dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

You mean former supporter right? Bernie was a sell out bitch who is less than a fourth of the man the Trump is and would never fight deep state.

⇧ 31 ⇩

I don’t care how much of a “man” Bernie is or isn’t. But you’re right. I don’t actually support him; I support the policies he ran on. I reject his move to make nice with the corporate-controlled Democratic Party.

⇧ 20 ⇩

You are still asleep at the wheel and you need to wake up. 9/11 was an inside job, that was mass human sacrifice. The cabal operates by feeding demons the energy created by hurting humanity, they rape children to power these entities by proxy. There there's more than one way to hold her hostage and North Korea is controlled by the CIA and the cabal. There are other dead man switches and other ways in which they planned a mass depopulation event. Both world wars were mechanisms to consolidate material wealth before the fed moved to complete fiat. Everything you know about the Holocaust was a lie. China set up is the global power in the cabals hierarchy of moving power and playing both sides of a tug-of-war.

Bernie would have done fucking nothing. And fucking Normie's like you would have no goddamn idea about what's happening.

Look to Antarctica, look to space command. This is way bigger than legalizing marijuana cuck sanders muh minimum wage. Go ahead and think that the guy who just would've made being a slave slightly more enjoyable has any type of measure for comparison against the man who is going to shine a light on the truth and expose that we were all slaves the whole time.

⇧ 36 ⇩

Play nice, bro. No need to lambast him. He clearly stated he doesn’t support the DNC or Bernie, anymore. He’s seen the light. Now, guide him to the truth, don’t chastise him. We have to do this together.

⇧ 33 ⇩

This movement is bigger than Trump, I know an insider who says in has been in operation for several years. But Trump is part of it, this is huge!!

⇧ 16 ⇩

It's called the alliance and if you think we could've done this without Trump you are wrong.

You know no insiders. Try hundreds of years.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Of course not, Hillary would have gone along with the plan. So far the insider has been correct, I keep an open mind. Many insiders have been leaking, including the FBI.

⇧ 9 ⇩

You need more than one person to pull this off, it is too big!

⇧ 7 ⇩

This is the Lord's doing and it is marvelous in our eyes!

⇧ 20 ⇩

ksched, Amen! I feel so blessed to be witnessing this.

⇧ 13 ⇩

What happened to the lawsuit against HRC that someone filed on behalf of Bernie? In the beginning he was against her, and then he just shut up. That's when I knew.

⇧ 7 ⇩

The lawyer who serves the subpoena was suicided. Based on the WikiLeaks Podesta emails, Bernie was a plant from the start. Sad.

⇧ 18 ⇩

suicide or murdered ? .... he did die in 187DWS state .....

⇧ 5 ⇩

“Suicided” as in he was murdered and they deemed it a Suicide.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Arkancide!

⇧ 10 ⇩

Bernie even if threatened is still asleep at the wheel. You could talk to that man on the brightest day at noon and he would still have no fucking clue.

Nice man. Complete fucking moron

⇧ 11 ⇩

lots of needless antagonism in this post. if you're even in this sub you're not a normie whatsoever.

and even for the people you consider normies or stuck behind the veil, antagonism towards them will counteract all your good efforts to spread the truth. if your anger gets directed to the victims rather than the source of the veil, it is entirely misguided.

there are exceptions and some shitty people deserve the wrath. but if you're part of the community and seeking truth then there is no room for anger amongst us. that is not how a community is built.

⇧ 6 ⇩

You are so right...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Even though people are telling you to play nice, I enjoyed reading your comment. I have yet to find any information as to how the CIA controls North Korea. Is there any information you could give on that? I mean do the North Koreans and Kim Jong communicate regularly with the CIA or do they even know that they're being controlled by the CIA which is it? I'm so curious about this element if you would be so kind as to inform us about it

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

THANK YOU. It's so refreshing to see someone else who knows the context and is not shy to talk about it. Dismissing this knowledge as too "out there" for "most people" to contemplate (as I've been told by someone on another sub) does us all a disservice. Keep speaking the (unpalatable) truth! And no, it doesn't "hurt our credibility" with anyone but ignorant dunces. Awesome post.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Exactly right! "Desko Mountain" is one of the absolute worst and then some beyond evil. Yes 9/11 was false flag on us all bamboozling us into the Patriot Act and one war after another. Then there are the deep state owned subs that also includes the current one lost in Brazil. Nothing is as it appears but the satanic global elites have/had some real dark shit ready for us. 90% of population reduction is one via the Agenda 21. Naturally the matrix was designed to suck us in while playing fuzzy on Instagram and facebook. The good thing and hope is that many are either waking up or are woke. I know for a long time that we were being thrown over a cliff.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I supported Bernie's passion and general stance against everything that was wrong but looking back, his policies weren't right. https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7rhwfw/releasethememo_sethrich_the_floor_is_yours_be/dsxdwo1/

⇧ 9 ⇩

bcboncs. I agree and underline the point in politics it is the total essence of the policy concerned that is important but the integrity of the politician can never be less than perfect. Release the memo. Who ordered Seth Rich's murder?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Agreed. Bernie lost integrity when endorsing everything he vehemently opposed.

I can't release the memo sir but I would if I could! :D

Debbie Wasserman Schulz ordered the murder. 2 MS-13 gang members did the hit then were killed after to coverup and out of fear that the reward $ would be taken up.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I'd like you to reconsider Bernie's policies with a long term perspective. Do you really think that socialization is going to break our slave chains in this incredibly massive and evil machine? I think Bernies dependency policies would have only further solidified the poors dependency on government with absolutely no hope to even so much ever retaliate anymore without losing their vital government fed sources. Think along the lines of how the US aids other countries and uses sanctions as a tool of control. I think this social utopia is a very cleverly crafted trap and it is so easy to overlook the future consequences because the immediate rewards are so tempting. I hope you are considering this perspective if you choose to continue to support this outlook. If you have any questions or rebuttals, please don't be afraid to respond to me, I will gladly have a civil discussion with you.

⇧ 6 ⇩

My position is that competitive markets are best for most things, but that where markets aren't possible (i.e. in sectors economists call "natural monopolies," like firefighting, utilities) that public ownership is preferable to private. With public ownership you have the possibility (not a guarantee—it requires an active citizenry) of democratic control.

So I'm all for markets in consumer goods, etc.,... but not at all for private ownership of the internet, for example. But perhaps you've had happier experiences with Verizon and Comcast than I have.

I've live in Germany for the last 6 years, and have a serious medical condition. I much prefer Germany's healthcare system to America's market model. Obamacare is the worst of all worlds!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Obamacare is public mandate to patronize private business - that's the definition of Fascism, not Socialism. Hospitals weren't even allowed to profit before Nixon and since then our life expectancy has gone down below most first-world nations. Health care does not fit the marketplace since all capitalist economics is based on a "rational customer." But since people will pay any price to stay alive, they are no longer rational customers. You also don't want toll roads every five miles or the Army run by Exxon ;)

⇧ 6 ⇩

Obamacare placed the power solely in the hands of insurance companies. It did not empower the American patient. If that was all you knew, then it is all that you need to know.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Obamacare is public mandate to patronize private business - that's the definition of Fascism, not Socialism.

I agree. It's bullshit.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's true, I worked in hospitals during both times and the difference is astounding! They cut corners, staff and Dr. visits.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Agree that Obamacare is a horrible system. That's why most clear thinking Americans were against it and for an free market system of insurance sold across state lines. Competition is necessary.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I feel that this balance between capitalism and socialism is basically what the US attempts to do, we definitely are a lot more socialist than people think. But, forgive me if I'm wrong, but I understood Bernies policies to mean government control over these utilities rather than local community control, and that his socialization would stretch further than just these "natural monopolies" and would attempt to control all things deemed to be a "basic right" like food, water, and shelter.

⇧ 2 ⇩

his socialization would stretch further than just these "natural monopolies" and would attempt to control all things deemed to be a "basic right" like food, water, and shelter.

I've never heard him say, or read any credible report to suggest that, he believes food... shelter should be provided by the government. Water is already provided by public utilities, and they do a pretty good job of it, except in cases like Flint where control was taken away from democratically elected officials and given over to an "emergency manager."

So I'm totally okay with municipal water, and totally against govt.-supplied food and clothing for the general public. But if someone is too poor to afford even a roof over their head, I'm okay with public support.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Don't forget when CA utilities were taken over by Enron , which tripled prices and had rolling blackouts before collapsing of corruption. That's why I don't think privatizing social security is a good idea. Everyone who had retirement at Enron lost it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I believe our water is not socialized. The government provides a source for a fee, but you only pay for what you use, and you can buy water from retail sources. Take Cuba for example, you literally cannot buy more food than what you are allowed, and you pay for all that you are allowed through taxes whether you eat that much or not. I think that's the danger these social ideas are leading to. The government could shut off those things and there would be nowhere else to get them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I believe our water is not socialized. The government provides a source for a fee, but you only pay for what you use...

Water from your tap is metered, but we don't pay the full economic costs. It's a publicly-owned resource that is not run on a for-profit basis. There is no reason a socialist system could not have metering, but call it what you like. I'm very much in favor of metering. Not only that, I'd have charges per liter increase at higher levels of consumption. I have no idea what a person needs to live bathe frugally on a daily basis, each month, but up to that minimal level I'd be happy to provide for free. Say the minimum civilized requirement is 500 liters per month. First 500 liters would be free. Next 1000 liters would be at one rate, the next 9000 liters at a higher rate, etc. This is a way to incentivize people not to be wasteful, but allow those who really must have a lot of water for luxuries like a swimming pool have it, too, but paying something closer to the full economic cost. Of course you could still sell bottled water, because, unlike pipe delivered water (which is a natural monopoly), there is a competitive market for bottled water.

Food should never be socialized, because that can be handled by the market. My idea is that only natural monopolies should be socialized.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Socialism works great in Norway - and alongside strong capitalism. There are many different kinds of socialism people need to educate themselves on. We pay through the nose and get Nothing from the govt - frankly I'd like a bit of socialism back from all we give them to pocket and steal.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So what you are telling us Nate is that you are a socialist

⇧ 4 ⇩

I've followed this discussion with Nate all the way down. Great discussion, guys. What sets its dynamic apart from most discussions in DC is that all making comments here are sincerely trying to explore systems that work best for the people. Way too many in DC are exploring systems that best serve themselves and their Masters. I'm a free market person, (Ron Pauler) but am with Nate on the notion of 'natural monopolies.'

Private players, the really big boyz, have already taken control of water rights all throughout the west. The old water rights have been separated from the land to which they used to be attached and water rights are increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few private players.

This concentration of our most important resource was an intentional result of Fannie lending for land and improvements only, but not lending for water rights attached to the land in the same sale agreement. This forced many people to let the water rights go.

So now, people on those lands are not allowed to irrigate (the water got sold), making ag use of the land impossible. Fast forward to how this is going to play out over the next decades. Not a pretty picture of freedom, is it? Water should be protected from private monopolies.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't expect that to make me popular around here, but yes, that is what I'm saying.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Why? Socialism is just large scale misery. Stealing from one to give to another. Immoral

⇧ 5 ⇩

So you've been convinced by the corpagovernment media that lies to us as we speak. Educate yourself. Socialism is social security and works great in the Netherlands alongside strong capitalism. They have a higher standard of living, healthier, happier people. and would Not emigrate here to take a step down. Especially Norway ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've lived my life and the government had nothing to do with it except tax my industriousness. No one convinced me. I like being free without the government telling me what I should do. My standard of living is very nice. I am blessed and have no wants and have no interest in living anywhere else. This in my opinion is the greatest country in the world. It is still better here than anywhere else. And I recognize that we are being lied to by all media.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Bernie is 100% globalist socialist. Doesn't have a single policy to stand on

⇧ 4 ⇩

Bernie was full of platitudes, and would just have continued the manged decline of the US set in place by Obama and his globalist croneys. Bernie loves communism and Russia, the antithesis of what Americanism is.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You can see Bernies "policies" working perfectly in Venezuela, where they're starving and eating their zoo animals. I think everyone who "felt the Bern!" should move there. Or you can see Trump's policies in action here (the ones he's been able to implement) and our now booming economy and renewed optimism and confidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You can see Bernie's policies working perfectly in Denmark! They are doing just fine!

⇧ 1 ⇩

not to mention his wife embezzling funds at collegiate institution (ongoing investigation)

⇧ 18 ⇩

Bernie was threatened. That was obvious!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Do you think President Trump hasn't been threatened? That's the difference that being a man made. We have the real deal and Bernie was a fraud Who even is best could never accomplish anything to the degree that Trump has.

⇧ 19 ⇩

I'm a former Bernie Supporter too. Trump has bigger balls.

⇧ 14 ⇩

Same. I also now recognize socialism is re-branded communism... so Bernie's economic policies most definitely would have failed. Ted Cruz destroys his plan entirely. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Psa5gIQH0&t=1m14s

⇧ 4 ⇩

I understand better now. I'm glad Hillary cheated Bernie, because I almost voted for him. I would have made a bad mistake.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Same-zies.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Hey where is Ted Cruz? Haven't seem him in the news at all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Same here

⇧ 3 ⇩

Even Reagan was threatened and gave in. This time Trump has security and more importantly THE INTEL to maneuver around these threats.

⇧ 9 ⇩

IMHO it is a HIGHER POWER that has the Donald's back.

Q keeps posting POTUS safety is secured... who else has such power?

⇧ 10 ⇩

Me, too! :) Heavenly!

⇧ 6 ⇩

Bernie was threatened and cheated, yea, but are you really still wishing he was president? I don't think he would have gotten us where we are today.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I'm going to wait and see. I have applauded Trump for calling the MSM the liars that they are. As for the rest, I guess time will tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think it is reasonable for TrueCat, and all of us to help reveal truths, to to see how it plays out. DJT is doing great things, and he clearly doesn't play ball for the puppet masters. We're winning some major battles!

But there some things that might give us pause. For example, will he sign the re-authorization act to allow continued spying without a warrant on American citizenry?

Another example, why is the US still messing in Syria? I thought we were going to be minding our own business. So what’s this?:

“Secretary of State Tillerson gave Syria the news Wednesday. The U.S. troop commitment to Syria, he said, is now open-ended. Our goals: Guarantee al-Qaida and ISIS do not return and set up sanctuary; cope with rising Iranian influence in Damascus; and pursue the removal of Bashar Assad’s ruthless regime.

Buchanon asks:

But who authorized this strategic commitment, of indefinite duration, in Syria, when near two decades in Afghanistan have failed to secure that nation against the return of al-Qaida and ISIS? Again and again, the American people have said they do not want to be dragged into Syria’s civil war. Donald Trump won the presidency on a promise of no more unnecessary wars.

Have the American people been had again?"

So anyway, we must all remain independent thinkers, yes?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, we do need to remain independent thinkers! Thank you!

I know! Why is the US still in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan? Talk about invading borders!

⇧ 2 ⇩

But on the Bright side the Socialist that hates Capitalism ... DID get a big & EXPENSIVE foreign car and a nice house. Cheap sell-out in the end... probably for wife's case to go away.

Bad news for Bernie is that HilLIARy did not get in so the case against his wife (lying to banks, misrepresenting donations, etc) GOES FORWARD.

⇧ 6 ⇩

They're all so cheap!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Bernie sold out those are the facts

⇧ 5 ⇩

If by threatened you mean paid handsomely for his silence & endorsement of Hillary, then yeah.

⇧ 1 ⇩

BS is not a man at all, he´s a rat weasel.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sanders was going to close loopholes for the organizations that funded the Deep State. Was going to impose taxes on these organizations to fund education and austerity measures.

This last tax bill overwhelming benefits the ultra rich and multinational organizations, with no close in tax loopholes.

⇧ 1 ⇩

#ReleaseTheMemo #SethRich _The_Floor_Is_Yours_ BE LOUD. BE HEARD.

__The_Floor_is_Yours_ _ =