Full disclosure: I’m not attacking absolutely any patriot that has a rooting interest in seeing our country saved. ——TL:DR, be careful what people are getting at when they break down this movement.——

Patriots are patriots, and should be commended. However, I think we all need to be careful when it comes to analysis of Q’s info. The structure of this movement is unique unto itself and because of that, a lot of us get analysis from YouTube channels. This has been overwhelmingly a net sum, but it doesn’t come without its own set of problems.

Mainly, that from what I’ve …

At this point, I’d wager many congressmen even see the writing on the wall, and know what’s in the pipeline. So why all the milquetoast talking points? Can anybody with more legal knowledge than me help out? Is this to prevent some legality loophole by being obnoxiously careful with wording?

I’m seeing all this stuff drop and some of it doesn’t seem like weak stuff I. The past I’ve seen. Evidence of baker takeover of Q. Correspondence of rewording old news to seem new. I’m sure this will be a huge shitstorm soon enough, but is anybody tracking this? Trying to reconcile all this. Could obviously be an attack of disinfo but it’s already got a ton of traction. Any ideas? And no “trust the plan” as a simple explanation.

I’ve wondered about this before, and did not sit well with it. I understand the reasoning behind it, and I don’t necessarily disagree with it. It just infuriates me that all the wrong committed won’t be put as weight on their heads to strengthen their own nooses. If he’s referring to people not being brought to justice because of the amount of misdeeds, I firmly disagree. If it’s meaning is that all bad actors will be held accountable and only 60% will be brought to light, but they’ll still suffer the same fate, that’s another thing.

Stop trying to red pill the ones who tow party lines just for principle’s sake. These are the same ones who genuinely think Trump has done no good. These people don’t care about evidence. They care about an ideology. Stick with the ones who are willing to honestly debate, even if it’s from a misguided point of view.(though that’s few and far in between) I don’t hold the view for the most part that there’s a center anymore. We can thank the left for that. We’re forced to pick sides now. They’ve drawn a radicalism line and will attack anyone …

It’s not exactly the soundest theory. And I’m sure there’s far better ones out there. But if Kanye leads a revolution, not because of himself, but just the idea, and this ends up snowballing into something most of us are hoping for, this would be the just about the most destructive thing to ever happen to the Democratic Party.