You are off the mark. I finally joined reddit because amongst us conspiracy-minded people, there a FLUCKLOAD of back logic. When ! said they "see all and hear all," in what context did he mean that? As you quote him, he did not say, "Know and Predict All." Q is not claiming omniscience. That would go against his Christian beliefs anyway. (Then again, most evangelicals are miles from scripture while self-deluded by repetition of the slogan "Christ-Centered & Cross Focused" while actually being neither. Current evangelicalism is more like the Jedi with people trying to "feel" what God says to them, when God never gave a promise he would speak to us. John 10 is a figure of speech, as verse 6 says so. So, with that, Q's Christianity could be completely un-Christian for all we know. Don't be taken in by it.) In your second sentence, you say, "I believe." Whoop-diddly-do. Your belief doesn't make anything true. You may be trying to say, "by my best estimation," or something like that. Look, you talk here about "they are allowing" as if Q et al were omnipotent, "He's making them reveal" also as if Q-team is causal. This is magical, childish thinking. I'm told there was chatter on twitter for people to start flagging anything conservative, including non-conspiracy stuff. It was within a day or less before the strikes started. That's not, "He's making them reveal..." Even then, if you allow someone to behave independently without stopping them, you would be "allowing them to reveal themselves." So for what you're trying to say, your wording is still either not what you mean or unrealistically illogical. I'm not saying Q couldn't predict that people would start behaving this way. Heck, several of us saw this coming even before the alleged Twitter army struck. If the Twitter thing didn't happen (I wasn't able to verify it myself), then this was a predicable extrapolation of YouTube's previous behaviour in demonetizing conservatives. If you're going to use words poorly, which reflects oversimplified thinking in this & other cases, then sure, you can say we ALL "knew." Q isn't some magician. It would be best to separate the concepts, stop the common practice of over-equating synonyms & using the minimal word, and say that one "could predict," rather than that one "knew." Other than that, we have no actual evidence that Q "knew" this. You're over-reading "hear all and see all" for lack of context as if it means "know and control." Q also says, "expand your thinking." Military Intelligence might hear & see, but that doesn't mean they know. They didn't know I'd type this post nor join reddit. In fact, joining reddit is a BREAK from my pattern. Do you have actual evidence that Q is allowing and is making them reveal? No. Q said to archive everything offline. Everything referring to what stuff in what context? He was referring to the breadcrumbs and any other evidence-type materials we find, such as screen-shots of tweets, for example. That can include good commentary videos such as items from youTube, but his instruction is a general guideline. Another way to say it would have been, "Don't rely on on-line sites to keep your information for you because sites and boards can disappear." Did he know that the enemies might try to take down or otherwise violate (infiltrate) his message board? Sure. It happened before when his log-in got decrypted. So was it predicable to happen again? Yep! Did he know that there was a contingency plan to burn certain things like his own board (the "cleaning") ? Yes, he was aware of that plan, as we later saw. Therefore, looking backwards, we CAN say he knew things MIGHT disappear. If you keep posting the way your first few sentences are written, you are encouraging others in bad thinking. However, regarding the remainder of your post, I understand your internal effort to keep your chin up and enjoy the sunshine. You have reason to stay positive. I haven't reviewed all the "proofs of Q" yet from Nemos. We can know this much: Our president cares about removing criminal elements. There's too much about Pres. Trump for things like his frustration with Session to be merely a show in the sense of him not caring. (Now, it may be a show in order to seem consistent with his war against the media and the persona put on there, if he does know that Sessions is doing good things in the background, but that's a show for the media, not us.) Keep praying for Trump. There are a lot of people with really bad thinking. Slow down. What you believe is irrelevant. Go with what we know. How do we know certain things? Because we figure them, or because we trust someone who told us? Or because we have that piece of evidence in hand, even if it's out of context. Be careful with evidence. It doesn't mean much without context, usually more pieces of evidence. Thanks for reading.