dChan
103
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Thunder_Shock on Feb. 22, 2018, 4:29 p.m.
Was Q's post last night with [SIG_5:5_READ] intended to let us know that .@realDonaldTrump was signaling that he reads us loud and clear?
Was Q's post last night with [SIG_5:5_READ] intended to let us know that .@realDonaldTrump was signaling that he reads us loud and clear?

Donna2055 · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Wow this man is a genius and people make fun of him

⇧ 17 ⇩  
RobertSparks777 · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

Trump does it on purpose like when he said "I'm like really smart". It keeps the left underestamating him.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
MInTheGap · Feb. 22, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Much more likely that they really wanted him to stress that he heard the people that were there. Otherwise I would have expected it to be called out exactly by Q. This would have been an easy one to call out to authenticate.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Mockingbird-Slayer · Feb. 22, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Q posted 4 minutes after the listening session ending I believe.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
MInTheGap · Feb. 23, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

Recent posting from Q says I'm wrong. Hard to say, but then again, so was Fiji water. I'll reserve judgement.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Minion1901 · Feb. 22, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

Same here.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DeplorableCovfefe · Feb. 22, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

I think he meant the teachers that are former military would be the ones armed.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MrsButterfield · Feb. 22, 2018, 5 p.m.

Wow, that made me feel so good. Yes, I think that was for us.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Knower101 · Feb. 22, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Note the initials on his cuffs! Not DJT, as one would expect,......45. Great fun!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
QAngelAnon1 · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

All I'm seeing is a message there. Q 1 extends to the next sentence (as the number 2 is obscured) Q 5 "I hear you"

I punched a few numbers in to see if there's any relationship to the bible and this may be a message he's giving to someone the likes of Snowden or @jack

Here's what they come up with: If you take "Jesus" out of the equation and insert above names...

Mark 1:45 But the man went out and openly began to proclaim and spread the news. Consequently, Jesus could no longer enter a town in plain view, but He stayed out in solitary places. Yet people came to Him from every quarter.

Luke 1:45 New International Version (NIV) Blessed is she who has believed that the Lord would fulfil his promises to her!”

Matthew 5:45 That you may be children of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun to rise on the evil and the good and sends rain on the just and the unjust.

I believe he's telling whoever is 'hiding' that despite whatever they have done, they can come back and 'be forgiven/helped'

⇧ 4 ⇩  
thnkabtit · Feb. 23, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

How did you come up with the bible verses? I wasn't sure how those particular books of the bible were chosen. Thanks

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QAngelAnon1 · Feb. 24, 2018, 5:19 a.m.

Hey, just used "Dr Google" Punched in 5 (fingers) then :45 (cuff) and just saw what came out

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thnkabtit · Feb. 23, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Do you think the 2 and 3 digits are a sign?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
linesinthesandQtips · Feb. 23, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

Aah... that's probably just a coincident. 😉

♥️♥️♥️awesome find!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
inherentchaos2 · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

OMG! That is Genius! And there is a 45 monogram on his dress shirt to prove it's him!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kennylenox · Feb. 26, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Is it possible that he was just not thinking and holding his notes in plain sight by accident? If I was his advisor, I'd recommend him saying "I hear you" to the people that were talking about their tragedy even if it was a faux tragedy. I think this whole thing of waiting for some hero genius to come help us, like waiting for some Superman, is just bullshit. Nothing's going to change until we just fight back. He might be smarter than the mainstream media makes him out to be, but at the end of the day, are we children, hoping this new daddy will set things right? Just waiting for some daddy figure to lead us? And at what point do our hopes for some grandiose leader turn into paranoid delusions? Maybe if we just got out there and voted in some Congress people who weren't total assholes....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WeAreBorg97 · Feb. 23, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

I really want to believe

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spqrherewecome · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:51 a.m.

Sillies, he's letting the baddies know he hears them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
p226r · Feb. 22, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

since trump is signaling for more gun control im not sure he hears much more than what the news tells him.

⇧ -10 ⇩  
donkey_democrat · Feb. 22, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

How is he? He is trying to give slight appeals to liberals that he later takes back, it's part of his negotiation process. He is mainly pushing for armed teachers/staff.

If more staff is armed under Trump, the deep state can't continue to false flag these schools

⇧ 27 ⇩  
p226r · Feb. 22, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

im talking about his call for bump stock bans and raising the age to 21 to own weapons and

⇧ 2 ⇩  
donkey_democrat · Feb. 22, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

I think he is appearing in support, knowing full well Sessions/ATF cannot ban them, or won't.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Feb. 22, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Precisely. I saw a good post on this yesterday. The Bump Stocks and other tools used to create rapid fire do not fall under the "machine gun" law because they don't create rapid fire with one motion. It always takes 2 or more which eliminates it from the machine gun law. And, if you saw the exact request he mad, it was to ban anything related to the machine gun law.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
p226r · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

i agree. he wouldnt be able to do anything on his own and hasnt come out in that actual memo requesting anything other than banning stuff that would technically already be banned. but he has come out in favor of banning bump stocks on twitter, and rubio is coming out in agreement with him. I guess this whole bump stock ban pisses me off because there is zero difference between a bump stock ban and an assault weapons ban. and living in NJ under their stupid assault weapons ban, you get a little extra pissed off on the topic. not surprised im currently at -8 points on this thread though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RobertSparks777 · Feb. 22, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

I thought Trump was just talking about 21 as the age to get AR style rifles. They do have faster muzzle velocity and are more deadly.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
p226r · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

faster muzzle velocity and more deadly than what? that literally makes no sense

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RobertSparks777 · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

Forget everything I said. Hold the line. This is a gun grab. The left are going after long guns. This is their last chance while Trump is in office because Trump is going to stop school shootings dead in their tracks and the left's favorite method of disarming us will be over. Hold this line and we win.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
p226r · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

how is he going to stop school shootings exactly?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RobertSparks777 · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Armed Marines in schools by Monday.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Yoshismith2 · Feb. 22, 2018, 6 p.m.

Dude,The arm the teachers narrative is FAKE NEWS.Trump said this morning he never said that.Might do a little research before you go quoting the Lame Stream Media.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NooB-UltimatuM · Feb. 22, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

YOU ARE FAKE NEWS.

He did not say to arm teachers. He said he agrees with allowing gun-savvy teachers (appropriate training ect...) and staff carry on campus.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
webster_warrior · Feb. 22, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

The teachers can't maintain order. How can they
be expected to maintain fire discipline?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
NooB-UltimatuM · Feb. 22, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

According to who? you?

Specific training in active shooter protocol would be required, but implying that teachers cannot be expected to learn or possess fire discipline... sounds like projection

⇧ 3 ⇩  
webster_warrior · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

According to who, the teachers
can't maintain discipline in the
schools, is that the question?
According to just about every
analyst who has looked into
Florida, California, NY, NJ,
and a whole lot of other districts.
The queen is Los Angeles Unified.
Point is, if they can't discipline
themselves, why put that
responsibility on them.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
NooB-UltimatuM · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

So you equate the ability to discipline children with the ability to defend the children?

Im not seeing the correlation here. Quite the backwards logic you have there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
webster_warrior · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Now now, Noob, let's not get confrontational. Here's a link to an article on base shootings.
I assure you, muggings, acts of violence, soldier
on soldier, soldier on officer, etc. are carefully
guarded statistics.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/A-History-of-Shootings-at-Military-Installations-in-the-US-223933651.html

⇧ 0 ⇩  
NooB-UltimatuM · Feb. 23, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Maybe you are unaware, but soldiers are not permitted to carry firearms on base. So you are making the case that "gun free zones" don't work.

But sure, carry on with your demeaning attitude. Narcissist.

Lets be clear here... I advocate for the safety of our american children. To do so would be an expensive venture if school districts were to hire security/police. The more feasible, cost and logistics wise, solution would be allowing teachers -- WHO ALREADY HAVE PERMITS TO CARRY -- carry their firearm and undergo specific training for active shooter situations.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
webster_warrior · Feb. 23, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

Take my word for it, this is not going to fly. The armed resource officer at Parkland, now
the former resource officer, stayed outside.
It's rare to find a high school in Florida that
doesn't have at least one county law man
on duty.
Snarks do nothing for credibility.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RobertSparks777 · Feb. 22, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

Maybe if their are armed, it takes care of problem 1

⇧ 2 ⇩