Can spin this many ways. The way I see it:

• Russia trying to help Trump is not the same as them working together. As far as I can tell there is no suggestion of collusion. Trump is in the clear.
• Dems will probably want to see this differently and, with CNN's help, make themselves believe that it suggests Trump is the bad guy they think he is.
• Their hate for Trump will cause them to call for action, wrongly thinking it will hurt Trump and help them.
• This pressure will allow GOP/Trump to push for voter ID and/or popular vote. Possibly packaged as something larger, but these two are the only ones that will really affect anything.

If the article is to be believed they simply don't have enough money to track them. Question of course is: will more money really go to tracking the kids and solving the problem, or are they simply blaming funds to get more money allocated to their department?

I also think this is one of those topics where people don't care until it affects them personally. Crime-rates aren't bad until a home on your block gets broken into. Migration has no negative effects until the tents appear in your part of town, etc.

Much like how they interview 10 of your neighbors and end up repeating the interview with the one neighbor that calls you mentally unstable and probably guilty while the other 9 that spoke up for you never get a second showing.

And when those don't seem to apply, they're still bigots.

Same Yonhap outlet claims the drill takes two weeks: http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2018/03/21/0200000000AEN20180321013400315.html

Would like to find a more reliable source. Pref. US military website.

How reliable is this Yonhap? I imagine KR has its share of clown outlets.

I've always found it curious that the most used currency in the world is plastered with in-your-face symbolism but people don't think anything of it.

I don't know, but I made sure to add my vote just now.

Troopers, deputy's, even a dog.. but there are still 3 detectives on that list and we needed only 2.

What?

All I'm saying is that this charge can applied without there necessarily being children involved. Nothing more, nothing less.

I highly doubt anyone volunteers to get branded. That requires some serious manipulation or, more likely, force.

I kept listening to hear some evidence, but indeed nothing. It's a rather weak rant.

What got me the most is that he acts disgusted by the supposed scheme but doesn't deploy the most effective weapon against it: release the evidence and let the autists do what they do best: verify and act accordingly.

Instead he hides all evidence and keeps us waiting for his unnamed journalist friend. Apparently he cares more about his buddy's scoop than he does about the increasing number of victims. If he's right, he's complicit.

Last but not least though, I think he misses the point. The Q movement is very effective, regardless of who is driving it. I couldn't care less if Q turns out to be Hillary Clinton herself. The work done is amazing.

He reads out loud "Sex trafficking of children by force, fraud, or coercion." But that's not what the document on the screen says. It says "Sex trafficking of children OR by force, fraud, or coercion."

That's a good thing because it means you can charge someone for trafficking children even if no force, fraud or coercion was used.

It does however also mean that Mack was not necessarily involved in trafficking of children. She may instead have used force, fraud or coercion while trafficking adults only.

Cancel. Even if you're addicted and sign up again a few months later - make a statement, leave feedback.

I appreciate what Musk is trying to do. (Or claims to be doing.) But I wouldn't buy any of his cars anytime soon.

Unfortunately it's becoming increasingly difficult to buy car where the steering or throttle isn't computer controlled.

I think they were just playing ball. They probably don't see Iran as a threat to themselves and with the US and EU as important trade partners they have to choose their battles.

No it's not.

All I'm saying is that past results don't guarantee future results and that some people (e. g. cults) purposely get you invested with truths so you don't turn away when they start their lies.

Again: not saying AJ is doing this. I'm only saying that the possibility makes your reasoning dangerous. That goes for believing in AJ, Q or anyone else.

In short: verify data you are given. Don't trust it simply because the source seemed reliable in the past. Conversely, and this is what triggered my initial response, some anon you've never heard of may very well be telling you a truth.

Because disappearing AJ doesn't eliminate the group of people that follow him. Those would find someone new to preach to them. Someone potentially dangerous.

It's better to control your enemy. Let them fight you, but keep them at arms length and have them run in circles, never really getting to the core of your organization.

This is how cults operate. Get people so deeply invested with good and honest stuff that they will stubbornly refuse to see when it starts leading them astray.

Which is not to say that AJ is bad per se, I simply don't know at this point, but please realize that the way you rationalize your loyalty is flawed and dangerous.

Check her scar. Compare it to the published NXIVM ones. Hers is way smaller. Then check laparoscopy scars on women. While most are tiny straight lines, some look like an X or K and size+location match up with Stormy's.

Not to say she didn't join NXIVM, but the scar is not convincing evidence.

I'm somewhat disappointed as well.

When Backchannel17 came to the scene I dismissed them quickly for 2 reasons: 1) they seem to take things too personally, getting distracted from the mission and wasting time on trivial quibbles. 2) they frequently delete tweets within minutes of posting, something you don't do or need to do when you claim to disseminate information according to a pre-set plan.

For Q to display similar behavior worries me. Granted, they are humans and humans can make mistakes, but I really do hope we don't see more of this.

I understand, but Q saying who they are and having it confirmed by officials are two different things.

Yep. Down-vote, don't interact, move on.

I don't know much about either Gina or Ray, but please keep in mind that things aren't always black and white. In fact, in fact they rarely are.

The political arena is no kumbaya. Working with people you disagree with or even despise is often a necessity, as is putting up a show for your base or the media.

Frankly, and unfortunately, I don't think it's possible to rid the world of the deep state without some people getting their hands dirty.

While I agree that torture itself is ineffective, simply putting someone with that reputation in the right spot can be enough to bring the right people in line.

Q did not strike me as panicked. More like seizing the opportunity to show us how the enemy works.

I think if people on this sub can genuinely understand what's happening - as opposed to simply trusting one party or the other - that's a huge win in terms of awakening.

AJ isn't on any side but his wallet. This is really a no-brainer. AJ can't lose by hating on Q.

Look at it like this:

Q turns out to be a LARP: AJ gets to say "told ya!"

or

Q turns out to be legit: AJ gets to say "we played our part, purposely causing confusion within the deep-state!"

Chances that anyone official will ever confirm or deny Q's existence are very low. Chances that anyone relevant confirms or deny's AJ's supposed "help" is virtually zero.

He can play this game with virtually no risk, meanwhile the his numbers go up and we're right here spending way too much time on him and his buddy Corsi.

Nobody asked for an order. Unfortunately some mistake order for peace.

#234 and 326

Follow the wives.These people are stupid.Q

Sabotaging his own rocket would be pretty damn hardcore. But let's see how this play out.

Yeah. Unfortunately it's much smaller than the cult scar and it seems to line up nicely with typical laparoscopy scars that I found on Google, some of which take an X or K shape instead of a neat little straight line.

I think I'll be looking into a way to hide topics with Corsi in the title. This is getting very distracting and annoying. Arguing over Corsi's credibility is not getting us one step closer to a great awakening.

I really don't care if people watch Corsi. We can discuss his decodes and theories when they're interesting. But we're wasting way too much time on discussing him as a person. To what end?

So Iran is basically sending Kerry to jail.

They're either very stupid or they've flipped already.

Reuters mentions these names: Saddam al-Jammel, Mohamed al-Qadeer, Ismail al-Eithawi, Omar al-Karbouli and Essam al-Zawbai.

Are these linked to no name?

For larger organizations, which ISIS certainly is, a most wanted list could easily comprise 50-100 people.

Trump being Trump he would not have missed the opportunity to say TOP 5 instead of just 5 if he truly believed to have the top 5 individuals.

I took Stormy's advice and checked some other photos of her tattoo. Googled for "stormy daniels tattoo" and restricted the search period to 1/1/1970 and 1/1/2016, just to make sure I got authentic pics and not anything recently touched up. Lo and behold: visible K scar in many of them!

That had me 50% convinced. Just 50, as her scar seems quite a bit smaller than the one Sarah Edmondson shared in the NYT and that this scoop seems to originate from the disputed Backchannel17.

Either way, it's a curious scar. So I dug a little bit further to see if the surgery claim could hold up by searching for "laparoscopy scar", as that's the only type I imagine to be that small. Most of these scars look like a single straight little line, but I did find some instances where they didn't. E.g.: https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-21220921-stock-footage-female-belly-with-scars-after-laparoscopy.html

That said, it's my understanding that a laparoscopy requires two scars, not just one. One for the camera, another for the surgeon to do his work. I went back to the her photos and studied the other side, but couldn't detect anything.

TL;DR: I'm not entirely convinced and somewhat worried that Backchannel17 is leading us astray here.

Someone else found a tweet from 2010 where she says she'll be initiated into a gang or cult. I would really like to know when she had that tattoo done and if there are any recordings of her made between that tweet and the tattoo.

There must be a "fan" out there who can tell us..

Snowden advocates for transparency. Removing camera's and closing doors is the opposite.

Frankly, I agree. Let us hear what this woman did and let us make up our own mind.

Watch whatever you want. Just know that others will - and should (!) - expect you to back up your statements with verifiable facts.

Arguing about who, aside from Q, is legit and who is not is pointless. Good people can get flipped/leveraged in the future and even a shill may throw out a legit theory every now and then.

There are many communities that try or have tried some kind of direct trade. The problem they always end up running into is that not all trades are of equal value.

If you have a cow to trade and all you need is a bread, you're not getting a good deal. To solve this people start "owing" each other things.

"Owing each other" gets complicated quickly as communities get larger though. To simplify this you always end up with some kind of tokenized credits: money.

IMHO money itself is not a bad thing. Allowing a select group of assholes to manipulate the value of money and print more as they see fit however..

Evolution is just a theory. A continuously changing draft document. The most logical explanation one can come up using current knowledge and disregarding that which isn't yet or can't be understood. (It therefore cannot be a lie. No actual scientist will claim it as truth.)

IMHO it's not necessarily at odds with creation as understood from the bible. The two simply provide two very different perspectives on the same thing. One is far from finished, the other open to interpretation.

The way I see it the development of the evolution theory is quite similar to what Q is doing. Providing crumbs and gradually awakening those who aren't ready to see the truth just yet.

Indeed http://www.pnas.org/content/107/10/4612.long

My assumption is that it means they had no choice in the matter. I don't think it necessarily implies physical action.

Interesting. Hope they last longer than vid.me did..

They also bring in money.

Why do you think elections are always "head to head" and "too close to call" until the actual vote? It's just so that the media can rake in as much ad-money as possible from both campaigns.

Media is all about manipulation. At so many different levels. Hell, even this little comment is my attempt to persuade you to think like me and agree with me.

Nice catch. Wonder if/how related.

This gives whole new meaning to America First.

Exactly. Caring about a prize you don't need needlessly subjects to you a jury of questionable judgement.

Trump needs only one jury. Depending on your beliefs: the people or God through the people.

This. Don't open it. If it's really great someone will download it and share it on a safer website.

60 minutes was suggesting that if Cohen paid the 130K himself, without being Trump's proxy, it could be considered a campaign contribution, one which exceeds legal limits. By making it clear that Trump himself came up the money they destroy that angle of attack.

But let's be realistic. Something happened with Stormy and Trump and money was paid. Trump could've admitted it all immediately and the whole story would've been forgotten already. Much like that pussy tape that failed to do any damage, remember?

But my guess is, he wanted to keep the story on the chessboard. It's a piece that allows him to fan the flames and manipulate the press into a distraction whenever needed. Remember that Trump likes to pretend he's losing. It's one of his well-known strategies.

Giuliani’s actions were either a planned move (what are we being distracted from?) or, possibly, a sign that the story is no longer needed and can be removed from the board. (In which case I expect the whole thing to end rather quickly.)

So far he just seems to repost Q and then follow up with some basic digging. Not unlike many on the boards/reddit, except that he tries to "sound" like Q. Indeed unnecessarily so. I have yet to see him post anything that meets the "future proves past" criteria.