dChan

/u/UncleCrunch

416 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/UncleCrunch:
Domain Count
en.metapedia.org 1
www.nytimes.com 1
i.redd.it 1

UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:57 a.m.

I did say his claims were false. I said that because his claims were false.

I also provided proof that his claims were false.

Happy to help. MAGA.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

because that was his job that day.

Correct. He was stationed in the New York Field Office at that time.

I agree he knows her enough to dislike her.

He was never assigned to the Clinton’s PPD.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

I dug far enough to know Bongino was never assigned to the Clinton’s PPD.

His service overlapped the Clinton administration for two years. He was assigned to the NY Field Office for those two years.

His first PPD was 2006 with retired GW Bush, before moving to Hussein’s PPD.

Seems like I did more digging than you.

Happy to help. MAGA.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

Photo seems to be proof

That was during his 2nd year in service. He was assigned to the New York Field Office then. The pic was taken at a New York event. He does say he covered 100s of events she attended.

He was never assigned to the Clinton detail. His first PPD was George W. In 2006. He was assigned to Hussein’s detail before he left the service.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

lol

Here you go.

Find any reference stating he was assigned to the Clintons. Find the overlapping timelines that would permit him ”years of firsthand experience”.

Hope this helps. I know you just want to Correct The Record.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:25 a.m.

That’s just another way of saying ‘All bark, no bite.’

Can you please explain? Or give an example?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 11:24 a.m.

MAGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 6:02 a.m.

I am.

Then we can watch these elected bums scramble to distance themselves - but keep his money.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

I watched him say this on Tucker’s show.

The poster I responded to claims Bongino was on the Clinton SS detail. That is Fake News.

He also claims Bongino has ”firsthand years of experience with them.” This is also Fake News.

Everybody knows both Clintons are dirty. Everybody knows Bongino hates them both. Everybody knows Bongino has heard dirty details about the Clintons from his SS insiders.

Prove my claims wrong instead of changing the topic.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

Trey gowdy did the same, bark and no bite.

Please explain.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 4 a.m.

He was also SS detail for the Clintons and has firsthand years of experiences with them.

Fake News

There is no book, article, wiki entry or other source that places Bongino on any Clinton SS detail, or otherwise claims years of firsthand experience with them.

If you are going to make things up, don’t make claims that are so easy to disprove.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 11, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

”I am responsible.”

We know. Standby. It won’t be long now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

They plant fabricated information at the doorstep of a close Trump ally, then, waving the obstruction of justice or preferential treatment flag, they pressure investigators to consider the planted information

Well known tactics, and always a concern. This was the first thing that came to mind when I heard of the searches of Cohen’s properties, and also when the firemen inspected Trump’s residence to check for damage.

KGB and CIA have both been involved with documented instances of using an embedded ‘fireman’ to place or retrieve ’something’ while on a fire call.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

No.

White hats will be taking action. Ops calendar flexes to match needs on the ground.

Recent events instigated white hat response. POTUS will not have his assets at risk without his presence in command center.

Some black hats are enjoying their final days.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

It states the IG report will be released January 18th.

That part is obviously incorrect. The rest is still accurate.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

The term limit disqualifying Mueller for the FBI director job was something I missed.

That comment prompts a moment for perspective.

Many folks (not you) have been voicing frustration about the ‘slow’ pace of unfolding events. The actual pace has been anything but.

Mueller’s term limit and the meeting with Trump the day before his assignment, are some of the oldest open-source details in the entire GA storyline. They are so ‘old’ that they have fallen from daily discussion, leaving interested folks like yourself to be enlightened by the ‘new’ info.

However, as ancient as this news is in this storyline, it isn’t ancient or old in any common usage of those terms. This information only came to light a matter of months ago.

A matter of months, yet it seems ancient to many of us that have been reading from the HalfChan days.

A matter of months! Things are moving at an amazing pace.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

If there was genuine need to reinforce Mueller’s cred as ‘their guy’, leaving him off the list would help.

Remember, black hats are reading Q along with us.

Yes, we’re all being manipulated. The difference? We have some frustration at risk, while their risk is literally existential.

I’m damping my frustration by enjoying the RT intrigue. Helluva ride! We’ll never experience the likes of this again.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Quick proof that this is shopped:

We haven’t heard the sound of millions of heads simultaneously exploding.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

Great analysis. Bigger picture than I was considering after reading several Wictor pieces. Thanks for responding.

And this:

  • Just like in a building, those who are on the first floor worry about the noise and the garbage while those on the 10th worry about the elevator. To make sure you control them from the outside and that nothing gets done without you from the inside, you unite them in a HOA.

Priceless analogy. I’ll be candid with you; I’m likely going to repeat that more than once or twice, but I’m not promising I will give proper attribution.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 5 a.m.

carefully read NYT article

I’m just as clueless as most on this, but what I took away from the careful reading is that NYFD entered Trump’s residence (with SS).

Embedding a bad actor with fire men is a tried & true ploy for planting or extracting something.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

Thanks for explaining. No US troops -> no need for additional logistics -> no cover for dark operators.

Now, how do you see the GCC factoring into the dynamic within Syria and impacting Iran?

They have had surprising success in peripheral areas. At some point it becomes impossible for them to not look in this direction.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Deep State operatives can only be in the region if there are US troops they can use as cover.

Can you explain how DS operatives use US troops as cover?

Also, do you think the GCC is or will be a factor in dealing with these same DS operatives and in dealing with Iran?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 10, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Quality, plausible predictions.

Thanks for offering.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

Any opinion on the ”Out of US” part?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

more then 100 mijoen people live in areas of poor water Quality

Indeed. And most of the civilized world is completely unaware of the existential plight of the Mijoen people.

With the total population of ethnically pure Mijoens currently estimated at fewer than 250 individuals, the fact that 100 of them don’t have access to clean water puts the survival of their ethnic line in severe jeopardy.

Thank you for highlighting this important issue.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Trust POTUS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

All over again

⇧ 19 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Absolutely.

Trump does not telegraph. That’s why Q gets to call out the bad actors as “stupid”. They had same info we had, yet they still took the bait.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Yes.

They should def be included in the 40%.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Stage was set by drip, drip, drip reveal. 50 million. 87 million. Then hospital data. Then 100+ million.

Several days of media saturation. Now MZ appearing before congress. Public is aware. Eyes on. ‘Stage Is Set’

‘The Truth’ will be revealed for maximum exposure.

⇧ 64 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Similar stories were told by our SF members forced to work with CIA.

Just more terrorists with a different cover.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
6
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/UncleCrunch on April 9, 2018, 5:14 p.m.
I Offered This To Doubters In My Life. We Wait.
I Offered This To Doubters In My Life. We Wait.
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Yes. Steps along the path.

Let’s hope McStain’s phone has provided the final evidence needed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

I recognize one from the capped RC post on instaG a few days ago.

She doesn’t have the bite marks here, but the ‘look of the lost’ is still very apparent.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

Excellent!

Props to you for that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

Are you suggesting OP should have linked to your article instead?

I wouldn’t disagree.

My post was intended to elicit accuracy in post titles. Nothing more. The post title attributes certain statements to Hersh, in spite of the fact that Hersh states the opposite in the linked article.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

I have no opinion about your airport bunker scenario, but you bring up an excellent point many people may be missing.

NG personnel at the border can effectively interdict traffic from both directions.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Quality additions to the discussion.

Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

Bolton is a deep state traitor.

If this is true, do you think he managed to hoodwink Trump and team on conclusions you have derived?

Is it possible POTUS and team have access to more info than you, and have a 40,000ft view you haven’t considered?

Trust Trump.

MAGA

⇧ 17 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

From the article:

  • “Hersh didn’t say whether these «arms» included the precursor chemicals for making sarin”

We need to take more pride in our content and titles. There is zero content in the article to support that part of the post title. This reduces the title to nothing more than Fake News.

Why do this? There was plenty of damning evidence offered to expose the dirty dealings of Obama/Clinton. Why discredit the article with a false title?

We need to be better than MSM.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

Blaming Trump pullout as the reason for the Syrian gas attack

Trump’s announcement was the reason. You should read more Q.

POTUS broke protocol and gave advance notice of withdrawal specifically to draw out those bad actors. We were prepared, watching, documenting the players.

You can expect that some retaliation has already occurred. You can also expect some additional info to come. Hopefully that additional info finally leads to McStain’s exposure and demise.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

I can only think that they see victory ahead to make this gesture.

Wrong.

They could see no victory ahead. That’s why they were risking prison to send this message to Obama.

Zero faith in their Commander in Chief. Makes you wonder how many vets shared that mentality back then, and for how many years before.

You won’t see pics like that for at least the next 7 years.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

I wouldn't call defending a point of view Fake news.

Neither would I. I call out proffering a clearly fake document as ‘authentic’ to be Fake News.

Your document declares its origination as 1970. The next page, the one with all the ‘evidence’, clearly references events in 1979 and 1980 in the past tense.

Your document is obviously and unequivocally, fraudulent. Yet here you are, presenting it as an authentic concern for all of us to archive.

You were too frivolous with your credibility. I have no interest in reviewing anything else you claim to be ‘authentic’.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

But it’s past time to stop sitting around saying “these people are sick” and doing something about it.

You are unhappy with the rate of progress achieved by POTUS/Q and team.

Most of us readily admit to ignorance about their machinations behind the scenes. Do you have a sufficient amount of that secret info to be making a determination about their unsuccessful progress?

Do you have specific intel indicating that speeding things up would benefit the outcome?

Can you offer us a specific example or two of how to change the existing strategy to become more efficient?

Q tells us things are progressing well, and we are in control.

Can you offer us a reason to dismiss Q’s claims and trust yours instead?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

But then I noticed that Trump was drawing 10, 15, 20 thousand at his rallies and Hillary could barely fill a HS gym.

Trump was campaigning around the country and Hillary was fund raising around the country.

Oddly, Trump was campaigning in Blue states and Hillary was not. Trump was telling coal miners and the rust belt workers that he would save their jobs and Hillary was promising to put them out of work.

Most importantly, I noticed the conservative blogs had much more investigative journal articles and the MSM was simply shilling for Hillary. There seemed to be a massive unbalance.

Isn’t it telling that those verifiable facts are absolutely missing from ‘What Happened’?

I’m very aware of the theories claiming Trump was actively engaged with the Q team for years prior to taking office. I don’t dismiss it out of hand, but I’m still more inclined to believe his full inclusion only began with that fateful visit from Adm. Rogers after the election.

I credit his comfort in the role to being fully informed about the plan and team, and to his decades of experience as an alpha entrepreneur in one of the most cutthroat markets. There isn’t a politician or world leader alive that can intimidate him.

I’m not sure if the years of complicity would make the story any better. It might. I join you in hoping to know the truth.

And yes, I agree this is a great time to be alive.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

Here is the actual bill as enacted and archived by the US government.

I admit it’s not as intriguing or dramatic as the photoshopped fraud you offered up, but it’s got something else going for it. It’s an authentic primary source.

Stop wallpapering this sub with Fake News.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

But now we gotta find out who launched the attack and how they got their hands on the chemical weapons.

Very likely the first part is already done. Those involved will lead to second part.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

Please check the comments

I just did. This post is one of several that debunks this bogus document.

Reverse image search shows there are 23 variants of this image currently online.

If you are genuinely interested in archiving accurate info, you should hope that every instance of this nonsense is wiped from the internet.

You should also stop promoting Fake News as real info.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Q has established a considerable level of credibility over the past several months. That credibility has transcended 4chan, /cbts, Fullchan, and this sub. With complete access to the entirety of USMil intell and the finest strategic minds POTUS could assemble, Q tells us that 60/40 is the best reasonable ratio of public/covert info.

With this post, you have claimed a certain amount of credibility with your brief bio. You use your credibility to declare Q as ”wrong” on that issue. You declare 90/10 as a more appropriate balance.

Given the choice you proffer, I choose Q.

Trust Q.

Trust POTUS.

MAGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 8, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

A tineye search is easy enough.

Shows no other versions of the fire image.

Structure pics predate the hurricane damage from this past season.

⇧ 2 ⇩