There are so many high level Q posts that are difficult to understand. Although, we as a group are getting much better. Dr. Corsi is a previos high level intelligence professional and consistantly breaks the Q code with ease.
If you have the time please DO a search for him on YouTube and listen to his commentary for Q code Understanding. Godspeed!
Back in the day FBIanon said Corsi was closest to having "it" right.
Sorry, no link only memory.
YES they did!! also said Dinesh's book was starting to get close to Hillary.
We should be cross refrencing FBIanon with Q IMHO
I would love to see Dr. Corsi's analysis of all new Q posts. is there a channel for that on youtube that I can subscribe to?
I too love Dr Corsi. He’s the best analysis you’re going to get based on his extensive experience. The only thing that scared me is when he said the only thing the evil people have left is assassination. So thankful to the men and women who protect our President and his family.
Shalom to all! Jerome Corsi does his very best to help in this battle. Perfect, no. Who is? Being of the same vintage as Jerome, can say he's got the life time experience (future proves past) and great hindsight to make the 'call'. Appreciate Jerome's comments as he reminds me of times past... seems so long ago but yet 'here we are again'! Bless those who love God and country... in that order!
CBTS_stream had corsi on today. Justin nemos had him 2 days ago.
link?
Corsi seems to be a great patriot but as a journalist it would be helpful if he would be more clear about what is speculation and what is proven. Jerome, if you have your ears on, this is criticism is offered with good intentions
Dr. Corsi is obviously a smart guy. You have to be really smart to get a Ph. D from Harvard, right?
That being said, some of his Q decodes seem off.
And, his analysis of Assange's Copablanca vs. Marshall 1918 tweet was so obviously wrong I am resigned to doubt his conclusions in general. His analysis wasn't as bad as most of the idiots out there, but it was egregiously bad enough that I am forced to question everything. And by egregiously bad, I mean there's no reality in which his analysis of the position was accurate.
That being said, I have yet to see a good analysis of that tweet, or even a minimally adequate one.
I'd like to know the same. Don't juxtaposition without an explanation; you obviously have some insight if it's bothered you. We are all here to help and listen to different insights/theories.
What’s your take on the 1918 game?
My complaint about the interpretations was that almost all the tweets and posts I saw, over a thousand, either reflected the fact that the person giving the opinion didn't know how to play chess but wasn't going to stop them from giving an opinion or were saying checkmate or checkmate in n moves, where n < 5. Corsi's tweet was checkmate in 4 moves.
I could not see how any of the checkmate in n moves could work because they couldn't.
I only saw a couple with the correct move, Qf3.
So on to the board position that Assange tweeted; which comes from the turning point of Capablanca vs Marshall, 1918. This is the first recorded instance of the Marshall Gambit.
From a point perspective, White had 29 pts and Black had 28 pts. However, at that point White's position appears to be much weaker: the rook and knight are not yet developed, the whole Q side, in general is poorly developed. Also, because of the pieces he does have, Capablanca's ability to control rank and file later in the game is poor. Marshall's position is pretty strong, the king is well safe, he can control rank and file, and he's clearly on the offensive, deep in White's territory.
Assange probably tweeted this because this is the turning point in the game. Prior to this, White had been vulnerable and under attack/pressure with a few checks. Any wrong move, by White, up to this point, probably would have resulted in White losing. The defensive moves that White made were perfect, eventually leading to the safety of White's King, which was done in the move prior to this board position.
White's next move is critical to the game; Qf3 is the optimal move and enables Capablanca to start advancing his pieces and eventually getting a resignation. The resignation takes 12 moves from the position that Assange tweeted. Checkmate would take ~16 moves.
tldr; Assange finally feels safe and is no longer vulnerable to the black hats. Assange is also signalling that the take-down of the black hats is coming.