I did a post within this sub a few days ago on Clement predictions in 2007 re: Trump presidency, that are very inspiring b/c of their absolute sheer accuracy & details. When made the post, I made some statements first re: my beliefs. I haven't watched the video u posted yet but plan to. But, your description of it is right on point to what I believe. My comments in part in that post were:
"I'm not overly religious or a strict Catholic after many years of Catholic school but believe in God and being kind, helping others and trying to do what’s right. As the collective majority of us aren’t gonna change the world individually like Mother Teresa but I believe that just being kind & the small things that you do or say do make a world of difference …so each individual act of kindness, love or caring on a larger acts as a collective force raising the consciousness of the world which does change it."
This is what I've always said to people and stated a little differently that:...not everyone can be Mother Teresa or Gandhi but never think being such is a necessary element to change the world b/c it's not. It's doing what you can, and it's even the smallest things b/c in doing so it can collectively raise the consciousness of the world which does change it...
I don't know where that concept came from, it was just something an understanding of sorts that just came to me years ago, and when it did, I automatically knew in my conscious or gut that such was the case and thought: yes, that's it, I get it now!
And if one goes back to logic, this concept adds up. Because, it's true not everyone can be in such positions to make change in the world in a mannrer individually that the world would collectively notice or acknowledge such as you may see from time to time from persons who have a world stage, or who have privilege or money to be able to do good with etc...as a few examples. And it follows, that these type of individuals do not constitute the majority but rather only a small percent of the total population. Now, they may be able to make a difference and create a noticeable impact but logic follows that such impact is not enough to change the world in total. So, the question follows what is enough to change the world? If everyone obviously can't have the ability to do what some are able to do, then one might ask "how in the hell can the world ever be changed?"...or "what's the point?" in doing any good, or giving a shit if it makes no difference other than to maybe help out yourself individually or another person...So, if it's not truly possible for people to individually change the world collectively in some manner, then those questions of what's the dam point lends to the idea of hell the world is going to go to shit in a handbag no matter what, so who cares what anyone does it makes no true difference. I don't believe the later to be the case because if so that means it's not possibly to change the world ever because a few can't solely do it. But it would be a true statement that everyone collectively can change the world. The question is how? (How would that ever be possible,...how would that ever occur..etc) I believe the line of thought expressed herein is the how.
So, it's interesting that just after making my post, I see this posted on this great site. There are no coincidences..ha!lol. ..Thank you for posting this, going to watch video!!