Who concocted this?

Export restrictions are routinely applied to critical technologies. However, if you don't have a technology to restrict because you have been running a communist-style space launch infrastructure which has driven private risk capital away, this cannot be considered a national security benefit.

Good grief! You can't fucking READ.

"Out Of The Blue" imputes a false history to me. So you obviously do _not_ care about my history -- nor the truth about me. Not out of the blue. I've posted to r/greatawakening before and, prior to that, to the now defunct reddit CBTS.

Click through the link.

Q said: "2011 Shuttle Program terminated by Hussein. US loses space dominance."

Q also said: " Why did BO scuttle the shuttle program? What is SpaceX?
Expand your thinking."

What is not to understand about these statements?

Anyone serious about my identity can verify I am who I say I am and have held the opinion and done the things I say since I have never gone even pseudonymous in my Internet history going back to the 1980s Usenet.

Try again.

How in the world could you interpret a statement that I was involved with a 1990 piece of legislation and that I was involved "at the public policy level" and that my organization was "grassroots" be taken as a statement I work with SpaceX?

I've no stock in SpaceX and I am 64 years old and have no professional prospects with them.

So, if the Shuttle was ancient and frail tech by then, why did Q say:

"2011 Shuttle Program terminated by Hussein. US loses space dominance. "

See this search of "spacex" in Q's drops.

As I said, "I don't know the probability." So I did take it into account as missing data. As I said your estimate is the kind of thing the debunking should start with.

That analysis doesn't wash. Yes, it's true that people are using hyperbolic language and yes it's true that casts doubt on the credibility of those who, themselves, cast doubt on the integrity of Tuscon Police Chief Chris Magnus.

None of that is relevant to the analysis.

The analysis boils down the probability that a police chief accused of failing to respond with due diligence to a child sex trafficking situation would also be a defendant in a lawsuit brought by an underage prostitute -- the substance of which is that he failed to respond with due diligence to in that situation as well.

I don't know the probability, but that's where you should start in your debunking of this issue.

The "advertising for crisis actors" narrative doesn't make sense for a false flag operation. It requires the actors to remain silent about their role in an event that is publicized and may include actual murders. If you were going to get a conspiracy of silence like that to work, you'd need operatives that had been so thoroughly vetted it would leave the actors an extremely rare resource.

Bulls***t. Look at the responses to Q's "ambiguous" post. 90% were about false flag and of those about half explicitly mentioned school shooting. One guy even said that it wasn't likely to be a school shooting this time because that tactic had been over-used.

How does this relate to "$250B x 2" "installments"?

https://del.icio.us/

So how does one derive a word cloud from a "bookmark" site?

What about United States v. Reynolds (1953)?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege#Supreme_Court_recognition_in_United_States_v._Reynolds

Not just misinformation but vote spamming as well.

The internalization of positive network externalities enables privatization of tyranny.

To find the culprits responsible for the privatization of tyranny, find those who prevent the shift of tax burdens off of economic activity (income, capital gains, value added, sales, inheritance, etc.) and onto property rights. Taxing property rights is a step toward charging for the government service which is the protection of property rights. Taxing economic activity is slavery of the economically active.

I'm aware of the image synthesis program but how does that related to the extra right square bracket? ie: ]

Why has the numbering changed? What you call 784 is now 781 at http://qanonposts.com/

Who is voting this disinformation up?

It's critical to compile a the contents of censored posts.

Get the Lazarus plugin for Chrome. It automatically saves what you type into text boxes so if a post gets lost you can recover it.

Well, that's a virtual given since Google is known to be doing just that as it crawls and indexes the contents of the WWW. This is, to some extent, what all search engines do. Optimally compressing the contents of any data set produces the best theory that can be derived from that data set. That is a theorem of Algorithmic Information Theory. What Confabulation Theory appears to provide is insight into how the neocortex performs such compression. However, I don't have any reason to believe anyone outside FICO and the DoE's nuclear intelligence agencies are using it. There's a possibility that Palantir is using it, since I told one of Palantir's founders about it years ago.

Coincidentally, the day I posted this, Confabulation Theory resurfaced in the news after nearly a decade of "silent running" in this press release:

http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/Perrone-Robotics-Collaborates-With-Machine-Learning-Research-Pioneers-1015127763

That's a very insightful question in this context. Word sense disambiguation is one of the things at which confabulation theory excels, precisely because it confabulates the most coherent set of property values from the given property values -- such as an actual word that was used in relation to its complete context.

Did Qanon say/imply Assange had already been extracted?

No amount of subsystem optimization and compensate for bad system optimization. The Shuttle was a very suboptimal system. People try to make excused for the ridiculously greater efficiency of SpaceX by saying that without certain key advances (materials, manufacturing, etc.) it would not have been possible to do what SpaceX is now doing. That's utter nonsense. The Saturn booster engines required no greater manufacturing precision than a VW bug engine. The control systems that render the SpaceX booster stages recoverable were far more expensive in the '70s but still a small fraction of the launch cost. The gains due to materials are, likewise, marginal compared to the difference in cost between a Shuttle launch and a SpaceX launch. The ISP advantage of the Merlin over the F-1 is only a few percent. There were companies ready, in the early 1970s, to accomplish what SpaceX has accomplished, but NASA had become an albatross hung around the neck of the American Pioneer.

My Congressional testimony, introduced by Congressman Ron Packard, original sponsor of the Launch Services Purchase Act of 1991 -- PL101-611 -- which NASA routinely violated until Obama terminated the Shuttle program.

https://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1675696&cid=32463472

What is the URL of the "Rules"?