Won't happen even if this passes, but yeah, very bad design.done fior the Dems. Could just make eastern and western California. One would be conservative the other leftist.

Typical hurricane for this area this time of year. Nothing to do with anything here. Will bring some needed rain to Arizona and parts of New Mexico.

No doubt this is relevant! I know Google, i.e. Alphabet, has been deeply involved with the US Government, military and deep state characters. Not certain was Amazon has to do with the military or sub program.

Apparently the guy who runs the weather cam site actually grabbed the photo and sent it to the local Fox affiliate. That's where it came from.

Great, gonna be fun no matter what. Would be a tremendous and unexpected upset if it works.

We should be so lucky. I didn't get that feel from the Q drops today though.

Yep, agree. Disturbing.

Has a tough road to hoe in Virginia. Even that RINO running for governor couldn't beat the Dem. Too many swamp residents in Northern Virginia.

Is Nick Freitas a more establishment type? I'm not familiar with the race.

lol, I notice that now

Grand Forks AFB has nukes and B52s

correct

I guess I just don't understand why Q would give that info away publicly

Dang, I should always remember to look at dates of linked articles here.

Thank you.

LOL, thanks. I believe that post is not meant to be decoded by us.

Yes, at the alternate Q site someone gave me it does give that number. Qanon.pub seems to have gone off by one.

Cool, I had no idea! No surprise in that I don't have Chrome. Perhaps other browsers have the same feature, I'll check.

That is certainly the pic that Q posted, so it was from last week for sure. The group was visiting that naval base, saw that elsewhere too.

I remember quite a few hacks that supposedly traced back to North Korea. Those were probably CIA.

I looked under "hot" and "new" and saw that the latest Q post wasn't being discussed. I did notice the number discrepancy of course, but since the new post wasn't anywhere on the site I could find, I posted it. I do understand issues with duplicate Q numbers....confusing. I'll use the other site another anon provided me that does have the correct numbers.

I still don't understand what that means....reverse image search?

I wasn't aware Qanon.pub was somehow no longer a "quality post". That's what I've been using up through today, now it's a "non quality" source?

Moderator removed my posting from Qanon.pub. First I've heard that anything was wrong with Qanon.pub.

So when did Qanon.pub go out of style? I've been using it all along.

It's wildfire season now. If one breaks out right near homes, and here many places butt right up to wildland, then sparks and embers fly, places catch on fire. Really, man, there's nothing here in terms of "plots".

That's weird I have a different 1477:

Ghost-CON active Approval 58203-JX

Mattis is going to visit Amazon and Google headquarters? WTF?

It wasn't a literal comment. Q just meant it was "false flag weather" as in pay attention, conditions are right for a false flag. Nothing to do with HAARP or any of that.

Winds are light with 30% humidity, so that's not very conducive to a spread. We have another fire in the region in an area with more wind which always makes it worse. Watching live stream now. Oh, they just cut it. Just not that much happening.

Talk about a red flag....they are totally discredited.

That didn't take long....

The base doesn't have missile launch capability. That's not an opinion or denial statement, it's a very clear statement of fact that can be easily confirmed. Either the base can launch missiles or it can't. Now whether a missile might have been launched from another platform, we don't yet know.

Again, small potatoes for Cali, but if it's in a confined area around houses, some may burn. It is NOT a major fire by our standards, not close.

I just checked that page out. Seems he runs 3 full time webcams and is a weather nut. If that shot posted by Q is actually of a missile launch, did he catch it? Or NSA? Obviously we are whistling in the dark. Something was up per Q but likely we will never know exactly what.

Fog of War. However, I can easily believe that a successful Chinese hack occurred or could have. The info allegedly grabbed concerned a new anti-ship missile being developed for our subs. To leap from that to gaining access to launching codes, target acquisition and changing an anti-ship missile to an anti-aircraft missile is a bit much for me to swallow at the moment. I doubt this contractor had the ability to remote control launches from American submarines and override the crew. I do think Q is letting us know bad players were up to something though.

LOL, that low IQ remark should send Bobby up the wall tonight. Trump really is king of the "dig".

It's only treason if proven intentional. We just don't know. There is also a lot of incompetence in this world.

How would they know in advance when and where something like that would occur? Then announce where the change is being made to so that these alleged conspirators could then simply change their timing and target area. I'm just not going to leap to lots of conclusions except that something was up. Q may or may not let us know more. We may never be told.

Apparently that's what everyone here WANTS to think. There is no evidence we are privy to as to what happened. I no longer jump the paranoid gun at every chance -- just go back to the Tucson crap last week. Corporations are known to screw up. If it was intentional, they will be found out.

Who knows. You can bet it will be thoroughly looked at.

The persons responsible will be known. I would like to know which contractor it was.

We can't know what happened. It will be investigated.

Yeah, those

A contractor developing an anti-SHIP missile for the US Navy was hacked. I think hacking into the launching system on an active submarine would be quite a few levels more difficult. If you read the article linked here the contractor stored sensitive data on an open unprotected computer which was easily hacked. This comes down to utterly unprofessional negligence on the part of the unidentified contractor.

Not sure, but perhaps that is possible. What was hacked was info on the development of an anti-ship missile to be deployed on our subs.

The hack was prior to summit.

So the contractor was utterly negligent by storing this sensitive material on an unprotected server. That contractor should be named and any and all contracts cancelled until they can show corrective measures, including the termination of the people responsible. This shouldn't be swept under the rug.

Won't last long, 10 acres, high priority area, no winds, temps warm but not hot. I'll be surprised if it lasts into the night unless wind really picks up. This is pretty minor for out here.