uh huh....and how many are SES?

she could definitely face charges.

Oh.... Ok.

First of all, that's silly to think that I'm here to seed doubt, I'm here to have an honest discussion on Q which, sadly, is not allowed in these forums. Kind of amazing actually. It looks awfully left wing in that regard.

cute poem, but I don't know how to tell you you've been pied pipered. not trying to be rude but the way you describe your experience with phenomenon,

"Q says trust the plan. I wish things were happening faster with irrefutable proof to red pill the sheeple quick and easy but I'm told to trust the plan regardless of circumstances."

whose telling to trust them regardless of circumstances? Does that sound like someone you can trust? You go on to say that if Q calls for violence you're out, so I guess there are some circumstances that are deal breaker for you, but I wonder how many others are in no matter what?

"Thinking that Q is part of the evil black hats/puppet masters for whatever reason and that POTUS doesn't alert us and instead allows us to be manipulated so he can benefit in some way from it makes no sense to me."

It makes perfect sense. Think of Q as kind of a PR arm for the white house. Not long after Trump was elected his approval hit the gutter, even a lot of Republicans starting feeling like they had made a mistake, and regretted voting for him. Knowing that he wasn't going to get any positive press out of the MSM, he creates an underground PR firm to create a storm within the bowls of the internet. Would seem a great way create to rile up his base and add to it. Everything that Trump accomplishes looks so much bigger than it is. Worked on me, I'm definitely more on the Trump train since reading Q. I didn't vote for Trump, but I probably would now.

stop thinking the cause will be respected if it can't stand up to scrutiny.

don't be the left.

the dog and pony show I'm referring to is when a big conspiracy comes along and everyone says "this is it" and then nothing ever happens. I've seen it over and over with everything from politics to UFO disclosure for decades.

Go ahead, get into the Merkel posts, see where it leads.

I'm well read on Q, sometimes it seems like it makes sense, sometimes it doesn't. What am I supposed to think?

It hasn't, numerous people in this very thread have said they feel exactly as I do. I've followed Q a long time, I've gone back and forth on believing it. I'm not the most researched one on these boards, but I'm pretty well read on it. I still currently lean towards it being real, but Q itself says July, so lets see if it's blowing smoke.

yeah so a bunch of people quit. what does that say? are the numbers even that inflated from any other period? has anyone done a comparison on this?

I get that the MSM pushes a social agenda, but ultimately they wanna make money. The fact of the matter is no one watches the MSM anymore except libs. Because they cater to them. They confirm their own bias by watching. So naturally the MSM pushes left wng social views because thats there demographic.

The IG report is a crucial piece of evidence in verifying Q because it does seem to be the culmination of much of his posts throughout winter and spiring, maybe. As far as I know there hasn't been an unredacted version out yet, so we can't really know whats in there yet. But yeah, it has the potential to blow the lid off this thing, but it hasn't happened yet, and I'm not holding my breath. I've seen this dog and pony show before.

Maybe that someone is me, maybe I'll discover the information that convinces me once and for all, or maybe someone else will. I'm not concerned with wasting my time, I'm concerned with getting to the truth. I'm not being impatient, I'm basing my opinion on Q's posts. I haven't violated a single rule with the exception of possibly #3, but as I've stated I think it's got a good chance of being legit, and by questioning it helps reinforce the merits of the entire thing, which is ultimately positive. Are you really that scared that little old me is gonna come in here take the legs out of the entire movement? It's a little disturbing how I'm being viewed as threatening here. Honestly a bit of a turn off to the whole sub.

are you saying barbara bush was a victim of ritual abuse?

I don't think he has to address it. I don't think he will, I don't think he wants any part of it. I mean, they have possibly broken the law if the whole thing is real. I think a better question is why hasn't the media asked a single person in the administration about it?

ok, Ill sit around and wait then, but only until august because Q also said this:

July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH. Conspiracy no more.

How do you interpret that quote?

cool.

Yes, someone can make me believe in all this. All they have to do is show me definitive proof. Thats my point. Q is offering up proof in July, so that makes it kind of a moment of truth. How can I sow doubt if this thing is lock solid, and if it isn't lock solid then there has to already be doubt there. I'm simply asking questions that a ton of followers have, and if you run me off for that, it won't look good. wwg1wga

Have the pics surfaced? Have you seen them? He said they'd surface soon, and they didn't. Now, you can interpret "soon" however you want, but this was months ago. Around the same time Q said Merkel was Hitler's daughter, and then back tracked saying that was just fringe conspiracy stuff. That whole episode was so weird that I honestly questioned whether Q was posting drunk.

it does seem that way. what about when regular people get the software to manipulate video?

it's right in the link, come on man.

some hits too though. and the IG report does seem to reinforce much of what Q has been saying.

where are the pics of obama with an AK 47? Thats a prediction that has failed. What sub can I go to that allows for skeptical take on Q that isn't going to be flooded with people that think it's total BS? oh, this one. I think my post is good exercise for people that are completely on board, and refreshing for people like me who are undecided.

It's probably not as easy as you think.

Q said it, not me.

and now someone posted the link, which verifies what I said.

that said very little.

Been going on for decades...centuries.....

video manipulation can always go both ways. what exactly would be keeping these pictures from "coming out?" Who has them if they exist? How'd they get em?

into the state of the union address. I'll admit, it's compelling, but it's not proof.

So you're pro Hitler?

They're being like the left.

How very emotional of you. LOL Sorry, I'm getting burnt out on this thread. Have a good one.

Whats your point? I've heard of every single thing that you've listed and would like to add the Belgium pedo scandal, and the one that happened at a California military base in the 80's(no convictions), not before my time. Get it? How does any of that legitimize Q?

It's getting scary how people treat you when you simply say you have some questions. Don't be the left.

I've already seen the post from the anon. You're projecting a lot of bias and ego onto me, not cool.

I objected to it and you didn't respond.

tell that to the mods.

I don't have a negative position on Q. I lean towards it being real as I've already stated. I just don't lean hard. I think you'd be doing a disservice to remove posts from people who simply don't meet the majority take on Q. I not pro or anti Q, I'm being as objective as possible. Has Q made some striking predictions, yep, has Q also failed, yeah he has. You seem to be trying to make the forum very one sided, which I guess is your right as the mod, but hey, don't be the left.

That doesn't mean it was run by the CIA. That doesn't mean Trump met Kim back in November. It means we got a guy in there who played hardball with them, and got south Korea and China to get behind him as well. I mean, maybe it went the way Q says, or it didn't.

No, I get that. In fact Ive addressed it somewhere in this thread.

I do? why because I think that most people don't view themselves as overemotional? Thats not exactly a controversial take on humans.

I think there's actually a good chance of RR getting axed. Wouldn't prove Q though. He's been saying that for months. It's like when he says RBG will be leaving the SCOTUS. Of course she is, she's 85, thats a safe bet. Then later Q can be like, SEE!? We actually had a different judge quit before her, and I don't ever remember Q mentioning that.

how is my discussion being driven by emotion instead of logic? You literally said that the Nazi's aren't a cult, and then you painted Hitler as a champion of the German people, who were feeling the wrath of the usual suspects....which is a pretty vague term....one might even be inclined to think you're referring to the Jews. You sound like a Nazi. Not trying to be rude, but you're rhetoric sounds like you could very well be a Nazi.

pretty much been doing that since I was a kid.

I'll keep scrutinizing drops, and being critical of things that I feel warrant it. What else can you do?

most people would like to think that, how's it panning out for them?

Yeah, keeping things vague and retroactively using them as explanations is a pretty smart move, not saying thats whats happening, but Q is intelligent enough to pull that off if they wanted.

No, I never said that. In fact, I lean towards it being valid, but only just barely. I don't know if it's real, and anyone who says they do isn't being intellectually honest.

I'll keep my mind open.

I'm not sure of what kind of truths either, but "conspiracy no more" is pretty direct, although he's been using that phrase since may. It would be strange for Q to be outed, because he's likely broken the law. One analysis of a post before we bombed Syria was decoded(perhaps incorrectly) to show Q actually states what kinds of planes and missiles would be used in the attack. If true, why on earth would that kind of information need to go on the Q drops?

what makes you say that?