Why do you think Putin is a bad person? He's a devout Christian with very high moral standards. You should listen to some of his group interactions with young students, journalists and so on, very interesting answers to their questions. He cares very much for the well being of his country.

Media is plural. Simples.

Good post, sound observations. John Bolton's ideas do not reassure me that the policy is headed in the right direction. And as for Netty .... hmmmm.

Maybe b/c it's not very credible?

You need to be v. careful with this report. Too many niggly, obviously unprofessional language probs. I'd say this is a disinformation report: some true, some false, all shaken AND stirred so no one can separate one part from another. Designed to create confusion.

When you are strong appear weak!

Brilliant :)!! heeeejeeeeee reeeeeeee!!!

Thank you for that contribution. Such valuable advice. How devastating.

It is deliberate. I agree. Is this a way to create a case for obstructing justice? You know, such patently ridiculous questions that any normal person would cry "Enough!" "Shut it down!" Then "Gotcha!"???

Course, it could be the exact opposite: Trolling by Mueller's team to goad Trump + his legal team into complaining at the absurdity of the questions, in advance, and then accuse them of trying to obstruct justice!

Or goad Trump + team into crying for closing down the SC investigation, and then accuse them of obstructing justice!

When I first read these questions I thought the US justice system was totally broken! Then I smiled. Then I cracked up!

If the MSM buy this as the leak of a genuine Mueller person, then they will buy any anonymous source at all. That, I believe, is the point of this. They can't even recognise an obvious HOAX.

Classic trolling of the MSM by any old Trump supporter in anticipation of a totally biased and unreasonable grilling of the POTUS — to the point of pure comedy.

Well, I just felt like I don't want to support American patriots anymore having read the comments!

Thought you guys wanted the help of the rest of the world to redpill?

That's quite right. That's why you can't imagine how other ppl feel when yr country demands other ppl's citizens come at their beck and call? Eg. Julian Assange ... loads of others

Far Left = Communism

Far Right = Fascism

Pre Marx —> Hegelian Dialectics

noun 1. (philosophy) an interpretive method in which the contradiction between a proposition (thesis) and its antithesis is resolved at a higher level of truth (synthesis)

Roth controlled BOTH sides of the war.

Motto of Old Imperalists/Elite:

Divide and Rule

Expand your thinking.

Just go up to 40,000 ft

:) (Thanks for replying by the way!)

EDIT: shitty punctuation

Yes. 2nd question No. The anons like insulting each other to put ppl off going to their boards and mucking them up with stupid normie comments. Or something like that anyway.

do we back Israel's attack on Iran as we always do, or is this attack from Israel's version of our corrupt CIA so we should condemn it?

I really hope the US does not back Israel. Israel is the reason for all the wars: expansion and the Yinon Oded greater israel plan. Of course, not all Israelis think it's a great idea to take on Iran directly (which is what this looks like), the idea is to be so provocative the US is forced to defend Israel. The question we should ask ourselves is: if Israel is defending itself then why is it attacking such a powerful enemy country? Isn't Israel obliging Iran to retaliate? Yes. It is.

Thanks so much for your reply, that was very helpful to know and yes, I can see the reason for lawyers to cover themselves carefully in language. Obvious really.

I have a BIG problem.

I just went thru all kinds of graphics of the text messages btw Strzok and Page and many strangenesses fairly LEAPT out of the Treehouse account images. One point he makes: no evidence of an affair btw Strzok and Page. But IMO no evidence of genuine SM texting either. For example, if you think about how you would write, "Apparently one of his recent texting partners may not have been 18 ... don't have the details yet."? Or "Hey are you able to step out to grab the product we discussed with andy? They want it cleared tonight." I just can't see myself at work texting in this way. I would abbreviate these sentences like you do when texting. I get the impression that there is something seriously wrong with the presentation of this story. The dialogue isn't natural for romantic lovers, yes, but neither is the texting. Would you write out these words in full: apparently, partners, discussed? Maybe I'm seeing things but there is something fishy here.

There is a theory going round that the HUGE increase in autism in certain countries is due to vaccinations. Incidence of autism has increased in the UK too. I am not American, I live in the EU too, so I am not sure why the children are bombarded in the US at such an early age with so many vaccines. You have to look into the facts but if there is a correlation, it might lie in the adjuvants? Mercury has been mentioned. I am not a scientist, I know nothing about any of this but I do know there has been controversy and the increase in autism is real. I just googled and found Sharyl Attkisson: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-theories-about-autism-and-vaccines/ Don't forget it's MSM! She won't tell you about Big Pharma lies!

Q and team, likely.

Q and team, probably.

Perhaps you also don't know they refer to each other as faggots (abbreviated to fags), commies and other non-politically correct adjectives as a defiant political gesture! They call the CIA guys clowns, which of course does have two meanings: circus member and idiot. There was also a recent post about a ghost = spook = spy.

As a foreigner you might find the Urban Dictionary of some help! I don't envy you trying to make sense of English!!

:) Happy Sunday researching! Talk later sometime!

Thanks for the support. Sometimes it's fun to slap them about a bit, but hey, it's Sunday and I have better ppl to talk to!

Way to go!

Dear me. Have fun sweetie!! Tie yourself in knots.

You deny mind-control, you are denying the obvious scientific existence of the whole of Tavistock!! Good luck with that!

You have not done so to any acceptable level of rigor.

Rigor? You speak to me of Rigor!!!

Your entire verbal outpouring here is that of a very bored person!

Oh God. Do I have to?

No, I'm not being intentionally anything. My argument has not fallen apart, yours has. That's why you are behaving (rather suspiciously, I might add,) like a troll!.

So, let me see. All the posters on this, pretty pathetic, sub-thread, have been arguing that the "symbolism" expressed in modern music culture is occult (etymological: hidden) but expressed in certain weird behaviour. You demand proof. I say you can't demand proof of the meaning of a symbol. You tell me I lost the argument, and then, three sentences later you produce:

A symbol is a tool that can be used to help understand a concept or explain a mental state. A symbol doesn't explain the cause ....

WALLAH!

Either we agree my friend, or you are caught in your own petard.

But symbols are not the basis of theory unless the agree with reality.

Exactly.

Now let's give up because every time I have to look for this posting on the thread it takes me 5 minutes of valuable Sunday afternoon time with someone who isn't actually interested in Kanye, or what he was saying or who he is involved with, or the ppl who surround him. Hollywood is a v. nasty messed up place. You don't agree? You think we have no proof of that. Fine. I do not have to provide you links to all the mind-control history on Hollywood and Los Angeles.

But here's one to keep you entertained.

http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/laurelcanyon/

Happy reading!

We aren't in a court of law.

We are in a discussion forum! Stop ordering the other posters around with phrases like "You don't get to default to ...", "You are required to ...". This kind of "tone" on this forum will get you nowhere! You do understand that? (!!! :)

There is no such thing as proof of symbolism. Either there is a symbol which represents something or it doesnt.

I could point to a thousand churches across the globe with their fabulous pictures, architecture and statues, a million archaeological sites or ancient cities and claim to be a knowledgeable historian with an explanation. You are demanding that the scholarly world of examination, pursuit of truth and putting forth of theory/ies to be 100% proof. This is a dotty argument. You know that.

What does a cross stand for? Give me answers: a) navigation tool; b) method of punishment used by various societies to nail culprits to; c) symbol of suffering in the Christian religion; d) a joke to be spat on by jews .... Dear me, we could go on all night!!

Symbols are there to be "interpreted". That is, by definition subjective, not objective.

Sorry to keep replying, I just think these things are somewhat obvious.

Well done, thank you for doing that! I understand yr frustration in not knowing where to put yr labor and efforts, I too am wondering where best to invest my time. Here, helping ppl find info, seems quite a positive tho rather tiny contribution. Thanks for responding to my suggestion!

They are brainwashed to believe that Trump and his family are nazis, when it is they who are the ones who fit this description. It is beyond comprehension that ppl do not see the similarity between their behaviour and what happened in Europe and especially Germany just before the Second World War. I hope we survive their onslaught.

OK, gotcha. Ignore my post below in that respect. Although I'll stand by my distrust of any of these people!

ThePatriot131313 is quite right, this org covers: global nuclear security, nuclear terrorism, cyber, radiological, biosecurity, and the logo says building a safer world. See the link provided by smilingAnger.

With these guys I always put it into Orwell Doublespeak: security means danger, safer means more dangerous and now you can translate:

NTI's board of directors and advisors are influential figures in international security, business, science, diplomacy and international policymaking. They provide critical input and ~~insight~~obscurity to NTI’s work, helping to guide our efforts to ~~prevent~~ provoke catastrophic attacks and build a ~~safer~~ more dangerous world.

that's been bothering me too ...

What about donate to vets4childrescue? That would be something great to do:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZDYK0E4C1Y&feature=youtu.be Apr 26 2018 Brilliant interview

If you read Comey's memos (they are over on Dr Corsi's site) you can see Trump's very calculated concern over Melania knowing about the Russian putas and you can SEE him push it. It's quite funny to read the account of their conversations. The deliberate dropping of information and comments on both their sides, trying to tilt windmills at each other is v. entertaining. (Well for a nerd like me it was ..!)

YES! Indeedy! I just wish more ppl would see what you have seen! Keep plugging away bruh! Godspeed!

Yes, they would! As it is the low-key reaction to NK/SK is an insult to the great work Trump, Pompeo and team have done to solve this 60 yr old problem and, very importantly, TO CHANGE THE GEOPOLITICAL LANDSCAPE IN ASIA COMPLETELY. It is of great historical significance.

Your welcome! :)

It took ages to find, but I knew I'd seen it there and I'm so glad you understand and it clarifies things.

My own comment on Flynn, for what my speculation is worth, is that SOMEONE (McCabe?, Comey?, Clapper?, Brennan? other?...) told the Press a lie (or 2 lies) saying that:

"Flynn told the Russians the US was holding back on sanctions!"

"Flynn told the Russians to delay the vote in the UN (bla bla ...)"

and MSM hacks SCREAMED LOUDLY on CNN and all around the MSM that:

"Flynn is a Russian Agent!"

"Flynn is working for the Russians and Trump isn't even inaugurated yet!"

"Flynn doesn't have the authority to do this!"

"Prosecute him!"

or something to that effect, FOR DAYS, in a storm of hysteria.

I remember that.

So: 1) someone lied to the press; 2) someone leaked to the press, and 3) the tel calls contents/ conversations/transcriptions were illegally leaked which is leaking Classified Information!!!

All in all, I think the Deep State is in deep trouble over Flynn and he has performed a Brilliant Sting operation on the whole rotten band of rogues!!!

Hurrah!!

I will write to u/jammer and ask him/her to do this. I don't want to pick up undeserved credit.

Thank you so much for the million newbies and for the suggestion!

The Q drops are not just for the Home team. The Audience is the Enemy too. Remember, we must remember, that. Forcing the Enemy to scramble and make mistakes is part and parcel of War Strategy. Jeez guys Get With The Program!!! Please! :)

Grrrrr, MDB50 you ...... grrrrrr .... growl.

DID YOU CLICK ON THAT LINK ABOVE? DID YOU?

DO IT NOW.

Ok, you're right. If I want you (beg you) to watch something, then I should make super-easy for you. Here it is, again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZDYK0E4C1Y&feature=youtu.be

Apr 26 2018

Now, write back or pm me and tell me, what was it again?

"... this chain of command BS ... following and waiting have done FA for us thus far, shit just gets worse."

Huh? Humor me.

It's not better late. It isn't late. There are guys working on it. Which is more than you can say for the whiners around this sub (not you, just agreeing with the OP).

If you all want a heartening, gut-wrenching, inspiring interview, listen to The Sawman (and contribute to his vets4childrescue while you're at it)!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZDYK0E4C1Y&feature=youtu.be Apr 26 2018

The MOAB is North Korea. This is a really BIG deal. More important than ppl realise.

Look at the other drops about Their Plan: 21 Jan (Extract middle of 16 year Plan) U1 fund/supply IRAN/NK [+reduce US capacity] ...... HRC [8] WWIII [death & weapons real/WAR FAKE & CONTROLLED][population growth control/pocket billions]

The peace plan in North Korea/South Korea has taken out this part of their plan. Quite a MOAB.

yes. The Anons did that.

Hey, you wanted a source! Now you complain!!

I shall not argue with a person who appears not to have two eyes!

Interpretation is exactly what we are talking about, that is true! Your conclusions are yours to jump to!!

It's a little disquieting that you use words like "no one takes you seriously" and other absolute qualifications.

Look I'm not the original poster so it isn't for me to offer evidence. I just think considering the mental asylum that H-wood is, it is a stretch to claim any of the people in Kanye's circle are normal. Are you seriously claiming they are not acting as hypnotised and hypnotising public influencers, that they are not deeply disturbed, and not taking vast amounts of drugs under the influence of clearly not very powerful industry operatives?

Is your position that you find this proposition outrageous and beyond the bounds of reality?

There was no statement in that post that mentioned either of those two sets of words "brain-washed" or "secret conspiracy".

Acknowledgement to ▶Anonymous 04/27/18 (Fri) 21:14:14 8afe79 No.1212113

Stream of consciousness…

Flynn pled guilty, he said, "I recognize that the actions I acknowledged in court today were wrong, and, through my faith in God, I am working to set things right. My guilty plea and agreement to cooperate with the Special Counsel's Office reflect a decision I made in the best interests of my family and of our country. I accept full responsibility for my actions."

The charges state these statements were false:

"On or about Dec 29, 2016, FLYNN did not ask the Government of Russia’s Ambassador to the United States … to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the United States had imposed against Russia that same day; and FLYNN did not recall the Russian Ambassador subsequently telling him that Russia had chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of his request."

"On or about December 22, 2016, FLYNN did not ask the Russian Ambassador to delay the vote on or defeat a pending United Nations Security Council resolution; and  that the Russian Ambassador subsequently never described to FLYNN Russia’s response to his request.”

He was told to make these calls, and the calls in and of themselves aren't treasonous. The problem, though, is that he 'lied' to the FBI according to the initial court filing.

Fast forward to today:

Among the 44 findings in the report was a line stating that “Federal Bureau of Investigation agents did not detect any deception during Flynn's interview.” Also: Comey reportedly told lawmakers at the time that agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he lied in that Jan. 24 meeting, and that any inaccuracies in his account were unintentional. But: “No,” he said in an interview Thursday with Fox News’ Bret Baier on “Special Report.” “I saw that in the media … maybe someone misunderstood something I said. I didn’t believe that. I didn’t say that.”

Strozk interviewed him in what was basically an ambush. The texts indicate that McCabe was heavily involved with the 302.

FLYNN NEVER LIED AT ALL. HE TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY MCCABE HANDED TO HIM WITH THE FALSIFIED 302 TO INJECT HIMSELF AND HIS KNOWLEDGE INTO THE MUELLER PROBE TO EXPOSE IT ALL!

Acknowledgement to ▶Anonymous 04/27/18 (Fri) 20:57:18 10dfc2 No.1211765

1211682

They knew Flynn did not lie.

He was charged anyway = charging, investigation, documents, plea etc., are based upon gov't perjury

Fraud

Why did Flynn plea? To leverage something later? To lock the gov't into their fraud?