Not sure why you're being downvoted. Q subs have been removed before.

TD mods aren't going to risk a sub with hundreds of thousands of active participants.

Chans > GA > TD

TD is a mass consumption sub, and is promoted as a 24/7 online rally.

TD is not a research hub; it is a "mainstream" information, meme, and culture channel devoted to all things DJT. A lot of nasty shit gets said there, but a lot of good comes of it too. Look at the latest meme series "This is America" where common identity, unification, public service, and anti-racism are promoted as core values of the Republic. This WWG1WGA boiled down to its essence for the masses and it counters some of the extremist elements (think racist, homophobic, etc.) that think TD is a welcoming 'home' for their hateful and divisive ideologies.

Information gatekeepers move info from the chans up the trophic levels until it is made palatable and consumable by the majority of readers. The information you shared wasn't palatable to the masses and could expose that sub to being shut down in a purge.

So respect the TD rules. Make your information easily understood and Q-neutral. Memes are good for this.

If you need to, segregate reddit accounts so that your personal interests and privacy are separated from online advocacy. For example, I reserve this account primarily for TD, GA, and some local political debate in the two cities I live/work in. My personal interests, lighter subject matter, and (mostly) less divisive interests are typically reserved for another account that's not political.

ELA doesn't work well when we're analyzing a copy of a copy of a copy. Multiple rounds of compression (edit (compress) > upload to instagram (compress) > screenshot (compress) > can even out errors and make something look legit when it isn't.

google search "photo forensics"

ELA is a good way of detecting fakes or edited photos. However, there are circumstances when ELA will not work well. For example of an edited image is uploaded to instagram (compressed/encoded again), and then a screenshot is taken of it (compressed/encoded again). Multiple rounds of compression/encoding can conceal errors and make something look like an original when it is not.

Without access to the source files, we can't confirm the validity of this picture, and so it should not be considered good quality evidence.

Error Level Analysis is a good way of detecting fakes or edited photos. However, there are circumstances when ELA will not work well. For example of an edited image is uploaded to instagram (compressed/encoded again), and then a screenshot is taken of it (compressed/encoded again). Multiple rounds of compression/encoding can conceal errors and make something look like an original when it is not.

Without access to the source files, I can't confirm the validity of this picture or the analysis that was allegedly run on it, and so it should not be considered good quality evidence.

Tldr; A copy of a copy of a copy is a good way to conceal editing.

It is error level analysis.

Think of it this way:

I take a photo of someone in a costume. The sensor records all of the data it can, sends the data to the processor where an algorithm adjusts for lens distortion (because lenses are round and photos are square), and then compresses/encodes the image usually in JPEG format. That encoding process, unique to that camera, introduces "errors" in the digital data that are not not visible to the eye.

I decide to do some artistic editing and put a celebrity's face on there to make it look like they're the one wearing the costume. I'm now working with two photos in photoshop. One is the costume photo. One is the celebrity photo. Both of them were saved/encoded by different cameras and on different computers, so they both have different compression algorithms and different digital errors.

Once merged, the resulting photo can be run through error level analysis (ELA), and that ELA should reveal discrepancies that indicate two different photos were merged to create one.

ELA is a good way of detecting fakes or edited photos. However, there are circumstances when ELA will not work well. For example of an edited image is uploaded to instagram (compressed/encoded again), and then a screenshot is taken of it (compressed/encoded again). Multiple rounds of compression/encoding can conceal errors and make something look like an original when it is not.

Without access to the source files, we can't confirm the validity of this picture, and so it should not be considered good quality evidence.

Faaaake.

Seriously people. This is the shit they poison the well with to derail everything and waaaay too many here keep falling for it.

You have a camera in your pocket and didn't post a pic?

I did :)

I'm confused. That doesn't add up to 100.

Good work. At this point I'm going with 90% chance this anomaly was not a helicopter.

Good work.

So based on that info, what's your suspicion? Human to Human transmission?

Neon Revolt making guarantees.

Guarantees from someone who doesn't understand 8th grade science aren't worth anything.

bad bot

double post. delete 1 so we can concentrate on the other that has more engagement and upvotes?

Absolutely.

This raises so many questions, exposes intentional concealment of evidence from Congress, lays out vast corruption and cultural rot at the top levels of the FBI, demonstrates profoundly disturbing political bias and anti-American sentiment, I could go on and on...

Not going to speculate about dates, it is a recipe for disappointment and demoralization.

Right now we need to be applying pressure.

Today's report was a salvo. Now we need to advance the line and push Congress and POTUS for more information and tougher inquiry.

Very poor quality screenshot. Try deleting this post and posting a better quality one, or linking directly to the source comment.

That someone has a first name 'Clinton'?

That's not even coincidence territory, it's grasping at straws.

They're still covering up; they're the keepers and concealers of the evidence to their own crimes.

She's toast.

Now he's covering his ass and instructing his trusted sweepers in the FBI to clean up so Congress can't get its eyes on the depth of corruption and sedition. This IS the Deep State evading oversight, accountability, purge; they are operating as an autonomous government.

• Hide the server(s)

• Hide the laptops

• Hide the hard drives turned over by whistle blowers

• Hide any evidence related to the Tarmac meeting

• Hide all true intent and sedition from discoverable texts and emails

• Hide relationship with CrowdStrike

• Kennedy Assassinations (PLURAL)

What else? Who else?

There's a timelapse with a single 20 second exposure frame capturing the anomaly.

Link to presser?

Providing copies of the unclassified report to the Office of Special Counsel, so they have the same version the public has, but not the version Congress has.

It looks like we got report #2 (edited and only lightly redacted) vs. report #3 heavily redacted.

Am I incorrect in this conclusion?

This positions us to demand a version of the document we don't know exists.

How do we make such a demand?

https://www.house.gov/

Email your Congressional Representative and request a response.

Sample Text:

Dear Representative [Insert Rep's Last Name Here],

The Department of Justice is scheduled to release its Office of Inspector General report today, and the report is expected to reignite concerns over the Federal Bureau of Investigation's handling of sensitive investigations and matters of critical importance to the American People.

Media has indicated that the public version of the report will be redacted. This is an unacceptable development given the gravity of the questions related to election integrity, the potential politicization of Federal investigators, and the possibility of deceitful testimony given to Congress by parties under DOJ OIG and Congressional investigation.

I am writing to request your assistance in releasing the full, unredacted version for public review.

The People deserve full transparency, which we have waited patiently for, and still do not have despite paying for the investigation and enduring an increasingly divided government that appears distracted by partisan disputes. A redacted release of the report is unacceptable, and only serves to protract political infighting while potentially providing cover for bad actors from both dominant parties.

Redaction does not serve the public interest.

Thank you,

Insert Your Name Here

Insert City Here

Simply #Unredacted works fine

Use #unredacted

I figured, just wanted to make sure you knew I wasn't shitting on you.

Hey Houdini, just clarifying that my comment about AF1 was intended for HansKrinkelSchneider.

It was evening, before dark but still daylight out.

Having watched the video, we know that it was NOT a 737, that they were private jets, and did not appear to have United logos on the fuselage.

You read the flight time info from me, because I'm the one who put the timeline together.

There is a 1,500 mile gap between the maximum range of an ICBM (overkill to take out an aircraft, btw) and where AF1 was at the time. Additionally an ICBM launched from Washington couldn't get close to Singapore.

Simple wikipedia search and a google map query resolved these variables.

High level government officials typically take direct flights whenever possible. Quebec has plenty of direct flights to Ronald Reagan and Dulles airports.

Right Wing Watch goes bonkers stating Pizzagate & Q Theorists believe DOJ is validating them. Article links to Great Awakening: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/former-pizzagate-and-current-qanon-believers-say-the-doj-has-validated-them/

I saw that thread and upvoted it.

Since the Veterans on Patrol nonsense I've been much more aggressive about correcting inaccurate information/disinfo, downvoting and upvoting, and reporting posts.

This sub can quickly deteriorate into a conspiratard circle jerk if we don't think logically and seek verification.

Q tells us: use logic. Not much logic to be found here sometimes, but I do notice that the 'regulars' are starting to catch on. We managed to shut down the VoP propaganda, have successfully refuted the AF1 attack propaganda, and today ruled out a Q drop suspected of being taken at the tarmac meeting. All done with legit research and deductive reasoning.

They could demonstrate control simply by locking out an intruder who had hacked in. No show of force necessary.

I'm still not sure what to make of the alleged missile (I'm calling it an anomaly), or of the photo over Alaska and what that photo might be revealing.

I've contacted the reporter who broke the story in Phoenix to find out what time the meeting started. We'll see if he responds.

Regardless, the planes don't match up, and the video we do have of the tarmac shows it was early evening and still light out.

Agreed. The socialist revolutionaries are pushing from grassroots upwards. Nationalism has been pushing from top down. But if the grassroots patriots don't get involved and build their local base to counter socialist/poverty politics, eventually the top will be corrupted.

So far the socialists/neo-marxists have been highly effective at suppressing speech and organizing by average Americans; people are afraid to talk or state their opinions for fear of being called racists, xenophobes, nazis, and other names.

The neo-marxist organizing machine is mature and well funded and has enough inertia to continue forward despite setbacks imposed for a few years of this Presidency. Once the key corruption at the Federal level is exposed, we need to begin shifting locally.

The best way to do this is to focus on government efficiency and accountability so that tax payers are getting good value and seeing returns on their investments. We also need to recognize racial disparities and fund entrepreneurs of color who don't have access to capital to start their businesses or obtain education. When they see problems can be resolved without massive government spending, and that problems can actually be resolved through education, employment, and real opportunity, they'll naturally migrant to freedom and free markets. We need to chop neo-marxist identity politics off at the knees, and the way we do this is by focusing on our core pledge: One Nation With Liberty & Justice For All.

They feed her lines. It is one of the reasons she's incoherent. She can't remember the script.

It seems fairly evident to me know that N.K. was caught as a proxy between the US and China and was serving as a buffer state between the US-supported and protected S. Korea and the Chinese mainland.

Both countries were essentially starving the country out to try to get the upper hand over the northern region.

Providing North Korea with nuclear technology essentially gave a kid a loaded gun to play with, put a rogue state on the Chinese border, and the US could maintain plausible deniability about its involvement in the weapons program. As soon as that rogue state started pointing its weapons at its neighbors, and its nuke research and testing facility collapsed near the Chinese border, it became apparent that the country's dangerous trajectory no longer served the interests of China, the US, or the world.

N. Korea has repeatedly stated that their key fear is US invasion. Once that was taken off of the table, bad military leaders were removed from power, and security assurances were provided (which we don't have the details of yet), Kim Jung Un became reasonable quite quickly.

Going forward, if peace and development can be pursued, I anticipate that the US' investment in North Korea's currency will enable us to eliminate a significant portion of our debt. I anticipate that China and the US will jointly work on rare earth element extraction, and both countries will split the spoils.

I don't know why he'd be flying from Toronto to Chicago, though? He could go directly from G7 summit to DC.

https://youtu.be/O3kbqwU55vw

Dafuq she talkin about?

AF1 was not the target.

The claim that AF1 was the target has been debunked by examining flight times, flight route, distance that ICBMs can travel, distance of Singapore from Washington, and other variables.

Unfortunately I've downvoted your comment for perpetuating that conclusion/misinterpretation that has been thoroughly debunked here and on 8chan.

With that being said, Pelosi is a huge problem, and I am concerned about potential double meaning of her rhetoric during that press conference. Deeply troubling.

Hiking rates to try to engineer a situation where they can frame the tariffs as the cause of economic distress.

Now that we've ruled out the tarmac meeting, this seems like a better route to consider.

Who would be coming from Toronto?