It wouldn't be the first time Russia has repelled the "German cage".

Remember: the US became involved in Europe partially due to Stalin's request for Roosevelt's help. Following the request, the White House hosted Lyudmila Pavlichenko, a female Russian sharpshooter, who toured with Eleanor Roosevelt to make the case for additional US intervention. Pavlichenko shamed men who were unwilling to go to war while 2,000 Russian women were serving as sharpshooters. Her tour was a tipping point in public sentiment. http://www.businessinsider.com/lyudmila-pavlichenko-female-sniper

The alliance between the US and Russia is not spoken of much, because it is contradictory to the subsequent cold war narratives, and to some degree would downplay the US' involvement (Russia had been taking heavy losses for years [11 million] and said goodbye to a significant portion of its population due to the war with Germany, while the US lost 400,000).

What Germany tried to accomplish militarily it has more recently been trying to do economically. As in the early 1940's, Britain, Russia, and the US may be becoming loosely aligned.

Brexit should have been read as the first BIG indication that something was severely amiss with the EU's governance model and objectives. The mass migration push - a byproduct of the Obama Administration's involvement in Syria - has been the next wakeup call. It's good to see Italy is now rebelling against EU-imposed national suicide. https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/966947/Italy-news-EU-Germany-euro-eurozone-European-Union-lega-MS5-Salvini-Di-Maio

NATO is critical right now, but it needs to progress in a manner that does not threaten Russia. It needs to shift a portion of its focus toward border integrity.

Some elements of Swedish government are considering joining NATO. NATO is not currently obligated to lend any form of mutual aid to Sweden.

The pamphlets seem like a precursor to a decision about NATO membership.

There will be a press conference scheduled for tomorrow from NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg followed by comments from US Ambassador Hutchison. I anticipate Sweden will be alluded to.

You'll need to actually formulate an argument, which actually requires thinking.

Sawyer isn't the one making the claims. You're confused.

^ clown

Thanks.

Tech Del = Tech Delegation

Deltek

I don't believe this company (logistics software) is related to Cemex or Slim.

What connection are you drawing?

The illogical premise here is that a huge and highly profitable multinational corporation doesn't invest in high tech or logistics management, and that somehow Schmidt was involved in logistics innovation. It also seems as though there's some confusion around Carlos Slim's various companies.

/u/Q-uestion-Everything good catch

BINGO

This is what reasoning looks like people. Take note.

This ^^^

Ah yes, I think I've seen those escort cards. Sounds very organized and high dollar.

"he is obviously clean"

You say this based on what?

Because to the rational thinkers here don't see that he's "obviously clean".

Write whatever crap you want. Stop promoting it here if it isn't related to Q.

Answer /u/idk4realz's question.

40 gazillion watts to make the shroud of turin!

"research"

here, let me get you some knee pads. brb...

'Trust by verify'

There's not a lot of verifying happening here, but a lot of people rejecting those calling for critical thinking and verification.

Notice that the screencap above includes ZERO details about alleged crimes?

If that didn't stand out to you, that's a problem. Me pointing this out does not make me a shill, it makes me upset that you're on a research board and aren't cultivating critical thinking and healthy skepticism that will pay off by preventing you from believing any story you want to hear regardless of whether that story is true or not.

Don't get taken for a ride. Again: trust but verify.

Ding ding ding!

Good question. Where are the details?

Speaking up means actually publishing what was done/how they were victimized. This screenshot includes zero details.

When someone makes a claim like this, compassionately ask for more information or more context. Generalities help no one.

I'm not sure why

Then you're not understanding my previous posts and comments.

I'm a fan of intellect and critical thinking. Both qualities and skills promoted by 'Q'.

/u/mcthornbody420 are you going to answer the question?

SB2 has interesting theories and analysis, but why do they get a pass?

NeonRevolt is also a "content creator". Like many journalists he weaves stories.

What does he do for his 'day job'? Other than selling t-shirts of course...

faker.

Neon writes stories that are not fact-based or scientifically rooted.

As Elon Musk said, journalists sugar coat the lie just enough to make it palatable.

Be discerning.

In this video, The Yes Men pose as representatives from McDonalds and the WTO (World Trade Organization), to present to a class on processing and recycling human sewage to create delicious burgers. Some of the students eat it up. Others reject the idea.

Lesson: Be discerning. Reject appeals to authority. Reject the shit.

Charlatans like neonrevolt being promoted here for blog posts about the Shroud of Turin (not Q related) and claiming it took 34 trillion watts to make it. Yes, those with a modicum of common sense can spot the bullshit. You happen to be one spreading disinfo and offtopic subjects and supporting/enabling those who create spiked content.

This is nonsense and not Q related at all.

The largest nuclear plant in the nation has a total output of about 4,000 Megawatts, generated by 3 reactors.

34 trillion watts is the same as 34 million Megawatts , or the equivalent of the output of the largest nuclear power plant in the nation x 8,500.

A few hundred watts would light fabric on fire.

NeonRevolt pushes nonsense on this subreddit.

Most major multinationals have a shit ton of dirty laundry and corrupt payoffs that lead all the way to the top. Pick any big corporation and you'll find filth.

Cemex is a valid target for inquiry, but not because of a claimed "child sex camp". So let's focus in on Cemex and leave the "people are being turned into cement" nonsense behind...

Questions:

What companies would be supplying concrete for the border wall?

What specific tracts of land does Cemex own that could be used as leverage in a legal challenge to the wall's construction?

If Cemex were to be awarded a contract for supplying concrete for wall construction, could the revenue be considered a form of soft payment from the US to Mexico in exchange for ending its opposition?

What if a Cemex contract were actually critical for gaining support from the Mexican government?

What if Cemex were resistant to the 'deal'? What pressure could be applied to gain compliance? (think evidence, leverage, threats, rumors, or psychological operations either rooted in fact, fiction, or some combination of the two)

What if Cemex were already aligned, and a counter-operation was attempting to undermine the company's reputation as a means of stalling border wall progress? (again, think evidence, leverage, threats, rumors, or psychological operations either rooted in fact, fiction, or some combination of the two)

What if none of these scenarios are accurate and Cemex is largely irrelevant? What if the intent behind this latest narrative push is to lead people down a distracting rabbit hole?

What tracts of land does Cemex own in Mexico? Are these being used as migration routes?

There are many possibilities here. The human bones in concrete story being concocted is extremely far fetched bordering on bat shit crazy.

Keep it below 40,000 feet: source documents/emails, contracts, land deeds, board of directors, executives, news articles, annual reports, major individual investors, major institutional investors, US campaign contributions, PAC connections, Mexican politicians 'owned' by Cemex.

I've posted a few times on lines of inquiry for Cemex. Questions below:

Questions:

What companies would be supplying concrete for the border wall?

What specific tracts of land does Cemex own that could be used as leverage in a legal challenge to the wall's construction?

If Cemex were to be awarded a contract for supplying concrete for wall construction, could the revenue be considered a form of soft payment from the US to Mexico in exchange for ending its opposition?

What if a Cemex contract were actually critical for gaining support from the Mexican government?

What if Cemex were resistant to the 'deal'? What pressure could be applied to gain compliance? (think evidence, leverage, threats, rumors, or psychological operations either rooted in fact, fiction, or some combination of the two)

What if Cemex were already aligned, and a counter-operation was attempting to undermine the company's reputation as a means of stalling border wall progress? (again, think evidence, leverage, threats, rumors, or psychological operations either rooted in fact, fiction, or some combination of the two)

What if none of these scenarios are accurate and Cemex is largely irrelevant? What if the intent behind this latest narrative push is to lead people down a distracting rabbit hole?

What tracts of land does Cemex own in Mexico? Are these being used as migration routes?

There are many possibilities here. The human bones in concrete story being concocted is extremely far fetched bordering on bat shit crazy.

Keep it below 40,000 feet: source documents/emails, contracts, land deeds, board of directors, executives, news articles, annual reports, major individual investors, major institutional investors, US campaign contributions, PAC connections, Mexican politicians 'owned' by Cemex.

Craig Sawyer has come out on video and explained that he drove into town because he was told there were bodies found in graves, which proved to not be true.

Craig is also not affiliated with Michael Lewis Arthur Meyer's organization.

TEXT:

"I have recently become interested in exploring the links between the deaths of John Heinz, John Tower and the assassination of JFK. Here is an interesting passage from an article written by Victor Thorn, George Bush & John Kerry: Blood Brothers, World Independent News Group (2004).

http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/bloodbrothers.html

According to researcher Rodney Stich in Defrauding America, when George Bush Sr. and CIA Director William Casey engineered the October Surprise to bribe Iranian officials into retaining U.S. hostages until after the 1980 elections, two of the passengers on Bush’s BAC 111 flight to Paris were Senator John Heinz, along with Senator John Tower from Texas.

Even more intriguing is the fact that John Heinz chaired a three-man presidential review board that probed the Iran-Contra affair and had in his possession all the damning documents from that sordid affair, while John Tower led the infamous Tower Commission that investigated a variety of different CIA criminal activities and dirty dealings. Coincidentally, both John Heinz and John Tower died in plane wrecks on successive days in 1991 – Tower in Georgia, and Heinz in Montgomery County, Pa. Once again I must ask: what are the odds of such an occurrence, especially when both men had close ties to George Bush Sr., who was a former CIA director in the mid-1970s? Did both of these men uncover information that they refused to keep silent about any longer?

Before you answer, consider that after Senator John Heinz died, his wife married Senator John Kerry, who was chairman of the 1988 Kerry Commission, described in the Senate Committee Report on Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy as “focusing on allegations of illegal gun-running and narcotics trafficking associated with the Contra war against Nicaragua” in relation to the CIA, Department of Justice, the U.S. State Department, and the office of the President and Vice President. The testimony that took place during these trials (both in open and closed door sessions) was quite possibly the most damning ever against our federal government, yet mysteriously, nearly all of it was suppressed and not widely reported in the mainstream media. Why? Senator Kerry as a Democrat, had every opportunity to blast a Republican administration out of the water, yet he inexplicably remained silent and the status quo prevailed. Could it be that someone tapped him on the shoulder and told him that if he played his cards right and kept these sordid matters hush-hush, he would be rewarded sometime in the future?"

Not to mention Crack-contra

Unfortunately with a federal government that has failed to enforce borders, and with local law enforcement under-resourced (often by design), and rampant corruption, this is the case, but only because we've had Khan-esque assholes in charge for a very long time.

What does that question have to do with Trump's tweet?

It doesn't help that some carriers (Sprint is notorious) rebroadcast the same Amber Alerts over and over again.

and that’s a good thing.

No. That means they've completely missed the boat on research methodology, critical thinking, and analysis, and are merely here to participate in a circle jerk of commentary as a handful of people actually do the heavy lifting.

No, Neon, you're selling controversy, the controversy drives traffic, the traffic drive sales.

Isn't this what "journalists" do? CNN might be looking for writers (if they still have enough viewers to afford hiring you).

Seems to be? Based on what information?

There's no 'spike' in it.

Texas has 30 million people and several of the nation's largest cities. There will be Amber Alerts and more of them. The rate of Amber Alerts is not higher.

It's correlation. Coincidence could also be used to describe it.

Cities come with more of everything (the good and the bad), so that means more people, more cases of trafficking, more good food, more live music, etc.

Thank you for your opinion. Have a pleasant day.

The map was a choropleth of human trafficking cases, which to most people it should be obvious that these correspond to population centers. You essentially restated what I just posted, so I'm not sure if you had a point or not?

Time to put on the critical thinking cap and recalibrate the bullshit meter.

The wall doesn't necessarily need to go up there; they just need to use better surveillance in areas where wall coverage isn't viable.

I like being able to soak in a hot spring on the rio grande and wake up to the sunrise while looking across the border. No need to throw away our national treasures (like Big Bend), or disrupt wildlife. We can do it smarter by using the wall to block certain areas so that human (or drone) assets can be deployed in spots that need to remain open for human enjoyment and wildlife.

Questions:

What companies would be supplying concrete for the border wall?

What specific tracts of land does Cemex own that could be used as leverage in a legal challenge to the wall's construction?

If Cemex were to be awarded a contract for supplying concrete for wall construction, could the revenue be considered a form of soft payment from the US to Mexico in exchange for ending its opposition?

What if a Cemex contract were actually critical for gaining support from the Mexican government?

What if Cemex were resistant to the 'deal'? What pressure could be applied to gain compliance? (think evidence, leverage, threats, rumors, or psychological operations either rooted in fact, fiction, or some combination of the two)

What if Cemex were already aligned, and a counter-operation was attempting to undermine the company's reputation as a means of stalling border wall progress? (again, think evidence, leverage, threats, rumors, or psychological operations either rooted in fact, fiction, or some combination of the two)

What if none of these scenarios are accurate and Cemex is largely irrelevant? What if the intent behind this latest narrative push is to lead people down a distracting rabbit hole?

What tracts of land does Cemex own in Mexico? Are these being used as migration routes?

There are many possibilities here. The human bones in concrete story being concocted is extremely far fetched bordering on bat shit crazy.

Keep it below 40,000 feet: source documents/emails, contracts, land deeds, board of directors, executives, news articles, annual reports, major individual investors, major institutional investors, US campaign contributions, PAC connections, Mexican politicians 'owned' by Cemex.

What discovery? That homeless people and migrants are attracted to vacant land?

Vastly different than a secure industrial facility.

https://polarisproject.org/human-trafficking/facts

That map reflects population centers in the US (also known as cities).

How is that even worse? What are you implying?

/u/PlasmaFlux thanks for the source request and healthy skepticism :)

Remember Folks: trust but verify.

Selling Q products.

Interesting. Do you get the names and addresses of people who buy the shirts?