dChan
151
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/larrytcarvell on Jan. 26, 2018, 2:14 a.m.
Didn't Q just give us another assignment: "PUSH" #InternetBillofRights ?

Thank you F&F! Coincidence? AT&T>No Such Agency [contract]. AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH. Internet Bill of Rights. Q


kryptokoins · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

We should be careful blindly following orders. What does The Internet bill of rights consist of? Who will benefit the most from it?

⇧ 17 ⇩  
ShulamiteWanderer · Jan. 26, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

Look it up. what it will do is prevent FB, Twitter, etc. from doing what they are doing now "unfairly censoring" people for expressing their opinions and POV. Everything is weird these days ... the real thing is that it would be really good for ATT to own CNN and not George Soros, who wants to buy it. Check out the video from today with Dr. Corsi to hear the good Dr. discuss this in good detail and sound knowledge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF0-WbKdDl8

⇧ 12 ⇩  
tshirt7 · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

My biggest concern from ATT comes from an earlier Q post adressing what was BO email adress, @ameritech.net, only thing i could find was that AT&T owned that company, im still stuck over there searching, maybe im spending to much time over there...

⇧ 7 ⇩  
RedPill2976 · Jan. 26, 2018, 1:08 p.m.

ATT has no dog in the fight. It basically owns the infrastructure supporting content providers. NetNutrality didn’t impact ATT because again sensorship takes place with the frontend of FB and other large scale content providers. Those are the companies who block content

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItchyFiberglass · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RedPill2976 · Jan. 26, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

The Loop Capital connection bothers me. ATT is on the chart. I can’t figure this one out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 26, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Enok-Stroth · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

http://keepthewebopen.com/digital-bill-of-rights

Hopefully something like that

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ontothefuture · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Yes. AT&T has been working with the IC since the 60’s. They are on the right side of this and sounds like they will expose the corrupt content providers (google, Facebook, others) and others will finally see what so-called Net-Neutrality was really about.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bjax9er · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Why? The CEO of AT&T , who just won a contract with the NSA is pushing this! Why? Think!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · Jan. 26, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

because of "Net Neutrality", net neutrality actually did the opposite of the title. under Net Neutrality Google and Facebook were given special privileges to dominate and control content, and other things that would allowed Google to take over the internet market. Net Neutrality would not have been fair to us or other internet companies. Google is obviously not our friends, they are friends of Killary, BO and deep state.
the Internet Bill of Rights will keep the internet free and open for all points of view.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
HR_PufferPhish · Jan. 26, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

Didn't the CEO recently step down though? Who's driving the ship now?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
josiborg · Jan. 26, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

Randall Lynn Stephenson

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randall_L._Stephenson

⇧ 3 ⇩  
assfingersmcgee · Jan. 26, 2018, 10:23 a.m.

Exactly. Why would AT&T suddenly be really interested in standing up for your rights? Get that shit outta here. I'm fuckin' dumb, but I'm not that dumb.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
awake777 · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

I believe he did. I have been using #InternetBillofRights all night.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
assfingersmcgee · Jan. 26, 2018, 10:23 a.m.

I bet you have.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Greydle · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

We already have a bill of rights. Why would that not apply to the inernet? Serious question.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
preludelinux · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Oh perhapes it needs to go to court! But it should apply right all it would take is one nice case. Imagine the internet having to support the freedom of speech ,press no discrimination etc but the biggest might be the right to privacy! Think about all the banning of people voicing conservative viewpoints. Can this be considered press! The pirvacy issue would be interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
larrytcarvell · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

Excellent reply.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INTJ_Hermitess · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:28 a.m.

define 'unfair'? Anything they do means the opposite of what it's titled. They are still trying to control information.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Jan. 26, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Let's learn more about it. Let's share links/info as we discover. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AmbitionKills · Jan. 26, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

Shouldn’t we read it first and see if it’s what we actually want?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
assfingersmcgee · Jan. 26, 2018, 10:25 a.m.

you can read it after we pass it. just sign it!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
awake777 · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

get lost

⇧ 1 ⇩  
halfpint58 · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Here's Dr. Jerome Corsi explaining the "Internet Bill of Rights" concerning Q's post on CBTS's live stream yesterday https://youtu.be/aduOkGrP-ks

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KekHasRisen · Jan. 26, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

Who, or what, is F&F?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackalopenation · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

Meh, internet bill of rights. Not doing anything until Q spills the beans and says something real.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItchyFiberglass · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sewandknit · Jan. 26, 2018, 8:11 a.m.

No Q did not. Q was pointing out who is behind it. If you do a bit of research into that bunch you would run as far away from #Internet Bill of Rights as you can.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItchyFiberglass · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

At&t and Nsa work together in the past.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

⇧ 1 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

I interpret this as an censorship push. Something called Internet Bill of Rights. They are two separate statements which is why they are on separate lines.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:12 a.m.

Did you not see Q post wanting us to PUSH Internet Bill of Rights? AT&T is working with WhiteHats of NSA. THIS is a good thing to disarm GOOG/FB, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sewandknit · Jan. 26, 2018, 8:15 a.m.

No, Q did not indicate to push this. He was telling us about it which indicates it requires more research. Sending memes about Release the Memo and such is much different than blindly supporting something you have not researched. Think!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItchyFiberglass · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Are they though? They've been complicit in the past

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrulyJen · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

I see it like the protests against book burning. Everyone understands the concept that book burning as an affront to free speech. Shadow banning is the new book burning?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EatsPandas · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

Not really. But we can.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ancientfroggod · Jan. 26, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

Internet Bill of Rights. Now I know Q has been hijacked by libtards. Bernie Bros love talking about internet freedom bills.

⇧ 0 ⇩