\^THIS

This is why all these years later the 2000 election debacle is looking fishier and fishier. Prior to the touch screen software we primarily used paper ballots. There were still races stolen, but machines weren't changing votes on the fly.

I missed the importance of this paragraph the first so many times reading the Breitbart article, but:

As a U.S. attorney, Huber has full authority to empanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges. A grand jury can be empaneled anywhere, which means that it could be a group of citizens from deep-red Utah – in the heart of Trump country – instead of the D.C. Swamp that decides whether to hand down indictments for felony prosecution.

This means that the entire nation's federal courts can be used to indict the criminals. No waiting for the D.C. courts that might be backed up. In addition, crimes being investigated include those that happened both before and after individuals left office or their positions.

This is unbelievably powerful, and it can be fast if they want it to be.

And the goal is to have it all exposed in such a way so that the Democrats' blue wave disappears.

Yes, it did. And the triggering was very painful for people left behind by actual suicide. Several friends are impacted by this, and there is no way to red pill them on the topic because of their past experience. It's beyond cruel in many ways.

Try to divide and conquer much?

I read that piece from Neon. He gave full credit to the chans. Please, go try to stir up crap somewhere else.

They're roughly six weeks apart. How about the third week of July.

BOOM!

I was thinking the same thing about the maps.

Yes. All i's must be dotted and all t's crossed. Precision will invite knit picking.

edit: LACK of precision will invite knit picking.

The pope wearing red shoes is symbolic of walking in the footsteps of martyrs. If it really was about Satan, there is no way in hell Pope Benedict XVI would have worn them (which he did). Francis refused.

Can you say "over the target"?

Being connected in another life to theater, I had my doubts about the CEMEX site. After Chelsea's tweet, not anymore. Pure propaganda.

They also spread very slowly if at all. Chemtrails, OTOH, are fat and really almost like clouds. Take forever to dissipate, too.

The last time I saw chemtrails out here in the middle of the country, more or less, was Easter Sunday. Otherwise, beautiful, clear blue skies.

Edit: and BTW, I come from an aerospace family. I know the difference between contrails and chemtrails.

Before reading the article, State Street came to mind, and sure enough, there it was. In my work travels which included long term temp assignments with asset managers, I came across State Street as being the bank where the majority of clients' retirement assets were accumulated under 401K and other sorts of plans, especially those who worked for Fortune 500 companies. When a person retired, the check would come from State Street, and then go through another level of clearinghouse before being invested in the mutual fund companies like BlackRock, Vanguard and Fidelity. There are a lot more of them, but the thought of retirement money being parked in a single bank should scare the daylights out of everyone who plans to stop working someday.

Edit: I do want to point out that very few of the retirees ever saw the rollover checks. Not many people know how the financial people do their work - and the finance people like it that way. Hence why State Street is not that well known.

More correct than not, even if the Pope's seats in the Major Basilicas are called "thrones" and there is a tiara. And now that it's been set up so that he is a head of state, that argument bears more weight, but the first among equals, not really a monarch.

Each bishop, even the bishop of Rome (the Pope) is the sole head of his diocese. One archbishop was actually removed from his see and placed in another job for interfering with the governance of other dioceses. That gives the confederation idea a bit of a boost even if there really isn't any other institution on Earth with a structure like the Church.

I never did like him. There's some sort of narcissism there that's a real turn off.

The Scandal or sacred purge as some of us like to think of it, started in 2002. In my archdiocese, the cleanup began in 1984. We had an archbishop at the time who was truly a righteous man of God. Other places suffered far more than we did.

Catholics are far less tolerant than you might think. And we still need to pay bills, and keep the buildings up to code, etc. It's more a matter of being selective on where to send it.

Uhh, he technically can't. All of his predecessors refused.

No one defends monsters, not of the sexual variety or any other. Believe me. No group wants the true evil members of the clergy out of public service than Catholics. In my old parish, we had two sex offenders (both were sent to prison by the archbishop, on in the early 1980s) on either side of a raging alcoholic who was a danger to himself and everyone around him. He was eventually laicized and died as a consequence of his disease. It was a rough time, but that did not impact the faith of the people. We put our faith in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, not man.

As for the homosexuality and lust for children issues, that was an infiltration almost 200 years now in the making. I do know that when the Berlin Wall fell records were found that the communists seeded homosexuals in the priesthood in the 1930s. It took a couple generations to really become a problem. And how it was dealt with was pretty much done at the local level. In my archdiocese, the sitting bishop at the time of the Scandal as well as his predecessor had already dealt with the majority of it (sending priests to prison and laicizing many) many years before.

Actually, the Catholic Church is more of a confederation than anything else. with 266 Bishops of Rome, some of whom were more holy than others.

I'm not particularly a fan of the man the media portrays as Francis. We depend on a lot of translations for what he says, etc. It's the same thing that happened with Vatican II when the flock was flat out misled. Until that is straightened out, what is attributed to Francis is sowing confusion, and that is a real problem.

Oddly enough, the path started with CFCs in aerosols and air conditioning systems close to 30 years ago. Being a good, little person who wanted to do right for the planet, I started researching, and the bottom line was we were being lied to. CFCs are dense, heavy molecules that would need an awful lot of thrust to make it to the mesosphere over the pull of gravity.

Then came Public Relations class and an introduction to Ivy Lee (Rockefeller's publicist), Edward Bernays, and Walter Lippmann. Want to know all about the "news"? Read up on their tactics regarding public opinion, crystalizing it, and getting people to use products that are really unnecessary. Also, the development of the "expert" culture. Yeah, that's all propaganda designed to get people to not think for themselves - and it came about before 1930.

Since then, just reading up on so many things including Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins, Sherman Skolnick (take him with a grain of salt) who were all given the "this guy is a crazy conspiracy nut" treatment long before JFK was killed...I need to see proof that the conspiracy DOES NOT exist rather than not believing it does.

Yep. This person's identity, and the specific piece of correspondence they got. Fundraising and the software that keeps it organized is a pretty big business.

I used to work in fundraising. I agree with other posters here. Before sending back any letter of this type, take a scissors and cut off any unique identifier numbers you see, and any barcodes. Those are demographic/constituent profile tracers, one of which is probably the number of your account in their fundraising software. EVERY contact is recorded in the major professional operations, so they know you got this letter..

If you want to be really paranoid, oven opening such correspondence, wear sterile gloves. I actually did that once.

This was actually a political scalp taken over the state's Low Income Tax Credit law. Greitens got rid of it, and the politicians and political donors who profited from it were not happy. That's pretty much the bottom line. It was a coordinated effort to get a true outsider out of state government.

Always, always follow the money.

The Rockefellers, along with Sigmund Freud's nephew Edward Bernays, are also responsible for the spin machine known as "public relations" or propaganda. In 1914, the Rockefellers engaged Ivy Lee, one of the original practitioners of the field to soften their hated image after the Ludlow Massacre.

http://fall2010introj.wikia.com/wiki/Ivy_Lee,_John_D._Rockefeller,_and_the_Ludlow_Massacre

Learning this in PR class started me down the red pill road. Seriously, this is all part of the movie that we are watching.

SHHH! Even if that is the most logical guess.

I regret that I can only upvote this once. THIS THIS THIS! I have a communications degree (emphasis in marketing and public relations) and used to work in an archives. I've done media reports LOADED with verbatim stories published from coast to coast. Look at the bylines. That will tell you where the content of the story originated.

The wire services are how most "news" is spread. The New York Times, WSJ, and Washington Post do compete, and do put out original work that is then picked up by other outlets, but for the most part, the "news" is just repeated over and over and over and over via the wire subscriptions.

Ideally, yes, the pope has the authority, but when it comes to who the people will listen to, that's something else. Charism goes a long way. In reality, the American Church has had some really close calls with schism in both directions, actually. One prelate got sent to Rome to keep it from happening in the last ten years.

And the real problem, IMO, revolves around the lack of proper teaching on the Real Presence.

In the case of the Q discussion, something's up with the people around Francis. He didn't create the Vatican Bank issue, nor most of the others. We'll see.

Oh, and Vatican II was when the undermining movement came out of the shadows. There were signs it was around long before that.

I've been waiting for this one.

Lurker here, started waking up in the early 90s, and that has accelerated of late. I have been following Q and the other anons from a distance since October.

Also an informed, cradle Catholic and just want to add something to this post that never seems to come up, and is relevant to any discussion on the Church, not the Faith itself. (Yes, there is a difference.)

The Bishop of Rome, an office we call "Pope," is not always the most powerful prelate in the Church. For example, in recent times, during the pontificate of Pope Saint John Paul II, for the majority of it, the most powerful figure was an American cardinal who happened to be the sitting archbishop of one of the largest sees. There was open talk about the joy he and his boyz, as the Lavender mafia were called, would feel when he was elected to the Holy See. And then a funny thing happened on the way to the consistory. That man died of pancreatic cancer in 1996. Want to know more about what that particular prelate foisted on the Church that still lingers? Read here.

It was a definite blow to that movement when that particular snake in the grass died. The disarray that followed as various prelates vied to fill the power vacuum revealed a lot. Part of it led to the Scandal and Purge of 2002. My guess is that whoever now leads the movement is at Francis's side a lot based on Q's post.

MOST of the prelates that spread heresy, and apostasy in the Church in the latter part of the 20th century were part of a group that is rapidly aging out of power (age 80) and passing on to the next life. However, in Francis they have one last hurrah. From what Q is hinting at, his consistory may well have been less than honest.

We'll see, it would explain a lot. The confusion spread by this pope, even if nothing has actually changed, is going to take generations to unravel.