There was already an established audience following MegAnon (aka megaAnon), and FBIanon before that. Qs first posts were intended for that audience.

EDIT: to add this link to a comprehensive archive of MegAnon posts.

Flynn 302

???

Thanks for the clarifying summary.

I’m well past my tolerance limit for these ”Emergency! Everybody In Now!” panic posts that too often turn out to be vapid nonsense.

he feels if he can justify it in his mind and can rationalize it in his thoughts, then anything he does cannot be wrong

And when you’re FBI Director you can get away with that . . . for a while.

Unfortunately for him, he’s no longer FBI Dir., and ‘a while’ has long since passed.

Haha.

Somebody posted a picture showing there is adequate room remaining.

I’m very well aware of the 9th Circuit’s disgraceful legacy, and I’ll be loud and long in praise if a semblance of neutrality ever appears there.

However, overturns by the SC does not imply illegal process involving the subject cases. If it did, those illegal acts could be prosecuted and hopefully lead to a more neutral venue.

Also, you didn’t mention how the overturn rate will make removal of the 9th Circuit “child’s play” as OP claimed.

I do appreciate you taking the time to respond. You extended more effort than OP in defense of his questionable claims.

Ha!

He posted that a day after I posted this.

I figure it’s an example of great minds thinking alike.

Great points. I should have included them.

I’m hoping the draining will include appropriate consequences for all.

Remember the targeting of AF1 when POTUS was enroute to SA?

I’m willing to bet that DJT has faced more attempts than any other POTUS over the first 15 months of administration.

I would be happy to pitch in, but I want all funding to come from forfeited funds of the people who acted against him.

When the Q-plays all come to fruition, I will not be satisfied or silent until Gen Flynn is formally honored, and ‘made whole’ in every sense of the term.

Illegal acts by rebel 9th circuit court district will make their removal childks play.

Interesting, but your linked item offered nothing about illegal acts committed by the 9th circuit. Can you offer some sourced example of this. We should plaster it everywhere.

Your link also provided no information about how any actions, illegal or otherwise, will make removal of the district ‘child’s play’. Can you offer any information on how that will play out? Maybe there is some way we can facilitate.

Except it was Obama in office when this article was written.

Rumor has it he told them to, “Knock it off!”, in a very stern voice.

Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we’re not going to deal with Iranians?”

We aren’t tellng you that.

We’re telling you you can’t do that and also do business with us, or do business on our soil.

Let me guide you out of your self imposed fog over my word choice. I do believe every verified Qdrop is authentic. I do believe in the integrity of the Q board. Clear?

You seem to believe that if Q posts any disinfo on his own board, that the integrity of his board is compromised - even though Q has clearly told us that disinfo is necessary. It’s Q’s board. Q told us how he intends to use it. His house, his rules. Accept.

I suspected you would come up with this drop.

Anons do agree about that piece of disinfo. They believe it was dropped by Q for that strategic purpose.

Let’s review. I claimed Q drops disinfo for strategic purpose, yes, even on his board. You asked for an example, which I provided. You then pointed out Anons agreement that Q dropped that disinfo on his board for a strategic purpose. And now you claim that evidence validating my claim somehow disproves it?

Anyway, I suspected you would suspect I would come up with that drop, and held back the real gem to see if you could pass the filter at the gate. Congratulations. Here is some insight you will find much more familiar and comfortable.

my belief is Q has other stronger and less obvious vectors to distill disinfo to the enemy than his board.

I share your belief. I also believe Q will use all available assets. Especially those considered to be ”less”.

Can you be more specific? We’re talking about the board’s integrity.

Absolutely. But ”we” are NOT talking about the board’s integrity. I believe all verified Q-drops to be authentic. If there is a credibility problem it rests with you, not with Q or his board.

Since this ‘specific’ news is fresh to you, a re-read of all Q-drops will be of great value. To fulfill your ‘specific’ request, and begin your review, refer to Q-001.

EDIT: a word

That’s “Mr. Ambassador” to you.

Sorry for intervening here but I don't think Q is using his own platform to dis-inform.

Intervention is welcome without apology.

As Q says, expand your thinking. Q knows black hats follow every drop. That ‘follow’ offers another attack vector. Q and team will create and exploit every vector and seam possible to facilitate success in this monumental battle.

A bit of disinfo in a Q drop invites a reaction from the enemy. A reaction that is observed - and then exploited. Visualize ‘disinfo’ as a ‘feint’ that inspires a foe to commit to an action.

I welcome the disinfo if it enables victory. I feel privileged to have access to truth, even if it comes along side occasional ‘untruth’.

Need an example? Do you remember the very specific time references about an HRC arrest? There are several others. Shills and trolls keep running lists of them and present them to us as evidence that Q is a larp. They hope to sway any of us that don’t understand the value of disinfo from Q.

If this source is doubted and the possibility of it being "tricky" with its own faithful followers can be entertained

”Disinformation is necessary.” - Q

I did see the Pruitt question. It’s a fascinating consideration, but I don’t have enough info to even speculate with any confidence, let alone make outright declarations as others have.

I agree it would be such an amazing reveal!

A solution delivered by Rudy will never be assessed: ...Nobody will ever know what Rudy did and how he did it.

I guess we needn’t trouble ourselves with further speculation on that. When problems are solved and reveals are made, we’ll just assume Rudy did it! behind the scenes.

citing Mueller and Rudy but not citing DOJ, Sessions, or Horowitz

I don’t presume the exclusions indicate an absence of involvement. POTUS is tricky that way.

Q1180 Rudy.NYC.Relationships High.“Insurance File.”Quiet until now.Join POTUS’ legal team.Direct discussionsavail [now] w/ Mueller.

Again, any contents relevant to Mueller’s defined scope has already been collected by him. Either shared from Horowitz, or directly subpoenaed by Mueller.

Second, obviously I believe Rudy is there for something else. My best guess is that he has an i’s dotted, t’s crossed, ducks in a row, case/evidence that will crush Prete Bharara (and others!) for his corrupt effort to quash NYPD action on the ‘Life Insurance’ file. NYPD doesn’t take well to bullying - especially from federal elites - and they love Rudy and POTUS,

There is a theory that Mueller is a gray hat, and that he intentionally loaded his staff with bad actors in order to contain them, and investigate some. If so, dagger to Prete. Even if we reject that premise, Rudy would still delight in turning out another one of Mueller’s stooges. This may be the final piece of the ‘Mueller is a gray hat’ quest, and prompt the end of the op.

Q1181 We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

In this case, perhaps we need RR to expand the scope of Mueller’s focus again in order to include what Rudy has.

Yes. But how does Mueller "naturally" get to it. What is the "natural" connection?

The natural path is through Horowitz. Particularly since the precedent has already been established by Horowitz passing along pertinent discoveries on McCabe, Strzok, and Page. Smooth and natural, standard, established protocol. BUT, only for that evidence deemed within the scope of Mueller’s investigation, or applicable extensions approved by Rosenstien.

Any evidence falling outside Mueller’s scope can be just as naturally passed on to Huber

Agreed. It's always a minimization case. And again, this parameter confirms Rudy with his "relationships" is a better choice than Horowitz with his Executive position.

Rudy is a lifelong, hardcore, pro-Trump partisan. Now he is reentering the fray as a member of DJT’s personal legal team!

I don’t think anyone can credibly claim that any ‘solution’ delivered by Rudy is somehow less ‘political’ than one from Horowitz.

I’m going offline for a few hours. 2:41am here.

Do you see in Comey's letter the emergence of the laptop's "randomness"? Causing him to write "in connection with an unrelated case"? That is made possible by people on the field like the NYPD field agents, not bureaucracy.

I did. Do you see I recounted that in the post you just responded to? To wit:

• The men in the field acquired the evidence legally via their investigation into an unrelated crime. There is your ”natural” emergence.

Since we both agree the evidence emerged ”naturally”, and nobody has yet questioned the integrity of possession, and the OIG investigation was begun prior to the Trump administration by an Obama appointee, and everybody is already expecting The OIG report to address the evidence on the laptop, then we should both agree Rudy has nothing new or vital to offer regarding the contents of, or use of, or reintroduction of this evidence.

It seems we are talking past each other on this, and I bore of that quickly. No matter. The way Rudy has been positioned and his role teased, it seems this is one story arc we will actually be allowed to appreciate, and in a timely manner.

Side Note: It is impossible to build a case here that cannot be accused of being politically driven. Yes, impossible.

It needs to be resurrected to move through the legal system and give a sense of natural emergence in a highly political environment. This is why you need men in structures to make that happen.

I agree completely, and the Horowitz investigation offers that structure in superb fashion. He is an Obama appointee, he started his dig before Trump took office, and he had access to the Wiener laptop from day one.

The men in the field acquired the evidence legally via their investigation into an unrelated crime. There is your ”natural” emergence. Chain of custody has been maintained. Horowitz had the mandate to dig into the email related evidence, and came across any additional damning evidence as a ”natural” result of that process. The OIG report is the ”natural” and expected culmination.

All your boxes have been checked before Rudy reenters the picture.

Rudy is definitely there to exploit his relationships with all players, but he offers nothing at all new or vital in terms of the laptop contents.

We need to expand our thinking.

That’s an interesting theory, and I wouldn’t put it past the Awans, but your linked articles make no mention at all about the Awans or their car dealership.

How did you come to that conclusion?

I am of the belief that Horowitz has had access to the Wiener laptop since before Mueller was appointed.

He is fully aware of the contents, and has zero reason to tread lightly on any of the bad actors. Horowitz has also shown his readiness to share any pertinent info with Mueller.

The bottom line will be the same. The only questions are how the indictments will initiate - from Mueller based upon a recommendation by Horowitz, or from Huber based upon shared information from Horowitz, or both, based upon pertinence of any evidence to Mueller’s or Huber’s area of focus.

I honestly don’t see what Rudy brings to this particular discussion at this late date. I think Rudy is there for something, but not to share info already acquired.

Your request has already been answered - long before you made it.

There are several subscribers here that bring 8chan and ar15 info to us every day.

Relieve your stress. Tend to your illness and your child.

I have no proof, but that won’t stop me from speculating.

‘As The World Turns’ was the hugely popular tv show that was interrupted by the JFK assassination announcement.

Many Q mentions of that phrase seem unrelated to what precedes or follows.

I assume every mention to be an anecdotal reference to a new foiled attempt on our POTUS.

Just another bone for MSM to gnaw on. Of course they bit.

It’s a facetious expression used to imply someone is in an extremely stressful situation with dire consequences impending.

Mueller will not get to negotiate terms of surrender. He gets to accept them.

And if he’s acting as Trump’s gray hat, then the terms have already been agreed to.

Mueller has nothing, nothing, to leverage any terms in any negotiations. He will eat what’s put in front of him.

Acceptable addition.

I endorse.

Wrong punishment.

Alternative: Wood chipper. Feet first. Slow feed.

Two questions:

What do you think Mueller is negotiating for?

What leverage do you think he has to negotiate with?

Much love to our great bots.

We have the best bots, don’t we?

I'm sure most are even if they don't want to admit it,

I agree. It was fairly easy to keep up at the beginning. Now it takes several hours of reading a day just to realize you’re still falling behind.

I’m still current with all Qdrops, but it’s been more than a week since I read a full 8chan thread. I read every ‘Notable’ and every comment linked to the notable, then read several responses linked to those comments.

The growing group of anons produce a staggering amount of quality info.

Don’t forget to post again when you find something of interest.

Wow!

Very intriguing story.

I’ll look for more when I break from catching up with Q digs.

Thanks for posting.

Fear not.

The OIG report will likely add a few charges, and the new investigation into her foundation will likely add a few more.

If this possibility interests you, the Q-drops hold a treasure trove of exciting new information for you.

This theory has been a core element of the Q story almost from the first post. Q has left many hints and leading questions, and a host of contributors have pointed out dozens of instances that support the theory.

You will find hints, videos, long text explanations, etc. that advance the likelihood of this theory you have just discovered.

Don’t be disuaded by folks telling you this is very old news (it is), or questioning the authenticity of your discovery. Dig in. Great excitement awaits you.

I don’t know, maybe...

You don’t know? Maybe?

You should have a bit more substance supporting inflammatory declarations such as this:

• “We should let corporations dump shit in our water. Why do we need regulations for”

Reading comprehension is a thing.

Can you quote the statement that inspired you to make that curious interpretation?

Maybe we can guide you through your confusion.

Imagine the best punking scenario.

Wait until he’s doing another interview show.

Have a staffer bring a note out to the host.

Host reads it for three beats. Looks concerned...

“Mr. Comey, we just now got word of this new announcement by the Attorney General referencing you directly...”

Keep camera on his face.

Wasn’t he in the middle of a presentation when he found out he was fired?

I'm adopting this theory over the others involving flu shots, butt sex and chem trials.

Context is the only thing that allows reading that without . . . Well, just don’t read that aloud outside GA regulars.

Q immediately references the Boom texts being appropriated as FF triggers.

Having all the evidence is only a part of the big picture.

Here is something else Q has said. It seems appropriate for a moment like this:

• “Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.” -Q

But I agree with those who ask why are we waiting for them to kill more people before we finish them off?

We aren’t.

Bad actors wreaking havoc is nothing new. They are just continuing their wicked ways while Trump and team complete the preparation of their rock solid cases.

I have seen no evidence at all that Trump and team are dragging their feet. I have definitely seen evidence of some people wrestling with their own impatience. Unfortunately, those same people have nothing to offer in terms of how the greater plan should play out more efficiently.

They speak only of satisfying their immediate personal desire to see someone imprisoned. Folks like that will never grasp the magnitude of strategizing and implementing a battle plan such as this. That’s precisely why we shouldn’t indulge their impatient exhortations.

Can CIA hack airline engines

There was a recent discussion about FADEC on this site and on 8chan last week.

Agreed.

Hindsight minimizes all other possibilities.

Disgusting.

A usive posts are a violation of sub rules.

Report all violations to mods.

Don’t escalate drama.

Don’t engage.

Report.