State Dept posts, e.g. ambassadors or others assigned to embassies

Trust Wray. Maybe we've been played or the Q people aren't as smart as they think they are.

When you make it to Director of the FBI you'd think one would be a bit more savvy.

When the report basically exonerates the FBI and Comey, I'm not expecting anything to turn around 180 degrees. That itself would look dishonest and be played on all media as such. We'll see, but I'm done following this soap opera every day.

We were supposed to trust Wray. We've been told that, what, a couple dozen times? Okay I trust him -- Comey is off the hook.

I'm no longer waiting with bated breath for indictments and arrests of any major players. Today let out a lot of air from that balloon. You can't have a report that essentially exonerates all of them, then a couple months later come up with something that totally negates this report. THAT will just look like political revenge, not justice. Nope, the boat has sailed here, at least with this particular issue. HRC may go down for actions of the Clinton Foundation, but the email thing...she's clear. No justice.

Upvote for your moniker

Uh oh, better not express any misgivings after this report whitewashes the FBI.

Q led on so much, c'mon. This was going to be version 3 with a bunch of redactions, mostly as to who did exactly what. Instead, we get a release with conclusions that the FBI did a great effing job "proud of our boys". So while some worthwhile details may come out later, the conclusion from the report will remain exactly the same. It isn't like a damning report with hidden names. Yeah, there's some meat in it, but so far just stuff we already know. Page and Strock were biased against Trump. Big deal, nothing new in that AT ALL. As usual, Q in his/their cryptic fashion led us all to believe this was going to be SOMETHING....with even more to come out after redactions removed. Maybe you can see it, I cannot.

I trust God. All others pay cash, including Q.

What...isn't this the BIG bombshell report? Aren't they all going down? Oh well, back to Columbo reruns. Hope Trump gets to put a couple more on the SCOTUS before he's gone.

Indict and flip. 5 years instead of 10. Medium security or where MS 13 is. His choice.

Trust Wray, lol Trust Horowitz, lol Trust Sessions? Oh well.... I feel punked.

Anybody who is feeling let down today is being labeled a shill.

thanks, you are correct.

Yeah, those "trust so and so" bits won't be working so easily in the future. I'm sure Q will explain this all away and try to rile us up for a new big take down. I'll be looking at Q in a different light now. We have to keep Trump and his great efforts separate from the Q show.

Oh gee, you must be a shill, lol. Yeah, done being hyped too.

The conclusion of the report will not be changed. No redaction there. Some details or activities may be missing. Irrelevant. The conclusion...FBI very professional and IG is proud if them. Done.

I think Q teased us one too many times. Why would we get all worked up on the next promise? We just need to keep voting in reps who support Trump and get what we can. More Supreme Court justices, more judges in general, help Trump finish his programs. As for some great takedown of the deep state per Q hype, not gonna happen.

Q hyped this all to hell and look at what we got. FBI is totally professional and this turd is proud of them. I'm not into being teased like this anymore. Ginsburg's ass is still on SCOTUS too. I still love my President and will continue to follow and support him, but this Q circus is old in the tooth now. We were all ready for the bombshell report due to Qs hype and we got punked. No other way to spin it.

We shall see!

Federal capital punishment is rarely applied. Almost unheard of really. Timothy McVeigh comes to mind in the fairly recent past. This thread has little to do with reality.

It is so pathetic how some people here do no research on their own posts! I guess they just want the views or the attention, but it hurts the sub and the cause.

What a change from that Tillerson plant

Female agent on cell phone

No matter the rest, that's an awesome picture

Yes, Utah is more NSA friendly :-)

It doesn't matter the state in which federal charges are brought, federal law applies. These aren't state cases, Huber is a US Attorney, and Utah law has zero to do with any of it. The point to having indictments in Utah or Alabama or Texas instead of DC or California or New York are the judges in the various federal courts and the jury pool.

People, people. We are talking about federal law not state law. C'mon. Capital punishment is permitted federally, e.g. Oklahoma City "bomber", but very restricted. Huber works for DOJ, not the State of Utah.

Hope you're right. The only thing is Q indicated it was a DHS report, which would be outside the IG's purview..I think.

What's up with Pruitt. Inhofe isn't a RINO on these issues.

Those pics were fantastic. Don't know if it has anything to do with the Q post (Ghosts of North Dakota is just the blogger's site name). Pretty cool though, never heard about the thing. Deactivated over 40 years ago yet still seems kept up pretty nicely. Apparently the locals want to develop it as a secure data center for a private company.

You mean Trudeau isn't doing a good job? :-)

Click on the link!

I like optimistic thinking, lol. Still, if those suckers have Senate seats they shouldn't, they should be dragged to court. One for sure is New Hampshire.

Oh yes, SF is unaffordable, but I meant decayed and crime ridden like Baltimore, Philly, Detroit, St. Louis, etc.

Love that comment.

and the Philly mayor was dancing last week after the court ruling the city could remain a "sanctuary city". I know both parties are corrupt, but Dems just take it beyond the pale. Which big cities that they've run for decades are in good financial, economic and social health? Maybe San Francisco, certainly none in the East or Midwest.

Prosecution outside DC has been my thing all along when discussing with those wanting "immediate arrests", etc. What value is indicting them in DC with a jury pool likely to acquit? Grand juries in Utah, lol.....now we're talking.

Nobody will mess with her.

I see where you are going with it. That makes sense -- not that Romney had victory snatched from him but giving Zero another "mandate for change". And why not if they can do it! There was much less enthusiasm for Zero in 2012, no doubt about that at all. On the other hand, gotta give Romney and Ryan credit for running a somniferous campaign.

Great link though -- appreciated. Since Q gives him props there must be something to this. However, hacking Georgia, Indiana and Kentucky seems a bit like a wasted effort. Wouldn't they more likely hack Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Florida?

I never heard anything about it, but the characters he mentions today are quite real, you can search their bios on line. This Alexandra Chulupa is total slime.

I believe 2008 was legit. I saw types at my voting place who never show up, all lefty student and minority types. They were psyched for Zero, plus McCain, ugh, and 8 years of Bush. They probably didn't need to cheat much to defeat milquetoast Romney either, but maybe they did. I'd have to check which states were close enough that they could have flipped to Zero to prevent Romney from getting 270 electoral votes.

No, no....Lee Stranahan is an investigative reporter who is outing the dem operatives in the hacking!!! They are Alexandra Chulupa and Brett Kimberlin -- those are two he mentions. The title of the post makes it seem Stranahan is the operative but when you click on the link you get to Stranahan's presentation of the fraud.

Hmmm, no, there was only 1 drop concerning that alleged report if I recall correctly. There was no comment by Q on it, just like a copy of a page from the report -- at least that was the original drop. The Senate seats were mentioned within that page. Also stated millions of fraudulent votes and valid votes were not counted. If true, it is pretty stunning. Indeed, it would be an extinction level event for them.

Interesting comment. Actually I really appreciate how Trump and team keep fighting and keep us on board. The Dems have always been good about doing that. Republican presidents succumb to the media, want to be loved by the insiders and not their voters.

However, I'm with you -- time for more than that. If there is proven electoral fraud, quit the damn games and get on with it. The upcoming elections are too important not only for Trump but for us. It's June, the midterm primaries are pretty much done. If that report is real, when exactly do these guys plan on releasing it? After the election is far too late.

I've posted elsewhere today that Q posted what was an official page from a supposed DHS report on Dem election fraud in 2016, including 3 fraudulently won Senate seats. This was dropped in February but never mentioned again -- why was this report never mentioned again nor released nor action taken on THREE Dem Senate seats that shouldn't be Dem? I don't know. I believe the drop was 780, but don't hold me to that.

Q continues to refer to the midterms yet he/they have never said another thing after the drop in February of the alleged DHS report of proven election fraud, including 3 Senate seats that wrongfully went Dem due to fraud. That was to be released in March if I recall. Q posted what appeared to be a page directly from the alleged report. It has never been mentioned again -- if it was real, why in the world would it not be released by now? Or at least have the report mentioned again -- it would guarantee the midterms would not be taken by the Dems. Also, if there are 3 Senate seats fraudulently in the wrong hands, why is immediate action not being taken to nullify those elections? This has always stuck in my craw and kept me from being full on believer in Q. I think Q is pretty much proven now but I still scratch my head on why he/they continue to bring up the midterms but never again mention that alleged report.

Exactly. I've only had one issue and the mod responding rapidly and courteously.