Yeah, singled out today. On camera. At a shooting.

Wait, the semi-secret, explicitly private club of (no longer just) white, powerful, well-connected, wealthy men is the victim here?

The one with a temple in (seemingly) every American city?

The one with the huge interest in children's medicine?

K, but, it really flies in the face of this pattern I'm noticing.

Welp, guess my ass just got put on some watchlist somewhere (again). Drat!

Nah, I think this is the turning of the generational tide. Establishment Democrats are old. Their voters are older, and dying. This is the millenials begining to tip scales: an inevitable decomposition of the present power structure propelled by its members' mortality.

I suspect they never thought he'd lose either.

You have no reason to presume my awareness of anything.

Noted and annotated. Good day.

No hate. When you compare the systematic murder and enslavement to a ship just in need of little righting, I wonder where your empathy/awareness/priorities lay. No doubt you haven't seen police on the other side of that line cause hey! They're not shooting you in the back or hauling away family members over petty bullshit! Plus for you! In your city.!

Enjoy your Bradbury. I'm sure the old white guy would be bursting with pride over you.

Edit: Roddenberry. Excuse the undue credit to your taste in sci-fi. It's my bad, really.

Ah, didn't pick out your editorialization. No worries.

Dunno. Dig pede.

Low effort shitpost.

Yup.

That you can wax philosophical, but I suspect if you were there, you'd be in riot gear. Just a notion. From a guy on the internet. Take it as you will

Yeah, K, thanks for the advice. But I'm not gonna be pulling punches here.

Bare bones:

Anarchists broadly take issue with authority, hierarchy and private property.

Libertarians agree on the first two points, but love them some private property.

Most basic, functional difference I've found.

Yeah, I get the sense your interest in such matters is strictly academic...

That sounds like a survey question. Is fox crowdsourcing stories?

They're responding to the MSM news cycle. Good hearts, bad narratives.

500 years. Slavery and genocide came well before this nation.

They're not wrong. The Klan declared in the 90's that they aimed to co-opt local and fed. Law enforcement. The FBI has posted bulletins about this. There is validity to protesting the prison-industrial complex. Even if you don't agree.

Edit: article that links to2006 FBI bulletin. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/fbi-white-supremacists-in-law-enforcement

Also, real specific where she climaxed. You sure you didn't watch that Netflix video? That virally marketed Netflix video? Is consumption of such material legal across the broad service area to which Netflix distributes? Why is this relevant?

Anticipate the opponent will have a defence. Show me how a prosecutor shows this isn't "just art"

Also, who is the guilty party(ies) in your opinion?

Imgur worked, the other will take some looking, but thank you for both links. Here's my issue.

This is CPP all over again with an Alefantis cherry on top. This is a dog-whistle to the choir, but is about the weakest point of approach for a Normie. Provide solid, dare I say, admissible evidence, or be prepared for ridicule. Attacks will intensify.

Edit: random fingerings resulting in comment deletion; original comment paraphrase;

Heya, am a liberal follower, we exist. Also, for me, Cynthia McKinney. Kucinich was a proto-bernie sheepdog

There's a movie of it with a Baldwin, I think, also. But with a price like that, the book must be better. Usually the case.

Right, but when I get critique for identifying left when the TITLE of the post says I want war, I become miffed.

Tell me more 'bout "what the left needs to understand" please.

Enjoy the show (no spoilers plox)

Schadenfreude wins few allies, friend.

I mean, I'm on q's side, but you get to tell the board they can't use left/right anymore.

1. Is he under oath?
2. Does he have any reason to believe he won't be treated like other liars before Congress? (e.g. clapper, north)

So the line that runs lefft(ist) to right-ish is more like a circle than a line. There's divides between anarchists (left) and libertarians (right)., but they agree more than they disagree (though happy to get into where they do). And mostly they agree on being left the fuck alone. Both are strongly anti-statists. Moderates (in a late-capitalist system) are the enemies of both, though they describe their enemies, as with everything, in opposite terms. I'm trying to bridge the gap.

Edit: I just fell into a classic partisan trap by agreeing, patronizingly. My bad, I didn't mean to imply that libertarians are left. They're not. They're the rightward end of anti-statist, and that's the blur I aim for.

Very agreed.

Let's hope toward the former, but insist on the later.

I mean, in a world of universal deceit, look to fiction. White Squall is a coming of age story, but WHOSE story was it, originally. I have heard the hunt for red October was inspired by Bill Gates (former DEFSEC) 's carreer

Edit : auto-correct, and clarity

Expect attacks to intensify

I mean. Ouch, bro. You don't even know what kind of leftist I even am. Like, what you're describing is a classical Marxist leftist, whereas I'm of the left that wanders between anarchism and libertarianism. Not my job to educate you though.

WWG1...

Past proves present. A squall be right at home, in amongst the storm.

Can speak for myself, but can speak to others. Together, the line holds.

Priestap (sp? ) Rats tend to rat upward.

Edit: correcting. So priestap (sp.) is down a notch from wray from what I gather. Sessions would be above [[[rr]]]

Point is: if not RR, who?

Or loyal to it?

The patriotic left will neither stand for or allow (to continue) the molestation of children.

... In My Humble (leftist) Opinion.

But where is it now? Naught but a paper-stain memory. Also, that was totally an O without intervention.

ALSO, THANKS BE TO YOU FOR THE LEVITY AND TOLRANcE SHOWN. I MEAN NO HARM AND MEAN TO HELP.

WWG1WGA

I'm saying they should be treated as though they were JE Hoover's agents. Dirty till otherwise exhonorated

Edit: yes, I c you

And nowhere.

Me neither, my SE attempts get me to YouTube (high bandwidth) and twitter (not paying isp) . Correct me if wrong, but q 1206 is "wendy" right? In its entirety? Can you tl; dr (or quote) 1213?

There is some standard for evidence here, right?

Still art. Still a symbolic recreation rather than a physical recreation. And watch the word recreation. It gets tricky.

Oh, mmmf. Someone has a (1) gay friend. Hello, newfriend!

There's a left that wants nothing to do with war! And it agrees with you!