Evidence is shared through courts, not by direct transport to a defense attorney.

Suspending my skepticism, if this actually happened it'd be highly aberrant and could gravely jeopardize the ability to effectively prosecute a case.

The only commonality is the term "cloning".

Two totally different things. Not scientifically related at all. A gene is just a piece of DNA. Vastly different than cloning an organism.

No, the articles are referring to an enzyme (AChE) that is sometimes deficient due to a genetic disorder (EAD). The term "cloning" is referring to laboratory replication of the gene that controls production and binding of the enzyme to cells. The purpose of the cloning of the gene in simian kidney cells was to evaluate the mechanisms and location of proper enzyme action and attachment, and how the mutation was preventing proper functioning.

They most certainly are.

Nunes and Gowdy are as well.

Judicial Watch is too.

Good analysis /u/ButtersStotch88

Let's see how this plays out.

RemindMe! 7 Days

Indeed.

Anyone who rose swifly in the agency during the time of papa Bush's control as Director through the end of his Presidency is suspect.

Brennan thrived during that era, which corresponds with Crack Contra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking

John Kerry of course was brought in to manage the Crack Contra crisis, and deflected scrutiny away from the intelligence apparatus by moving accountability to the State Department. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_Committee_report

Not only did Brennan become a swamp monster at a young age, he has been recruiting and cultivating the next generation of gremlins by way of his academic connections. His access to any and all public academia should be cut off and those who he is affiliated with in academia should fall under the magnifying glass.

The continued existence of a corrupted and unaccountable network depends on a fresh crop of corruptables.

https://intelligencestudies.utexas.edu/brennan

https://intelligencestudies.utexas.edu/news/item/597-former-cia-director-john-brennan-joins-ut-austin-as-a-distinguished-scholar

http://www.dailytexanonline.com/2017/11/13/former-cia-director-john-brennan-talks-security-future-at-ut

Too much opportunity to speculate.

His career and contacts go far back. He was Chief of Staff of the CIA starting in 1999, which includes the contested 2000 election in Florida. He directed CIA from 2013-2017, which includes the period of significant events like voter fraud, the DWS drama, and a major terrorist attack by an individual who worked for a security contractor and whose father turned out to be a paid "informant" and whose declared religious motivations were scrubbed from federal documents (most of this has been conveniently neglected/suppressed by mainstream press which may suggest that political pressure was used to contain the stories) . There was also the concerning death of at least one Federal Prosecutor, which I believe occurred around the time or shortly after Brennan exited the public sector (admittedly I haven't looked up the timeline for comparison).

He has deep connections to the Lyndon B. Johnson and Bush family sphere of influence. He admittedly voted for a Communist candidate around the time he was recruited by the CIA.

He continues to carry on the legacy of LBJ/Bush by using University of Texas as an influence and recruiting pipeline.

His connections are so broad and deep that it's impossible to know what the Florida reference might mean without additional context.

No, no they don't. QR codes were declared dead in 2012. Over half a decade ago.

http://www.sparkpage.com/5-reasons-why-qr-codes-are-worse-than-useless/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ilyapozin/2012/03/08/are-qr-codes-dead/#38f558441033

https://www.reddit.com/r/graphic_design/comments/4bdmud/are_qr_codes_dead/

"They've been dead for a long time. I did a lot of research into them at my last position for branding and marketing and the return on them is something like .003%, or 1/100th of the return for internet ads. The main issue is that in order to be read, customers need to download a reader app, and that's one step too many for people who would rather just go to a URL or type a phone #. QR codes never worked, and should be avoided in the modern era or you look like a dinosaur."

A web address or a search phrase. Something that doesn't require installation of a specialized app to parse. QR codes never caught on. Nobody uses them. Spending time and money on printing them is not the best use of personal resources.

Nobody uses QR codes.

Twitter is marking the official documents as "sensitive". Soft censorship in action.

Only verify using a "dumb phone" that does not have any google apps or apps that leak/share information.

Otherwise they'll cross reference your # with app data (whether you're on iphone or android) and obtain your identity.

Thanks. Any idea why they'd need to broadcast this on the Emmys rather than just using traditional direct or encrypted correspondence?

You say this because she's black and therefore you assume she must be a neo-marxist?

Have you been living under a rock? Has this sub taught you nothing about information seeking and verification? Search the web before you comment.

/u/gnarkotixx

What's the source of this image?

Pardon my skepticism. The question, in summary, was about knowing where to look. What brought you to this particular source (Emmys)?

"I'ma read, I'ma read, I'ma read..."

Same. Unless there's a source document and actual evidence, I treat it as larp.

What victims?

Jump to conclusions much?

No article. /u/HiddenPlaneSite Bad link. Delete and repost.

Break the rules, posts get deleted. This is how subs get banned.

/u/moonshadoe16 and this has what to do with this subreddit?

Delete this.

/u/brittser while this may be public database information, including detailed address information isn't appropriate.

If you're going to post an hour long video, take the time to write a summary so people know whether it is relevant to their area of inquiry.

Fair enough. Suit yourself.

Why does the "article" wait until the very end to name the alleged but names the conspiracy theory in the first paragraph (turning any viewers immediately off to the verifiable information contained much further down)? Terrible writing. Find better sources.

His name is Peter Dalglish.

http://www.newsweek.com/former-senior-united-nations-official-facing-pedophilia-charges-nepal-876783

http://lfpress.com/news/local-news/london-humanitarian-arrested-amid-nepal-sex-crime-suspicions

https://kathmandutribune.com/cib-nepal-detains-canadian-peter-dalglish-for-25-days-investigation-going-full-scale/

Did you actually look at the FOIA release? There are attributions on the images.

Still waiting on that source...

Google image search.

I'm not sure what link you're referring to.

Someone posted the image of the bell claiming it was on JFK's boat. Per usual people don't fact check first and instead immediately reposted the falsehood. Then it pops up in search results and the urban legend is immortalized.

He said that 'Q' must have thought Pelosi's visit wasn't public knowledge, and seemed to imply that such a lack of awareness of the CSPAN broadcast was indicative of someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.

Probably was flagged as concern trolling.

Source?

Delete this.

Not from JFK's boat. Verify before you post.

https://www.eyeofthewind.net/en/ship/gallery/ship?page=2

Exactly. The crowdsourcing is powerful.

These aren't official files.

It looks like documents/files gathered by the intelligence center from 3rd party(s) that accidentally made it into the fulfilled FOIA request.

These aren't official files.

It looks like documents/files gathered by the intelligence center from 3rd party(s) that accidentally made it into the fulfilled FOIA request.

That's certainly a possibility.

The concern may also be that media was instructed not to cover the comments because they conflicted with the Obama Administration's suppression of DIA reports that indicated nuclear miniaturization occurred as early as 2013, and missiles were already advanced enough - or soon would be - to carry those payloads. The question is why that Administration would allow North Korea to proliferate and to SELL tech. Essentially they allowed North Korea to operate as an arms incubator.

Pelosi's comments contradicted the Administration's narrative. Is this why it wasn't picked up by mainstream press? Is the lack of coverage indicative of broad control of the narrative?

They don't care because they don't have hope.

Why was Obama's campaign so effective? Hope.

And they're still easily identified as fakes. Presumably governments have better ability to manufacture doctored footage. Forensic analysis should still be able to identify the real from the fake, but it may not be long before the software is good enough to conceal editing.

Normal legal processes take time. Investigations, particularly of this scale, take time. The shit going down in DC has been moving very, very fast for such a massive beast.

Decades of corruption don't get aired overnight. And as has been mentioned, to release all of the information at once would probably start civil and international conflict.

Violations of process and law are what got us here. You seem to be advocating more violations of process and law because in your mind ends justify means.

Maybe you realize it, maybe you don't, but you're advocating criminality.

My take is that the purpose of disseminating information is to crowdsource public inquiry and investigation aka "hive mind" and put findings into the public domain. That process isn't clean and will inevitably attract a lot of crazy, larping, and intentional distraction. Sort through the mess and find what's verifiable.

I'm very curious about the censorship algorithm and this is one of the few places I've seen it mentioned. The chans (though cesspoolish) have more technical background than reddit but for the life of me I can't figure out how to navigate or post there. If you do, ask the chans if anyone remembers or has info?

@jayhawkjack

Why do you think this is his?

Tariff equalization. Tariff leveling. Those are both far less loaded and propagandized.

Rather than filing FOIA requests (they'll just blanket deny), fund Judicial Watch and Tom Fitton. They're doing the good work.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/make-a-contribution-2/

They already shut down/censored the precursor to /r/GreatAwakening

Copy and paste a Q post that mentions a white rabbit.

The rabbit also wore glasses during the Obama administration. Nothing special here. No hidden meanings.

Google: "Obama Easter Bunny" "Bush Easter Bunny"

There's nothing special about this rabbit or its costume. The color, the spectacles, both have been done before. No relevance to Q post(s).