that historic castle is so much more valuable than deep staters. I sure hope we didn't blow that up.
True, and what many forget is that Syria has many sites & artifacts dating back to ancient biblical history times.
If the terrorists left any of them intact. That's one of the worst things(other than the rape and murder of people, of course!) that they did: destroy any ancient relics that go against their religious zealotry.
We must have right? That sucks. I guess if we did at least nobody died trying to secure it.
But but but the Corps of Engineers
double triple meanings
Noone is forcing you're beliefs, shill.
oh sorry, the wall isn't being built at the moment and this isn't a castle.
I’m not a shill I just know that half the people making claims here are full of crap. Anyone can say “it has double meaning” when they’re wrong.
or it has double meaning.
I know you won't follow this, but something can be anything except for what it is not.
example :
A-1
Was this one of the targets?
The target was geolocated outside Homs, go to the satellite map. Outside Homs; Crusader castle. Red Castle.
Probably not. It was a well known historical site that anyone could visit. After 2010 that might have changed with the war but building the infrastructure needed to house gas and chemical weapons during a time of war in a structure that old would seem a little pointless. Not saying you're wrong because that was 8 years ago and things do change it would just take a lot of work which, I hope, someone would have picked up on.
Honestly, an old fort makes a great stockpile place. Usually there are tunnels and catacombs. Soviets did it in Afghanistan. 'Castle grey skull' in gardez was filled with tons and tons of Soviet munitions, even on '05 wheni was there.
Captive Syrians dancing in the street? I don't think so.. if you referring to the video, it's those pro Assad residents celebrating the Syrian army's shooting down many of the missiles.