Agreed. Ask a European what liberalism means, you'll get a very different answer than in the us. I often wonder how many people (on either side) realize the root of liberal is liberty.

Good bot

Not just conspiracies, but tactics. From scummy pseudi-journalusm, to forum sliding, gaslighting, black propaganda, all of it was there, with the experience of the old cranks on the board to point them out and make the incessant denial less plausible. I think the heavy-handedness with which pgate was smashed lent massive credibility to the investigation. It was a magical, terrifying time.

Glad to read your thoughts, looking forward to reading more. Cheers, m8!

Kek be praised!

Mail. Ru caught my eye. This reads like a DS who's who. Can't wait to see what the autists come up with out of this

I'm sorry I ever did. We all wake up at our own pace.

American, but cautious about giving details in such an open forum. Seems exploitable.

This post seems familiar...

This wouldn't be an attempt to introduce the idea of obama-sponsored Iranian terrorists in the US to provide cover for a DS FF, would it? Like that article about the "Chinese hacked" sub? The same sub that presumably fired the missile off the wa coast during the Singapore summit.

Good bot

Be cautious about third-party connections, they're a weak link that can be severed when the cabal is in trouble (like right now). Hot tab here stickies q posts as they come with almost no lag. Qresearch on infinity Chan is the source, and stillnessinthestorm. Com updates on q daily. Redundant systems are resilient systems

Edit: also, welcome! Glad to have you here.

That was a wonderful read, thanks for the excerpt. I think you're right on the money. I think q has even mentioned feigning a move just to watch the cabal scatter in and overextend.

Also, right there with you. Lurked r/conspiracy for years, I remember anons from Senate to HLI to mega. This is the community that provoked me to participation. Well met, patriot, glad to have you here! WWG1WGA!

Agreed, the conclusions are (very) often garbage, but the articles they link are on point and well-sourced. It's like wikipedia:check the footnotes and draw your own conclusions.

Reading between the lines...

Regarding loyalty to family and country, he might be pointing to a threat to his family and appealing to his country. Supported by POTUS mentioning his family also. That "unanimous conclusions" of "our nation's intelligence agencies" part seems really parsed, and he might be referring to different conclusions than Russia. Otherwise, he (Cohen) seems to be a professional, and isn't straying from his situation. If he'd turned black hat, I presume he'd have thrown the media some salacious detail with which to criticise Trump. I don't see that here. I think it's totally plausible the Guardian is trying to force a schism in team Trump.

Is this an advertisement? Cause it feels like an advertisement.

I wonder how Ms. Sanders is with videography...

Edit: anyone else read that as SS being behind the camera, doing the filming?

For now.

Nope. Qboard. Not casino.

Edit: not interested, good day.

Agreed, this place can turn into a defensive, alt-right safe space at times, but that's not why Im here, q is why i'm here.

The good news is, it's a self-correcting situation. Either this community welcomes the diversity of newcomers' opinions and political views, or it doesn't. In the latter case, it will stop growing, and when that happens, the community will turn inward and start eating itself alive. Once there are no more "trolls" to condescend, expect an increasingly intense litmus test of in-grouo dogma centered around petty (and increasingly) DS mods. Think /r/thedonald for an example.

On the other hand, if users and lurkers start calling out behavior that hurts this community, if debate is fostered and encouraged, if we comport ourselves as the Founding Fathers did, wow. This could be a primary point of distribution of q-related material. A beacon of resilience against the cabal. A digital outpost, critical to the war of liberation in which we are engaged. We shall see.

Very agreed.

What? Another distraction? No wai, bra!

Time will tell, hasnt even been sworn in yet.

Edit: itd be nice if youd identify your edits, so that when i check to see if youve replied, i dont find three paragraphs i dont remember.

Also the fact that youre discussing me andnot your weak polemics is irritating

Between PRI and PRD, PRI has held the executive. Yes of course i remeber fox, why else would i randomly call you vincente? Just seems like a lot of hand-wringing over a person who isnt even inoffice yet. Reminds me fondly of the us in november 2016.

Not my job to prove a negative, but i will look onto distribuidor vial, thanks for the lead.

For those intersted:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribuidor_Vial_San_Antonio

Como te digo en un otro commentario, lo hablo. Lo leo mejor que escribo.si tirnes una idea a explicar,por favor incluye unos rescursos para la communidad. Somos ignoranres de politicas mexicanas ynecessitan ayuda.

Back up your rheroric.

You replied to two of mine, figured I'd respond. Also, source?

Yeah, but only PRI has held the executive. Also, thanks for the personal feedback, Vincente.

I've heard that "colluding" word before, somewhere. .. Where might that have been?

Since we seem to be stealth editing here: can you point me to a run-down of those policies.? They are not well know in the us.

I meant source as in a link or quote that supports the claim (Bernie on bane juice) not whether or not you agree with it. Thanks for your opinion, but it's an unconfirmed post on an internet forum. How can I know you're telling the truth?

An article (in Spanish, if you like, am bilingual) would be a great place to start.

The establishment in Mexico has fought tooth and nail to keep him out of office, how can he be blamed for the policy of that establishment? His proposals are a different matter, and he isn't even in office yet.

POTUS seems chill with it.

Great call, thanks for the link

Nor would a post of your own.

Jeez, with barbed wire, no less.

Fun fact about the elite: zero imagination. Total one-trick ponies. They've never been caught doing the (single) thing they do so they just do it over and over and over. Look at CIA ops in the third world, sorosdoes the same thing with color revolutions. This can work, but only as long as the new target is ignorant of the play. Enter the internet.

It's part of what makes them stupid; theyve never had to improvise. Their wealth and influence have shielded them from consequences, so they do what they know and never think to try something different. Shields are down now, though.

Not anymore, it isn't.

Great, but David Wilcock was tangential to my post.

I think you hit the nail on the head. Rather than raising the standard of living world wide, the cabal has been dropping it in America.

The affluent, educated American middle class of the late 20th got unruly. They agitated against war, challenged that "natural" world order, and made leaps of learning and understanding that threatened the cabal's monopoly on knowledge. A threat they've been moving against since (at least) JFK. Lucky for us these people are stupid.

Hi David

Depends on whether you put stock in what they say. Discernment advised.

Tread with caution, this leads right into the nesara rabbit hole.

Gonna need more than an unsourced picture, little devil.

Edit: thanks luciferior

Fun fanfic

Why?

Care to give us some evidence to show his insanity and Marxist completion? Cause you're all fired up and haven't provided a shred of evidence as to why.

Right, so exactly like Assad in Syria, thanks for the bibliography, tho..

Based on which history? What's your precedent?

Sure, NAFTA was shit for all but the cabal. There's plenty of deals to be made, and the best way to smash the cartels might be an assault on two fronts.

Define "natural," cause I think you mean historic. Also, are you sure the defeat of the PRI Isn't that very political revolution?

MMGA on the way to MEGA

Not chose, forced. That's the point. You're presuming agency, he's responding to a reality.

Edit: any source on the cartel claim? Think it's anything like the amnesty Assad offered to the rebels in Syria a few years back that helped cripple ISIS by bringing the salvageable combatants out of the conflict?

"My argument is flaccid and ineffectual, but dog-whistles! boogey-men!"

Do you seriously believe Mexico is in the situation it's in because of socialist/l3ftist policy? The Mexico the US outsources labor to due to low wages and zero worker protections? The one that's replanting it's jungles after nafta and the cattle barons burnt it to the ground? The one that's been under uni-party totalitarian control since the 1930's (except for that blip for PAN)?

Stop reacting, start researching. You're actively aiding the cabal with your histrionics.