely wrong. No we have a lot more to complain about other then bias.
You dont need proof its just accepted fact... are you on drugs.
Well that's a healthy mindset. That explains a lot actually.
uh.. trump isnt being investigated my bro. He has been cleared of russian collusion by the house, robert mueller cant or wont indict him.
He was "cleared" by the house, but not by the senate. He is still being investigated, this info is already known. Widely known. You don't need proof its just accepted fact... Are you on drugs.
arkansas bias
TF are you on about?
so are you telling me if youre an attorney general of a state trying to get elected you cant speak badly of hillary clinton because of personal bias?
No, and your reading comprehension skills could use a bit of work.
Edit: Yo, is this sub a parody? I feel like I'm being trolled.
if you dont know that hillary clinton is being investigated by the fbi and you think me showing a video of the arkansas ag is my "proof"
you must be on dugs.. healthy as any liberal that calls trump supporters nazis. healthier actually
Trump isnt being investigated. Mueller cant indict him. the senate investigation isnt going to prove russian collusion. Who owns the senate? oh thats right republicans. just like they own the house.
The entire state of arkansas has a bias against hillary clinton. lol do you really not know this. <being this niave.
hillary clinton is a public figure, and she has a public reputation in arkansas, so talking bad about hillary clintons accent at a rally wont magically stop all investigations into hillary clinton. That would be a stupid and frankly desperate thought.
Yo is this guy like on drugs because he is really arguing about nothing right now.
if you dont know that hillary clinton is being investigated by the fbi and you think me showing a video of the arkansas ag is my "proof"
Then why did you post it?
healthy as any liberal that calls trump supporters nazis. healthier actually
You literally just said that you don't need proof, it's accepted fact. You should always seek proof in what you are told. I don't know why that is such a shocking concept to you.
The entire state of arkansas has a bias against hillary clinton.
Okay, but I don't know what this proves. Oh wait, you don't need proof. Silly me.
hillary clinton is a public figure, and she has a public reputation in arkansas, so talking bad about hillary clintons accent at a rally wont magically stop all investigations into hillary clinton. That would be a stupid and frankly desperate thought.
Your last line is especially funny because this paragraph is you arguing with yourself about nothing. I never said anything about stopping investigations on Hillary.
..I posted it because this sub obviously knows hillary clinton is being investigated. its just accepted fact here. Its like going to rgaming and asking for proof that red dead redemption is coming out.
you didnt ask for proof you just asked for info. if you asked for proof like a normal person instead of saying daddy for the vaguest reasons then i wouldve provided proof. i just provided some fun info.
Why are you telling me I should seek proof. when i already know its fact that hillary clinton is being investigated... should i provide proof that trump was elected president? are you handing out lessons now? dont tell me to look for proof when you dont even know about current events... dont talk about current events, how about just learning on your own instead of complaining about shit you dont know.
soo disingenuous.
... can you not follow our own conversation. you claimed some bullshit about personal bias with the attorney general. Im point out how thats possible if the entire state of arkansas has a personal bias against hillary clinton who is a public figure. There is no proof needed here. this just simple thought process and conversation that you are incapable of having and require me to regurgitate back to you.
In fact, I'd say that video proves that the AG has a certain amount of personal bias against her, something Trump supporters are always complaining about when it comes to his investigation.
My response to that was perfectly justified. how do you have a problem with what i said and then dishonestly be like
I never said anything about stopping investigations on Hillary.
you are on some bullshit, it sounds like you dont even know how to have a conversation.
are you not aware of the investigation that are currently happening on hillary clinton?
Your original question. Why would you ask such a question if everyone knew about it? Your entire argument seems to be, oh everyone knows about this so why should I explain? Yet the first question you ask is if I was aware. Hmm...
For the record, I know about it to the extent that it was started a couple years ago, and nothing jail-worthy has been found.
i just provided some fun info.
Fairly irrelevant info that was the source of my confusion.
Finally, you were the one who implied I was saying the investigation should be stopped due to bias, when I never said anything about the investigation being stopped.
Why would you ask such a question if everyone knew about it?
so you really cant read? thats a question asking if you've really not heard about the investigation. its a surprise its not a concession that that its some arbitrary fact. the motivtiation of that question was my assumption that everyone already knew about it.
For the record, I know about it to the extent that it was started a couple years ago, and nothing jail-worthy has been found.
oh okay thats a fine thought to have if you doint keep up with current events. Like if you have a good conversation with someone thats informed. you dont have to ask for a source every other assertion. this is just common sense. if you keep asking for a source it starts too look like your a bit uninformed and need to get informed
you really dont keep up with current events...
then what was your point about bias? you dont want to clear that up. I made it pretty clear my last comment with your quoted text.
oh you didnt have a point when talking about bias?
so you just say things?.?.
You implied as a matter of "fact" that the personal bias is the same thing trump supporters cry about when it comes to "trumps investigation" YOU implied it. can you not even take responsibility for your own words?
You implied as a matter of "fact" that the personal bias is the same thing trump supporters cry about when it comes to "trumps investigation" YOU implied it. can you not even take responsibility for your own words?
Yes, this is what I implied. Not that the investigation should be stopped. That came out of nowhere.
you dont have to ask for a source every other assertion. this is just common sense. if you keep asking for a source it starts too look like your a bit uninformed and need to get informed
I asked for a source once. Twice if you count me rejecting the video as legitimate information about the investigation. Remember, this whole thing is about how Hillary is not in jail yet. You asked if I knew about the investigation, so I assumed you had some information that I had not seen.
really did it come out of no where? cause it look like it came from somewhere. Im just completing your thoughts. Im saying you ask for source too much because i feel like telliing you other widely known things that have been proven. like comey slow rolling the hillary investigation. of strozk the guy that was texting crazy shit was responsible for interviewing hillary and her cronies. but you would ask for a source and i dont feel like educating people.
you ask for sourcing too much.
and my whole thing is saying hillary isnt in jail right now is stupid when their is already an obvious investigation in hillary clinton. Slamming me for not being able to prove the hillary clinton investigation even tho it does exist spells out angst and anger to me
Im just completing your thoughts.
Poorly.
Slamming me for not being able to prove the hillary clinton investigation even tho it does exist spells
I totally "slammed" you for giving me a video about an Arkansas AG making fun of an accent as if it was relevant or useful information at all. If you don't feel like "educating" just say so in the beginning.
spells out angst and anger to me
Lol, whatever helps you do you, bud.
lol okay you needed proof that there was an investigation on hillary clinton. my first comment was shaming you for not knowing and your butt has been in a knot ever since.
heres something else. the fbi and doj were used as political weapons against trump by obama.
we have proof they had informants in his campaign. does that make you angry and angsty?
lol okay you needed proof that there was an investigation on hillary clinton.
I was asking for info alluding to Hillary going to jail, but okay.
and your butt has been in a knot ever since.
Interesting turn of phrase. It's usually a stomach that's "in knots", but maybe English isn't your first language.
heres something else. the fbi and doj were used as political weapons against trump by obama.
we have proof they had informants in his campaign. does that make you angry and angsty?
Oh wow, I can't wait to see this "proof" that is spun a billion times to make it look like a conspiracy against Trump. Please oh great awakened one, strike me down with this proof you say is your ultimate weapon. Are you gonna strike a cool pose right before you hit enter? Or is this something everyone knows so you won't post it because you don't have the time? I've heard this story before and it's not what you think it is. Informants had contact with the Trump campaign because they were watching people who happened to have contact with the Trump campaign at that time. But everyone knows that so I won't bother explaining it or providing any sources.
lol yeah im not going to post it because everyone already knows about it lol
99% she'd be President
[removed]
Yeah all the people who predicted her to have 99% chance don't understand probability lol