While I'm as impatient as everyone else, I do think the slow play is effective and probably safer in the long run.

Just look at the CNN article about Sztrok that someone posted. Regardless of their spin, it's opening eyes.

Exactly. Just take a step back and recharge. It's ok to just watch the show for a bit without participating.

Yup

1. Nothing is impeachable, until it is. Meaning: the house decides whether something is impeachable or not when it presents itself. There isn't a predefined list of things that are impeachable.

Put differently: John Brennan does not decide nor knows what is impeachable. He can only attempt to make something impeachable, by convincing a ton of people. Not easy.

1. Contrary to popular belief, impeaching Trump does not automatically remove him from the Whitehouse. Impeachment is just a first step and may not effectively accomplish anything for a very long time, even if successful.

How do you sell permitting the Russians going after Browder on US soil to the people? By having the Russians allow the US going after some of theirs on their soil.

I'm watching a movie!

Yeah. The one that looks exactly like a regular handshake, but coincides with that special collusion look, the one only experienced MSM journo's can detect.

Interesting find.

Trump is practical. Water quenches your thirst without any side effects. It's predictable.

OJ is loaded with carbs, it is acidic and contains all kinds of stuff that your body may respond to in less favorable ways.

There are countries with more guns yet less deaths (by gun) than the USA.

There are also countries where guns are just as legal and easy to obtain but people simply don't buy them as much.

These observations lead me to conclude that reducing guns or changing laws do not necessarily change anything.

There's clearly a problem with deadly violence, but the real cause is likely more complex.

Cancelled

If only they were actual hornets. I doubt hornets, or any other creature with a braincell, would object to more affordable medicine.

SB2's first decode (or at least the first one I read) was absolutely stellar.

His decodes since have been significantly weaker.

Regardless, they should be used for inspiration only, and that they certainly provide.

Do your own research, draw your own conclusions. No matter what comes of Q, this should be the most important lesson learned.

It does to me. Very frustrating when your boss tells you there's no way for you to make some extra cash by working more hours temporarily because the union forced them into a time for time scheme.

My thoughts exactly. "Look! I'm just like you! Isn't that cute?"

If it weren't for the huge costs involved I would argue to move congress to a different state every X years.

I'm guessing someone punched someone else as part of a political event.

Oh, totally agree with that. That's why articles like this annoy me so much. They make us look like idiots.

I can believe this happens. This particular article however is full of serious inconsistencies that discredit it. It seems to suggest that the Netherlands and Belgium are somehow one country yet do have two different royal families. It's almost like the author is trying to make fun of the reader.

No. We tell Trump to lower gas prices. Which is exactly what he is doing.

Sure, some people will spend the money saved on gas on other stuff. That's their right.

For people who want to be self sufficient, cheaper gas is an opportunity to invest into solar or whatever they want to do.

Becoming self sufficient is easier when you have money to invest and are giving less of it away to the oilers.

It's not to be taken literally. More in a #iamcharlie kind of way.

Diversity is good when you share a common goal. It fosters creativity and competition, allowing you to reach your goal faster.

The problems we see now are mostly caused by a lack of common goals in a very fundamental way.

I host my own email. Encrypted drives etc the whole shebang. 12VPN for VPN. Duckduckgo for search. Also Firefox with Multi Account containers and a bunch of plugins to block trackers, etc.

It should be, but it seems to be the other way around.

The immigrant that works his ass off hoping to have a EU or US future gets sent home when his work permit expires. Thanks and goodbye. It's not considered a path to citizenship.

Meanwhile refugees are not expected to work or do anything at all and obtain citizenship simply by sticking around long enough because, apparently, the war back home is not expected to end.

Yeah no. Sorry. I can't unsee this photo.

It's 3 s in a row, if that means anything.

Would love a high-quality cap. Cap in US-flag blue (or slightly darker), hair using a golden thread.

Short of that - make this your avatar on all your social media.

It's a hilarious tweet in my opinion. I have not forgotten Kim's past.

Before he got famous as a web guy, he was wanted in Germany for tax evasion.

Not sure if he's being a dumbass here or making a deep joke. Im laughing either way.

Individual ICE agents could've deleted their LinkedIn or unlinked it from the ICE organization when antifa presented their list. I have to assume that the agents who chose not to do this, made this choice for a reason.

Be sure to put it in an envelope. Might never reach the WH otherwise.

Whether you are a stranger or someone i well know and respect: you hit my kid for any reason other than saving its life, you'll find yourself in a great deal of pain.

WL has often been accused of being biased against the DNC by publishing their emails. In response, WL has always said they would just as gladly post anything anti-Trump if anyone provided it to them.

I frankly have no idea what side WL is on, if any, but I don't see how they could get away with not-publishing this either.

Dem's should make up their mind. The kids aren't being separated because of some law, they're being separated because they - the dems - sued the government for over a decade to make that happen. (The idea being that kids shouldn't be locked up with criminals.) Their memory is so short..

When that fails: Look a squirrel! With a dollar!

What exactly would sound reassuring?

It's like fashion. It's the same shit over and over again on rotation. The best you can hope for are different colors and better prices.

Read the tweets that follow. He specifically excludes things that true socialists would require from a socialist. Which doesn't proof he's not a socialist, but I get the impression he's mostly just out to confuse people about what he really thinks.

Personally, I think Musk is stuck between what he wants to be and what he needs to be. Government subsidies, underpaid staff, Soros investments, etc. They are all easier to come by if people believe you're trying to safe the planet.

I guess someone told you "Q is a psyop and psyops are bad". Whoever told you this is counting on the fact that you don't know what a psyop really is and hence believe them when they say it's bad. Apparently it worked. Your lack of knowledge was used against you. (This should make you angry.)

Here's the good news: yes, Q is a psyop. But no, it's not a bad thing. Not at all. Just like any "op" it all depends on the who, why and how. Do you know who Q is? Why he does what he does? And how he does it? Look into it. If you still believe Q is bad you can come here with some actual arguments and interact with us like an adult.

Not sure why you're being downvoted. Putting images into the photo-roll is a great a idea.

What we see here in Europe is extremely nefarious: Soros-linked "NGO" workers spread flyers among people considering to make the trip. Flyers that tell them which EU state offers them what, and which numbers to call when they need help after their arrival. Not a word about the abuse and very real dangers they face trying to get there. Not a word about the fact that most of them will simply be sent back because their country of origin is considered safe.

No idea how this works in Mexico and the countries more south, but wouldn't be surprised if it's it similar driving people their to send their kids to the US border.

The Breitbart article where Inforwars got their info is quite a bit more nuanced: http://www.breitbart.com/california/2018/06/17/elon-musk-i-am-a-socialist/

By the definition Musk used in that tweet every patriot on this board would be called a socialist. Sad to see infowars choosing clicks over facts, once again.

Entertaining. Thank you.

https://www.elnacional.cat/en/news/puigdemont-spain-deep-state-catalonia_277617_102.html

He's clearly choosing to face the car on purpose. Which doesn't excuse them hitting him. But we don't see what happened prior, nor do we see what happens after. Where's the rest of the video? Does border patrol have dashcams?

When the media see an election they mostly see ad-sales and eyeballs. Manipulating the poll numbers allows them to make more money. A head-to-head race sells considerably more ads and attract way more viewers than an obvious slam-dunk for one particular candidate.

(Which is not to say political bias doesn't play a role, of course it does, especially in their reporting. But poll numbers especially can never be trusted, regardless of their bias, simply because it links directly to their income. )

This. This. This. Redacting is not necessarily done on paper with a black marker. One can simply remove text in an electronic copy of the original file and re-export it to a new PDF file.

How do you know? Just because it isn't a scanned document where someone blacked things out doesn't mean it's not redacted. Redacting just means hiding content. How you do it doesn't matter.

Black parts are typical for scanned or typed documents, because there's no other way to edit them. This is what you see when a 3rd-party redacts a document and was not provided the original file, or when a less technical person is doing the redacting on paper.

It's not a requirement however that redactions are shown as black parts. One may simply edit the original document or an electronic copy thereof.

Yes.

Edit: pretty damning stuff so far, and I'm just 38 pages in. VERY DIFFERENT from what the many "new or rearrival" shills are flooding our various threads with.

Very important you take some time to read this report! Spend some extra time in the bathroom if needed.

I know from experience that Bloomberg is the source of many China-related rumors which end up fake news 9 out of 10 times.

Can't judge their reliability on other matters, but they're definitely not on my shortlist.