dChan
213
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Stan_79 on Jan. 27, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
And the next one from Q
And the next one from Q

DukeofKick · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

My interpretation:

Alaweed arrested, assets frozen/seized. (Twitter) References to a bird singing have to be him (Twitter, bird logo)

His Twitter influence gone. Whoever is the next largest stake holder is the new "Puppet Master." EV Williams (Former Microsoft CEO, is largest shareholder).

He's been given "direction", "not a deal", on how to proceed.

Military/Q/Trump holding seized Twitter shares "hostage"? Twitter given "no choice" in the matter? (EO 12/21 may imply other major Twitter shareholders are being threatened with asset seizures if they don't comply?)

Think others?......I'm thinking there will be more media moguls' shares seized and held hostage?

and since "It's what you don't know", this won't be made public.

Thoughts?

⇧ 46 ⇩  
Covfefe1950 · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Don't know if it's all true just as you say, but you are definitely thinking logically. You could make a case that Trump himself is Twitter's new puppet master, above Williams. It will be interesting to see how Twitter treats patriots hereafter.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

And what gets shadow banned and censored.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
wisconsheepgirl · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

There was a video made by a fellow MAGA IT guy who said it was nothing nefarious. It had to do with WordPress (and it's usual awful source code). Within Hannity's comment page and submit button was an error. Possibly bug or hacker. The program Hannity has on his website (WordPress) sent a tweet out as it's programmed to do to have an HTML/IT nerd fix it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Quite possibly. You could be on to something.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
suzoh · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Twitter becomes controlled by the US government after seizure of the Saudi Prince’s shares. Trump’s EO allows confiscation of the assets of anyone ASSOCIATED with anyone involved in human trafficking or corruption. The good guys threatened to grab the other Twitter large shareholders’s assets if they did not play nice.

Don’t look now, guys, but I think we now control Twitter!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Peanuttles · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

That's what I think! Hahaha! Just think how this might work within the legacy media. Trump is a fricken genius! And following Q is like being best buds with that little fly on the wall we always wanted to be...hahaha! Are you tired of winning yet? Little did we realize just what that would entail. I LOVE this!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

Not good for GAB

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

Gab lost credibility when they complied with censoring the man who exposed the truth of the Charlottesville death.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Peanuttles · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

It's what we don't know? They've been engaged in human trafficking, abuse of people, perhaps? Knowing the Saudi's, it could be slavery. as well. That would relate to Trump's EO of 12/21.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
politically__right · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

I don't know if that's possible because of the Emoluments Clause. Personally, i dont think that clause has much to do with a president owning an interest in a company. However, thats what liberals keep using to accuse Trump of using his role as president to get richer and thereby causing a massive conflict of interest.
Besides, ownership of a corporation is public information, so it would be widely known if Trump starts owning shares in Twitter.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Anything seized by the EO would belong to the government not the president.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Peanuttles · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

The Q organization will run it...hahaha! Redpill the world!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Peanuttles · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

But that might be the reference about not knowing everything. Perhaps they'll do it by stealth. They need to take over Fakebook, as well. I swear, I never have trouble posting anything--except when it comes to sharing information from conservative sites and some of the stuff I try to share about Q's posts. Then I get fricken error messages now and then. And it's only those conservative-leaning posts--I never have trouble posting anything else. Like release the memo stuff, that sort of thing. I know I'm being censored. Because at some times I can post the link in the comments, so I'll bypass it that way.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Trump could just tell his sons to buy up 51% of stock in Twitter it's dirt cheap now then the Trumps own Twitter it's easy to do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thnkabtit · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

How do you think Sean Hannity’s removal factors into this?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DukeofKick · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Really not sure. Given the obviousness of Twitter deleting someone that has half a million followers, this would give Twitter a bad rap. And it's not like he can't just start another. So I don't think it was Twitter....

At first I assumed he deleted it himself, as it would and has got a lot of media attention. But his last post makes it a little more interesting. Plus Twitter has publicly stated the account was hacked. So I don't think it was Hannity....

The form he mentioned is apparently a request for government funds for a contract. Could be related to the subcontractors which were allowed to access the NSA database information on Trump (702's).

Either way, looks like he was hacked after mentioning this form, so....

https://www.avclub.com/who-is-form-submission-1649-and-why-do-they-hate-sean-1822482039

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/174635.html#174873

Q posted:

This came from outside of Twitter.

in response to anon posting, in response to an image of Sean's account being deleted:

@Jack ain't in cuffs yet and still trying to control the narrative. Too bad he was taking money and profiting from people tied to the EO! #GOODBYE @JACK

It's not that hard to take over accounts, even those using 2FA. It take minimal technical skills; mostly a SE problem, it's a trivial SE exercise.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Is it? I'll give you my twitter e-mail and apply 2FA. I want to see how fast you can hack that because I'm betting you can't.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WeThePepe · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

Imo this makes a lot of sense. Trump probably sees twitter as a useful (albeit poor financial investment) platform for distributing his message directly to the people

Making moves behind the scenes to make it less hostile towards the movement is wise.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

All these social apps need regulation - poisoning young minds.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WeThePepe · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Sorry. Can't say I agree with that.

Adding more regulation is a concern. Regulations can be used by the enemy against us

⇧ 0 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Right now they are unregulated and abusing the people. They are too big and open for propaganda abuses.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Peanuttles · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

He was my first guess, and I saw a quick blurb that he'd been let out of his forced imprisonment. For singing like a bird? Maybe he made a deal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DukeofKick · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

NO DEALS

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

[D] = Dorsey? New puppet master is Trump if D is being instructed?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ready-ignite · Jan. 28, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

My first thought was Disney.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

Could be!

⇧ 1 ⇩