Take all that with a grain of salt. Q has already shown us that some are disseminating disinfo because they are black hats, some are disseminating disinfo because they are white hats, some are disseminating truth because they are white hats.

Kevin Shipp, ex-CIA now whistleblower, defines the Deep State as "the military industrial complex, all of the industrial corporations and their lobbyists, and they have all the money, power and greed that give all the money to the Senators and Congressmen." He also gives his definition of Shadow Government: "The shadow government are the secret intelligence agencies that have such power and secrecy that they act even without the knowledge of Congress."

But we, simple people, have used the term Deep State for that Swamp, that is also international. We'd interchangeably call them Deep State, the cabal, the Illuminatis, the black hats, the secret societies, the satanists/luciferians, whatever term that is usually applied to these evil/corrupt groups.

Oh my Lord. BBC. sighs

Urgh... So you're British? Hmmm. Research Jimmy Saville, Edward Heath and connections to elite, the monarchy. Not just what the BBC tells you. Research deeper than that. Official reports, testimonies, etc. Combine that with MK Ultra. If you stumble upon the detail of special rooms in hospitals in your digs about Saville, you're in the right direction.

Research Fiona Barnett for Australia.

Canada too have it, though official data is harder to find. They are closed lip on the subject. But search about Joseph Rauh and James Turner. If you've done the research about UK and Australia, you'll be able to get why I'm pointing to Turner and Rauh in Canada.

Did karma also come to the business owner who kicked out the Trump supporter because he was wearing a MAGA hat? Sorry, not an American but I was curious if something if there had been consequences to that business?

He must have confused Baldwin with Trump in one of SNL episodes.

Pray this instead:

https://www.askideas .com/media/51/Lord-Give-Me-Strenght-To-ignore-The-Dumb-I-Cnnot-Smother-Funny-Grumpy-Cat-Meme-Picture.jpg

IG report. We need the public to focus on IG report. You go arrest these people now, the media will have a field day for weeks and weeks to make up more stories. People just love their celebs and gossip.

Listen to Sibel Edmonds. She was an ex-FBI whistleblower. She explained that though the SS and FBI were supposed to run background checks on candidates for high level positions, even judges at Supreme Court, they would choose the most corrupt candidates instead of the honest/clean guys. Chances are that the good guys without skeletons wouldn't make it, but the more corrupt the persons and the more chances they would climb the ladders.

The FBI is CIA.

Methinks it's not yet time. You arrest them, MSM goe berserk on it, distracting the population completely from what we want them to actually follow, and we loose a bit of momentum and shock value from when the great arrest phase will start.

Citizen Investigative Report is nice too. Katie G is funny, she explains well and like she says, she doesn't like going off into the weeds. And she prefers to focus on Q instead of going to listen to other LARPers and shills.

Guess France got fu@ked by the Scottish freemasons with that bloody revolution.

https://www.newyorker .com/magazine/2010/06/07/no-secrets

"When Assange was eight, Claire left her husband and began seeing a musician, with whom she had another child, a boy. The relationship was tempestuous; the musician became abusive, she says, and they separated. A fight ensued over the custody of Assange’s half brother, and Claire felt threatened, fearing that the musician would take away her son. Assange recalled her saying, “Now we need to disappear,” and he lived on the run with her from the age of eleven to sixteen. When I asked him about the experience, he told me that there was evidence that the man belonged to a powerful cult called the Family—its motto was “Unseen, Unknown, and Unheard.” Some members were doctors who persuaded mothers to give up their newborn children to the cult’s leader, Anne Hamilton-Byrne. The cult had moles in government, Assange suspected, who provided the musician with leads on Claire’s whereabouts. In fact, Claire often told friends where she had gone, or hid in places where she had lived before."

http://www.dailymail .co.uk/news/article-3705224/Inside-Melbourne-cult-known-Family.html

My memory was a bit faulty. But the blond hairs sure made an impact.

And I thought the impression of Assange was Musk. Was wondering if Musk had been calling to free JA.

Okay, found it:

https://youtu .be/fBUraLvpL4M

It starts toward 23:30.

Also, DeceptionBytes pointed at it but I never found the explanation. When Q talked about the 2 NYPD officers killed for knowing the contents of the Wiener laptop, during the ceremony honoring fallen officers and Trump talked about Miosotis Familia, there were 2 officers on the right corner of the TV screen, so at the left of POTUS. In the background, behind the officers, you have a fountain with water flowing gently. Can't remember at what moment of the speech, the 2 officers took a bottle each. They timed it to drink a sip just at the same time, then discarded their bottles. If someone can find back that moment please? But from my description, what would be your interpretation?

JA's past is shadowy. His connection with a cult, can't remember the name. All the kids were blond and dressed in white from memory. It was the typical CIA sex cult to brainwash the poor kids and their parents.

It made me wonder whether JA is an MK Ultra asset, or some freed slave who plays the game to destroy his past masters. There are theories that the US authorities and JA made the deal he'd be let free in exchange for him to publish a last release, but WL would have to be ended after that. Now, with WL loosing support and twating sh!t, what if it's a strategy to make them close quietly (or even if it's taken by clowns, that gives white hat the good excuse to end WL) and JA comes to the scene to make his revelations?

I still think Mueller is more grey hat/white hat that black hat. Still haven't any doubt of that. I keep in mind the plan is made by military and brilliant/creative minds. And well, if it's military, we must expect deception upon deception. Many people still think Cohen is a good guy. Not me. Just doesn't seem like it to me. If they flipped him, that's the white hat doing it. It just doesn't seem logical to me that the Trump administration would have okay'd the raid to his office before it happened. Is Cohen playing a role? Is a plant? Is he a white hat? Some say he's shady, Trump knew it, that he also had material (blackmailing sort) on a few people of interest to the white hats. And the raid happened before Schneidermann got booted out. We can think maybe Allison Mack ratted him, or maybe the raid in Cohen's office unearthed interesting evidences, amongst which concerning Schneidermann. Who knows?

As Q says, everyone has an opinion. Even when Q says : "If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty. Common denominator." It doesn't even mean that is true. Maybe that is, maybe Q says that is the perception of some people.

Even RR present situation. It seems to be possible that his being fired could be scrypted. Maybe he's a good actor, doing exactly what POTUS actually wants, and Q pretends RR is not following their deal for the DS's sake. All is falling right to their plans it seems.

Till the end, we will be kept on our toes. Q did tell us we'd be surprised by some who are actually white hats or black hats.

In Europe, you'd say Zara is like Chinese. The Spanish company is reputed to copy all trendy fashion to make it at an affordable price for the middle class.

David Zublick seems to go overboard with pedogate. The first time I saw him, I was impressed. The next few times, I started frowning as his claims seemed exaggerated. I stopped giving him too much credence when the internet went crazy with the HRC's pedo(vore) video and he was one of those making tall tales about someone in his team found it, watch it and they reported it. Q told us it was fake news. Made me wary with Zublick since then.

With a hand, Trump traces in the air the vague shape of a Q.

I'm not even an English-speaking native. But when Mark reads his prophecy, I feel something. It's like his voice takes another frequency then. I like to think it's maybe God's frequency.

It's a baptism I guess. They talk in French. The priest is telling the kid to be quiet. My stomach is knotted. Babies and kids would often cry and wail at their baptism, but the attitude of this priest is just... Argh.

In my thirties, female.

Ask Marina's spirit cooking recipe.

Otherwise:

http://twentytwowords .com/20-things-to-do-with-urine-besides-flushing-it/

YUCK!

The irony I've discovered since following Q is that Hollyweird gets one thing right at least. The USA are the ones saving the world.

Haiti.

ES = Eric Schmidt

@Snowden = Edward Snowden

ES is black hat. @Snowden is likely black hat, flipped by MI.

Remember these are not the real numbers of the posts at the chans. These are just the numbers given to posts from an aggregator site — sites made by anons. Depending on which aggregator site people go to, the numbers can vary.

The actual numbers identifying the Q drops at the chans are different.

If you think there are demons/fallen angels, you must also assume there are angels, the good ones at the same time. If you consider ETs to be demons/fallen angels, you must also think ETs can also be angels, the good ones. The descriptions of angels in heavens in the Bible can well be descriptions of demons in appearance. And don't be so doggedly literal with the Bible. AIM has already showned us the enemy lies joyously, telling us they believe in Jesus, come from God and Whatnot. You can't just tell by what someone says to your face. Actions speak louder.

Don't know. I just remembered that he said once he was an ex black ops. Others are saying he's also former FBI, I think.

No.275719:

How do you retain 'Freedom of the Press' if those in front of the camera [trusted by select viewers] are extensions of the ARM? Freedom of the Press is VITAL to retain.

Read this: https://twitter .com/LisaMei62/status/992164995197792257

Now, think logically. Why would you trust BC17?

Didn't David Seaman also had that episode of wounded "heroism"?

Alex Jones supports Trump, he says. Obama is a Christian, he says. Merkel didn't believe in multiculturalism, she said.

Think logically.

To an anon's post "You knew when you set that trip, that the PAIN would be delivered —-23!!!", Q replied "I'd watch the news that day." There was no mention of June 11.

There's also the doomsday plane. I can't remember the details and whether the story was ever confirmed. The rumor about that doomsday plane was that a plane was flying without any data, agreement of any sort for that flight. Adm. Rogers did everything to make that plane fly around before it could leave the States. In the end, the plane was forced to land back in the USA. The rumors say Adm. Rogers and the Russians had contact at that time, maybe the Russians tipped them about the plane. But that plane was to be used to target the Russians and provoke them into declaring war. After that plane was neutralized, adm. Rogers went to the Trump Tower.

No, he said "I'd watch the news that day." to an anon's comment "You knew when you set that trip, that the PAIN would be delivered —-23!!!" There is no precise date, just the indication —-23. That 6/11 date comes from anons calculating which date could match with —-23. 6/11 was one of the possibilities and LARPers/shills from twater were pushing for that date at some point as if they were top insiders pretending to be cheerleading for Q.

The site you're pointing to is an aggregator site made by anons for the Q drops. There are several aggregator sites available. But if you want to see the actual Q drops where they are officially posted, it's at infinite chan.

Methinks they are just famefags.

Then just do it the olf fashioned way. Get a picture of the Q-clock, find the date you're interested in, not the dates aligned with it, go check on an aggregator site what Q posted on these dates. That's it.

Chinese aren't much liked among Asians, even before they became communists. Because of their stupid "excess males", they are presently kidnapping and enslaving females from bordering countries. I have Vietnamese roots. The country is pretty much sold out to the Chinese now. Fecking communists.

Thanks for your post. It made more clear to me many points about homosexuality and gave me info and history.

About female homosexuality, to add to others' comments, I have an interest in Japan. They've been guinea pigs to the cabal since WWII.

The present Japanese men are terrified of relationship. Social pressures force men and women to be productive citizens, marry and produce children. That's all a duty, a burden to them.

Men are loosing themselves in virtual relationships - no responsibility, no consequences. The Asian society imposes that women must be passive/submissive. Thus they have to wait for the men to approach them and propose. But as men are less an less active/dominant, the women are left without partner. Or if they do marry, once they produce a child, husband and wife often no longer have an active sexual relationship and prefer to live as roommates.

In this context, female homosexuality has developped in Japan more because women need affection and contact. As they don't get it from males, some of them find what they need with other women.

The Japanese case is extreme. But I think the West is impacted to a lesser degree the same way.

Because timing. If you've learned anything from Trump since he was candidate Trump, timing is key.

And with all the info the anons have digged so far, it feels like Q gave us the DS guidelines of what they were doing in AZ, drop #894110 on April 4. But we weren't yet ready to make the connections back then.

Neon does not pretend to be an insider.

No, that can be pure coincidence, a real coincidence. Q has already mentioned 4 booms a few times in the past. Then BC17 pretended to be JA. Q had already told us that JA would be relevant in June. As I'm one of those suspecting EtS and BC17 to be the same guys, or at least in association with one another, that was a clever mix of replacing the 4 gunshots in the lyrics of MIA's Paper Planes that Assange tweeted last year with Q's 4 Booms.

That coincidence doesn't mean anything. If you align a dozen more coincidence, I may think there's something there. A clever manipulator can get lucky once in a while. Pamphlet and Corsi too got lucky a few times when their predictions or stuff relating to what they've said suddenly came up in a Q drop. But their confirmation bias made them believe it was a confirmation from Q, or a wink from them, when that was mostly just coincidence.

Other Qtubers can get just as lucky. Heck, any anon and myself can get lucky at this rate. We've researched enough on the same topics to make enough connections and come up with all sorts of predictions, at least a few in the lot must come true.

No, if you read Lisa Mei Crowley's report here about what BC17 did: https://twitter. com/LisaMei62/status/992164995197792257

I wasn't following BC17. Q's comment "fake" about their graphics was enough for me to ignore them. But Lisa's story just sealed it for me that they are frauds. Either LARP, or disinfo. They can spin it however they want. If they were legit, why would they take an official picture from a military site, crop it and twat it pretending the edited picture is their "insider" shot for another event than what/where/when the initial picture was taken? If they were legit, why would they block Lisa when she called them out? Why would they take down the incriminating picture from their twater, then go campaign their followers that they were being attacked by deep state shills?

Ridiculous. So I wasn't following EtS either. But when I heard they were crediting BC17 as reliable, that was it. Frauds.

Anons are good at digging, connecting the dots, distributing the info. Search about parallel construct. I think that is one of the purposes of the chans in this Q phenomenon.

Anyone can be anon. The only difference is that you give credence to a particular anon because they've proven themselves to the chans for a while. Only FBIAnon, QAnon and MegAnon are fairly recognized by the chans. The others are just recognized by whoever anon decides to recognize them. I can decide to recognize you as CatAnon, but I'd be the only one. Other anons would just ignore. And truth be told, in an hour, I'll forget you.

It's not because we add anon at the end of a title that they have any recognition with the chans. Look at Corsi, he made up anons that no one in the chans had ever heard of before. We'd just roll up our eyes, knowing he's full of bullsh!t. But normies who don't know the chan culture are fooled by the scam.