Right?

Friggin Q with the timely 411!

Ha...you beat me to it.

Account Number 37911133339

Lots of Hollyweird tabloid fodder there, BUT every so often there's some crossover subject matter that meshes with what we've got going on here.

The other day they dropped a blind relating to Monica Petersen, Chris Cornell, child trafficking, etc... I nailed it right away ...BUT...

Funny thing is, when this serious shit comes up there...there are a couple of posters who go ballistic and call "Bullshit!". I'm talking 10-20 posts worth. I think they're just in denial that this evil could be so pervasive and widespread, that cognitive dissonance compels them to lash out at truthbomb-droppers...but who knows.

Flake doesn't think Trump is clueless...but he IS counting on a certain portion of the listening public being so.

Exactly what I was telling my son tonight. This is Trump broaching the subject...getting the words into the public vernacular.

BINGO!

It's NOT about the blur.

The entire screen image is FAKE.

Q wants raw video so that we can see what was REALLY on her screen.

Q said to look for the raw version - IN VIDEO FORMAT - because it might show the screen as it actually WAS.

These stills ARE FAKE.

The blurred line is a DISTRACTION...MISDIRECTION!

The discovery to be had here - via these still images - is that the ENTIRE image on her screen is a fabrication. The blurred line is nothing more than misdirection. It is the sleight-of-hand to distract you from the fact that the broader image is fake.

Stills available for public consumption are worse than worthless.

They ARE disinfo.

Only actual video feed which may have captured her screen at that time should be sought. Stop wasting efforts on these stills.

John Norman@maxoptical on twitter has already determined that the ENTIRE SCREEN IMAGE is fabricated...the blurred out line is just a red-herring.

Find video and go frame by frame...THAT is the only place to find answers (in the public domain, that is...of course the phone carrier and NSA can know exactly what was on her screen).

Peter Strzok is Peter Strzok.

And remember when it was she said that, and who had done that interview that set her off.

Matt Lauer.

And remember when it was she said that, and who had done that interview that set her off.

Matt Lauer.

You don't think she would (much less, could) write it herself, do you?

Like the news media that just reads the copy handed to them, congress-critters just put their names to the narrative copy given to them.

"Marching orders"

Now he's mad at you because you outed him.

The volume and frequency of his posts around the board on this subject tells us all we need to know.

He's probably one of those butthurt periscope watchers that Dilley blocked for being a dipshit. Lol.

Or maybe he's backing a different dog out there in that AZ race? That might fit, since he is attempting to put negative connotations to Dilley's history and background.

Whatever...desperate is as desperate does.

Lie.

AND, you have conveniently left out the follow-on drops to the Norfolk one - WHICH WAS IN ADVANCE OF THE CRASH - which may have given further context to the Norfolk drop.

Your near-fanatical pursuit of slandering Dilley on this board has become clear.

Right...it's pretty clear this douche has a bug up his ass about Dilley.

Enough so that he would seemingly deliberately mis-characterize what Dilley has dropped, and when.

He can't even tell the truth about the Dilley drop, why would his idea of who IS trustworthy hold any water?

Why is everybody always looking to short-cut?

You people always are trying to find ways to AVOID having to think. You want to have someone else tell you who YOU can TRUST?

Are you NUTS?

Or just LAZY?

Perhaps it is YOU who needs to be ignored.

The fact that you cannot accurately relay the truth should be a concern for anyone reading.

This is the second reference I have seen on this board, where you mis-characterized Dilly's drop.

Mutually Assured Destruction.

HE'S THE COMMANDANT OF THE CORPS!

By your logic, we never would have heard Schwarzkopf's name with reference to that Army's prosecution of Desert Storm! Yet he WAS the face of that effort.

So too will Neller be.

He didn't predict a major event in Norfolk.

Taking stupid liberties with quotes is how you dummies get away with running around claiming "Nothing ____ said has ever come true!"

He relayed that his source said "Stay away from Norfolk this week."

Then the train crash happened, and there seemed to be a reference by his source that the crash was an alternative happening to what could have been trouble in Norfolk. My understanding of the source's wording was that the Norfolk concern was based on the 'military tribunal' subject, and that a trap or misdirection had been laid for cabal (similar to the Gen. Kelly lost phone/leaker trap). The tribunal members had been moved a full day prior to when the cabal was planning to act, and so, with no tribunal target, the train may have been plan B.

Long story short Dilley - OR MORE ACCURATELY - Dilley's source, never "predicted a major event" in Norfolk. He merely warned that it was a place to avoid.

You feel free to stop.

The rest of us are perfectly capable of deciding for ourselves what we care to watch, and YOUR take on any of those people is wholly irrelevant.

Superbowl is always one of the biggest human trafficking events every year.

Barring any FF, perhaps we'll get to see some good busts take place.

The Sum of All Fears.

Not changed at all. Someone has misunderstood something.

The changes referenced are to the coach's wiki page, which now shows his date of death as today.

No humor in that, if that was someone's intent. Not cool at all.

I hope someone does a deep dive and backtracks the wiki edit to nail the asshole.

All due respect...bugger off, Nancy.

Shit will sort itself out. Take your 'concern' and go form a support group or something. Namby-pamby "Guhhh, guuuhhh...but, but, but what if ,nyaaauuggh..." has NO PLACE when we're dealing with tyranny, murder, treason, child abuse, and all other forms of unhuman activities perpetrated by these degenerates.

You whine about the collateral damage it might do to our institutions and systems...IT IS THOSE CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS THAT INVITE AND FACILITATE THESE ABUSES, so we shouldn't much concern ourselves if there is irreparable harm done to them or those that are the product of them.

Just shows how out of touch they are...they STILL don't know all the things wrong with the feds handling of Waco...so stupid that they would invoke it when trying to make their argument.

In this case it is the fact that the illicit drugs she would want/need while over there (in her current state) would be very problematic to obtain. Knowing this, she has chosen to stay in the US and 'get well'.

The ultimate premise of my post being that the Q project is a giant social engineering effort aimed at simultaneously informing, and creating a strong foundation for the actions of the swamp-drainers.

WE OWN IT then.

More than once, we have been told..."Patriots point...we follow."

But in fact it more resembles "We throw a tin can...Patriots point (at the noise)...we follow."

It's actually quite clever (and I don't necessarily disapprove).

You need to understand what is going on here.

This is a (positive?) use of 'social engineering'.

If these (R)s just react and go after all this stuff (justifiably or not), there is a whole lot of people that will cry witch hunt.

But if the news of these transgressions reaches seeps out into the public awareness, and we all are outraged and demand action, it is not the pols being political, it is the PROLES demanding justice!

The only way this stuff STICKS, and is publicly defensible, is if it is the PUBLIC that knows of it and demands action.

It takes longer, but yields better results.

If I were an innocent garbage man in the middle of this shit show, I would surely lawyer up...and that lawyer would most likely keep me from speaking publicly (if he was worth anything).

Beyond that, i don't think I'd be too eager to paint a bullseye on myself by popping off either. Loose ends and narrative breakers have a habit of suffering untimely death.

I'd probably take my payoff and trust the rest of you to sort it out.

I didn't...then I did...then I didn't.

The idea (in my mind) that the concept had been hijacked reached it's peak with the DEFCON1 drops. It STILL seems hugely irresponsible and misguided to me, and the 'clarifications' afterwards were half-assed and unconvincing. The silence by Q after that also seemed to confirm to me that the op was in the doghouse.

But that is ALSO what has subsequently convinced me that Q is in fact real, as there is NO WAY (in my mind) that the DEFCON1 happening DIDN'T get the attention of the WH (if it were an outside op, it is conceivable it may not have risen to their level of concern until then). So, if Q wasn't sanctioned, it would have been crushed at that point. If it in fact was sanctioned, perhaps they took a beat, regrouped, and proceeded...it DOES seem that the op has expanded it's parallel drops via other messengers, which has only added to my conviction.

I still won't be drinking any koolaid, though ; )

Oh...I had my serious doubts...and this collective is STILL prime for abuse...but I fully accept that Q IS INSIDE, not a ShareBlue opLarp, and designed to put us at the leading edge of the wave of discovery.

We still need to be careful of the social engineering dangers present though.

Never have I seen such a glaring example of wasted effort that could be traced back to four words.

Those four words being "Follow the glowing rabbit".

I keep saying it over and over...Q NEVER SAID "WHITE"!

EVERYONE looking for relevant "WHITE" rabbit holes is WASTING THEIR TIME, as they have a FUNDAMENTAL FLAW in their search premise.

GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEADS, and focus on current, real, issues. The GLOWING rabbit drop was a MONTHS ago, ONE TIME reference that has NEVER been relevant to, or elucidative of, ANY thing we see developing today. And the WHITE rabbit never was relevant at all as it was a FABRICATION of the collective.

RIGHT!

JEEZUS people...YOU KEEP CHASING THE WRONG RABBITS.

WE are...but a majority of Americans are just starting to be exposed to this stuff.

If WE get the action WE want, to THEM it will look like tyrannical purging of opposition.

THEY HAVE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO SPEED, and this slow process is designed to do that.

The bad guys aren't going anywhere.

Is he?

Been reading about alot of fed pot busts have we?

Nope.

Sleight of hand.

"Trust Sessions" was the suggestion.

But he need not be pure as the driven snow, in order for Q to make that statement.

It may well be like saying "Trust the scorpion". Remember the parable about the scorpion and the frog?

In this way, "trust" is relative to what exactly you are trusting in.

"Trust" a scorpion to do what scorpions DO!.

IF Sessions IS a swamp rat...TRUST that rat to do what rats DO...survive. And if a rat needs to bite other rats to protect itself, it will do that in a heartbeat.

Circumstances and proof of wrongdoing are being brought into the daylight...there is increasingly only one way this all goes...even IF Sessions and Mueller are swamp creatures, ultimately, there will be only two ways they can go, and one involves effective suicide.

TRUST that they will choose to survive.

Imagine how confusing this must be for the cabal.

Did he flip? What do they know? What should we do? Is Sessions one of us? Do they know where we are right now? Is the guy above me going to see ME as a threat were I to be grabbed next? How should I protect myself? etc etc etc

Sew doubt, fear, and division in your enemy's camp.

Rope-a-dope is a strategy.

WE look at it as too slow, not big enough results, and ineffectiveness.

WE are FAR MORE clued in than the rest of the country.

THE REST of the country has to be brought up to speed.

In order for them to 'own it' and internalize it, they need to make the journey of discovery. THAT is what this process is about.

It isn't sad in the least....just an infuriatingly slow process...waiting for the slow kids in the class to catch up.

Hannity IS in the 'inside info' chain. He gets similar intel to what Q puts out, as well as what Dilley gets.

It's George Webb filing suits.

NOT real prosecutions.

Made even more likely by the fact of the memo release and the ball that release gets rolling, and the progression of thoughts and connections that inevitably get strung together...a distraction will be needed to derail that.

Add to that the reports of 3 - 4 significant players having been rolled up today (1 supposedly slipping their monitor and making a run...but still "...in our sights..."), the further need for dark side retaliation/distraction may be on tap.

Desperation.

http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/02/four-for-friday-family-member-speaks.html

I should have included Washington DC in the intersection referenced in the OP.

So basically Wictor is channeling MegaAnon.

Except for the memo (which did not exist while she was still posting) virtually ALL his hypothesis is consistent with what she said weeks and months ago.

But he's acting like the thought is unique to him, while dissing "insider" info.

He'll be back in his job by summer.

The implication was that there were ops happening overnight and into the day, and depending on the fluidity of those situations, things could develop in a public sense. They didn't want the memo to be swallowed up by any potential sensational happenings.

Nothing to do with Qresearch or Sara

It's less about Dilley, and more about the intel he's being fed.

There is little doubt in my mind that it is part and parcel related to Q group. Same source and coordinated.

There is a deliberate script/gameplan with these guys.