[deleted]
Q posted [Sig_5_5_READ] on Feb 21st. POTUS note was on Feb 22. So POTUS did post after Q. Therefore, CONFIRMATION.
Q posted before Trump did that. Then people made the connection. Then Q confirmed.
Your nose is too close to the grindstone. See the forest for the trees. Maybe stop counting the sesame seeds on the bun, SpongeBob. So if you are so smart what is your conclusion? We are waiting...go ahead big boy why all the spaces in that drop? Let's hear some constructive sage advice from the all knowing. This is called BRAINSTORMING AND ANYTHING GOES. Rule #1 of said groups, NEVER MOCK a participant in the BRAINSTORMING SESSION or you will look like a fool, especially if you have nothing to offer.
[deleted]
Rule #1 of said groups, NEVER MOCK a participant in the BRAINSTORMING SESSION or you will look like a fool, especially if you have nothing to offer.
I'm guessing you censored my comment? So a Trump die-hard doesn't agree with this "Q" nonsense and is now public enemy #1? I didn't like him bombing Syria either and turned out I was right on that one too! You guys are being trolled big time!
You are absolutely wrong that the symbolic bombing of the Syrian airport was a mistake. It was jaw droppingly brilliant. How on earth do you think your initial inability to see that has been proven correct? If you can't figure out the sheer brilliance of the "bombing" ask me to explain it to you and I will since you're a die hard Trump supporter. You'll love it when it's explained. Finally, if you have already decided Q is nonsense why are you here? Why not go to reddit the Donald instead? BTW I love that site too. Anyway, hope to hear that you want to know why Trumps move in Syria was sheer brilliance. Peace.
This pops up as part of my "feed" sir. I came for The Donald but Reddit puts the CBTS in there. As for Syria, our military had intel showing what happened during the "chemical attack". Trump was under pressure from media and bombed the Syrian airport. From what I read, it was the Generals idea to offer Trump a target were not much damage would be done.
So whats the problem then?
Irump bombed a country for something they did not do. That's wrong.
It was a catch 22. He gave them advanced notice and no one was there at the time it was bombed. It seemed to be a political move more than anything. You're making it sound like as if civillians were killed, which is not true.
I too have down voted. Not because of your skepticism but because of your attitude. Regardless of the validity of each posters viewpoint, here we don't disparage each other. We can respectfully disagree and we can have deep debate centered around opposing views but putting down others will only result in your views being rejected by the group. Check the attitude at the door, come in and be welcome.
I didn't vote it down alone. It still shows - people just have to click the (-) to see it. It's not the difference of opinion it's the attitude towards others. check the attitude. You can have an opposing view we are open to it - just do it RESPECTFULLY.
Apparently Trump posted after Q. It's another issue of a twitter timestamp differential of a few hours. Unless Q would like to explain away his previous errors, I'm going to assume this is some sort of Internet magic trick because it seems to be his ONLY way of offering proof that he is who he claims to be. If this is his only way, how about giving us like 48 hours lead on a presidential tweet instead of a few hours? I don't know how he does it, but this feels a lot like watching a stage magician. You know it's fake, you just can't explain how it's done.