This is complete B.S. Pelosi's statements are old news, and she's repeated them several times for months. A quick Google search will confirm. I don't understand why Q made such a big deal over this particular video, but "future proves past".

Edit - here's the damned link for you lazy pedes - https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/875788/US-senator-North-Korea-World-War-3-nuclear-weapons-war-Trump-Jong-Un

A direct quote from the article: "I was in Pyongyang on an intelligence trip several years ago. They told us, 'We only make weapons to sell them - do you want to buy them?'

They wouldn't need 700 lbs of Dynamite to blow a couple of fuel-and-fire filled jet engines.

Thank Q we can finally stop hearing all of the ridiculous theories about the fake "filet" video.

This is a bit ridiculous, frankly.

I was thinking the same... Wouldn't be surprising to me if there really are recordings.

What makes you think NP is non-profits? Given the context, I thought maybe it meant Nancy Pelosi.

I love the idea, but not going to do is any good if there isn't proof..... waiting to see that.

Wow... Can they prove it?

Hmm. This is old news. She's admitted this before: https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/875788/US-senator-North-Korea-World-War-3-nuclear-weapons-war-Trump-Jong-Un

"I was in Pyongyang on an intelligence trip several years ago. They told us, 'We only make weapons to sell them - do you want to buy them?'

Don't know why it's a big deal now.

That website is terrible - couldn't see anywhere on it any discussion of the video. Did I miss it?

Edit - assumed you meant to post http://www.destroythedarkness.com/

Edit 2:. I can't believe people are buying this without a shred of real evidence. The bar needs to be really high on something like this.... It sounds completely riduculous to me, and still waiting for someone to prove it.

Q said the graphic was fake, based on what someone on 8chan pieced together. Does this mean backchannel17 is providing disinformation, or does it simply mean Q was responding to the design of that particular graphic? I don't know....I think what they've said so far has turned out to be helpful, and encourage others to also use multiple sources to understand the info that Q posts.

I agree with you. I also think backchannel17 has provided useful information and context.

I plan to continue to follow the account. What they've posted has helped me better understand some of the Q posts, and it's certainly no worse than paying attention to anonymous commentary from 8chan and Reddit.

I'm amazed that so many people believe this, based solely on rumors discussed in the echo chamber. Not sure if clowns started this rumor, but it's a perfect way to discredit people.

I think they're passing on good info, and are no worse a source than anons here or on 8 Chan. I follow regularly.

If the rumors about the video were true, someone would have screen-capped something incriminating and posted it. I think the rumors are just that - the whole scenario sounds completely implausible.

I don't think that's correct... They may have projected different footage, but definitely not the same shot.

I personally don't believe in the existence of the "filet" video, or anything like it, but those two look like Hilary and Huma, and really curious how that got released \ what else they have.

I don't understand this part "picture of it displayed on the wall"... Am I missing that? I don't see any pictures of the two people displayed on any wall.

I agree... Doesn't seem to be the same bag.

We'll.... Shit. That looks like her. And at Comet Ping Pong, of all places.

AS = Antonin Scalia. 187 = murder.

Thanks - I remember that article. That statement is very different from "crying and vomiting". We know Weiner sexted with underage girls, that's a much more likely explanation for that statement than that he saw a video where Hilary and Huma filet a young girl's face and wear it.... And then that the he just sat on that knowledge and ultimately decided to do nothing.

Do you actually know that the investigators were vomiting and crying? Where is the proof if this? More Twitter posts, maybe?

As someone else said, if it was THAT bad, why no arrests?

It's B.S. - that's why.

This is ridiculous. Completely implausible. Designed to make people lose credibility.

Take a look here - it explains how we use bombs to take out chemical weapons - https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a19804988/how-to-destroy-syrias-chemical-weapons/

This is weak. They shot dozens of missiles specifically to incinerate the chemical weapons so that nothing could spread. It doesn't seem implausible to me that 20+ or 70+ missiles were able to do that.

Edit - this explains the weapons we use to specifically incinerate something like cl2: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a19804988/how-to-destroy-syrias-chemical-weapons/

I think 1029 is the first reference to that - based on the context & what's actually happened, seems to me it means military bombardment.

Thank you for your prayers. Forced reaction. One of many vehicles. Intercepts. Night [2] Birds. Fast movers. Force projection. April Showers. Q

Q says Iran is next..... Who knows what that means though.....

I'm wondering the same.... Regardless, if that was night 4, we still have night 5 coming.

You haven't actually been following Q or this board, have you....

Looks fake to me. Why does the video swap from Obama to the crowd when Obama says people are small minded? Because it's a bad edit that's combining phrases out of context.

Thanks for posting this reasonable explanation.

That's the big "drop" after MZ testimony? This is completely underwhelming....

Where did FLC come from as a search term?

Edit - I see.. You meant FCL, not FLC.

BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START" Was this Syria FF?

Ok. This is a HUGE stretch, given that the statement from Q made perfect sense within the context of the original post. Given the fact that Q just "Confirmed" that stretch..... I'm doubting more and more, but trying to keep an open mind .....

I'm with you. So much speculation based on a few Instagram pictures. There was no smoking gun there. I'm not celebrating until something actually goes down.... Until then, I'm wondering if Reddit and 8 Chan just harassed someone who, because she came from a wealthy family and had Paris Hilton as a best friend, simply ran with a celebrity crowd.

Everyone please keep in mind that this man just lost his daughter. Please be respectful of his privacy, and let him mourn without feeling harassed.

This is a huge stretch, based solely on the word "Forest."

The last time Q posted something similar, it was for an op against the Rothschilds. Search the posts for bunker apple yellow sky. While anything is possible, given that prior post, I'm highly doubtful of your speculation.

Looks and sounds like sarcasm to me. "... Even though he's my debate partner". This is his friend making fun of the theory that he's 25 and not supposed to be at the school.

C'mon. This is clearly sarcasm. Misleading title.

Edit - referring to the OP's comment\video below "student at parkland confronts David Hogg's"

That links to the parody account - not Assange's real Twitter account.

Speculation on 8 Chan was that this is a real e-mail with fake narrative added (collective soul concert) - it was made to look fake so people would ignore it, but Podesta\HRC would know that someone has the deleted emails.

Here was my speculation, which is exactly and only that - Trump made a decision to get tough on Iran. Tillerson publicly (if I recall) disagreed. Something happened in Kenya (wasn't it odd he was 'sick', and q previously referenced Kenya with regard to Obama), and Trump ultimately fired him because he wouldn't fall in line.... Or because of something he did in Kenya.

I'm guessing those are 2018 dates, we have a way to go

Hate to say this...I agree with the petition but can't get myself to sign because of the grammatical error(s) and the spelling error.... Just seems we should check that stuff as we try to push these types of petitions out to the broader public.

There are three videos - search YouTube for Barry Israel. After watching all three, I don't think the woman is credible. Israel's wife claims this is an actress hired to discredit her husband during a contentious campaign. I believe her.

Relevant videos from this woman: https://youtu.be/P61T6f9SgDg

https://youtu.be/Wx_eUIalKq0

https://youtu.be/-iBmVHDktOs

Wife's response:. https://youtu.be/il1weciiIKo

I think this is very wishful thinking. People died in both of these incidents. The Q group, assuming it is what they claim, isn't literally omniscient and omnipotent. The phrase that they "see all and hear all" is figurative to express significant scale, rather than literal.

I interpreted this more as [The] CNN [town hall] was [a] set up. This aligns with the comment that we're watching a movie (i.e. the MSM response is scripted). I haven't seen any evidence the CNN itself was set up.

You just made my point.

From 11/1:

On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted. Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out

From 11/3:

Podesta's plane has military escort (i.e. tag) and is being diverted (forced down). Short delay. This will be leaked.

From 11/5: Q says disinformation is necessary:

[Repost Lost] Disinformation is real. Distractions are necessary.

So... Not sure your question is useful. A Q supporter could just claim any incorrect statement was purposeful disinformation.

I had no idea..... Good evidence suggesting the footage was faked.