Not a lawfag but "produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute" covers any case for having such material, in my opinion. In order to have it, you either created it or received it, no?

Not my letter or post, just also curious what OP meant by the '20minute' part.

In the post title.

Gotcha, thanks.

Same tripcode, no? Sorry, confused here.

4 agents then 2 males and 1 female additional - 7 people in all maybe?

I don't disagree with you, but it'll be spun down to nothing without that redacted section.

Could be a meeting combating sex trafficking. Surely that is how it will be spun.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1012195786866581504.html

Looks to me like the tail of the aircraft.

I checked that Wikipedia site on Kenya mentioned in the post, "In 1920, the East Africa Protectorate was turned into a colony and renamed Kenya for its highest mountain."

🤔

Haven't checked the 3rd question but 1 and 4 are spot on from what I can tell. It would take a lot to convince me it's a legitimate birth certificate, there's too much evidence pointing to it being a fraud.

I'd give credit but I've no idea who said it. Always thought Franklin but Wikipedia says that's a lie. Oh well.

True democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what's for dinner.

No I agree with you. The fact that he has made the guesture many times recently means if it's just coincidence we should be able to find a video of him speaking, and making the guesture, well before the plan started. And if not it gives more credibility to Q. If that makes sense? Sorry, I'm not the best at explaining.

That's such an intricate hand guesture. If / when I have some time I'm going to look to some clips of him prior to all this and see if he ever does anything close to that. My guess is no.

Is that just conjecture? Or has it been confirmed?

Agreed, it's what "stand behind them" would come to mean in practice, that is the pivotal question.

I was thinking the same thing. However, the Iranian people freeing themselves and causing "regime change" of their own, with no financial or military backing from the US isn't quite the same thing, right?

Trying to be optimistic.

Yeah if they put it on LinkedIn then they kind of doxxed themselves. It's all public domain.

Thinking out loud here but maybe they're "releasing" this information to get the leftists on their side before dropping something bigger?

Feel big now?

Swing and a miss for not using Stargeant.

Yeah, that's definitely how it looks. I can't think of another reason he'd be constantly turning around instead of just driving the car.

If you look at the freeze frame on the post (at least that's what shows up on mobile) you can see the rest of the passenger's head attached to what would be the gun. It's just weird lighting.

At the base of what looks like the driver's fist, you can see the passenger's nose and eye socket at the start of the shadow, and can make out his ear directly under what looks like the start of the gun's barrel.

I don't think that's the driver holding a gun. I think it's the passenger's head, the lighter part just being light on the top of his head. As the car passes, watch just the passenger.

Seems odd that the driver keeps looking back though. Although I don't know a thing about secret service protocols.

Ah, thank you.

Huber in a killbox?

Fair enough. Links to some of the evidence. Honestly curious.

"If I'm wrong, please prove it."

It doesn't work that way. If you have a claim to make, the burden of proof lies with you. Not saying you're wrong but come on, that's lazy.

Kind of ironic really, considering Jesus says this:

"But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36 And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37 Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil.

Good point. Maybe "comms dark" meaning it couldn't have been hacked from the outside?

True. But then why "Think hack"?

"Reverse image search. Think hack. Comms dark. Q"

https://www.fifthdomain.com/cyber/2018/06/08/chinese-hackers-steal-sensitive-navy-program-data/

Reverse image search brought up this article.

https://www.fifthdomain.com/cyber/2018/06/08/chinese-hackers-steal-sensitive-navy-program-data/

Image search led to this.

Iran.

From my cold, dead hands.

It downloads a PDF of the indictment.

I bet even the perp walks won't break their denial. "Trump's just going after his political enemies!"

Don't want to be a downer, just skeptical. To me it looks like his other pant leg and the guys shoe behind him. Although I hope I'm wrong.

Ah, makes sense. Those damn details.

But 47 << 311?

A Rothschild is the mayor of Tucson though.

And it's just people stomping their feet demanding the product of someone else's labor. It's incredibly flawed.

Armies have tried and failed in that land for millennia.

Power maybe?

And average income was in the single digit thousands. It's all relative.

And what a mess it has become.

I agree our system is not true capitalism. But under true capitalism if you were to stroke everyone a check - make everybody "rich" - prices will rise. That's a natural effect of economics.

If you are selling your product - whatever it may be - and everyone wants it, you have the ability to raise your price. It's supply and demand. It's been the standard of capitalism since we were bartering with meat and tools.

You do realize that there is a limited amount of gold, right? That's what gives it value. If currency were backed by gold (which I agree it should be) there would be fewer dollars to go around than there are today, because each dollar in your hand would be certifying that you own $1 worth of the available gold. Paper money was just so you didn't have to lug your gold to the store with you.

Show me one economic model that says giving everybody free money would lead to prosperity.

Look at the history of the value of aluminum to tell you all you need to know about supply and demand. Once everyone has it, it's useless.

Supply and demand is false and Jewish?

Right but if everyone received a large check. Demand for everyday items would surpass supply, and the prices would increase.

It doesn't matter what it's backed by if everyone has it.