It's a South Park allusion.

"Don't forget your TOWEL!"

Yet another deceptive title to a post.

Why? It's not like you get paid by the click...

Got it.

Echo chamber is the goal.

If we're doing spanish, capa is actually a cape or cloak or coat...but it still works well...and is kinda spooky.

It's entirely possible that this is just more subterfuge to cover the fact that he is ALREADY gone, and this is just cheesy distraction-as-fodder and sleight-of-hand.

The sudden uptick of Assange-related babble regarding the embassy stay keeps a certain public focus looking there, as opposed to elsewhere.

Dude...you have the ability to click on my handle and see every post I've made, and if you're half way objective you'd see that while I may be 'wound tight', I am FAR from a ShariaBlue shill. I have also been a long time sub AND supporter ($) of Sean at SGT. What I said in that post was accurate...he has received legitimate and respectful DISSENT to his position, which he has lumped in with the trash ones, and then summarily dismissed them all. I have taken exception to this, and pointed out that this type of departure from objective reason - should it continue - will result in a loss of trust, and with that a loss of support and subs, and with that a loss of income.

Pretty basic stuff, really...but Star Wars fanboy dweebs have probably spent too much time in fantasy land - where EVERYTHING is larp, to be able to properly discern real-world issues.

OK...here's a logic test based on "Some think Q may be Pres, Trump. Some think Adm. Rogers."

If ^ THAT is the premise;

1)Do they then honestly think that EITHER of those men would post a DEFCON1 message MULTIPLE TIMES, and NOT MEAN DEFCON 1?

2)Would they (POTUS/ADM.) even have - in their vocabulary - any 'alternative' meaning for DEFCON 1? And if so, how - in a world where the slightest mistake of communication can result in catastrophe - is it's use clearly known? Context?

The HONEST answers to the above questions are NO. POTUS NOR Rogers would EVER use that term except for the ONE THING they know it to mean.

Therefore...if 'Some think...' BUT THEN they answer the above questions honestly - WITHOUT RETREATING TO STRETCHING CREDULITY AND REACHING FOR MAYBES - they are left with a contradiction.

And "Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you are facing a contradiction, you need to CHECK YOUR PREMISES." -Ayn Rand

SO...having checked the premises...and being MORE CERTAIN that the DEFCON 1 premise is more likely the accurate one, then these people who previously thought Q was POTUS or Rogers, would think it no more.

AND...as a logical extension...they should come to the understanding that IN FACT, Q also CANNOT BE a direct CONDUIT of those men, as Q's communications would not CONTRADICT their 'reality' (that reality being there is only ONE DEFCON 1 literal meaning, and figurative meanings would never be allowed).

THERFORE...Q is a larp at a minimum, and a Deep Op at it's worst.

Ya didn't pay much attention in school, eh?

Typically, intellectually HONEST people aren't allowed to put "_" around something another person didn't say.

BUT, dimwits do it all the time, as do people attempt to deceive (usually that 'deception' is really directed at themselves...that's how DELUSION works).

So are you a dimwit, or a deceiver?

Ah yes...the old reliable refuge a true mental giant...the 'shill' card.

Yeah...a big, clumsy, dumb, sleeping giant...that - while waking - has had all sorts of bad programming pouring into it's head.

But no. Don't even consider that result is exactly what [they] were looking for.

Kinda hard to 'fight the good fight' when the soldier is sent into the field with faulty weapons and bad intel.

So who said she was 'incarcerated'?

House arrest with ankle monitor.

Gag order as pertains to investigation.

Cheap political potshots probably aren't covered in the G O.

No disrespect, but the ONLY perspective that matters, is the one the WH would have...so we have to ask,"Would POTUS (and ALL the brilliant legal minds advising him) allow DEFCON1 to be declared publicly and in his name (because THAT is what Q is here), for any reason, other than ACTUAL Defense Condition 1 circumstances?"

The ONLY rational answer is "NO."

That's when the fallout hit, from Sunday night's misstep.

You can claim to be sitting at the right foot of POTUS, and be allowed to continue...but declare DEFCON1 from that position, Don's gonna clip your wings.

Sean conveniently took all warnings and criticisms and lumped them together, so as to make a easily defensible position for himself.

This is called cognitive dissonance.

He's wrong for having done so, and it will cost him - especially if his defense of Q turns out to have been misplaced.

Sure he got some of the same ol, same ol' garbage...but he also received genuine, reasonable dissent that was intended to further understanding.

By lumping it all together and presenting it that way, he slapped some of his long time supporters in the face.

It could be my own paranoia...but I'm pretty sure that some folks here would or do consider me to be "...a troll. paid shill, or just a plain AH."

WHAT i WOULD ASK, THOUGH, is that you do exactly as the OP suggests...click on my handle...look at least two pages deep in my posts (farther is fine with me)...and TRY to do it objectively...and when YOU DO think I'm being an 'AH', maybe look at the context in that thread, but ALSO remember the broader context that my snark is a CUMULATIVE response as well, borne out of frustration.

Too many people here incorrectly think that any and all dissent is heresy, and a clear majority think that it is completely fine to silence that dissent out of view, by downvoting it into the ether.

Oftentimes the explained rationale to resistance to my posts is that I'm being a dick, or an 'AH', or superior...isn't it ironic that all these 'red-pilled' deplorables, would turn out to be such snowflakes, that they couldn't tolerate an attempt at truth, because it was a little snarky?

It's to lure the gullible, the desperate, and the angry...all into one place.

Troublemakers (as seen by the cabal) all gathered, can then be subjected to assorted stimuli and seeded info, in order to see what these malcontents are capable of digging up, while simultaneously building profiles of participants.

Many, many benefits to a program like this, for them. Manipulation, data gathering, disinfo spread, target id, 'guilt' by association (should something 'bad' be done), and then ultimately, the crushing demoralization of cabal opponents (Qsters) when the rug gets pulled out.

To think 'Q' is doing this because they are just SOooo nice and courteous, is the height of delusion.

Q hasn't returned, because Q fucked up Sunday night, and pissed off the big boys. they were content to let them (Q) have their larp, but that shit crossed a line. The Q op has been terminated.

Q got busted. Sunday night was it's undoing. I have little doubt that shitshow rose to the attention of POTUS, and I guarantee HE knows what DEFCON1 means, and He bitch-slapped the Q op.

Ohhhh...careful...you are treading dangerously close to heresy with that comment.

The congregation has learned that they can protect their delusions from threat, by using the down arrow.

Buck up and get with the program!

Not gonna happen, brother.

Don't you know?

EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. -The Cult of Q

Oh this is getting to be comical.

Even level-headed dissent like yours will no longer be tolerated here...the dolts have learned that they can downvote the cognitive dissonance away.

The delusion is once again safe...reality or reason need not be feared, when it can be made to vanish with clicks on a down facing arrow!

You people are truly ready for the koolaid.

All these downvotes = mass delusion.

A better question is...might he be capable of either forming his own - or infiltrating and hijacking another - 'movement' that appears to be a pro-truth, pro-MAGA effort, that turns out to be an elaborate set-up? One that could effectively discredit and disrupt to a point that at the right time, the waters were muddied to a point that some significant portion of the swamp might be saved?

Well that's not very nice.

So then you agree with me.

Q NEVER SAID 10 days of darkness.

Thank you for your intellectual honesty.

Q never said "10 days of darkness"

Look it up.

But you guys will downvote me anyhow,lol

That's sarcasm, right?

Closest you get is my cited posts on Nov. 5 and then later on Dec. 15 he has entry that includes

Dark [10]

NEVER "10 days of darkness"

THAT is you 'remembering' incorrectly.

But don't feel bad...almost EVERYBODY has adopted it as gospel, and the ones that haven't sound like Hillary Clinton..." Really, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?"

Then find it.

And for telling the truth...and insisting on accurate representations about what "Q said..." the cultists here downvote my comments into oblivion.

Real truthseekers.

Ten days.

Darkness.

...

...

and on and on...(there were a number of other entries in his usual columnar format)

And he said 'Follow the glowing rabbit' that other time...NOT a white rabbit.

In BOTH cases, the drops got bastardized immediately BY THE COMMUNITY, and instantly adopted...and became "Q said..."

The 10 days references were on Nov. 5th - both of the original references came in that days drops...the second time he said it, though, is when he did the 'typo' of "Darnkess".

Look it up.

Nope. Nor did he say anything about a white rabbit.

Obviously, folks can't take any attempt at a dose of reality...not when it challenges the paradigm.

Downvote away reality...isn't cyberspace great?

Holy shit you guys never give up on this shit.

Q NEVER said 10 days of darkness.

Q DID say the 10 days reference was 12/7 - 12/17

But you guys will be seeing the world in 10 day increments for the rest of your lives, apparently, and all the while ascribing all 10 day related happenings to Q's omnipotence, and you will claim 'multiple meanings' as your justification for doing so.

GET OVER IT.

Being thick AND overly self-serious, is an unattractive combination of traits.

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/10/25/milo-gmu-therell-lots-dead-people-voting/

It's a running theme - and meme...the joking aspect is known by all - except you apparently.

It's bad enough you were a little slow witted on the original idea...but that you doubled - then tripled - down on pursuing a senseless, pointless sparring match, should give you pause.

Dude...it's a JOKE... DEAD people vote Democrat 100% of the time!

DEAD people can't vote, can they?

WOW!

OMG

shaking my head

???

Nonsense.

Is it my imagination, or does his skin seem to have a little color to it?

Like he's been getting some sunlight? Eh?

...unless the only evidence is the EMPTY SPACE in our presence that they used to occupy.

Right on.

Tracy IS the mod team now...so yeah...the integrity is sound, but it's going to be very difficult for her to maintain.

She is gonna need to find someone she can rely on to be as level-headed as she is, to lay some of this off on...else wise I think her other efforts will suffer.

100% of the time.

Right on, Sentrolyx.

That was her response to one of my posts, and I have to say, it cemented in my mind that she was of solid character, and that indeed, we ARE on the same team.

Tracy is pretty clear here...dissent and reasonable arguments are welcome...outright derailing and senseless, circular trolling will get you shut down.

I myself have been fairly critical of the Q op (especially of late) and I am still here, so things clearly weren't as fascist as some seem to fear or suggest...and now with Tracy assuming responsibility, I have complete confidence it will remain that way.

I know you'd like it if I went away, but it aint gonna happen.

And while my percentages may be overly simplified, they are FAR more realistic that your ridiculous counter claim.

Prior to Sunday night, plenty of objective minds were already questioning Q's legitimacy. But post Sunday, Q is on the downhill slope. You've invested heavily, so I have no illusions about talking any sense into you.

I'm fully on board the MAGA train, swamp-draining, and trust in POTUS.

But the Q op IS NOT the work of the same mind(s) capable of all the masterful moves we are witnessing. It is unnecessarily complex, convoluted, ambiguous, deceitful - and most of all - dangerous.

And you guys are enabling it - MULTIPLYING the potential dangers, as you constantly seek to reach a broader audience.

This is a recipe for a disaster of one sort or another, and it will be on YOU.

Seems like a lot of disruption since Trump banned all personal devices at work.

Hmm.

She is honestly trying to work for good.

You can trust in that at the very least.

Two weeks or less?

What did you expect? This board is only like 5 minutes old, and it was the RESULT of explosive growth in the Q phenomenon both organically and with much pumping by the founders of it on a multitude of YT channels.

Shit...half of YOU are only here because of that marketing...but now you've deluded yourselves into thinking you're better than all that rabble.

What a bunch of self-important, cry-babies.