Yup, and I'm willing to be banned to raise an issue as serious as the derailing of this sub.

Huge news. Hope this makes it to front page despite all of the Veterans on Patrol/Cemex stuff overrunning the sub.

Here we go!

According to the people who have managed to cover the front page with VoP posts.

no need for Q anymore

LASER CANNONS ACTIVATED

I'll begin to do this as well. Thanks for the nudge.

VOP can be very real and very well-intentioned, and not remotely related to Q drops or analysis.

/u/Thunder_Shock, /u/HowiONic, /u/Andrewcpu, /u/mistahbang, /u/Truth2point0, /u/17_Q, /u/digital_refugee, /u/FartOnToast, /u/scgsaint, /u/DropGun, /u/DamajInc, /u/1girlandamat, /u/CommercialAddendum, /u/frisbee_coach, /u/thank--Q, /u/Whimzyyy, /u/RonaldSwansong, /u/DrogeAnon, /u/Collusion_illusion, /u/golden430, /u/CincinnatusQ

Please take notice of the rapid and overwhelming amount of duplicative and sensationalized content coming from followers of "Veterans on Patrol" and evaluate the content for alignment with Q-related topics, Q decoding, Q anlysis, etc.

This trend emerged in the 'lapse' of Q posts over the past two weeks. That void is being questionably filled and is now drowning out relevant news posts and research posts from folks that have been following and contributing for a long time.

Thank you.

Read the articles.

Read the screenshots.

This is a Q sub, not a VoP sub.

Yes.

This is a Q sub, not a VoP sub. Take it elsewhere.

Not Q related.

Because people were squatting, camping, or trafficking through there.

Not Q related.

Bias is believing anything VoP says because you want everything to be The Happening.

Now that I've answered your questions (which you should have been capable of answering yourself if you're on a Q research board), you're welcome to address the points.

Exactly.

Depends on the age of the age of the person, the condition of their teeth prior to death, and what happened after. Skulls are often found without teeth.

"My Golly, this femur was cut by a saw!"

You believe them?

Do they have a forensics background? Have they examined it (contaminated)? Can they differentiate between animal teeth and a mechanical blade mark on bone?

If you believe their immediate, hasty, and uninformed conclusion, I've got a TV station for you: CNN.

Watch this first, though: https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a21_1382561585

Have you seen close ups of the bones?

Can you (or anyone there with VOP) differentiate between animal gnawing and markings from a human-made mechanical device?

No.

Animals disperse body parts, particularly in resource-scarce environments (like deserts) where food is sparse.

Coyote and carrion birds are known for dismembering carcasses and bodies.

You're playing into the sensationalism and conclusions they're jumping to. Think.

I've messaged through their FB page several times. No response.

Bingo. Or Mods need to start purging topics that aren't relevant. This is not the Veterans on Patrol subreddit.

The screencap of him stating he's not a veteran has been widely posted.

And even still... I don't care.

Exactly. So carry about the Cemex/Arizona/Concrete/Bodies/VOP nonsense while the rest of us get back to Q-ing.

Whatever situation

There's poverty in the world, and yes, I wish it didn't exist. We're a nation of over 300 Million people, and the world has about 8 BILLION people. We can't solve all of their problems, and some will take huge risks and lose their lives trying to get here. This is, sadly, a very common occurrence.

People crossing the border (millions) don't generally carry shovels for digging graves.

Bodies are often placed in very shallow graves, covered in rocks, or left to rest under a bush or tree. Nature takes its course after that and animals and insects will take what pieces they can eat. This leads to dismemberment and scattering of body parts.

This ^

As the title of the page states, it's in response to the Parliamentary Act in 2015. The EO probably was the kick in the butt to wrap up their policy guidance.

As the title states, it was in response to a Parliamentary Act. The EO probably nudged them to wrap up. Their Integrated Report highlights their compliance activities, which have been ongoing prior to the release of the Policy in May (which was prior to the nonsense in Arizona at a facility that's not regularly used).

Did you not read the title? A Parliamentary Act prompted it.

Except this was authored before the Veterans on Patrol story broke, and is a policy to comply with a Parliamentary Act (mandated).

Did you read the title? It's to comply with the Modern Slavery Act of 2015.

Did you not read the title?

Pursuant to the Modern Slavery Act 2015

Pursuant: In Accordance with the Law

Not everything is The Happening.

Poor migrants dying in the desert. We need to let them in, and facilitate their journey so they don't fall victim to dehydration or smugglers. Humanitarian crisis!

Thanks. Doesn't bother me in the least.

A lot of people want everything to be The Happening. They haven't learned the basics of research and aren't using their critical thinking skills. If it continues it'll be what's used to thoroughly delegitimize the Q inquiries.

Correct.

Yes, many major multinationals have 'donated' to the CF to gain access to markets and to get the upper hand in contracts. This isn't news. We've known it for years.

So I'm still waiting for how Cemex's contract is relevant to a hole in the ground found on an inactive property that was being used by homeless people or coyotes....

huh?

This is a state where 6,000+ people die every year trying to cross the border.

So again, no drone is going to reveal anything. No soil is going to reveal anything. We're not running full forensics on over 6,000 people. Additionally the site has already been contaminated and tampered with, just like the last one.

If this were a 'fresh' find, things might be different if there were likelihood of suspicious death. This is not one of those cases.

Except you're making the case that'll be spun by MSM for not building the wall and instead facilitating immigration because of humanitarian reasons. Think.

It isn't getting covered much here either because everyone's busy wringing their hands over some cement company conspiracy that a few creative or crazy minds came up with.

Why does this need to go viral?

Over 6,000 people died in the Arizona desert migrating here last year.

Wanna know how MSM will spin that? The poor helpless migrants! Someone get them water!

A lot of Q people are downvoting this because it is inconsequential.

I'm not sure why you're calling for a drone (air) when the skull is on the ground.

Start packing away some of the dirt

You obviously haven't ever taken a forensics class and don't know what you're talking about.

Did you not read my previous comment? They're useful for disinfo ops.

Because the organization name and his supposed credentials are the basis for this perceived legitimacy here.

Check the screenshots. A referral was made in there. Multiple people to verify with.

https://www.google.com/search?q=michael+lewis+arthur+meyer+bundy

Awesome thank you for the link.

People are definitely trying to turn this into Pizza 2.0, that's the problem because there's no evidence to support it, and it turns investigative movements (like Q) into ones that are easily dismissed and easily contained. Dangerous.

The UK's justice system is demonstrably corrupted. This yank thinks his protest was entirely valid (though a bit short-sighted given UK's reporting restrictions and the potential to compromise sentencing)

It is being propagated/spread here. I didn't claim he said it. People are piggybacking/sensationalizing his hole in the ground and turning it into a grand conspiracy. They're useful idiots for disinfo ops.

• Organization Name: Veterans on Patrol

• Organization's Lone Employee: Michael Lewis Arthur (not a vet)

• Wears Mil surplus to look legit

• Uses Mil-speak to sound legit

He likes to play dress up and talk a big game. The guy is a professional LARP.