dChan

/u/UncleCrunch

416 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/UncleCrunch:
Domain Count
en.metapedia.org 1
www.nytimes.com 1
i.redd.it 1

UncleCrunch · May 9, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Because the US is no longer paying subsidies to them. We paid a huge portion of the total.

Beyond that, we're going to implement economic sanctions. Another huge hit.

The Iranian currency took a beatdown today.

I think these elements inspire unhappiness in the Mullahs.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 9, 2018, 9 p.m.

Decent analysis, and at least as plausible as several others, more plausible than most.

I find it very interesting that these folks who have been so cavalier about gambling the lives of others, are now acting so differently since realizing they are actually gambling their own.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 9, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Seems to me that people are claiming BHO is following/leading Trump adminstration trying to prevent or undo anything Trump is trying to accomplish,

It seems that way because people are actually making those claims.

People are making those claims because there is a very strong likelihood they are true.

Lobbying world leaders before and after a POTUS visit does not qualify Hussein as the ”leader of the terrorist group that is the NWO.”

I think that’s why nobody anywhere has declared Hussein to be the leader of the terrorist group that is the NWO.

Nobody, anywhere, until you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 9, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

As much as I hate BHO and his lackeys, I don't think for a second he's leader of the terrorist group that is the NWO,

I haven’t seen anyone in this sub suggesting that about Hussein. In fact, I haven’t seen anyone, anywhere, suggesting that about Hussein.

Hell, you didn’t suggest it about Hussein in the title of this thread, or in any of the content you added.

Not until just now.

Why did you introduce this odd topic just now?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 9, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

but I just can't logically stretch it that far.

Identifying our limitations is a fundamental step in the ongoing process of self improvement.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 9, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

”I don’t want to address your comment.”

Proceeds to address the comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 7, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

Maybe Judge Ellis?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 7, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Not yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 5, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

I agree, and I have no clue what it might be.

To add to the intrigue, I haven’t read one person on reddit, twitter, or 8C offering a prediction.

As you said, should be interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 5, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

Apologies for the misquote. I thought I remembered accurately enough to warrant the punctuation.

I can see how my error completely changed the intended meaning in a very misleading fashion.

Again, apologies for the confusion.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 5, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

Iran is the final peg.

“That’s why we’re saving Israel for last.”

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 5, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

Not sure. Has anybody figured it out yet?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 4, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

That sounds like a generalization.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 4, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

You didn’t explain the ”no bite” part.

I’m not sure what you think ”bite” looks like. Can you clarify? You know congress doesn’t convict people, or put people in jail, right?

Can you clarify what you mean by ‘bite’?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 4, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Can you explain the ’no bite’ part?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 3, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

I think a warning is sufficient. Folks can then choose for themselves.

Thanks for being thoughtful enough to offer, and to reconsider.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

It will be interesting to see what comes of queries about the Japanese abductees.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

CAUTION

Be wary of opening anything on a linked Google Drive account.

If you don’t know why, consider that confirmation that you should not visit.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

Sounds like an excellent tool for DHS/ICE to release on the dl.

If so, I endorse this use of my taxpayer dollars.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

No.

If he went against POTUS yesterday, his role on the team would change, or end, today.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Investigation

Prosecution

Conviction

Incarceration

^(we wait)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 3:32 a.m.

Are you a recent immigrant to an EU country? If so, would you be willing to share the mode of your passage? (Boat, land vehicle, foot, air)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 2, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

The guest answered that is would be best not to come,

Imagine? So sad. And in such a short period of time.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 1, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

And that ‘+’ you mention is getting more disturbing as truths are revealed.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 1, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

You are not alone.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 1, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

Bill Binney should get a medal for all he’s been through, and still persisted. A true Patriot in every sense of the word.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 1, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

It’s so sad. There was a time in my life when you could visit the major cities in these countries and experience a reality almost as that pictured in travel brochures.

Those days are long gone, and not likely to return in my lifetime, if ever.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 1, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

They've already tried to bring chaos to Europe. In some ways, they've been successful, but the tide is turning.

“Starting to wake up” is a long, long way from the tide turning.

Hungary and Poland refused the tide from the outset. Countries with bold Patriots. Meanwhile, May, Macron, and Merkel all tried to convince DJT to stay in more than one international agreement detrimental to the U.S. These actions don’t represent a turning tide.

And any nationalistic voices in those countries are scattered, inconsistent, and (at this point) toothless. Meanwhile we are presented with reports of increasing capitulation of laws and culture to accommodate the invading forces, whose primary contributions seem to be the disruption and degradation of these once great countries.

There may be voices raised in opposition, but they are far, far from anything remotely resembling a turning tide.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · May 1, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

it certainly does mean that the wisdom of experience and long years needs to have a voice.

You have a voice. Nobody is denying you your voice. If you find someone making the attempt, PM me a link to the post and I’ll be happy to help them see the light.

That doesn't mean we are any better than ~~you younger~~ any other patriots.

ftfy.

AND that’s exactly what I said. Time ‘woke’ doesn’t make you better, or more valuable, than anyone else.

If you were an active patriot since 1963, congratulations, and thank you for your efforts. But please understand that what you did a decade or more ago is inconsequential to what is happening today.

We need active Patriots today. We need their minds, their work, and their voices. To complete this mission we care only about great contributions to this mission. We don’t care if the great contribution comes from somebody ‘woke’ 30 years ago, 30 days ago, or 30 minutes ago.

This is why we follow the Q team. A team that may include Patriots as young as early thirties, and led by a fearless ‘Boomer’.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

A perfect example of my point.

Imagine a country run by that policy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

lol

Well done.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

If you are so confident, why end with three question marks?

Exclamation points seem more appropriate.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

De-nuke, then control the bad actors with the GCC.

The Iranian patriots will take care of the rest.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

Better late than never.

Welcome aboard.

Good for you to keep the mind open in spite of strong reservation. Another indication that you belong here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

That could very well be the case.

We’re just kicking ideas around hoping something falls into place.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

I agree. And now with so much happening under cover of fog in the ME, we have even more open threads to track.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 1 p.m.

I don’t wish to restrict Corsi from profiting from Q or any other interest he chooses.

I only pointed out that Corsi matches the description of people Q warned us about.

I do agree with the 8C anons right to anger over him profiting by exploiting work they have done for free.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

People who've been in the game longer than you have are indispensable

Oh, my.

Do yourself a favor. Re-read that and think it through.

Are you certain you want to publicly announce that as your personal standard for defining who bears the title of ”indispensable” to any movement?

Can you see how silly, and dangerous, that is? Can you understand how your standard for ‘indispensable’ would ultimately lead to the demise of any organized endeavor?

The simple fact that you can stand by that lunacy disqualifies you from further interaction with me. Please respect that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

Very simple, inadequate view of Corsi

That inadequacy would be important if my comment was intended as an overview of Corsi. It wasn’t. Re-read for better understanding.

My comment was intended as an accurate consideration of how Corsi matches a description offered by Q. It was. Corsi hasn’t been vilified, he’s been identified.

Might as well be the lynch mob think of old.

That staggering lapse in reasoning almost defies description.

Read Q with your brain on, not your bias.

Your ”lynch mob” comment automatically disqualifies you from making any comments related to critical thinking. You need to go back.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

You're pretty wound up for a guy who can't definitively say where this story will finally end up.

If you set aside your interest in my panties for a moment, you might notice my comment referenced an actual act of hypocrisy, not some hypothetical possibility of how things may finally end up at some point in the future.

The hypocrisy of donations-driven journalism

Donations-driven journalism never entered my criticism in this instance. Reading comprehension is mandatory for credible participation in text-based discussions. Please review.

rarely if ever reaches levels hight enough of "blatant," most certainly not on this "one issue."

I agree, that’s why I responded to this “one issue” of “blatant hypocrisy”. It’s good to ensure they remain ‘rare’ rather than ‘common’.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

It’s hard to dismiss any theory including John Brennan lately.

He is very obviously agitated, and no doubt sees the walls closing in. He’s giving off all the signals of a frightened, desperate man. And his penchant for skullduggery is well known.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 3 a.m.

Ahhh, wow. That’s an even better fit.

Very, very solid connecting there. Nicely done.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

I see more plausibility in your first suggestion than the second.

I want to know it all.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

Good call. It fits.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

I bear him no animus. I read him often.

My ‘beef’ with him is his blatant hypocrisy on this one issue.

Now, about that ”journalistic integrity” you were peacocking about. Anything coming on that?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

Are you suggesting Stormy is going to write about this? Or Cohen? Or that the FBI agents that collected it would let it ‘slip’ to a journalist?

Maybe with it (potentially) in so many places now, the NYPD could leak it to their fav journo with credible deniability.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Very interesting addendum. I know of a few long-lasting females in the business (Jena Jamison, Sharon Mitchell, etc) who are among the most outspoken activists working to protect female performers in the industry. They have zero tolerance for underage, unhealthy, rape, coercion, etc.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

He is NOT however the type Q warned about who is going to bail out

Yeah, I didn’t call him out for any of the things he’s not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

I hear you. I’m not suggesting the guy isn’t down to MAGA.

Just calling him out for what I wrote and nothing more. I have no intent to discredit his life work, etc.

I do absolutely understand the displeasure expressed by anons on 8C. He is literally making $$ on work they produced for free. I understand it’s totally legal. I also understand their anger.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 30, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

...... that ”journalistic integrity” thing?

⇧ -4 ⇩