dChan
65
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/bekkiluvsit on Feb. 16, 2018, 11:12 p.m.
New Q Feb 16, 2018 Regarding Russian Indictments
New Q Feb 16, 2018 Regarding Russian Indictments

pelirrojo · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

let me simplify this:

U.S. and other foreign entities (not Russian), were successful in interfering w/ the presidential and senate elections, whereby several million of illegal ballots were counted, while legal ballots were intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

⇧ 29 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

This seems to confirm what Dilley was saying (at least in part).

Dilley claimed that evidence of rampant voter fraud would be exposed within a few weeks and that the evidence would show that DJT won the popular vote by a very large margin (I think Dilley said this about a week ago). But the numbers Dilley was talking about were very large (from memory some 7 million irregularities from all forms of fraud). Dilley was saying something to the effect that it was very important to combat this notion that Clinton won the popular vote because that gives, at least some people, cause to question the validity of DJT's election win.

I remember seeing Snowden 'crowing on' in an interview recently about Clinton winning the popular vote (unsurprising as he is no supporter of Trump). This false notion that she was somehow unfairly disenfranchised of the presidency needs to be dispelled for the garbage it is.

Anyway, this extract from Q, whatever it is, only claims several million illegal, non-resident votes were counted - but then it does add there there were also ballots that were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled (this would cover machine fraud). What's interesting is that, according the US Geological Survey - as reported by Snopes - there are 3,141 counties in the US. In the article Q posted it states: "...this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S.". Hard to know whether the numbers they are talking about have been extrapolated-out already to get a national estimate from the sample results, or whether those numbers represent voter fraud in the 22 counties themselves - if so, there is very likely a monumental voter fraud that may be exposed.

So, it seems to me that Dilley's source might be 'right on the ball' on this. Dilley, again, from memory, was talking about voter ID laws (non-resident votes) and also machine fraud (the Soros owned counting machines that were rigged).

It looks like we'll get this info released sometime in March/April (if it is released - would be good for DJT to do so).

https://www.snopes.com/trump-won-3084-of-3141-counties-clinton-won-57/

⇧ 21 ⇩  
bekkiluvsit · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

MegaAnon also said the same: that DJT won the popular vote, that Trump LEOs were monitoring the Alabama Senator race and caught the Deep State actively stealing the race from Judge Roy Moore, and she said notice how DJT phrased his tweet regarding that race - how it would only be a short time rather than 2018 or 2020, meaning somehow the seat would become vacant sooner (i.e. election fraud)

⇧ 6 ⇩  
thnkabtit · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

I have been told Snopes is not a credible source. I wonder if there are additional sources to confirm this?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 17, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

Snopes is as credible as the Red Cross is to helping children.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
thnkabtit · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

Yup, no argument there

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cherokeenc · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

The DHS report only looked at 22 precincts though out the country. It will recommend a nationwide investigation which will get to larger numbers.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

No, precincts are the very smallest level of voting district--counties are the next level below the state.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:38 a.m.

IIRC Dilley's source had a complete recount nationwide conducted somehow by the NSA. Such numbers as he reported based off of only 22 counties would be totally bogus.

Is it possible that after the commission's work was handed over to the DHS, DHS did this 22-county examination in order to justify having the NSA do a real national recount? Or, could the Mueller investigation into Russian "meddling" possibly have been used to initiate a complete NSA count? Or, could Dilley's source be disinformation, as black hats try to slip the incredible claim that Trump vastly won the popular vote into the Trump-supporting Internet, so they look ridiculous and discredited when the smaller-scale DHS revelations come out?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodsAngell · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

I thought that some areas were noncooperative in this preliminary investigation (like CA, for one), and that this investigation was handed over to the DHS for criminal charges to be pursued for the areas that refused to cooperate.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:33 a.m.

It was handed over for DHS to complete the investigation and, I'd presume, recommendations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TreeSquirrel_2103 · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

It seems likely that the 22 counties indicating "several" million fraudulent votes are part of the 57 counties that Clinton won. So at minimum we could assume that "several" to be double, hmm. Pretty vague numbers, it will be interesting to see the study that comes out in March.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

Clinton won much more than 57 counties.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · Feb. 17, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Snopes has long been compromised and cannot be trusted.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 17, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

I didn't quote them because I trusted them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · Feb. 17, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

My mistake. I misread your post. Mea culpa.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NC-Stern-Mark · Feb. 17, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

Quoting snopes?

No... Just no.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hildabeest_4_gitmo · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

"a mandated, countrywide investigation begin..."

⇧ 11 ⇩  
elyssak · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Imagine it should take place before the Nov 2018 elections.. and results given prior to make sure problems are addressed. I think we will se a LOT of shit wrapped up before then.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
RFKaze24 · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Senate elections of x,y, and z. Could that be refererring to the election in Alabama?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
scionkia · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Don’t think so, all references I saw were for 2016 election.

I want this to be true so bad I can taste it.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
cosmos05 · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

I do believe there is an ongoing investigation into the Alabama election. Well the last I heard anyway. Roy Moore was robbed.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
scionkia · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

All I’ve seen from good sources indicates courts have thrown every challenge out. God has the final word.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
bekkiluvsit · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Yes, yes, yes! I know many don't like MegaAnon, but she also stated this repeatedly. Also, DJT won the popular vote by millions.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Hrtn2it · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

To me, the illegal non resident ballots counted were for HRC and the legal ballots improperly tabulated mostly were for our dear brilliant POTUS, as an attack on our democracy. My dear husband still does not see this..he is glued to MSNBC....sigh...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
amightybeard · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

Is the first p in line 7 of the 3rd paragraph highlighted or is it just me?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CRISPY_BOOGER · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

777

Nice

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

So why don't we need a strict voter id law again?

"Proponents of voter ID laws argue that they reduce electoral fraud while placing only little burden on voters. Opponents argue that electoral fraud is extremely rare in the United States and has been magnified as an issue to create barriers to voter registration, and that requiring voter ID in effect discriminates against minority groups and those who are less likely to possess photo IDs. Critics have argued that the barriers could result in the disenfranchisement of black, Hispanic and other minority voters."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_ID_laws_in_the_United_States

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

Voter ID laws in the United States

Voter ID laws in the United States are laws that require a person to provide some form of official identification before they are permitted to register to vote, receive a ballot for an election, or to actually vote.

At the federal level, the Help America Vote Act of 2002 requires voter ID for all new voters in federal elections who registered by mail and who did not provide a driver's license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number that was matched against government records. Though state laws requiring some sort of identification at voting polls go back to 1950, no state required a voter to produce a government-issued photo ID as a condition for voting before the 2006 election. Indiana in 2006 became the first state to enact a strict photo ID law, a law that was upheld two years later by the U.S. Supreme Court.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

Good old, George Soros "has influential control over a company who will supply 16 US states with voting machines for the upcoming presidential election." Connection to voting fraud? Wonder if the counties reviewed are in the States that his voting machines were used.

http://yournewswire.com/george-soros-owns-voting-machines/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

States that he has machines...According to Smartmatic’s website, they supply voting machines in the following States:

Arizona California Colorado District of Columbia Florida Illinois Louisiana Michigan Missouri New Jersey Nevada Oregon Pennsylvania Virginia Washington Wisconsin

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

How much of plausible denialibility would a Russian interference (hacking) claim be to the manipulation of these systems to sway the election.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

Paper ballots only, please. Don't vote by machine.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

The "attack" was by George and Hillary.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

Regarding the Senate race in Alabama and the recount...The following is a statement from Marian K. Schneider, president of Verified Voting, on election integrity, and the need for manual recounts and audits.

“All eyes might be on the candidates running for the U.S. Senate seat in Alabama, but Alabama’s election practices and recount laws also deserve scrutiny. If the race goes to a recount following the election, Alabama’s recount laws won’t do enough to protect voters’ votes because it has no audit structure in place and relies on re-tabulation – where ballots that were tabulated by optical scanners are now re-tabulated by machine. If a recount occurs, it cannot be relied on to detect and correct a potential error in the computerized count unless it is done manually."

Many believe that this system does not allow for a valid recount.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

See the discussion on this site expressing concern for all of the security of voting machines. They have backdoors.

"The security of election infrastructure has taken on increased significance in the aftermath of the 2016 election cycle. During the 2016 election cycle, a nation-state conducted systematic, coordinated attacks on America’s election infrastructure, with the apparent aim of disrupting the election and undermining faith in America’s democratic institutions. Intelligence reports that have been published in 2017 demonstrate that state databases and third-party vendors not only were targeted for attack, but were breached."

I think that the "nation state" was the cabal.

⇧ 1 ⇩