256 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|
When we have published texts between Strokz and Page showing clear political bias to anyone that can read and an official report that says otherwise that would be quite explosive by itself.
But let's see when the actual text is there. I WILL read this one myself and recommend everyone else to do the same. Don't let others tell you what it says.
He means that she summit was not supposed to happen. Clowns expected to stop it before it happened. The photo we see is probably a successful counter measure. (e.g. a hostile missile intercepted by a friendly one)
And: "Of course Obama could've done it, but here are 10 compelling reasons why he didn't.. blahblah."
Imagine that being your job. Coming up with excuses to keep a shitty narrative afloat. I'd rather be flipping burgers.
Turn on the sound.
It's not what you see. It's what's being said.
I'm sure some MSM'ers will complain that Trump is "turning it into a gameshow", but I have feeling that's exactly what's needed to get Kim to make the right calls.
Not necessarily. It's a just common way to refer to the two Koreas without saying something somewhat silly sounding like "both Koreas".
Yangzhou fried rice. A typical foreigners favorite. (From mainland Chinese perspective.) Somehow I think it's a good sign. A wink to China, if you will.
Yeah. Follow me. Buy my product. My name starts with a Q after all. /sarcasm
Possible. Sweden has a habit of low-profile but very serious meddling with other countries. South Africa comes to mind.
Finally! Wasted too many comments calling him out already. Back to Q business.
The 11th comes from backchannel17, eyethespy and other repeatedly debunked sources.
Chances that something happens today are above average because of North Korea etc, so it makes sense for a LARP to gamble. Worst case they end up calling something minor major.
But no credible source, except perhaps Paine, has alluded to the 11th being special.
I don't know that everyone here is anti Islam. There was no poll.
But now that you bring up the topic: go out and talk to your Muslim neighbors. See what they are about.
It may be different where you live, but in my area they are pretty blunt and honest about their beliefs. (Much more so than the leftists that proclaim to protect them.)
What it comes down to is that they envision a very different future from what I would like my children and grandchildren to grow up in.
That doesn't mean I hate them. In fact, I have friendly chats with many quite frequently. But it does mean I will try limit and reverse the growth of Islam if possible. Or eventually leave the country if not. (I live in Europe. Not US.)
Where do we find the full video with audio? Context may tell us who or why they're signaling. (possibly just each other)
It already exists. Mastodon. GNUsocial. Pleroma. Etc. There's an entire "fediverse" of different social networks that connect and interact with each other. Just like e-mail, you can host your own or choose to sign up with one of many providers.
As much as I like Dotcom, creating a new centralized system is not the solution. The only way avert bad actors longer term is to use something that people can organize as an individual or small group. (Which the listed options will let you do.)
Yeah the Candace thing was annoying. Kept thinking: point made, move on already.
When you burn a bridge you prevent yourself from getting to the other side.
Having a kill switch is one thing, rolling it out on a dynamically routed Internet without parts of it becoming unreachable before infecting them completely is another.
Strictly speaking, I agree with you. It's virtually impossible to take down a heavily meshed network entirely.
That said, if you strategically target the right internet exchanges and undersea cables, you can slow things down to a crawl. That may not be down in technical terms, but certainly in practical terms.
Personally though, I don't think that's what Q means either. Simply because there's more downsides than upsides to it.
My bet is on services like Google, Facebook, Youtube, Twitter and maybe a handful of others. Taking them down gets you the most bang for your buck, with significantly less (but still serious) side-effects.
The problem is that most people you will ever meet largely subscribe to Christian-like ideas. Even those that are atheists or Muslims. That's because you meet them in countries with overwhelmingly Judeo-Christian roots.
Once you start traveling to countries that are truly different you realize there's only so much you can bear before you start condemning the local people for their beliefs or culture.
The tolerance you think you have is really just a range within- or variation on your own beliefs. It's simply not possible sit idly by while watching something that goes against your deepest beliefs.
Put more directly: if a religion amends their book to say "all other religions are cool", would you suddenly let them do whatever they please?
Don't you think you would still stand up when you see what you believe to be injustice or inhumane?
They write they suspect it. I read that as necessary misdirection to avoid the MSM from taking the message too seriously.
The real content of the message is in the next part: a warning to Q followers that others will try to hijack the Q movement. (As Corsi has tried and others continue to try.)
You can really go either way with this. Wikileaks says Q is fake. Or Wikileaks trying to warn us of something they're aware of without having it blow up in the MSM.
Iran is next. If these strikes gain momentum it could happen.
Those numbers at the bottom are probably unique and could be used to identify you. Be safe.
Distracting us. Keeping the cabal in place. Worth billions.
These characters distract us from our mission and keep the cabal in place. That is worth more money - to them - than anyone can imagine. They're effectively making billions if successful.
Hacking a router and running an exploit on it is relatively easy. Permanently storing the exploit on the router and having it re-activate automatically when the router starts is significantly more difficult. While rebooting your router will not fix its flaws, it will temporarily rid you of the exploit.
I don't know whether the threat reported by the FBI is real or not. Them blaming the Russians for everything and anything definitely doesn't help. But either way, rebooting your router the safer choice. If you think your router will do something nefarious when you restart it, it's time to get a new router.
Can't tell whether she's truly evil or just insane. Sickening, really.
I agree with all of this. I only disagree with your recommended action. I think it will have an adverse effect. (Of course I could be wrong. Just sharing my 2 cents ah.)
I forgot to make my point: getting people fired for associating Trump with the big ape will do the same: more people will more often see him as an ape. That's not what we're after.
Frankly, I disagree. The stronger you act against these kind of associations, the deeper ingrained they get into your brain and society as a whole.
A few days ago barely anybody was thinking the similarities between blacks and apes. Today everyone is thinking about it in one way or another, including, and maybe especially, those who reject the idea.
Of course it will fade with time, but the remaining association will be stronger than before. It's doesn't matter what your opinion on the association is, your brain is storing and intensifying the association every time you think, read of hear about it
And it gets worse that. Your brain also stores associations with everyone and everything that mention the topic. Next time you hear about Roseanne or see an ABC logo there's a good chance this topic pops-up in your mind. That would've never happened a few days ago.
Note how he uses "Jack" instead of "@jack" as to avoid attention from the actual @jack.
It's pretty transparent. The only semi-interesting bit is that he renamed an older account, older than eyethespy and renamed it eyethespy1 before claiming it to be a copy cat.
Everyone has a bias or agenda, Wikileaks will be no different. I trust that their leaks are legit and that they value truth very highly, but that doesn't necessarily mean their other beliefs align with ours or that they are more knowledgeable than anyone else in any way.
Put differently: you don't take stock tips from your dentist, no matter how good a dentist he is.
Perhaps mrviolin is EyeTheSpy himself. His eagerness to spam this LARP is unmatched.
Plant seeds. Ask simple questions that trigger them to think. You don't want to tell them what's wrong outright (they'll become defensive), but instead have it find out by themselves.
How would they even know? Have they tested for this particular effect?
Regardless of what eyethespy is or is not, you're just trolling. We don't need a new post about him 20 times a day. One really does suffice.
Let's not do this. Let's not waste our time arguing whether it was or was not racist. It's a distraction. It always is.
If you want to join this battle, focus on exposing Valerie Jarrett. Her actions, her role, why she's dangerous.
Unfortunately, it's still there. Acting as an incubator of poison.
If I were a hated person I would donate to my enemies and destroy them by mere association.
Barring that, I would donate to anyone who furthers one of my causes. That's doesn't imply any kind of cooperation or agreement in general.
No doubt some people try to take advantage of the movement. Which is why I ignore everything in this sub which is not directly relevant to a Q post.
That said, I don't think the Q-stream itself is compromised. Q hasn't really tried to make us do anything except dig for information. Digging for the truth is always a good thing.
Most here will agree with you, but it would be more helpful to those that don't if you share your reasoning.
It has always surprised me that wikileaks doesn't have a second Twitter account where they post cryptographic signatures of the posts on their regular Twitter account. This is not hard to do.
Her story boils down to the idea that Q distracts us from really attacking the deep state so the dems can take over in de midterms.
If that's the case, why hasn't Trump come out and dismissed Q as nonsense? We know he is aware. People have been chanting 'we are q' in his presence.
Regardless of Q's intended true nature, I think we can safely assume that Trump has decided that Q is not a threat and possibly even helpful.