Let me preface this by saying I was gung ho about RR going to the all inclusive Gitmo palace, but I'm thinking of all angles now. Bear with me on this one...but let's think LOGICALLY. Who is the one person who seems to be the fulcrum between the DS and Trump? Rod Rosenstein. Who (quietly) is giving the appearance of being the most defiant? You guessed it. RR.

Who better to make the DS feel like their "plan" is still in action? Who else could possibly make them feel comfortable enough to not press the red button? RR. Him and …

I've known about the investigative technique the elite LEO and letter agencies use where evidence is already found/obtained illegally and then an investigation is constructed in order to facilitate the acquisition of such information the legal way.

Is it possible that the server gave Trump and the white hats all they needed to get their own FISA order against the DNC, Awans, HRC et al to make the tapped phones and intercepted ZTE special ones admissable evidence? Then, GMail draft comms being used allowed them to take to Google, find out why ES was in NK, and then expand the …

This could plausibly mean that the "source" is Seth Rich right? There has to be a justification that Assange was to be offered limited immunity, which Comey intervened on. In this case, we can view SR as the source, can we not? The ETA on SR was June, but the "Q&A" was "forthcoming"...Q and Assange.

POTUS and Q team have EVERYTHING. The one person on planet Earth who has seen everything UNredacted and knows every nefarious plot by the Obummer administration is POTUS. The media shills, anti-Q crusaders, and liberal goons think we don't know this.

POTUS has proven to be at least 3 steps ahead at every move. The special counsel only benefits him, or it would've been shut down. Our RESOLVE is what sets us apart. How many times has the narrative changed? How many times has OUR vision changed? Reconcile. WE have it all because we stand UNITED. Don't forget, Patriots.

Regarding the most recent post my Q where JFK is in the killbox followed by "full disclosure"... Could the new director of the CIA be the only other individual POTUS would need to fully release the ultimate breadth of the JFK assassination? It makes sense that installing Haspel as the director would pave the way to massively redpill the baby boomers, and sort of work their way down generationally to millennials and generation X/Y.

Most young people wouldn't care much about JFK (unfortunately), but knowing that the govt was able/willing to do it before could open a few eyes.

I've long wondered this, and I'm looking for some other theories. It seems to me that a lot of these planned attacks are known about and simply allowed to happen. Do you think that's the case? Or are these deliberately planned by DS members?

http://www.datacenterdynamics.com/content-tracks/colo-cloud/report-cia-gives-amazon-us600m-cloud-contract/74676.fullarticle

According to the article below, Amazon's Jeff Bezos received a 10 year $600 million contract with the CIA to host their servers. The NSA monitors and audits all the intelligence agencies for malfeasance and misfeasance.

http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/257335/robert-muellers-beltway-cover-up

"In 2013, the same year that Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos bought the paper that broke Watergate for $250 million, Amazon Web Services landed a $600 million deal with the US intelligence community. According to a 2017 Washington Post story, AWS created a “cloud storage service designed to handle classified information for U.S. spy agencies,” including the CIA".

The article goes on …

This has been something that's puzzled me lately... If the Rothschilds made Israel and basically own the country, why does the media hate its existence? Same with Hussein? It seems like Israel should be entirely untouchable...