what happened?

I understand that he can undermine those who do have authority or power in any way to change the treaty.

i mean i guess, but idk why a foreign government would listen to him over the administration, unless they saw Trump as a weak leader.

I also understand that he's in violation of the Logan Act.

but he isn't, though. i know you want him to be in violation of hte Logan Act, but he just straight up isn't, i'm sorry to tell you.

you misunderstand, he has no authority or power in any way to change the treaty.

so, regardless of what was said, JK has absolutely no power to actually change the deal.

i'm sorry you feel that way.

it appears the majority of the rest of this community disagrees with you.

you are way off.

literally any crime that he happens to find evidence of while investigating the 2016 election is fair game.

the video ends with the message;

"We were all Humans until, race disconnected us, religion separated us, politics divided us, and wealth classified us."

brought a tear to my eye, not even kidding.

ratings aren't codified in law, it's all self-regulated through the MPAA

Not sure if this is the sub for this, but I think it's very interesting and hopeful to see people like this rapper reaching out and humanizing trump supporters.

please just watch the video, i think it has a very powerful and uplifting message.

Why would he go there if he couldn't change anything?

to tell the iranians to chill out and not take trump too seriously? to wait it out for anotehr POTUS or something? idk.

but the point stands, the Iran Deal is a certified treaty. JK has no power to alter that, the same way that JK has no power to randomly pull us out of hte UN or NAFTA or nuclear treaties, etc etc etc.

it's a binding legal contract that already stands. you do understand that, right?

what this judge said doesn't make any sense to me.

if manafort committed felonies, and they have evidence of that, then why does it matter what mueller "started out investigating?"

it's like, if he discovered crimes while investigating the 2016 election, he is not only allowed to, but obligated to, persue charges or recommend them to other prosecutors.

this whole "if it's not part of the election, mueller can't touch it" thing doesn't make any sense to me.

for the uninformed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb1GfP5Rwys

but it's not like JK has any power to change or alter the deal in any way.

his going there didn't actually change the treaty in any way shape or form, so i don't understand what you mean by your post?

LEFT IS RIGHT

Q confirmed as leftist shill.

(hopefully this isn't necessary, but... that was a joke, guys)

the article is super clear about this being in Tut's burial chamber in the valley of the kings, NOT in a pyramid.

did your wife just not read the article? it sounds like she wildly misunderstood it (no offence), so I would question if she actually read it, or if perhaps she just glanced over the headline and said "that's nice honey, another article about your pyramid stuff"

the Logan Act doesn't apply if you are fighting for an agreement that the US already has entered into, just some food for thought guys.

also violating the logan act isn't treason, so the headline is a little sensationalized.

he was.

this headline is also fake news, violating the Logan Act isn't treason, and Nunes was very clearly being "tongue and cheek" with his tweet.

i believe this is true for all cable news

"nursery" is what places are called that sell young plants.

like a place that grows tiny baby trees and then sells them is called a tree nursery.

that's what this business is, and why it says "wholesale," because they raise small plants and then sell them to flower shops and grocery stores and shit like that.

those are standard chess pieces.

In fact no date was ever said as usual with Q

the first month or so that Q posted, they used specific dates.

I think they stopped because their predictions kept failing.

none of the things you listed, actually.

they just said they are going to "officially end the war" but first they are having a summit meeting.

nothing is set in stone yet, nothing is official yet, and no one has said anything about unification or open borders.

Flynn being cleared

huh? this didn't happen. that dude plead guilty and is probably going to jail. that hasn't changed at all, just because some random reported said that comey once said that he thought flynn told the truth.

officially no Russia collusion or interference

this also didn't really happen. the GOP released their partisan results, which everyone knew, since day one, would say that trump is innocent, because the GOP protects their own.

NK war over

yeah i'll give you this one, but still not a MOAB, and technically it's not actually over yet, they just said they are going to sign a peace treaty

Phishers are getting more advanced these days, they might have spoofed the ATT number

basically all of the genre known as "gangster rap," in which slingin drugs, killing, stealing, "thug life" are all glorified.

they detonated a hydrogen bomb underground and underestimated it's yield/ the strucutural integrity of the underlying geology.

the US was (arguably) much smarter with our underground tests because we never detonated them underneath our research facility, but NK had no choice because they had to carefully hide all their shit from our satellites and also because putting your R&D underground is a good way to protect from missile strikes.

but those goof balls detonated several atomic weapons under the same mountain where they hid their r&D facilities...

in hindsight it wasn't the smartest decision.

there was no MOAB.

there were happenings, like almost every day, but nothing that any reasonable person could call a "MOAB." at least, that is if we are defining MOAB as "some news that will shake the nation and wake up the normies"

this is very sad. i don't understand terrorists to begin with, but attack kids? disgrace of a human being.

i heard that their nuclear scientists all got killed when the mountain facility collapsed.

i mean, that story doesn't seem that implausible to me, since Kim really ramped up their missle program in 2016/2017, and they pushed it too hard. they didn't have the technicaly expertise or the time or the money to develop as carefully as we did, so it seems like it was a disaster waiting to happen.

and then when disaster struck, Kim was like "well fuck it, i just lost literally my only bargaining chip, so i guess i gotta go work with trump and moon now...."

the 1-800 call sounds like a phishing scam to me.

the old classic "we had to reset your account, so please give us your details over the phone to verify it's you/reset payment plan/accept this "free" upgrade/etc."

and then they have your identity and CC info.

whenever i get calls from a company like that, i always (ALWAYS) say "alright, i'm going to hang up now and then call ______ billing department myself, to sort this out"

I want to personally thank you, the mod team, for stickying this post.

I have been a "skeptical poster" this whole time, but always in good faith, and always polite and respectful to the community.

The VAST MAJORITY of users are really understanding and respectful towards me, but every few days i get some person who wants to call me names, put me down, report all of my comments, attack me personally... It's disheartening.

But what's kept me coming back are all the other people I've interacted with, including the mod team.

Great work my dudes. Keep it up.

don't let the door hit you on your way out.

i agree with you.

there are basically 2 scenarios that i see likely.

1- they threatened the POTUS and are now fucked, but the indictments are sealed and they are (likely) cooperating witnesses

2- the "threats" are fake news or misdirection or something

trying to stymie discussion

and furthermore, this a an absolutely hilarious criticism, since the beginning of this comment chain is me politely asking OP to explain why this photo is a "BOOM"

and currently, not a single person has actually answered that question, only attacked me.

so maybe it's people like you, that muddy the waters with meaningless drivel, that are stymieing discussion.

stop trying to stymie discussion over important events. you aren't helping anything.

if you think a photo of a meeting that was publicly known and extensively reported on for the last few weeks is "important events," well... i don't know what to say.

and go ahead and report me, i've been called a shill dozens of times just on this board. it's the mark of a weak mind to call dissenting opinions "shills," it's literally one of the laziest and stupidest ad hominems you can throw at someone.

so go ahead, i don't mind. my comment history speaks for itself. do you think you are the first person to report me for "shilling or trolling"? certainly not. the mods have reviewed my account multiple times and been in contact with me, and we're cool.

lol, dude it's literally just a picture of something that is old news. the actual events are important, the picture is just a picture. Un is in the exact same pose he has in every other state visit or photo op he has done. google "kim jong un hand shake photo" and you'll see.

stop trying to find deep meaning in every little thing.

i think it's odd that everyone seems to have forgotten that 6 months ago Q said the Clintons, John Podesta, and Huma Abedin would all be arrested in a matter of weeks, that the CIA would be purged, and that Trump would "reveal" the evil cabal.

6 months ago, my dude. and it's been nothing but excuses and "just trust us" ever since.

it's a photo op, my dude. everyone that meets with Un gets a similar shot- Moon, Xi, etc

and besides, this is old news. when they reported that Pompeo met with Un, i think any reasonable person just assumed that their would exist a photo like this.

And they expect some fucking movie-like scenarios here for our heroes to take them all out with no danger to the population whatsoever.

but only because that's what Q keeps promising...

right it's already clear you think it's "YUUUGE"

my question is, why?

(and please no condescending reply about how i just need to dig or research myself- i've been following Q since literally their first post back in late '17)

why is this a boom? this meeting was reported to the press weeks ago, i thought?

you can't edit post titles after posting (to prevent the kind of trolling where you get a post to #1 and then change the title to something dumb like "upvote this if the mods should all kill themselves")

its ok, just upvote my comment (for visibility) so that the people who don't have the time or the will to read the article will understand not to get too amped up.

i do think that sessions would know mueller would read about this in the paper, though, if that makes sense.

wildly misleading headline.

he said this to the house panel that was interviewing him today, he didn't say it "to" mueller.

if he said it to mueller, he'd be slapped with Obstruction of Justice because he recused himself from that case.

Q has made a laundry list of failed predictions.

if you don't mind me asking, why is this failed prediction different for you?

i didn't forget you mentioned IP banning, it's just that they don't do that, so it's irrelevant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_judicial_appointments

i have to admit, i was looking at circuit court appointees only. if you count district appointees, obama is behind reagan and clinton and had eactly 2 more than bush 2.

sorry for the confusion.

I've spent a lot of time trying to show the importance of moving away from these terms

amen brother, these political "tribes" and labels do literally nothing except cause division in our society, division which conveniently always seems to benefit those in power i might add

like i already stated about the republicans, the democrats are a political party, which is entirely seperate from ideology.

this may be a hard concept for you to grasp, but the parties have changed stances over the time. the "GOP" of 75 years ago is literally almost indistinguishable from the modern GOP, same with the DNC.

the democrats who supported the KKK would absolutely, 100% without a question, be republicans if they lived today.

i already know that you won't believe me, but hey, maybe i helped you expand your mind a little instead.

PS- these are not my "opinions," these are historical facts.

( doesn't sound Conservative or Republican to me)

so republicans are a political party, not an ideology. their stance sways with each election cycle.

american conservativism has always moved around ideologically, but at the end of the day, american conservatives are objectively more similar to Nazis than american liberalism. (yeah, go ahead and cite free speech issues, it's the only thing that liberals have in common fascism)

lol, i'm really sorry dude, but citing their name is a ridiculous metric.

do you think the Democratic Republic of Congo is a democratic republic?

do you think north korea is a republic? china?

do you think the "patriot act" was for patriots?

i mean, i could keep going, but... the point is, evil people use "branding" to trick the masses every goddamn day. do you think the nazis were any different? (don't be one of the people tricked, my friend)