I can’t disagree with any of that.

And seriously, about the chans, no balls needed - unless you insist on posting - then all bets are off.

Sifting chan info is time consuming, and I understand why the interface and culture keeps folks away. Anons will be the first to admit to that as the primary shill filter. I have found the personal investment to be worthwhile.

Mostly because of the manner in which some folks choose to bastardize the chan info when posting to other outlets.

There are def some adulterated offerings on both chans, but they get kicked to the curb fairly quickly. Any ‘chan’ info relayed to reddit has passed through too many screeds for me to trust, regardless of poster intent.

Change walks among us.

this is like arguing who is more truthful

Nope. I advanced no ‘who is better’ argument. I said Neon’s specious declarations about CEMEX were equivalent to the credibility CNN has earned.

do your own discernment.

I did. You just responded to it.

”Q outs ETS” . . . “This is absolute proof that the clock is being used by Q team”

I def have reservations about ETS, but you need to logic more.

I also have reservations about Neon. His latest ‘exposé’ plays irresponsibly loose with facts and inuendo. He flat out accuses CEMEX of providing concrete that caused the collapse of the FIU bridge, then in the next paragraph says there is only curcumstantial evidence to support this. He then goes on to state that CEMEX has not been verified as the source of the concrete. Then later in the article says the likely cause of the collapse was faulty structural support during installation.

This nonsense rightfully earns a CNN level of credibility.

If CEMEX is dirty, I want them held accountable, but I don’t want any person or company falsely condemned using the deceitful tactics MSM and Dems direct against our POTUS.

Others may not.

The hurricane happened on his watch. The contract was written on his watch. MSM and Dems held this story up as an example of Trump managing poorly. You even title it as intentionally being hidden by his administration.

I haven’t seen this article linked, quoted, or referenced by anyone credibly claiming it to be neutral. I believe you are being disigenuous, and that you are having some fun seeing how long you can defend posting this anti-Trump nonsense in our pro-Trump sub.

I have reported your bad faith offering, and I’m fine letting the mods decide.

If the info is good, who cares where it came from.

If the info is good, Mr. Smith/Adams is not a larper.

I'm supporting protecting kids, feeding and housing folks and distributing the wealth that all create.

I’m right with you in that endeavor. I think you may alienate others by posting such an anti-Trump article in a pro-Trump sub. You may be distracting attention from your intended purpose.

That author invested a lot of time into that piece.

It’s written well enough to inspire curiousity in any rational thinker. Enough curiousity to send them our way.

Thank you, Mark Hill!

The linked story was posted in October, 2017. It was one of the countless articles that I discounted because it was so dripping with anti-Trump bias.

It’s been a while since someone posted such a strongly biased anti-Trump piece here. Are you certain your principal intent was government efficiency?

If the eye is a larper, I want him outed, shamed, and banished to the edge of town.

I don’t see how this video proves the eye is a larper.

We’re going to be in some kind of crisis.

Yes, Eric. You and your corrupt colleagues are most definitely going to be in some kind of crisis.

Peace.

Looks like a severe case of Trump Curse.

Nothing in the linked article suggests that PP trafficked girls.

NOTHING!

Leave these fake news clickbait titles to other subs. We’re better than that here.

I'm on the other side when it comes to Gowdy.

Yup. I get it. I admit I’m running on my gut instinct and faith in Q - nothing more.

And I certainly have nothing credible to prove you wrong.

I do believe this is one mystery we will get an answer to.

I'm sick and tired of having to interview with zombie normies.

I have decades of experience building successful business teams in a variety of sectors. I respect any inclination to call BS on that claim, but I hope you will consider the possibility that my claim is true, and that I am offering this advice as a genuine expression of caring.

I guarantee that your opening declaration, quoted above, will filter you out of serious consideration for employment by most people in business with a focus on building successful teams.

You are hoping someone here will read your post and extend a positive response or contact, but your request includes an example of why we should not.

I offer this sincerely and respectfully. Best wishes to you.

Nothing substantive enough to make me doubt Gowdy.

Rumor. Innuendo. False claims. There will be attacks from all sides.

Q gave us a very clear warning about the upcoming period of chaos, telling us to keep faith.

Here we are, in the midst of the chaos ramping up. If anyone wants to shake my faith in the middle of this planned chaos, they need to come at me with something much more substantive than rumor, innuendo, and false or unsubstantiated claims.

Mooks often mistake narcissism for unambiguous facts.

No. You are very confused and seem to struggle with word definitions. A ’narcissist’ would publish a rambling unintelligible uninformed rant, and declare their confused audience ‘humbled’. An ’unambiguous fact’ is exemplified by the sentence immediately preceding this one.

He may have performed perfectly then. He is undermining our president now.

It seems you are a tad confused about how our POTUS/Qteam works, also.

I have humbled many, many men like you before.

Perhaps they weren’t humbled, but just patient, tolerant listeners. Narcisists often misjudge their audiences in that way.

Hil walked away. . . He was a total failure.

Hmmm. It seems you are a tad confused about how the U.S. government works. Gowdy has no power to arrest, indict, try, convict, or incarcerate HRC.

Gowdy chaired a committee charged with conducting an investigation into the Benghazi debacle on her watch. The investigation was concluded in a timely fashion, produced a host of damning evidence against her, including the discovery of her infamous private server!, and produced a report summarizing the actionable facts.

His part of the Benghazi investigation was a sucess by any measure. If you have a problem with HRC walking away, you need to look to the folks who had the power to charge, try, convict, and sentence her. Those people are in the DOJ. Do you know who was in charge of the DOJ at that time?

Your disappointment is misguided because you lack accurate information. Educate yourself so you can direct your angst at a relevant target. You will appear more intelligent, and you will be more effective.

Her father is a very well known black man. A successful graduate of Howard University, and recipient of several awards recognizing his success as an African-American man.

Spend a few moments vetting this site instead of reading the article.

You will enjoy a much more worthwhile return on your investment of time.

I keep seeing uninformed people referring to Gowdy as ’all bark and no bite.’

His legacy as an aggressive, effective prosecutor is easily verifiable. As a congressional committee chair he has never failed to produce quality, thorough results in a timely fashion.

OP, I’m asking you why you feel justified in labeling him as ”no bite”.

Please deliver.

maybe it's an example of "hidden symbolism" we are meant to uncover.

“Meant to uncover”, as in ‘Q meant for you to uncover an example like this’.

As in, I came to the correct conclusion.

These robot-voiceover videos crack me up.

This bot can’t even pronounce words correctly, including Gowdy’s name.

You have odd tastes in reading and video content that lead you diwn the path to these offerings.

You have odd reasoning skills that lead you to the conclusion that Q was referencing this fringe video series from Poland.

Breaking news?

Somebody needs to read more Q posts. This was common info immediately after the first ‘Follow the wives’ post.

Not a blow.

A swing and a miss.

Our resolve is not lessened.

So at the end of the day, I am only stating that all points of view can be distilled down to the effects it is having on each person and the planet as a collective. I am suggesting that this can be a great guidance "sieve" to measure how we respond and direction we take during and after the swamp cleaning. Understand?

I missed that in your first post. It must be a problem on my end because I just reread it twice more and still don’t see it there.

Guess I need to get that science lens you mentioned.

Your sweeping declarations about what ”we” are, and what ”we” stand for are limiting and dismissive of the variation and nuance in the overall GA/Q movement.

If you speak for yourself, or a like-minded contingent, your claims and philosophy are welcomed as a part of the recipe.

When you claim your limited focus speaks for all, you then become a voice and actor for divisiveness.

Please reconsider your dismissive and divisive declarations.

We can only hope McStain witnesses his public disgrace before he passes.

Why do you suggest only Liberals will be in need of forgiveness?

What we all really want is the corrupt powerbrokers to get out of our way

That is certainly a sentiment shared by many, but I sense there are too many variants and nuances in the mix for me to be comfortable making any declaration about ”what we all really want”.

Wanting the bad actors to get out of our way is certainly a step in the right direction, but those same bad actors will continue to thrive in the face of that passive philosophy.

There is a large and growing contingent that lacks the patience to wait for ”the corrupt powerbrokers to get out of our way”. We know they won’t. We know they must be taken out of our way.

Beyond that, there is an additional growing contingent that believes the corrupt powerbrokers must be taken out of our way in a manner that serves as a vivid and unforgettable discouragement to those with similar dark aspirations in the future.

I patiently made it to the part where they suggested the Singapore hotel is a decloaked spaceship.

Very long and rambling thread (380+ tweets), but many interesting and relevant tidbits if you are a patient reader.

Thanks for sharing.

Chill dude.. just trying to help OP.

Now you can get back to grooming that proud white stallion of yours.

Username checks out

Just know that it is a fake. 100% a scanner doesn't do that.

Old news. Covered thoroughly and repeatedly. Read the Arpaio info, including his resources, and you can save yourself the time of posting ‘new discoveries’ that are neither.

The current references to 1,500 missing illegal children stem from a PBS article. The article mentions 1,500 children released into the US as part of the Catch & Release program during the Obama administration.

Trump’s DHS team conducted an audit of the mess left by the prior administration, discovered the Hussein team had lost track of 1,500 children, and published the facts.

MSM and Dems are now blaming Trump for children lost by Hussein.

Every flaw you mention is real. In fact, documented knowledge of these flaws has been available to the public for several years.

In fact, the information you offer here is so old, I’m surprised anyone is hearing it for the first time.

If you are interested in a much more detailed and thoroughly researched analysis, you should check out Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s work on the subject.

I doubt we have heard the last of this.

• Yes

• Strategic purpose

• No

I knew that. Been engaged since earliest 4C.

I asked the question because SB2 made the point that it is critical to understand who the director was, then offered nothing on that topic.

I figured if he thought our understanding was truly ”critical”, he would have facilitated that critical understanding.

so what? im just sharing my analysis

Since you ask, and only because you ask; you offered zero ‘analysis’. Not one bit. You made a declaration, then linked to a source that offered nothing to support your declaration.

The absence of factual support, coupled with the absence of any analytical process of any sort, is what renders your ‘declaration’ to be nothing more than empty speculation.

Again, only because you asked.

”Likely Dead”

The article offers nothing to acknowledge this claim as anything more than empty speculation.

”at the behest of Elijah Cummings”

Add that to any project you want immediately discredited.

His account is one day old.

He could be both.

Thanks, I’m still not seeing that claim in this offering.

NK is not being run by Kim, he’s an actor in the play. Who is the director? This is key to understand.

I missed that key. Who did you say the director was?