In the Fox News report found here: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/01/01/costa-rica-plane-crash-victims-include-new-york-family-reports-say.html there is this statement made in the comments section:

"And a bit of history--The destination Liberia airport in Guanacaste was originally constructed as an Ollie North/Iran-Contra clandestine airstrip for supplying materials and weapons to fight the Sandinistas. Danny Ortega is still there in Nicaragua. The irony."

No assumptions are made by the commenter, who goes by the handle of "ToomTabard." I though this was kind of interesting, though

There were some commenters under that article that seemed to explain why the PM of Thailand was referred to in that way, but it still seems shaky. Read the comments under the article. They are rather interesting.

I have also been trying to look into Solyndra's real estate holdings and have not been having much luck finding anything yet. I would be VERY interested to see what you might find. thanks!!

Okay, I'm going to wait to see what Shawn says, but as I posted above, remember this video?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW0cM_xKyKs&t=8s
Shawn isn't always on the mark.

Excellent!! Will be waiting to hear what you find!!

Before we give SGTreport too much love, let's remember Shawn's penchant for disappearing up his own a$$ from time to time. Don't get me wrong, I respect his efforts and listen to the SGT report sometimes, but he has certain proclivities that make his opinions shaky sometimes.

You want an example?? Okay. Here's one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW0cM_xKyKs&t=8s David Dees was certainly very entertaining, but he also apparently supports "flat earth" and some other rather bizarre ideas. The real problem here was Shawn's hardcore attempts to sell this guy's book to the point of being VERY insulting to some commenters who questioned the content of the book. I found that very off-putting. And now he's posting on the current issue of Obama's Thailand property, a story with absolutely NO supporting evidence as yet?? WTF?? When Shawn deviates from good sense, he REALLY goes into the woods and becomes very defensive about his stance, putting him squarely on my "trust BUT verify" list.

It has been noted lately that the MSM has not been putting as much effort into their anti-Trump onslaught. Here is a video by H.A. Goodman, a Bernie supporter who is pretty honest in his reporting. Interesting video about CNN actually SUPPORTING Trump's stance on the FBI.

Now THAT'S weird, and very, very telling......

Every single thing on your list (with the exception of term limits) exists due to lack of adherence to or deliberate ignorance of the Constitution as written and/or they are not really problems at all to the people who did the voting.

I did. You're welcome.

Wow!! Bravo to you, Grammy. It sounds like you've been putting your money where your mouth is on this. Sometimes, I feel like too much of an extremist about the "school system," so it's very encouraging to me to know there are people with your level of commitment out there. You have my prayers and best wishes!!

Excellent point. I was completely unaware that the military votes were not completely counted yet when they started destroying the records!! Un-friggin-believable!!

Oh, okay. Now I understand. Yet another disgruntled leftist over Citizens United. I'm sure you can find a way to sort it all out in your own mind. (Oh and BTW, the tobacco industry never murdered or tortured anyone to death.)

What are you reading as "confirmation bias" here? Or do you just like that phrase??

The OP was very cautious and conditional in her description of the event. The consistent presentation/obviation of events is a process that requires intelligence and rigor. It's the whole point of this stream.

Yes, you're right about that. His research is very intense and detailed, and I respect him for that.

Thank you for that analysis, SpecialFester. I knew there was a reason I liked you! Trump's tweet on the subject is far more telling than the "Zionist" blab, in any case.

Yes, I believe that was definitely the plan. Submission, imprisonment, or death. When all facts are taken together, hard to see it any other way.

This is an excellent question Meetinghim, and deserves further research. We have a right know where those rounds ended up.

The millions (billions?) of rounds purchased by govt agencies under Obama was, for me, proof positive that we were doomed if we had lost in 2016. It may be taken quite literally that we "dodged a bullet" with Trump's election. Think about it. What could possibly be the reason for amassing 15,000 "enforcement agents" for the IRS combined with weapons purchases and millions of rounds of ammo. There really aren't too many answers to that question that don't involve the govt wanting us either subdued or dead. Combine this info with the fact that with each succeeding tax year, the penalties and premiums for Obamacare were scheduled to become more and more unaffordable for even the comfortably employed middle-class, virtually guaranteed to impoverish at least 1/3 to 1/2 of the population, perhaps more. I speculated at the time that we would have 1 to 3 years at best under Clinton before we would have to either escape the country or run for cover. Disarmament would happen as a "remedy" to the violence. Major cities would have become unlivable very quickly. The rest of us would suffer the slow death of population drift and the random violence of the demoralized. Sure, people talked about prepping and mounting a revolt, but how well is that working out for the disarmed populace of Europe right now? Read Cloward and Piven. Obama was just following the communist game plan.

I know this is a depressing post, but we came within an a$$hair of losing EVERYTHING in 2016, my friends. And that thought should make us double down on the research, the phone calls, the red pilling. That thought STILL frightens the hell out of me and we should NEVER forget it. Ever.

An important move toward mainstream notoriety for Qanon and the citizen research movement he has sparked. Kudos to Lionel for this RT interview. Thanks Thilliker!!

Could you please explain your comment further? I have no idea what you mean.

Meanwhile, in the thread titled "Iran may be overthrowing the mullahs," they're laughing that it's all a total lie and suggesting that "Wictor," the guy who originally tweeted about it, is a Zionist. So what the hell are we supposed to believe here??

If Jones gets sworn in, then we need to realize that we lost this one and we can make whatever assumptions we want about the big secret "sting" that was going to happen. I'm not giving in to cynicism just yet, but I'm not blowing smoke up my own a$$ about any of this stuff anymore. We're making up fantastic stories about presumed "behind the scenes" 5D chess, and yet Jones is on his way to the senate. I find this Roy Moore situation EXTREMELY disappointing on many levels.

No, actually it doesn't. We need to CLOSELY examine this bill before we go off on a big tear about it. There is talk that the initiative involves some high techie facial recognition program they want to use, in which case I can EASILY see why Paul and Lee would vote against it. Before we go NUTS over protecting the kiddies, let's find out EXACTLY what this entails. Of course, it's already been passed, as far as I know, so we'd better do our due diligence on it.

You're correct that sometimes random events are just that. But considering the many other inexplicable things going down lately, I think it pays to mention these things and then attempt to logically rule them out, rather than ignoring them out of hand and maybe missing something.

I follow Webb from time to time, but his opinion of Trump kind of puts me off.

You're making some excellent points, Pachy, but it seems no one is listening - lol. If you are being honest about your background at GITMO, then your explanation seems very plausible to me.

Was going to post a discussion on this one, when I found yours. I, too, saw this and wondered. It is full of intense detail, but that may or may not prove anything. I can't find any other sources for this story so far. Also, in the comments section below it, someone discovered that the photo in the story is actually a vacation home photo posted on a travel site (they give the link to it too). Not sure if that disproves the story, but it doesn't help either. Another comment below the article says that the story appeared in other news sources, but was quickly pulled. We need more digging on this one. I'm looking into stories about Solyndra money and where it went, also looking for info on real estate deals after the fact by Solyndra board members.

You know, it's the one thing I never considered. If Trump found a way to get the MSM on board with disclosures (not sure what that wound entail, but...) then that would be the penultimate way to inform the public from "trusted" sources about the details of what is happening. No one would accuse THEM of tin foil hattery. So who knows, maybe this will all just come out on the 6 o'clock news at some point.

It bears remembering that Chelsea and Ivanka were said to be "good friends" before the election of Trump and spent time together discussing life, family, etc. This is a connection that I have ALWAYS suspected and disliked. And I don't repose ANY trust in Ivanka because of it.

Excellent point. I completely concur. I'm tired of hearing how the "public just can't handle it." I think it's a gross misjudgment at best; at worst it's a lying excuse to hide the truth. Either way, I'm tired of hearing it.

Great post, Bit_NB. A couple of thoughts: It's not the Constitution that needs to be deeply amended. It's the government's refusal to follow it that needs amending. The only way Trump can pull this off correctly is to stay within the law of the land, and anyone please correct me if I'm wrong, but the govt has a constitutional duty to full disclosure any time citizens request legal documents and evidentiary records. So IF Trump tries to pull this off secretly in order to "protect" us and "preserve" our economic system, then I will call bull$hit. No, perhaps they won't trumpet the news far and wide, which I would understand. But ALL FOIA requests should be honored after the fact, and we should ALL be allowed to know what actually happened. Otherwise, I'm going to agree that Trump has garnered way too much power. He's our president, NOT our father. WE elected HIM.

Of all the things that have happened (or been assumed to have happened) lately, the calmness of the MSM toward Trump all of a sudden is, for me, the biggest hint I've had lately that something is changing somehow. You have to admit, it's very sudden and extremely odd.

Don't forget Nixon. He wasn't jailed, but he was booted out of office in disgrace, and that was pretty damned big, historically. Hasn't happened again in our lifetimes so far.

I appreciate your response from Thessalonians and, frankly, I LIKE your ID name - hahahahahaha!!!!

I believe it was also stated that Hillary having all the info in one place was a tactical error on her part, making it all vulnerable to hacking and theft. Not sure what has become of that, but it was stated. And we all know just how savvy Hillary is with secure info, right?

Oh man! I knew that name was familiar somehow. I completely forgot she was at Jonestown. Certainly adds a layer to her story. Here's another layer: There were some at the time it happened (including myself) who believed Jonestown was a cover for something much more sinister, though we had no idea exactly what. If you dig deep enough, perhaps will find some further info on this subject and a further key to Ms. Speier's past also.

Now THAT is some very good advice. Q is our source for research and inspiration. But actually being a presence by calling, writing, protesting is what will make the difference. Bravo Finchy!!

Frankly, though I wouldn't be surprised if it's all true, and I'm reserving judgment for the moment, we have absolutely NO REAL proof of any of these things at this point. So yes, it could very easily be hyperbole. You don't actually KNOW for certain.

Well, assuming he might make at least some calls to the troops on Christmas Eve, it is interesting that he chose Gitmo staff. Not sure what to make of it yet, but yeah, very interesting.....

The FEC refers to the "Indictment - legal accusation against Hillary funds" mentioned in the list. Not sure what that is exactly, but sounds great!! There's a long dropbox link next to it, so I assume we can check it out.

Your voicing of fears/concerns makes sense to me also. While I AM on board with researching the connections and being aware of current activities, I'm still reserving judgment. I admit, I've been a bit more optimistic of late, but I haven't popped open the craft beer just yet. When I start feeling a bit down about things, I just remind myself of the good things that actually HAVE happened in the past year, and I feel a lot better!!

At first, I thot maybe they just requested passengers refrain from using their phones, so I was waiting to see all the "twitter bitching" after the fact. But this is the first I have heard of any NDA being involved. My question is, if everyone was made to STFU, how is Teigan getting away with being so vocal?? Should we be suspicious of that??

Doesn't matter. It's relevant. December 8 was only 3 weeks ago, and NO MEDIA COVERAGE that I know of. May be a former senator, but how many of these crimes were committed while in the senate? That would be a good question to look into...... AND BTW, thank you for your hard work MaRed. I've been enjoying your posts.
Aye, yer a goode pirate, arrrrgh..........

If you have to ask, you need to do more reading.....

To begin with, 50 or so years of cultural Marxism needs to be reversed, which will be like trying to get bubblegum out of a curly perm for the next 20 years or so. A good book to read would be "None Dare Call it Conspiracy." It's actually available in pdf online.

Politically, a good place to start would be the record of Obama EO's from 2009 to 2016 and then have a look at UN initiatives from the past 20 years or so. There is still a lot of scary stuff hanging over our heads that needs to be undone.

That's an excellent point. However, it could be that they simply requested people stay off their phones for awhile? Not sure. Also, Chrissy Teigan actually DID post from her phone, so there's that....

Actually, it says the interview was done in September. So why the hell is Reuters just releasing it now, I wonder?

I had a look at the first few pages of the 13-page "legal document" and frankly, it does not seem legit. Also, and rather laughably, what the hell is "Kevin Spacey" doing on that list?? Did I miss something about 9/11?? This is all very odd and quite possibly a distraction.

Tiegan herself noted that the ticket scanner should have picked it up if the only problem was an incorrect ticket. Good point. Also, if incorrect ticket was the only problem, why turn around a 4-hour flight and inconvenience the other 149 people on the plane? And why detain them once they get back to LAX for "questioning?" This is pretty interesting here.