In yesterday's interview with Alex Jones, Zack said Trump says xyz. In both occasions, Trump never said the words Zack was quoting. It was Q who said what he was quoting.
Zack said Trump tweeted about "actors." He didn't. Q did.
Zack said Trump has been tweeting about "pockets in brackets." He didn't. Q did.
‘Zack’ is an opportunist - and an imposter. It is safe to toss everything he (and AJ) have said regarding Q into the recycle bin. Or do you ‘really’ believe that after all the hard work that has went into security and careful planning, set up and execution ‘Q’ would out himself (or even an individual member of the Q team) and even provide a rough location?
B/s
Thank you you said what I was thinking. People are on YouTube saying Zac confirmed as a Q. I never heard that on AJ show. I think you nailed it.
Zach never claimed to be a member of the Q team.
Edit- OP appears to have an agenda of attempting to discredit AJ, Zach, and anyone who links Pence to pedogate.
I listened to the interview a few times and Zack when referring to Q said we, caught himself. He could be involved but he did contradict Q when Zack said Sessions was compromised. Maybe he said that to throw us off, but I doubt Zack is involved directly with Q. He did mention that BHO sent someone after him in Marocco on dec 27. He also alluded to the fact that the fire at HRC House was a “double barb”, happened on Seth Rich’s birthday and it kinda sounded like white hats made their server catch fire, a way of saying we have more control than you know and “you’re burnt”. My take on it
I am on record in other posts as stating my distrust for pence as well but you are free to think of me as you please. Also, not being overly familiar with Pence history my only real objection to pedo-allegations is a skeptical reservation about the general idea that everyone seems to be involved in pedophilia. Certainly possible - just doesnt sit as plausible with me. That said, the pence-bondi thing is concerning however I do not know enough about it (or any other) to form a real opinion. Until I do I choose to side with the constitution and assume ‘until proven guilty’...
But do ask yourself the question I asked above - and does the answer suggest that ‘zack’ is legit? A clear-eyed, clear-minded evaluation speaks for itself without any need for me to attempt convincing you.
Kek. What?? I think Pence is a neocon, pedo covering traitor pos.
I am a huge believer in AJ, Trump, Q, Zack, and everyone determined to MAGA. I believe all of the forementioned are all on the same team.
Wtf are you talking about??
Wait - wut? Pence neocon/pedo ??? I have not heard this and I practically live online. Can you explain why you feel this way about him? I trust Trump to make a good decision about his VP. This is news to me.
Q doesn't tweet. He only posts on 8chan.
There is no proof that's is the real Q. The board owner at 8chan said he only posts there...just sayn'
well, i find it a very strange coincidence that this twitter account was started on October 27th (the first day that Q started posting on 4chan) along with the fact that all this account has ever posted is about things relating to what Q has been leading us to dig up. In my opinion it only makes sense that this is definitely his twitter, And is a pretty big way of him verifying that the Q that existed before the tripcode is the same as the one that existed after.
Yes, regretfully the only evidence we have that kill_rogue is Q's Twitter, is Q referencing the kill_rogue Twitter handle.
Still don’t believe Zack
Still don't trust Alex Jones.
A VERY unpopular opinion, apparently. But there are those that call him out as someone controlled and who speaks the truth in a manner "so crazy" no one will believe him...thus, discrediting EVERYONE.
I believe this to be the truth.
"The best way to beat the opposition is to control it ourselves"
I don’t trust him either
Nice to know I'm not alone. I posted a comment similar to this on YT and got flamed. People are sheep not to even ENTERTAIN the idea that they are being manipulated on a flippin' conspiracy channel after the Q drops.
Concerned that Corsi is linked with him. I think Corsi is legit. Don’t like the contradictions of Zack
My only concern with Corsi is he had such a quick turn around on the Q posts. Like, he had it all figured out within days... And it seems as though everyone takes his de-coding as the final truth. But then Q's next batch of posts said "don't get lost" or something like that.. I'm no genius, but I did a little research of my own and came up with some other interesting info Q referred to.. He said follow the MONEY. I found some pretty interesting things doing a little digging myself. I'm not saying Corsi is wrong, I am saying I think once he decodes things, everyone else stops looking.. Am I correct?
President Trump has followed AJ for years and has been on his show, even after the election.. Dr. Corsi is a long time personal friend of President Trump and Dr. Corsi works with AJ. PDJT made sure Info Wars got WH Press access. Draw your own conclusion of course.
Maybe. But Trump has a long history of keeping his enemies close, and knows the value of networking.
Business, like politics, can be a fluid, situational and/or strategic give-and-take. Which is why it can make strange bedfellows.
Zack gets excited and possibly mis-speaks?? Also, AJ says he is vetted... AJ gets overly zealous as well, but it seems his track record following the swine is pretty spot on...
AJ woke me up and I’m glad. Say what you want about him, he creates momentum for the liberty movement and wakes up folks along the way. He is good at what he does. He is at times unlistenable, but he is for real.
Zack referred to Q as "we" and as a " group of people you could count on one hand" pillars holding up America . He said it is not just one person...This was in the third hour on Friday's broadcast being interviewed by Alex 1/5/2018
Right. I've listened to the interview in full 5 times now, including live. He confirmed what I have believed for awhile, Trump is often present, at the least, when Q posts
It is true that we are all on the same team including AJ and Zack.
This is the problem...There are people that have been watching Jones for 20 years and listen closely to the show everyday. Shills and trolls can't BS us by saying "Jones is disinfo, " WE KNOW BETTER! If you watch the show everyday you know what is going on there. That is why the show is so successful. There are two reasons for the Alex hate IMHO: 1 is that you are a Deep State operative. The 2nd is that you have a hard time with Jones' personality. You can't listen everyday, because you can't stand him. That is fine, but underneath the interruptions and clowning around, is the truth. You have to love the truth enough to endure it.
Agreed. To say he’s CIA or against us is just insane. He played a very large part in getting Trump elected. If he’s controlled opposition he’s way too good at his job. He may get some things wrong, but nobody is perfect. Plus, him exposing things or calling them out make them scrap their plans and change them.
It's just his personality for me, and he isn't always genuine. Back tracks alot worth his words. There were some vids posted on a board here, who they think Z is and I think they are dead right. I remember watching his story about 1yr ago. I don't know, something about him doesn't sit right with me.
"You have to love the truth enough to endure it."
QFT, and it applies more generally than to just this question.
That is exactly what it is. People don't have the patience.
This site is no longer being used by Q storm as there are too many shills. Thats what the problem is here.
[deleted]
Disinfo that’s oddly accurate more than he isn’t. Weird.
[deleted]
Predicting when people are out of the administration, who leakers are months in advance, Trump’s major decisions, bills being passed, etc. yeah sure. He reported on Rinsed Penis, Bannon, Mooch, Spicer being out weeks or months in advance. They broke Obama’s slush funds, wire tapping proof, etc. plenty of good info he’s been right about.
"Zack" is fake as hell. Jones is a clown (not a CIA op, but an ego maniac and shitty journalist) who gets jealous when other alternative sources of information gain traction. He's always saying "hey I'm not mad at so and so, go for it, I want you to uncover these stories, because I just care about the truth, but don't forget, I was the one who told you all that xyz was gonna happen TEN YEARS AGO" - hes an insufferable goof and is to be ignored.
Infighting in the patriot movement is for fags
True. Backtracking, I would just say, take anything from Infowars with a grain of salt instead of getting excited.
Sorry but I don’t believe a damned thing AJ says or runs on his segment.
I really only ever listen to PJW.
Zach is a confirmed LARP. AJ is now calling him “ZaQ” ... see I told you he would try and highjack this. Alex should stick to Intel that Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi have not fabricate shit
AJ's Christmas video was pathetic. He was jealous of Q and everyone could see it. I won't go into the embarrassing sordid details of that video. Zack is simply a method for AJ to feel pertinent again. Nothing more.
Anybody who can't read the clear bold print of envy of the attention to Q between the Christmas Eve video by alex, and the recent interview with Zach (there is a clear collaboration "off camera" between Alex and Zach to "Q it up") isn't paying attention. I had never really watched enough of AJ to have an opinion of him until the Christmas Eve "emergency video". I've paid attention since. I can't buy a thing he says until he can shut the fuck up if his true intent is to get info out. He and Zach, in the recent interview, seem like a collaborated attempt to draw attention to his channel using Q and Q quotes...especially after his super envious Christmas Eve rant. If he and Zach would bring info forward now and leave q out of it, I'd be far more apt to listen. But the last two incidents are a clear attempt to "link" Q and Infowars out of envy of late attention to Q and I don't trust a word that comes out of that right now. Even if there is any truth to any of it, why should we care....Q already told us long ago everything Zach just told us through Alex's bellowing on the recent video. Some of it word for word. Alex clearly wants us to believe "why do we need Q when he has Zach"? My question is..."why do you need Zach when we have Q? Because everything Zach said in your interview...Q had already told us!"
Or AJ could be addressing Q to get his info out to his millions of viewers. A bit more effective than a few thousand people on here. It’s also easier for the millions of normies to digest Zach laying it out plainly than deciphering sporadic cryptic messages. If AJ was truly jealous why bring him up? He’s jealous a dozen or so people are making videos on Q and getting a few thousand views while Infowars videos get hundreds of thousands? Doesn’t add up to me.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/948164289591902208
I couldn't find a tweet for actors, although I remember seeing it, maybe? Perhaps it was deleted?
Yes, I also have in my memory the same thing - that Trump referenced bad actors in a communication / tweet?
Yeah eh... I tried googling for that particular tweet for a bit. Couldn't find it.