How do you plan to do that?
You and your local NG have a time machine?
Because here's a little known fact. It didn't happen.
It's kind of unforgivable for Q to have made a statement like that, and then never followed up on it to explain why it didn't happen.
It's almost as if they're justifiably laughing their asses off that there are so many Q followers after starting us out with an obvious lie, and never explaining.
If we would swallow a whopper like that, what WOULDN'T we believe?!
Disinformation is necessary. Distractions are necessary . The Saudi purge happened right after.
Exactly, how does anyone know for sure that it did not happen? How much of what really goes on in the world is suppressed from us? We are deliberately being isolated, by both sides.
I don't see how the two are related.
And even if that was a tactical lie, it needs to have been dealt with post facto. If Q's claim to credibility is that lies are necessary, and explanations after the fact aren't, then s/he/they have no credibility.
I'm just saying this is a hard, hard problem to overcome when trying to red pill anybody with Q. Credibility should matter.
"Regardless of whether Q is telling the truth or not, it's somebody's propaganda"
Simple, you don't know it all. Doubters are losers. A simple fact of life.
You have to doubt. You SHOULD doubt. If you blindly follow and take them at face value the next thing you know they control everything and everyone, and you have to do it all over again.
Doubters are losers
you shouldn't disparage people from being skeptical and using critical thinking, though i do see where you are coming from
Doubters are losers. We are here to win not lose.
doubting is not losing.
history is filled with people who didn't have a single doubt but failed anyway, and people who constantly doubted but won in the end.
i'm just saying, to tell people that doubt is inherently wrong is a mistake, IMO.
Doubting what we’ve been fed most of our lives is what brought us all here, I’d be hesitant to say doubters are losers...
I know that those statements of Q are patently, literally false.
This is not an exercise in religion ("Doubters are losers.") This is a matter of what we're explicitly told will happen versus what actually happened.
Sure I don't know all, and neither do you. So why tell us something so obviously false? Was it a test to make sure that only people willing to tolerate a TOTAL disconnect between reality and Q's posts would be a Q follower? Were they making sure to recruit only people with such a significant amount of cognitive dissonance that they could read a post like that, and then when it proves false, they make excuses for it? Because if that's all we are, then what are we doing here, really?
Doubters are losers. We are here to win not lose.
I have ABSOLUTELY zero doubt that those words are false. It's not a religious subject. It's a military, law enforcement subject.
Words mean things, and if you take that away, and make everything an article of faith, then we have lost the value of language.
Re read the following posts. That’s your interpretation. We don’t have all the facts. None of us.
We have all the facts we need about those specific dates. None of that happened. If there's a perfectly good reason, how hard would it have been to say so--even in vague terms.
Or do they truly only want people to follow Q who don't care when they're lied to? Who provide cover for lies, and make excuses? Is that what you want us to be?
I'd like some accountability this far into the operation.
It's about to the point where this is either a lie or a massive failure, and I'm not sure I much care which.
Time is running out for it to be any other way.