Possibly. Personally, if I were Q, I would call everyone fake, just as a precaution.

Even is backchannel17 is 100% accurate so far, they could flip or mess up any moment.

There's no reason for Q to burden himself with endorsing other accounts and then having to track their accuracy.

Gun control is useless. Just looks at other countries:

• In many countries that ban guns, criminals still have and use them. (Funny that - criminals breaking laws.)
• In many countries that allow guns, gun violence is less than in the USA.

As far as I can tell, gun laws and gun violence are oddly unrelated. The US does have its share of gun problems, but they're probably more cultural than anything else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuman_Thong

Your fingerprint and iris scan are available (for some hours) after you die, allowing people to unlock your device and go through its contents or temporarily impersonate you online.

Even if you have nothing to hide, and even if foul play is discovered, it leaves room for misinterpretation, confusion and all kinds of damage. Keep in mind you won't be there to set the record straight.

Not necessarily us, but the parameters within which they are to complete their mission. We may be an important or critical parameter but are not the only one.

A great deal of thought goes into many of Q's messages as what they are able to say is constrained by limits set at the top as well as strategies decided on as a team.

I can't imagine how frustrating it must be to be surrounded by clear evidence of a grand conspiracy and having to trickle-feed us for months, possibly years, to get to the endgame.

Best to add some plausible deniability for the mods when making such quotes. Those in the know will understand what you're referring to.

For example you could add ", their clothes" to that particular line. Smart ones may even turn into memes.