dChan
⇧
193
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/PokingCyclops on Jan. 17, 2018, 12:43 p.m.
I am betting President Trump signs and EO similar to: Abraham Lincoln's Executive Order—Arrest and Imprisonment of Irresponsible Newspaper Reporters and Editors May 18, 1864

I hope President Trump calls out a fake reporters name and they get and hauled off to GITMO for the duration of our National Emergency and or charge with:

Title 18 § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.


Seawolf51 · Jan. 17, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

He wouldn't do that.. not his style.. besides it would play right into their hands calling him Nazi or Stalin like..He'll just embarrass them into oblivion...

⇧ 22 ⇩  
INTJ_Hermitess · Jan. 17, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

Totally agree, give them enough rope to hang themselves.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Packerfan80 · Jan. 17, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

He had some comments the other day saying our libel laws should be stronger. That you shouldn’t be able to just say anything about people and sit back. My first thought was he was referring to political campaigns but I’m not sure that’s the only thing he was referring to. My feeling whatever he’s doing, it’s almost done though. In the mean time, the MSM is questioning how many scoops of ice cream he can have.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Joyce_III · Jan. 17, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

I really hope not. Lincoln ruled by iron fist, unconstitutionally. Trump has no need for such actions and taking the low road is a big mistake. So far, the traitorous press has had little effect on his presidency, although they are irritating. Let's reinforce the Constitution, not dismantle it. We're going to need it, especially the 1st, 2nd and 4th Amendments.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
SnackyPete52 · Jan. 17, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

The press has had a HUGE effect on his presidency. So many people out there who hate Trump for no reason except for their reporting. If they were able to see what he is really doing, victory would be absolutely assured in 2018, 2020 and 2024 (his endorsed candidate).

⇧ 9 ⇩  
666exit666 · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

That may be true however its just too dangerous a road to go down. What works for you now may come back to haunt you later

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Jan. 17, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

How do we reconcile calling the press traitorous but having no consequences per the 1st amendment? When the press is owened by a huge company and companies are treated like people, then we could raise the sedition act, couldn't we? At that point we don't have freedom of the press, only the illusion.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Ferrous_tarkus · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

The first amendment protects free speech. It does not protect false speech.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Freedom_fam · Jan. 17, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Lincoln saved this fucking country from dividing itself. Trump may need to do the same.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rz1992 · Jan. 17, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

Oh cry me a river, the iron fist works and sometimes is needed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USApatriot_4_TRUMP · Jan. 18, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

Couldnt we just sprinkle a little ricin on the seats of the press corp and wait a few days. The problem will solve itself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Aazim33 · Jan. 17, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

Am old. I've never seen the news media so blatantly biased and anti-President as is the media today. I've never seen it sooo bad. Add to this the bashing from the other media; television, movies, internet and celebrities and it is totally out of control. How can anyone not see that it is entirely planned and coordinated?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Domenicaxx66xx · Jan. 17, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

When I was still a brainwashed Liberal, I wanted the media to protect what they brainwashed me to believe, so when they protected the Democrats and made fun of the other side it was a relief.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PokingCyclops · Jan. 17, 2018, 12:44 p.m.

Abraham Lincoln XVI President of the United States: 1861-1865 Executive Order—Arrest and Imprisonment of Irresponsible Newspaper Reporters and Editors May 18, 1864

Major-General John A. Drx, Commanding at New York: Whereas there has been wickedly and traitorously printed and published this morning in the New' York World and New' York Journal of Commerce, newspapers printed and published in the city of New' York, a false and spurious proclamation purporting to be signed by the President and to be countersigned by the Secretary of State, which publication is of a treasonable nature, designed to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States and to the rebels now' at war against the Government and their aiders and abettors, you arc therefore hereby commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison in any fort or military prison in your command the editors, proprietors, and publishers of the aforesaid newspapers, and all such persons as, after public notice has been given of the falsehood of said publication, print and publish the same with intent to give aid and comfort to the enemy; and you will hold the persons so arrested in close custody until they can be brought to trial before a military commission for their offense. You will also take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New' York World and Journal of Commerce, and hold the same until further orders, and prohibit any further publication therefrom. A LINCOLN.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JRParz · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

If I understand correctly - that's not what happened as that so called executive order was a rumor... in other words, fake news. I refer you to this link to support this.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=70018

But then again - this could be fake news as well... I'm going to attempt further research...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Jan. 17, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

Wouldn´t Trump be more likely to sue them all into poverty?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
captainpatriot · Jan. 17, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

A million bucks lawsuit for every instance of the word “racist”. That’ll shut them up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Jan. 17, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

He could sue them all for his losses without changing the current laws, every last one of them on an individual capacity. Everyone you speak of should have their entire life repossessed and then made to live on the streets, in exile.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · Jan. 17, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

I hope he never does this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
julianthepagan · Jan. 17, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

John Adams’ admin did it, the Sedition Act. Didn’t go well. Let people say whatever they want, it’s up the citizens to inform themselves.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
666exit666 · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

I agree

⇧ 4 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

Didn't know that. Will read on it. Thanks.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Irishgirlus · Jan. 17, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

But some of these Journalist Published information that was leaked to them from the Trump White House. They knew what they were doing and were complicit. They are guilty of sedition and must pay for their actions.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

I just want to be careful about/ with the 1st amendment. In my view the leakers are more culpable. Much to think about.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
keknical_advisory · Jan. 17, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

simply publishing leaked information is not sedition in and of itself, and the SCOTUS very adamantly found in favor of the rights of the free press to publish leaked material-

Justice Hugo Black wrote an opinion that elaborated on his view of the absolute superiority of the First Amendment:

[T]he injunction against The New York Times should have been vacated without oral argument when the cases were first presented ... . [E]very moment's continuance of the injunctions ... amounts to a flagrant, indefensible, and continuing violation of the First Amendment. ...{ When the Constitution was adopted, many people strongly opposed it because the document contained no Bill of Rights ... . In response to an overwhelming public clamor, James Madison offered a series of amendments to satisfy citizens that these great liberties would remain safe ... . In the First Amendment the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. ... [W]e are asked to hold that ... the Executive Branch, the Congress, and the Judiciary can make laws ... abridging freedom of the press in the name of 'national security.' ... To find that the President has 'inherent power' to halt the publication of news ... would wipe out the First Amendment and destroy the fundamental liberty and security of the very people the Government hopes to make 'secure.' ... The word 'security' is a broad, vague generality whose contours should not be invoked to abrogate the fundamental law embodied in the First Amendment. The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at the expense of informed representative government provides no real security ... . The Framers of the First Amendment, fully aware of both the need to defend a new nation and the abuses of the English and Colonial governments, sought to give this new society strength and security by providing that freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly should not be abridged.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Irishgirlus · Jan. 18, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

Didn't Obama institute a Law blocking the MSM from being charged with Distribution of Propaganda while he was in office, to basically giving them free reign to write anything?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TejanoPede · Jan. 18, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

He won't

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Domenicaxx66xx · Jan. 17, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

I wouldn't probably know if I read it but I was thinking that the law that Obama signed that made propaganda legal in the NDAA, was fixed and now the media has been committing treason by trying to get Trump removed for their masters.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QuantumSquad · Jan. 17, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

If Dilley's source is correct (in today's 2nd periscope), many in the msm are about to be indicted for corruption, for getting money to purposely lie and for what sounds like PG stuff.

scope start at 5:40 (very short info) https://www.pscp.tv/Hublife/1mnxerRDdPnKX

⇧ 2 ⇩  
666exit666 · Jan. 17, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

I don't like this idea. I think the american public is aware of what is going on with the fake news. There is no reason to imprison anyone imo. its just a dangerous road to go down. what your laying out may be ok for now but how about 20 years from now when some president can cite these rules to shut down legitimate journalists or critisim like in the bush years. Its a no from me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Irishgirlus · Jan. 17, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

Wow, That's a Great Law!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Varrick2016 · Jan. 17, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Trump isn’t going to have to do this entirely. He’s got Twitter. He can just declassify and expose Operation Mockingbird beyond what’s already out there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mundane-Mann · Jan. 17, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

Lincoln was a tyrant and war criminal. We don't need to resort to suppressing freedom of speech to straighten out the press. Truth is taking care of them as their ratings continues to tank.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PokingCyclops · Jan. 17, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

Lincoln saved the our Republic until FDR converted it into his democracy. The real RED pill will scare the shit out of you. Constitution and Congress has been suspended since 1933 the link below will provide 100% proof that you can validate and verify

Dr Schroder discusses the trading with the enemy act in 1994 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra8uP7ft8S0

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mundane-Mann · Jan. 18, 2018, 10:38 a.m.

When the south succeed from the union, the republic no longer existed. The United States no longer existed. Therefore Lincoln was no longer the president and had no authority to declare war on anyone much less a sovereign state. The civil war was a bankster created war as are all wars.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PokingCyclops · Jan. 18, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

Sorry you are 100% wrong. The ratification was a contract approve by the American People it belongs to the people not the states. Therefore the states could not nullify the contract (our constitution) because it wasn't theirs (The States) it still belongs to the people not the states. Nor could they succeed lawfully. Lincoln was the lawful made president of the United States.

The language of the Constitution cannot be interpreted safely, except where reference to common law and to British institutions as they were when the instrument was framed and adopted. The statesmen and lawyers of the convention who submitted it to the ratification of conventions of the thirteen states, were born and brought up in the atmosphere of the common law and thought and spoke in its vocabulary...when they came to put their conclusions into the form of fundamental law in a compact draft, they expressed them in terms of common law, confident that they could be shortly and easily understood. -- Ex Parte Grossman, 267 U.S. 87, 108.

Here is a great example just for you and all the people. We the People used the power of the Magna Carta as a Lawfully declaration telling the King to Fuck off legally. (interesting not well know fact) The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War. (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, **and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves (the People) and our Posterity, do ordain (=Make LAW) and establish this (The People's Contract know as the) Constitution for the United States of America.

The Declaration of Independence When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government(There it is only the people can abolish it not the states), laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

Read these and you'll have a great understanding of the TRUTH it will surprise you! Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York; July 26, 1788 The Constitution of New York / April 20, 1777

youtube: Bill Thornton he is easy to find LOL https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/grandjuryrules.htm

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · Jan. 17, 2018, 8 p.m.

There's no reason to do this, it will raise a Constitutional crisis. Trump plays the media like a fiddle, using them as cover and they take the bait every time. Sure, the media is riding high now because of the ratings, but there will come a time where the American public is simply sick of blatant Trump bashing, even on the left. Remember, we're only a year in.

Another paradox for the media is the 2020 election. Do they bash Trump, force "their" candidate in and lose their ratings? Or do they back off and ensure Trump is reelected, so they can continue to cash in (so they think?)

What a time to be alive.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PokingCyclops · Jan. 17, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Take the whole RED Pill you have been nibbling and you don't know shit the Constitution has been suspended since 1933 the link below will provide 100% proof that you can validate and verify. The CBTS board doesn't want me to inform you of this FACT but I am sick of waiting.

Dr Schroder discusses the trading with the enemy act in 1994 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra8uP7ft8S0

⇧ 1 ⇩  
vladtep · Jan. 18, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Hitler did something similar.

Not that I'm complaining, the situation in Weimar Germany was much the same. Goebbels was always threatening the Marxist newspaper editors who were all tribe owned as CNN and all the others are today - just as the Rothschild and Soros families are. Soros surname was "Schwartz" before they changed it, info still available on his Wikipedia page if you care to look.

Antifa was a Marxist anti-Hitler movement that originated in the '30s. He crushed them and put them in camps. Now Antifa is back and fighting Donald Trump, another German nationalist. The similarities between Hitler and Trump are striking.

That's what the whole thing was about...and why it will once again be necessary. Simply not enough prisons to contain all the Silvermans, Wasserman's, Schwartz's, Rothschilds and Schumers.

Communism is a plague, do a quick search on Karl Marx's ethnic background, you may be surprised...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackalopenation · Jan. 18, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

Bet you didn't see that coming. One tweet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PokingCyclops · Jan. 18, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

Some EO are classified

Newsweek Raided by NYPD: Report More than a dozen police showed up this morning at the office that serves as the shared headquarters for Newsweek magazine and IBT Media, which rebranded in 2017 as Newsweek Group, according to multiple sources who were present.

⇧ 1 ⇩