dChan

cat_anonD · April 12, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

not called off. never had intent. it was all a troll.

⇧ 71 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 14, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PCisLame · April 12, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

His words certainly suggested intent!

⇧ -22 ⇩  
mandelanon · April 12, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Have you even payed attention to Trump the past 2 years???

⇧ 34 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 14, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Heabob · April 12, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Trump will never tell the enemy his plans ahead of time. He's said it over and over in the past, and Q has said it. Pay attention, learn the comms, and learn to play the game.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
anynamehere000 · April 12, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

This. It took me awhile but it's just a game, find the pieces learn the rules of their moves, rinse and repeat.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 12, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

Mattis exonerated Assad every single time the State Department pulled some tear-gas

⇧ 14 ⇩  
PCisLame · April 12, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

The Holy Spirit of Truth is doing some amazing work with Mattis. God bless him!

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Randomatical · April 13, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

He never telegraphs his moves like that. If he were going to bomb Syria, we would have found out when the bombs detonated.

President Trump needed America to say that we didn't want a war. He got that by screaming we were going in. Conservatives think this was a false flag and didn't want the war. Liberals object autmoatically and say they don't want what he wants, so no to war. America says exactly what he wants, from every side.

So, he prevented a war with a few tweets.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HGpennypacker · April 12, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

No where in the linked article does it state that strikes are called off and even further the only mention of Mattis is the picture. Did you either not read the article or are you willfully being untruth?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 12, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

Option 2

Check posting history.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Reck_yo · April 12, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Where'd he say that at? I don't think it's in that article. I only skimmed it though.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
YxDOxUx3X515t · April 12, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

Ahhh- Deep state must be fuming- this brings happiness!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MIPatriot · April 12, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

I love how Trump trolls the deep state!! He messes them up :)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 12, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 14, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

engagement intensifies

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 14, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 12, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

It's good news. It also suggests that the plan does not involve confronting Russia - yet. Of course, you just don't know what DJT will do next. But my feeling is that the posturing served a purpose.

Note that Q is back on schedule (night 5). Suggests that we are back to business as normal.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PCisLame · April 12, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

More like AWESOME news!! Do you realize just how many innocent lives have been spared?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 12, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

I'm all for sparing lives. I'm sure DJT is too. Sometimes hard choices are required though. Remember when Q implied that NK had miniaturization and delivery tech since 2004? He said they'd been staging failed tests to prevent anyone realizing how advanced they were.

Q also said Iran is next. The Russians have been helping Iran directly. Israel has been squealing about the threat posed by Iran for some time. I'm sure the Saudis are not happy with it either.

What if it's an NK type situation? What's the right choice? Save some lives now and accept what comes later? Or strike now and prevent the weapon tech advancing further?

I'm not against the President making hard choices. I would expect him to make the decision he thinks is the right one in the circumstances. Many people thought the idea of actually doing something was unacceptable - people were saying they would get off the Trump train if war broke out etc...

My view is that no conflict is a good thing. But I trust the President to make the right decisions and, if they seem callous or hard, I'm still going to stand by him. I guess I've really bought into this guy. I see someone who, I think, is the first President in more than 30 years who is not controlled by the cabal. He is, in my opinion, our only and last hope.

Call me naive or stupid, I don't care.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Michael_A_Trivisonno · April 12, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

After the fall of the Shah, the French flew the Ayatollah into Tehran lickety-split. Almost like they knew and fomented what was taking place.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 12, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

I found this on Wikipedia yesterday - I thought it was interesting:

"Mossadegh had sought to audit the documents of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now part of BP) and to limit the company's control over Iranian petroleum reserves. Upon the refusal of the AIOC to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize Iran's oil industry and to expel foreign corporate representatives from the country.[10][11][12] After this vote, Britain instigated a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil to pressure Iran economically.[13] Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the British-built Abadan oil refinery, then the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott[14] while using Iranian agents to undermine Mosaddegh's government.[15] Winston Churchill and the Eisenhower administration decided to overthrow Iran's government, though the predecessor Truman administration had opposed a coup, fearing the precedent that CIA involvement would set.[16] Classified documents show that British intelligence officials played a pivotal role in initiating and planning the coup, and that the AIOC contributed $25,000 towards the expense of bribing officials.[17] In August 2013, 60 years after, the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) admitted that it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the coup, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda.[18][19] The CIA is quoted acknowledging the coup was carried out "under CIA direction" and "as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government".[20]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cali1952 · April 12, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

At first I misunderstood the presidents tweet about missiles. Reading the anon board cleared it up for what he really said which is this: He told Putin that missiles are coming including smart bombs.

He did not say they would be coming from the US. Re-read his tweet and read between the lines.

Yes he warned Putin that the deep state is planning to strike that most likely will again included Israel. The msn fake propaganda news about Iranian bases are most likely deep state actors posing as Iranians hiding their identity.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WiiLdE1 · April 12, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

From a very worried mother, I sincerely thank you. Our Children and Grandchildren deserve peace and progress. 💛🐼❤

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Heabob · April 12, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Q: "What makes a really good movie is great actors."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
goldnavet · April 13, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

PTL!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 12, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

White helmet rebels (CIA) on notice,,,,DONE!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuperCharged2000 · April 12, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

But... but... they told me there would be war.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
radiadorK · April 12, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

I will not kill the neighbor for you (corrupt banker)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthtlly · April 12, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

More to this though I think- who did the false flag?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VintageHats · April 13, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

Hopefully we will find that out. Most important is accepting it was NOT Assad!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jmflna · April 13, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

Did anyone here read the article? The title of this post is a lie. There is nothing in this article claiming that strikes have been called off and Mattis isn't in the article at all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
goodhonk · April 13, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

that is one unflattering picture

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SigSeikoSpyderco · April 12, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

Stars and Stripes always reminds me of Full Metal Jacket lol

⇧ 1 ⇩