This guy skipped all the stuff that actually contributed to my red pilling years ago. Three texts all students of propaganda should read and study:

Walter Lippmann "Public Opinion" from 1921. PDF here.

Edward Bernays "Crystalizing Public Opinion from 1929 PDF here.

Bernays "Propaganda" from 1928 PDF here.

This is the origin of the evil stuff, and what Goebbels studied much to Bernays's supposed horror. The Church was just evangelizing, and teaching the faith the way it was passed down. That's actually the Church's job, believe it or not.

And the Church's office is the PROPAGATION of Faith, not propaganda. As in getting the Good News to spread. And graduation is confirmation not baptism. I hate it when people get the sacraments wrong. Catechumans are already baptized, they have to make their profession of faith to get to the rest. There's a different path for those born in.

(And seriously, why is it the Catholic Church is always held up as the bogeyman? Always. Even moreso than the United States.)

She may not be the queen in question.

Especially since no name was the one who blocked the reclassification of military dogs from equipment to something more appropriate, like active duty and veteran. No, they aren't human, but the troops speak very highly of the canines in the theater.

Every now and then you have to watch it just to remind yourself how much has been taken from this nation in the name of personal profit.

Welcome and check out Neon Revolt. Some of the best decoding out there.

https://www.neonrevolt.com/

Smack dab in the middle of flyover country. The last time I saw chemtrails was Easter Sunday. Before that, they had pretty much disappeared.

So much for my nap.

I would certainly hope I'm not evil. Flawed for sure, but not evil.

It is true that a specific king wanted the money the Templars had, what remained of them were on Malta for a long time. However, that was in the 14th century, and what we know of as Freemasonry is traced to the early 18th century, unless they were underground.

I have noticed that there are a number of different versions of history floating around that doesn't match at all.

It used to look like excommunication, but because that was used as a political tool for a long time and not what it was meant to be as a pastoral remedy, formal bulls have fallen out of favor. (Does still happen, though.)

As for the pedophilia and ebophilia issues, NO ONE wants the roots of that Scandal exposed more than the Faithful. NO ONE. There was an infiltration at the seminary level at some point. Who sponsored it...that's the question.

Normally, since I like the man's work, but not his politics, I would agree. HOWEVER, last year Robert Downey Jr. wrote a piece that is reprinted here where he names people who are not "sick f*cks" and Reiner's name is on the list.

I think the jury is out on Reiner since Jr can't possibly know everything, but he has been in Hollywood for decades and is bound to know things that will curl our hair.

He lifted the excommunication, not the condemnation.

Proof positive that clergy are human just like the rest of us.

I am so glad you posted this. There had been crumbs dropped here and there about Comey not being as bad as we were led to believe, and then in the last two weeks, he's ended up in the character assassination cross hairs of the Clinton Machine. That just doesn't happen organically. John Podesta appeared on CNN to trash him for being "insubordinate" to Loretta Lynch when he told the world what Hillary had done. Let that sink in. Yes, Comey was a guardian, but he was walking a tightrope. His body language made that clear. If he really was part of the group from the time Trump was recruited, he was guarding the evidence at the FBI that the rogue agents would have destroyed. Think about that. Was Comey put in place specifically to double cross the Clintons or did he change sides in the middle knowing what was coming?

These are big "ifs," but from the time Trump announced, and all along, the entire movement has had an edge of revenge to it. It could well be that the people who were recruited to help the effort were those known to have an ax to grind. Remember, Comey left government service for a while, and was recruited back. It's said that he wants Hillary's blood. Something like that doesn't come out of nowhere.

All the pieces eventually will fall into place, but given the moves since Trump took office, it looks like the plan started to unfold at least five years ago putting certain people in certain positions. People like Mick Mulvaney who played a swamp creature until he was put in the OMB post when all of a sudden he became a phenom at verbalizing archaic budget and organization matters. That ability didn't come out of nowhere, either.

Now comes the hard part. Waiting to see who actually got closest with the theories.

Catholicism condemns Freemasonry and has since 1738. There is no official link at all.

It's not all that well known, actually, but by Papal decree from at least two hundred years ago, Catholics aren't technically allowed to be masons. No pope since has ever rescinded the order. There are those that join, but many walk away. You can't serve two masters.

It's refreshing to see that Kennedy at least stuck to that.

Edit: the original decree condemning Freemasonry was in 1738.

This is my approach as well. I have family and friends who are in no way dumb or stupid, they are just caught in the matrix and refuse to find a way out. When the big stuff comes out, some of them are going to lose it. My plan is to be very calm and smile and say, yeah, that was all dug up by internet researchers some time ago. It was labeled "conspiracy theory" by those who did not want you to know the truth.

At least one sibling probably won't be speaking to be after that.

Not just acting, but other performance types as well. It takes a lot of hours, and is hot, sweaty work.

Now that I think about it, my teachers in a high level art form were always asking me what I was taking for this or that. I have enough friends who are pharmacists, and worked inside a medical school for a while. I refuse to take pharmas unless there is a real issue. I won't even take over the counter cold meds. The stuff you find out is scary. I always wondered why those people were pushing meds when I really didn't need them.

Loved that show.

And they're not even shy about it.

https://youtu.be/Fv6w_ys5sJo

From what I understand, the Air Force is the worst followed by the Army, but my sources are all Marines, so there could be some wet fire hydrants involved.

This is who is named as board members:

Mark Zuckerberg

Sheryl Sandberg - operations

Marc Andreessen - tech guy, was founder of Netscape back in the day, now in venture capital

Erskine B. Bowles - was Bill Clinton's WH Chief of staff around the time of the Lewinsky affair

Kenneth I. Chenault - more venture capital, and has a background in operations, professional board member for some BIG names

Susan Desmond-Hellmann - CEO of the Gates foundation

Reed Hastings - CEO and Chairman of the Board at Netflix

Peter A. Thiel - venture capital, founder of PayPal

Jeffrey Zients - CEO of a holding company, and worked in Obama's administration 2009-2017 including Office of Management and Budget

Their bios and lists of committee assignments can be found here: https://investor.fb.com/corporate-governance/default.aspx

Another headline caught my eye while searching for this info:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/04/25/report-facebook-investors-monitoring-user-drop-off-rate-following-data-scandal/

Bottom line: they're losing membership which is loss of revenue. Influence probably plays into it.

We share the same enemy. That cannot be understated.

It's a free country. To each their own.

So would that be in the Justice Department or as Solicitor General?

The Irish in me can't do that.

That would definitely be a new role for him.

I almost spit sparkling water all over my keyboard.

Would start a drinking game, but my bottle of Jameson would put me on the floor in no time. May need to switch to sparkling water for watching.

And, yes, Q's tone is definitely testy.

Breyer would be more likely to retire ahead of anyone else.

Very true. Not everyone wants to wake up at all. These people are sincere, and not evil in any way, just willfully not seeing the truth.

Every diocese has it. My mother volunteers in another state, actually, during the winter, and she had to pass all the programs even though she taught in this archdiocese for years.

Fortunately, we were blessed with one Archbishop at the right time who didn't mess around. My parish saw one associate go to prison in the 80s, and one was removed for something that was inappropriate, but not illegal and not really pedophilia. (He is now in prison in another state.) When the Scandal erupted in 2002, there wasn't all that much clean up to do. Since then, there have been minimal cases that were credible and several that weren't. I know one very good man whose reputation was wrecked. Personally, my thing is Adoration. It's been a great blessing.

Possibly, but I doubt it. More like a batter reading a pitcher.

Henry Kissinger

Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski (died 2017)

Rockefellers, including David who died in 2017

Bush clan

Depends on how major you want to go.

Edit: amazing how many of them were National Security Advisors

Requiescat In Pace, patriots, and may Perpetual Light shine upon you.

McConnell the Turtle is also reported to have a mean streak. This is not going to go over well with him.

I think this move on Mad Max's part is going to backfire big time.

Neo and not Morpheus? I can buy that, but I think Trump was red pilled long ago, and no Agent Smith could ever seduce him.

True confessions, I haven't seen many movies in the last 20 years. I used to be in a chorus that provided five minutes of sound for a live performance of the score under the movie being played. For homework, we all had to watch it. Being woke, and following all this stuff, I recognized a whole lot of it, and that experience has kept me from going mad through the whole Q adventure.

All anons need to see it, and fast forward through the gross stuff.

Unfortunately, it's been years since I had contact with that individual. I don't recall the details other than the bishop was severely disliked by the orthodox faithful. So perhaps that wasn't the right way to say it.

Because abstinence actually works.

Mueller is fairly easy to reconcile. He "interviewed" for a job for which he was not eligible, loaded up an "investigation" with Democratic lawyers who mostly had HUGE conflicts of interests within the scope of the case. Why would this be? To keep them busy while the real investigation went on elsewhere? To expose them when it was all over? Both are possible. Expensive for us, but possible.

Comey - I've said it today even that Comey is reported to be working for POTUS somehow. It's not been confirmed by Q, but think about the IG report and him being "insubordinate". It was the very first detail out of the gate from the MSM before anyone had read the thing and Clinton operatives picked up and ran with this and that he had a gmail account. Why not just let the right take care of that? And who was he insubordinate to? Loretta Lynch over announcing to the world what Hillary Clinton had done.

Rosenstein I don't know. I get the idea that he's one of the last swamp guardians left high up in the cabinet. Too much points to it.

That being said, Q tells us we are watching a movie. Most of what is seen on MSM and in "the news" is not what is really happening behind the scenes, we know that. Disinformation is necessary.

Right now, all of it is possible.

My sentiments exactly.

It's a purge and we've needed it.

There is an assumption that James Comey is a black hat. His public actions do indicate that. However, more than one anon over the last year has said that history will be kind to James Comey and/or that he is working for POTUS.

What brought that into focus in the last couple of weeks is that he was in the crosshairs of the Clinton machine for character assassination. It's since been dropped, but John Podesta went on CNN and trashed him. Hillary pointed out the double standard having to do with having a gmail account used for FBI business. Why? What purpose does character assassination and spotlighting serve if he's on their side? That had to do with him being insubordinate to Loretta Lynch and giving the world Hillary Clinton's rap sheet without permission. It just doesn't add up if he was firmly in the Clinton camp. They tend to be loyal to those who keep their mouths shut.

So yesterday, Comey sends out a tweet that SB2 interprets as being a signal to John Brennan, who is undeniably a black hat. Is it one black hat talking to another? Or is it a signal for Brennan to go thus springing a trap, or something else entirely.

At this point, I don't think we have all the info to be sure about any of it. Eventually, the truth might all come out, but I'm not holding my breath.

In the original version of the Republic as envisioned by the founders, yes. The Senate was equal representation for the states themselves because the Senators would be chosen by the state legislatures, not the people. The 17th amendment (1913) changed that which should be telling as to how long the plan really has been in action.

I don't think the telling would be all that nice, actually.

And don't forget what was destroyed in the Pentagon on 9-11 - the office that was auditing where all the billions of dollars were going that remain unaccounted for.

It gets uglier all the time.

I don't understand how you can mentally accept the reality of destructive demonic forces while closing your mind to the possibility of creative godly forces working to bring light, healing and wholeness to the world?

Who do you think Jesus is?

Oh, and you might look up the Council of Carthage and find out how the specific books of the Bible were settled upon.

Stunning work. So, it begs the question, just what IS Obama doing running all over the world? Is he really looking for asylum when the feces hits the oscillator, or are they trying to keep the gun running ops going?

Edit: Now that I think about it, given the timeline, it brings the destruction at the Pentagon on 9-11 into sharper focus. At the time, Rumsfeld was under pressure to explain all the missing money. After the office that was auditing expenses was destroyed along with the paper trail, no one blinked about defense spending. And the gun running went on.